TEST TRACK FOR INDIAN RAILWAYS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BEST PROCUREMENT PRACTICES ON INDIAN RAILWAYS BY M. P. JUNEJA ADDL
Advertisements

A Decision Support System for Improving Railway Line Capacity G Raghuram VV Rao Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad.
ESTIMATES Mrs.Nirupma Kumar Prof. Fin & Investment.
Indian Railways Update 10 th IHHA Conference 2013 New Delhi.
Business Critical Rules March 2015
L’Infra, une activité au cœur de la SNCF INFRASTRUCTURE French Highspeed on South East TGV line: 25 years of evolution Jean-Paul BALENSI Vice-president.
IRSC DUBLIN OCTOBER 2006 vue n°1 INTERNATIONAL RAILWAY SAFETY CONFERENCE Dublin 23 – 25 october 2006 CIRCULATION OF TRAM-TRAINS ON THE FRENCH NATIONAL.
Smart Sensor Technology For Rail Network health Hawk Measurement Systems.
Meeting AECOM, AM SOP-T, CFR, JASPERS
Schedule of Dimensions And Track & Bridge Structure for Dedicated Freight Corridor adhpm.
Location of Signals. Considerations for Location of Signals Braking Distance Overlaps Isolation Simultaneous Reception.
ARISTOTELION UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI SCHOOL OF TECHNOLOGY FACULTY OF RURAL AND SURVEYING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING.
Railway Safety Plan and Its Status in Korea
Lean Six Sigma: Process Improvement Tools and Techniques Donna C. Summers © 2011 Pearson Higher Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ All Rights Reserved.
NORTHERN RAILWAY AN OVERVIEW 1. NORTHERN RAILWAY ROUTE MAP 2.
Certification of railway equipment. JSC VNIIZhT Test Centre Speakers: Alexandr Savin Eduard Gunchenko 17 October 2012 VNIIZhT (JSC Railway Research Institute)
UNIT III GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF TRACKS
Japan’s Efforts to Ensure Safety of Railways October 12th, 2010 Railway Bureau MLIT.
Track for High Speed Trains on IR Challenges Ahead –An Overview Onkar Singh CE/Co-ord/N.E.Railway.
CREW MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
INDIAN RAILWAYS introduction presentation done in FRI/Dehradoon for non railway people.
Model RailRoad Manager Inventory Management. Inventory: Rolling Stock and Everything Else l Locomotive, Freight Cars, Passenger Cars, Caboose, MOW l Trackage.
Rail Related Research at IIT Madras
HIGH SPEED RAIL TRANSPORT G. P. Kosta CBE/S. W. Rly./Hubli.
EurailSpeed Milano 2005 Siemens Transportation Systems The Transrapid Maglev System a necessity for the growing mobility market a necessity for trackbound.
INTRODUCTION OF HIGHER AXLE LOADS ON INDIAN RAILWAYS
1 Building and Maintaining Information Systems. 2 Opening Case: Yahoo! Store Allows small businesses to create their own online store – No programming.
TeNeT Group1IRSTE Seminar Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and Indian Railways Ashok Jhunjhunwala, TeNeT group, IIT Madras
Project Tracking. Questions... Why should we track a project that is underway? What aspects of a project need tracking?
Testing and Stability of Rolling Stock
1 Prospective research of VNIIZhT in field of freight traffic Prof. А.Е. Semechkin GRFC2007, New Delhi, March 2007.
INDIAN RAILWAY VISION CAPACITY CREATION BY More than 30,000 kms of route would be double / multiple lines (compare to around 18,000 kms today).
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
Dedicated Freight Corridor By CHAHATEY RAM CBE/ER.
A System to facilitate comfortable Travel of wheelchair users and other passengers with mobility Problem in Trains Callidai Motor Works, Chennai National.
Korea Rail Network Authority, Republic of Korea. Contents Introduction Organizations - KRNA Overview of KOREA’s High Speed Rail development Background.
Railway Operations: Issues and Objectives Capacity management Infrastructure planning Timetable preparation Management of day-to-day movement of trains.
Movement on Noise Regulation – Alignment with R 51.03
Chapter 28 Track-Train Dynamics. Problem  Lateral Forces High Center of Gravity Cars  Vertical Forces Loaded and Empty Cars.
HŽ Passenger Transport – overviewBUCHAREST HŽ PASSENGER TRANSPORT.
Delay Attribution Guide April 2011 Changes Ana Maria Sanchez Delay Attribution Board Administrator.
Working Party on Rail Transport – 63rd session Geneva, 18 November 2009 EUROPEAN COMMISSION.
Coaching stock.
PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS TO CHALLENGES FACED BY RAILWAYS IN THE REGION The Case of NRZ Harare, 15 October 2015 THERE IS NO BETTER WAY THAN THE RAILWAY.
Student Name USN NO Guide Name H.O.D Name Name Of The College & Dept.
DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR – CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE PRACTICES
Mind the Gap – Human Factors and the Platform Train Interface
Detector Derailment Device (&) Frenado (Braking) Automatic Train
CRS SANCTIONS Chetan Bakshi, CRS/Central. WHY CRS SANCTION IS REQUIRED ? Section 21 & 22 of Railway Act 1989 stipulates that “ No Railway should be opened.
Demonstrating Digital Railway
CE2303 Railway Engineering
INDIAN RAILWAYS  I. Rly. Vision for Next 10 Years  Opportunities for International Partners A Presentation by – Mr. Arbind Kumar Director (Projects)
HIGH SPEED RAIL ASSESSMENT NORGE
SUBMERGED FLOATING TUNNELS
INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS Review of the East Africa Railways Master Plan Peter Kieran CPCS Transcom Limited March 11, 2010.
Modernization of Track for High Speeds. Modernization Transport more passengers/goods at high speed, safe, economic.
Geometric Design of Railway Track
CE2303 Railway Engineering
2 ASPECTS: -Use of better designed, ICF coaches with better springing arrangements. -Better breaking system for safe and smoother rail travel. -Use of.
Principles of Information Systems Eighth Edition
GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT HIGHWAYS RESEARCH STATION Training program for newly recruited Assistant Engineers.
Simulation of mixed traffic on a railway section
Prof John L Wilson EA Infrastructure Spokesman
Investigation of Road Project By S.N. Nanaware
Investigation of Road Project
PRESENTATION ON- CARRIAGE AND WAGON SHOP
UIC 518.
FIELD LEVEL CHALLENGES FOR SOLAR PARKS IN INDIA
Prof John L Wilson EA Infrastructure Spokesman
Life Cycle Costing.
Presentation transcript:

