John Neuner, Program Manager ASCLD/LAB-International CWAG January 28, 2010 Sacramento, California.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Establishing a New Accreditation Program in the U.S.
Advertisements

EPAA Conference 5 November 2007 Georgette LALIS Enterprise and Industry DG European Commission The international dimension of regulatory acceptance.
INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION FORUM, INC.
International Recognition System for Accreditation
1 Assessment: Norms and Accreditation. Assessment: Norms and Accreditation-Module 11 2 Learning Objectives At the end of this module, participants will.
Conference for FOOD PROTECTION Promoting Food Safety Through Collaboration.
The New TNI Laboratory Accreditation Standards Requirements for an Accreditation Body.
International Federation of Accountants International Education Standards for Professional Accountants Mark Allison, Executive Director Institute of Chartered.
CPA is a UKAS company United Kingdom Accreditation Service Background and Introduction 2014 Seminars.
MRA Workgroup. In this session, we invite you to discuss the following question: What institutional structures will be needed to establish an MRA in tourism.
MFRC Annual Midwest Laboratory Director’s Meeting June 25 – 26, 2013 Louisville, Kentucky ASCLD/LAB UPDATE.
International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) & International Accreditation Forum (IAF) 13 th International Legal Metrology Conference Sydney,
Industry Canada /strategis.ic.gc.ca Industrie Canada /strategis.ic.gc.ca 1 September 26, 2003, PCC.1 MRA Workshop Inter-American Mutual Recognition.
INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION FORUM, INC. “Certified Once, Accepted Everywhere” Last Updated January 2013.
International Organization
Motivating Best Practice in Lab QMS 1 Principles behind ISO/IEC J.E.J. (Ned) Gravel, CD, PEng, CAE, CA-LS, IPL Principal, MOTIVA Training Inc.
1Having confidence in certification CASCO Comms/ International Organization for Standardization.
ASCLD/LAB Standards and Accreditation: Trace Evidence Discipline John K. Neuner Program Manager, ASCLD/LAB-International Trace Evidence Symposium August.
Accreditation and Proficiency Testing. APT Subcommittee MembershipMeeting Activities 21 members, 15 non- Commissioners Representation: Accreditation bodies.
NABL’s Role in Food Safety Through Laboratory Accreditation Anand Deep Gupta Accreditation Officer NABL New Delhi.
An introduction to the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program Sally Bruce, Chief for the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program.
Texas Forensic Science Seminar 2010 Austin, Texas Austin, Texas Overview of the ASCLD/LAB Accreditation Programs Ralph M. Keaton October 7, 2010.
Accreditation & Certification in Forensic Science Understanding the Difference Phil T. Pulaski, Esq. Retired Chief of Detectives, NYPD.
United Kingdom Accreditation Service
Conformity Assessment and Accreditation Mike Peet Chief Executive Officer South African National Accreditation System.
Overview of existing assessment schemes Rolf Bienert, John Lin.
Laboratory Accreditation as a Component of the Help America Vote Act Mary H. Saunders Chief, Standards Services Division.
STANDARDS OVERVIEW Wednesday, April 30, 2015 KAREN RECZEK, STANDARDS COORDINATION OFFICE, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY
Conformity assessment – Standards and CEOC’s involvement Annual Conference 31 of May 2010 in Vienna Dipl.-Ing. Gerd-Hinrich Schaub CEOC International.
The Electric Reliability Organization: Getting from here to there. Gerry Cauley Director, Standards ERO Project Manager ERO Slippery Slope NERC Today Uphill.
1 BETTER WORK AND STANDARDS PROGRAMME (BEST) A Programme of the Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh BETTER QUALITY INFRASTRUCTURE (BQI) COMPONENT.
“The Quality Infrastructure in Lebanon” Export Norms, Quality Control and Competitiveness FUTURE PROGRAMME Prepared By Ali Berro Director of Quality Programme.
UNECE – SIDA “ SOUTH EAST EUROPE REGULATORY PROJECT” FIRST MEETING OF REGULATORS FROM SOUTH EAST EUROPEAN COUNTRIES PRESENTATIONFROM THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA.
Principles behind ISO/IEC 17025
Slide 1 ROAD TO EUROPE – PROGRAM OF ACCOUNTING REPORTING AND INSTITUTIONAL STRENGTHENING How can the European Federation of Accountants (FEE) Assist ?
MNAS MONGOLIAN ACCREDITATION SYSTEM
The TNI National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Board Update Daniel Hickman, NELAP Board Chair.
Most Common Deficiencies Cheryl O. Morton Managing Director, AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC.
The United States Trade Representative  Is an agency within the Executive Office of the President  Approximately 200 people work at USTR  Negotiate.
Perspectives on Standards and Conformity Assessment in North America Wayne Morris February 10, 2016.
THE ROLE OF PROFICIENCY TESTING - A PERSPECTIVE FROM AN ACCREDITATION BODY Randall Querry American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA) November.
1 Accreditor’s View of the Value of MRAs: the APLAC View Helen Liddy APLAC Secretary.
© A2LA Understanding the Accreditation Hierarchy - Who’s Who and What’s What ? NCSL International Conference Orlando, FL August 7, 2008 by Roxanne.
THE NATIONAL VOLUNTARY LABORATORY ACCREDITATION PROGRAM (NVLAP ) DECEMBER 3, 2015.
What do Accreditation Bodies currently do to engage with regulators? Some common approaches.
National Association of Testing Authorities, Australia NATA accreditation and criteria for validation and verification Mark Worrell – RACI.
1 CASCO/DEVCO Workshop “IAAC Experience in Supporting the Development of AB in Latin American and Caribbean ” Reinaldo Balbino Figueiredo IAAC Chairman.
Harmonised use of accreditation for assessing the competence of various Conformity Assessment Bodies Dr Andreas Steinhorst, EA ERA workshop 13 April 2016,
Internal Audit Quality Assessment Guide
1 European Regulatory Approach to Free Movement of Goods Daniel PIERRE General Director.
INTERNATIONAL ELECTROTECHNICAL COMMISSION «Harmonization of the national accreditation system of Eurasian countries» 23 December 2013 Moscow World Trade.
1Johannesburg South Africa SMA May International Organization for Standardization.
Final Rule Accredited Third-Party Certification 1.
Perspectives on Standards and Conformity Assessment in North America
5/13/2018 2:10 PM Crime Laboratory Accreditation in the US and ASCLD/LAB Support of Crime Laboratory Accreditation in Mexico Anja Einseln, Forensic Scientist.
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
John Drengenberg Consumer Affairs Manager
the Republic of Kazakhstan
Information on activity of the Kyrgyz Center of Accreditation under the Ministry of Economy of Kyrgyz Republic Chapaev Zhanybek  
Conformity Assessment Activities
Current status of accreditation in Mongolia
INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION SERVICE (IAS)
Accreditation of Environmental Testing Labs by a Non-Governmental Accreditation Body (NGAB) – How is this Different from a State Accreditation? Operational.
Emanuele Riva – IAF Vice-Chair
Overview of the ASCLD/LAB Accreditation Programs
Jennifer Stradtman, Director, Technical Barriers to Trade
HKAS Accreditation Service for Certification of Management System of RCHE Service Providers Mr WONG Wang-wah Assistant Commissioner for Innovation and.
The Value of Accreditation
LABORATORY ACCREDITATION
John Drengenberg Consumer Affairs Manager
Presentation transcript:

John Neuner, Program Manager ASCLD/LAB-International CWAG January 28, 2010 Sacramento, California

Brief history of ASCLD/LAB accreditation in the US The US movement to ISO/IEC accreditation Current issues facing the quality of crime laboratory accreditation ASCLD/LAB’s support of EMA – developing a crime laboratory accreditation program in Mexico

About thirty years ago, in 1982, the first crime laboratories in the US were accredited by ASCLD/LAB in the state of Illinois For the first twenty-two years (from 1982 through 2004), laboratories were accredited to what has become known as the ASCLD/LAB Legacy accreditation standards

ASCLD/LAB Legacy standards were created by crime laboratory directors and maintained and constantly improved by those same crime laboratory directors (known as the ASCLD/LAB Delegate Assembly) The director of each ASCLD/LAB accredited laboratory is a voting member of the Delegate Assembly

371 crime laboratories are currently accredited by ASCLD/LAB (98 in the ISO accreditation program) Including US federal, state, local and private laboratories Including 12 laboratories outside the US

In 2003, the ASCLD/LAB Delegate Assembly voted to transition to the use of ISO/IEC as the foundation for crime laboratory accreditation The new program, based on ISO standards is called the ASCLD/LAB-International program

Today, crime laboratories in the US seeking ASCLD/LAB accreditation must demonstrate conformance with ISO/IEC and the ASCLD/LAB-International Supplemental Requirements for Testing Laboratories How are ISO standards and “supplemental requirements” developed?

A committee of subject matter experts from around the world draft the standards The draft standards are released for public comment and ultimately voted on by all ISO members Each participating country (economy) has a single vote to adopt an ISO standard

When the ISO standards are adopted, each “sector” of a country’s economy that will use the standard has the right to develop what most call “sector specific supplemental requirements”

“Sectors” of an economy may include:  Housing (or building materials)  Automobile industry  Food production  Health Care  Forensic Science  Others

Each “sector” of an economy may develop “sector specific supplemental requirements” The International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) developed a general set of “sector specific supplemental requirements” for use in forensic science ILAC G19 – available free at

ASCLD/LAB does not use ILAC G19 ILAC G19 was based to a large degree on an outdated version of the ASCLD/LAB Legacy standards (1997) The updating of ILAC G19 is a slow, international process

ASCLD/LAB developed our own set of “sector specific supplemental requirements” for forensic science “ASCLD/LAB-International Supplemental Requirements for Testing Laboratories” Most crime laboratory accrediting bodies around the world use more than ILAC G19 (US, Canada, United Kingdom, Australia, etc.)