TEST TRACK FOR INDIAN RAILWAYS By ED(Testing) RDSO, Lucknow

Why Testing? Statutory requirements as per Policy Circular No 6 of Rly. Bd. For new/modified design rolling stock Check safety Get natural frequency in various modes Check comfort level for passengers Performance rating of locos

Existing tests for new stock Detailed oscillation trials separately on service track (run-down) maintained as per Main line standards C&M Vol-I standards (Rajdhani Track ) Confirmatory oscillograph car run on tracks above 110Kmph where induction is planned Usually on Rajdhani Routes For trains involving new rolling stock EBD for speeds exceeding 110 for passenger & 75 kmph for goods Computer simulation is adequate for lower speed Coupler force trials of trains Rating & performance trials of locos

New rolling stock induction process Design & issue of speed certificate by RDSO Detailed oscillation trials Joint safety certificate by PHoDs of zonal railway where trials are proposed CRS sanction Actual trials Issue of final speed certificate by RDSO after CRS approval Zonal railways use new stock after CRS approval

Present Problems in testing Difficulty/ delay in obtaining CRS sanction Non availability of block / through path in busy sections Track parameters are not precisely known Track parameters change after every run due to track disturbance by normal traffic Safety related problems of adjacent track on double line sections

Present problems in testing (contd) Track / OHE fitness certificate is required after runs beyond sectional speed Non-contiguous test stretch cause to & fro movement after every run Need to reverse the locomotive after every run Problem of berthing facilities of staff coaches Excessive TA of Test Unit staff

Why Test Track? Delay in formalities related to CRS sanction No CRS sanction required for trials on test track Testing on dedicated track No disturbance to normal traffic Precisely controlled track parameters No safety related problems on service track Testing time likely to drastically reduce

History of Test track Test track at Mughalsarai sanctioned in works programme1986-87 Total cost of Rs.5.98 crores (revised to Rs 12.45 crore in 1993) 4 km of closed loop with 1.1 km of reversing cross- over was planned Railway Board reviewed and abandoned the project in 1998 due to various problems

History of Test track (contd) Railway Board sanctioned Test Track in 2002 –03 for Rs 87.3 crores Proposed site in Kanpur-Lucknow dropped due to protests by local people against acquiring their land in 2003 Proposal for test track in Jodhpur-Barmer area accepted by Board in March 2004

Present proposal Total cost Rs 87.3 crores 12 Kms stretch of straight section 7.5 kms of Endurance test loop Curves incorporated in endurance loop Track to main line maintenance standards ( upto 120 Kmph) Additional 12 Kms straight costing Rs 25 crores for 160 kmph dropped by Rly Bd.

Endurance Tests For track and rolling stock components To estimate life of components Facility for accelerated service trials, FAST When lead of service train insufficient Cost of condition monitoring very high Usually for railways where maintainer of component not part of the system Actual service trials follow FAST

Present status Detailed estimate for construction of test track to be made by NWR RDSO is making detailed estimate of Facilities Instrumentation Equipment

Problems in existing proposal Test track length inadequate Total length of 12 kms against 35 kms required Track for speeds upto 120 kmph only Rajdhani track not provided. Does not have station yards which is essential for oscillation trials Reversal of locomotive required after every run Curves in a separate endurance loop Stoppage of endurance tests during testing on curves

Problems due to Site Test track has to be closed during summers due to sand storms Need for facility/staff to remove sand breeches after every summer/sand-storm Sand dunes near test track Salt mines No potable ground water

Problems due to Site (contd.) Jatropha Carcus is unlikely to act as Sand barrier Stray Cattle barrier Poor rail connectivity Dust/sand storm to effect visibility, which is very critical for testing Low land inside loop

Low Cost Alternative Identify “single train only” sections like RJK-SHTS section of MB division of NR 22.9 Km track 30 Kmph max speed Only one pair of train which is also not very popular One level crossing Three halts/stations Other track features like bridges, culverts and curves

Low Cost Alternative (contd) Upgrade the track to mainline standard with reversal facility at SNK Existing train service can continue when there is no trial Stop service train on the day of trial All runs in one series can be completed in one day Since only one pair of train hence no problem About 3 kms of precise track parameters required General sanction can be sought from CRS as no passenger safety would be involved

Test Track- Implications for Future of Indian Railways

Integrated Modernisation Plan (2005-2010) Trains upto 300 Kmph Future rolling stock design efforts to be for this speed potential, hence test track for 300 kmph needed Safety related issues to become primary concern Crash-worthy rolling stock to be designed Better understanding of technical issues related to derailments More reliable rolling stock and track

Test Track- Additional Use Track stress analysis under dynamic conditions are possible only on test track Lateral forces recorded at rail level Also help in calibration of measuring wheels Analysis of effect of track parameters on rolling stock behaviour possible only on test track

Test Track-Additional Use (contd) Crashworthiness tests can be done Studies related to derailment possible Telemetric data acquisition and remote controlled train can be planned Re-railing/accident relief equipment may be required in derailment/collision related studies

Test Track Know-How Lack of adequate information related to Other possible uses of test track Equipment and technology Technical and managerial problems related to test track No information on high speed rolling stock testing Safety related issues Testing procedures and precautions Testing personnel safety Construction related details

Proposed Action Plan Introduce mainline testing in RJK-SHTM Before implementing the project, visit world’s leading test track centres Interact with experts Observe actual testing Study available technology and equipment Understand problems, possible solutions and their cost-effectiveness

Proposed Action Plan (contd.) Review existing proposal based on knowledge gained for a cost-effective alternative related to Facilities Location Length Shape ( closed loop or straight) High speed test track Testing Procedure and analysis

Thank You!!!