ASCLD/LAB is currently updating the “ASCLD/LAB-International Supplemental Requirements for Testing Laboratories.” These should be ready in a few months. The ILAC G19 document is also currently undergoing an update and will likely be finalized late this year or early 2011.

With input from subject matter experts, the ASCLD/LAB Board of Directors drafts all revisions to the supplemental requirements The draft is released to all interested parties for public comment Public comments are considered by the ASCLD/LAB Board of Directors

A second draft is prepared and released for public comment A final version is then released for a thirty- day voting period by all current members of the ASCLD/LAB Delegate Assembly With a positive vote the supplemental standards are adopted

Other accreditation requirements may be developed by “regulators” in a country In US forensic science, an important regulator is the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) who issues quality assurance standards for DNA analysis Public health agencies in some US states also regulate certain toxicology testing (like blood alcohol analysis)

Laboratories seeking ASCLD/LAB- International accreditation in the US must demonstrate conformance with: o ISO/IEC 17025:2005 o Sector specific supplemental requirements o Applicable regulatory requirements

ASCLD/LAB “sector specific” and “regulatory” requirements ensure that using ISO/IEC for accreditation considers issues of importance to forensic science Key issues identified in the US to strengthen the quality of forensic science services are no different than the issues faced in other countries

Making the accreditation of crime laboratories mandatory using internationally accepted standards as the basis for accreditation Ensuring that each person working in a crime laboratory meets minimum education and training standards; can demonstrate technical competence; and receives ongoing developmental training and proficiency testing

Establishing standards for issuing clear and complete test reports Ensuring the use of valid test methods Ensuring that each crime laboratory has an appropriate relationship with any parent body

Ensuring that each laboratory has and follows a comprehensive, documented quality management system Ethics requirements are in place The ASCLD/LAB-International program supports all of these key issues

Over the last twenty-five years, other countries have turned to ASCLD/LAB as a model for implementing their own crime laboratory accreditation program Australia and Taiwan are two examples Other countries have relied on ASCLD/LAB for the direct accreditation of crime laboratories

With current participation in ISO-based accreditation, ASCLD/LAB’s approach to accreditation outside the US has changed The changes will impact how ASCLD/LAB approaches the accreditation of crime laboratories in Central and South America - including Mexico

2008 – ASCLD/LAB was formally recognized by the InterAmerican Accreditation Cooperation (IAAC) 2009 – ASCLD/LAB was formally recognized by the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) Following formal, international recognition ASCLD/LAB signed mutual recognition arrangements (MRA) with the IAAC & ILAC

As an IAAC and ILAC MRA signatory, ASCLD/LAB will now work in harmony with other MRA signatories, like the Mexican Accreditation Entity (EMA) As interest in crime laboratory accreditation has grown within Mexico, ASCLD/LAB has worked with EMA to support their development of an accreditation program

ASCLD/LAB representatives continually interact with EMA representative at IAAC and ILAC meetings An ASCLD/LAB representative made a presentation about crime laboratory accreditation during EMA’s celebration of International Accreditation Day in 2008

In cooperation with EMA, ASCLD/LAB presented a week-long assessor training course in Mexico City An EMA representative observed ASCLD/LAB conducting a full assessment of a crime laboratory in the US

In support of the cooperative relationship established by the IAAC and ILAC MRAs, and in accordance with the international approach to “cross border” accreditation, ASCLD/LAB has no plans to offer the direct accreditation of crime laboratories within Mexico unless invited to do so by EMA ASCLD/LAB will continue to support EMA in the development of a crime laboratory accreditation program in Mexico

ASCLD/LAB will respond to certain requests directly from crime laboratory directors within Mexico Having a laboratory representative observe the ASCLD/LAB assessment of a crime laboratory in the US (remember that the EMA program will also be based on ISO/IEC 17025, and the accreditation process will be the same)

Have a laboratory representative attend an ASCLD/LAB-International Assessor Training Course in the US (learning to be an assessor will prepare that person to become a better internal auditor for your own laboratory, and would also prepare that person to become a technical assessor for EMA) Connecting a crime laboratory from Mexico with an ISO accredited laboratory in the US that can share examples of documented, ISO-compliant policies and procedures

ASCLD/LAB fully supports the ongoing efforts to establish a sound crime laboratory accreditation program within Mexico. We stand ready to assist in any way that is mutually agreeable to EMA and in any way that supports the cooperative principles of the IAAC and ILAC MRAs and international, cross border accreditation activities.

To purchase ISO documents To purchase ISO documents (in English) FREE G19 document Program guidance documents that could be helpful ASCLD/LAB interpretations of numerous accreditation requirements

John K. Neuner, Program Manager ASCLD/LAB-International