1 Title IA Online Coordinator Training School Improvement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
No Child Left Behind Public School Choice. Federal/State Requirements Federal System No Child Left Behind (NCLB): Choice Supplemental Educational Services.
Advertisements

Title One Parent Involvement
NCLB Program Improvement Status Report for Chipman Middle School Presentation to the Board of Education October 23, 2007.
NCLB Program Improvement Status Report for Chipman Middle School Presentation to the Board of Education October 28, 2008.
NCLB and Title I School Improvement
Delaware Statewide Title I Conference 1 School Improvement – The Ever-Changing Landscape – Part I June 29, 2010 Bill McGrady U. S. Department of Education.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Information Session: Parent/Guardian Communications, NCLB School Choice and SES August 17, 2010.
Accountability Reporting Webinar: Parent/Guardian Communications, NCLB School Choice and SES August 23, :00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. Kenneth Klau.
AYP Regional Meetings In Need of Improvement Schools and Districts MDE School Improvement Division and Regional Service Cooperatives August/September 2010.
1 Overview: What is “No Child Left Behind”?. 2 Reauthorization of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (“ESEA”) of ’65 Money to states for specific.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Program Improvement Year 3 Corrective Action.
No Child Left Behind The New Age: No Child Left Behind.
Title I A Requirements under NCLB Public Law Office of Federal Programs September 2014 Oklahoma State Department of Education.
IMPLICATIONS FOR KENTUCKY’S SCHOOLS AND DISTRICTS SUPERINTENDENTS’ WEBCAST MARCH 6, 2012 NCLB Waiver Flexibility 1.
MSDE Alternative Governance Plan Development School: James Madison Middle School January 2012.
Title I LEA and Peer Review Process of School Improvement Plans Kokomo Center Schools Kokomo, IN.
Rules and Regulations.  Requirements (Title I and Title III)  Notices  Timeline  Schools on Improvement  Use of Funds.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Information Session Juliane Dow, Associate Commissioner Accountability & Targeted Assistance Massachusetts Department of.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Public School Choice The School District Of Palm Beach County May 2011.
Title IA Coordinator Tutorial Title IA and Private School Students
STAR (Support through Assistance & Reforms) Report.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
Title I Technical Assistance Training Federal and State Programs.
Title I School Restructuring Meeting NH Department of Education April 14, :00am-12:00pm.
NCLB Title I, Part A Parent Notification Idaho SDE Title I Director’s Meeting September 15, 2008 Cathryn Gardner, Senior Program Advisor Northwest Regional.
A Guide to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and Public School Choice The School District Of Palm Beach County April 2010.
The New Age: No Child Left Behind (NCLB) By Don Bertucci, Chaffey Unified School District ROP.
1 Title IA Coordinator Online Training Targeted Assistance Schools
1 NCLB Accountability Rules& Requirements Requirements.
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
Title I School Improvement Committee of Practitioners Bridgeport Conference Center June 9, 2008.
2011 School Improvement Technical Assistance Meeting Dr. Reginald Eggleston Assistant Superintendent Division of Federal and Special Programs October 27,
May 25,  MSP scores are compared against a uniform bar.  The MSP scores compared against the uniform bar are not representative of individual.
AYP/SINA/DINA Iowa Statewide Data Conference Tom Deeter IDOE Bureau of Information & Analysis Geri McMahon IDOE Bureau of School Improvement August 10,
1 Determining Title IA School Allocations Title IA Online Training
Title IA Coordinator Tutorial Preschool Transition
SAISD Principal’s Meeting September 17, 2003 Office of Research and Evaluation.
Title IA Online Coordinator Training NCLB Transferability
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
State Support System for Districts New Hampshire Department of Education.
Supplemental Education Service Providers Becoming a Supplemental Education Service Provider.
Testing & Accountability Update TAKS, EOC, & STAAR.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
Ware County High School State of the school. 12 th grade 448 students entered the 9 th grade in 2003/ students have left the county or state 243.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
1 Title IA Coordinator Online Training Targeted Assistance Schools
1 Title IA Online Coordinator Training Parent Involvement
1 Title IA Coordinator Training Preparing for Title IA Monitoring
1 No Child Left Behind: Identification of Program Improvement (PI) Schools and Districts July 2003.
Major Changes to Title I Regulations Public School Choice & Supplemental Educational Services Presented by: Karen Davies, Title I School Improvement Coordinator.
GUIDANCE ON SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT Region VII Comprehensive Center The University of Oklahoma 555 Constitution Street Norman, OK David.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
Predominant Findings Title I, Part A and Part D March 5-7, 2008 Spring LASAFAP Conference.
Springs 2006 and 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress Results Potential Challenges with 2008 Annual Measurable Objectives & District Corrective Action.
1 Restructuring Webinar Dr. Zollie Stevenson, Jr., Ph.D. Director Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs Office of Elementary and Secondary.
Coordinator’s Academy Local District 6 Program Improvement Thursday October 27, 2005.
Presented by: Frank Ciloski, Sherry Hutchins, Barb Light, Val Masuga, Amy Metz, Michelle Ribant, Kevin Richard, Kristina Rider, and Helena Shepard.
Preliminary AYP Preliminary Adequate Yearly Progress Data.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
Community Liaison Training NCLB Parental Involvement Requirements “Creating an Audit Trail” October 19, 2007 Eduardo Elizondo, Director Federal Programs.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
Ellie Gearhart August Campus Improvement Plan Revise plan Parents School staff LEA Outside experts.
OVERVIEW OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT – FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY BECCA MARSH, DIVISION OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT AND SUPPORT TEA, CHARTER SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION ©2013.
Roles and Responsibilities
Presentation transcript:

1 Title IA Online Coordinator Training School Improvement

2 Title IA Online Coordinator Training School Improvement

3 Improvement Status How does a school get into Improvement Status? –School does not make AYP for 2 consecutive years OSA scores do not improve –Disaggregated by student populations Student participation is less than required Student attendance is less than required Student graduation is less than required

4 Coordinator’s Role What is the coordinator’s role in improvement? –In collaboration with school staff, district admin team and parents Review AYP Analyze data Determine what caused improvement status

5 Schools in Year 1 Improvement What needs to be done in year 1? Notify parents –Explain school improvement –Reason(s) for identification –How to help in improving school Offer parents school choice option

6 Schools in Year 1 Improvement Coordinator’s role: Inform district/school of requirements Assist district/school fulfill requirements Collect and file evidence of compliance

7 School Improvement Plan What is the school required to do in Year 1? Revise school plan within 3 months Implement plan after district approves it –No later than beginning of next school year

8 School Improvement Requirements of school in improvement Reserve 10% of school Title IA funds for professional development Obtain technical assistance to implement plan –Practical advice from an expert

9 School Plan Implementation Coordinator’s role Arrange: –Technical assistance –Peer review and approval of plan Provide information to district/school concerning requirements

10 School Choice Option What is School Choice? Parents of students in Title IA schools may transfer students from a school in improvement to one making AYP –District pays for transportation Coordinator’s role Inform district of requirements Document notifications and transfers

11 Exit Improvement Districts remove school from improvement status School makes AYP for two consecutive years Coordinator’s role: Assist with AYP review Document reasons for exit

12 Improvement Status Year 2 School doesn’t make AYP Year 3 –Improvement status Year 2 –Parent notifications District continues –Technical assistance –School Choice

13 Improvement Status Year 2 School Improvement Year 2 (cont.) Add Supplemental Education Services Coordinator’s role : Arrange Supplemental Education Services

14 Supplemental Education Services Coordinator’s role in SES –Determine eligible students –Notify parents of eligible students –Facilitate contracts/agreements for services –Receive SESP reports/distribute to teachers –Evaluate service effectiveness –Assist ODE Monitor providers

15 Exit Improvement School makes AYP for 2 consecutive years Coordinator’s role –Document meeting exit requirements –File new school plan (after revision) –File evidence of compliance with improvement requirements for monitoring

16 Improvement Status School makes AYP for 1 year –Continue implementing school plan –Continue offering choice –Continue offering supplemental services Coordinator’s role –Continue technical assistance arrangements –File documentation of compliance with improvement status requirements –Continue supplemental services

17 Improvement Status Year 3 School does not make AYP for 4 years Improvement requirements –Continue choice and supplemental services –District takes corrective action(s) –Parent notifications

18 Improvement Status Year 3 Coordinator’s role –Continue supplemental services –Inform district/school of corrective action requirements –Continue to document improvement activities

19 District Corrective Actions District chooses at least one –Institute a new curriculum –Extend school year or school day –Replace staff –Decrease management authority at the school –Restructure internal school organization OR

20 Corrective Action continued Or Appoint outside experts to: –Advise the school –Revise improvement plan –Address issues underlying school’s continued inability to make AYP

21 Corrective Action Coordinator’s role –Inform district/school of corrective action requirements –Assist with corrective action(s) –Continue supplemental services –Continue technical assistance arrangements –File documentation of compliance

22 Exit Corrective Action Districts remove school from corrective action if school makes AYP for two consecutive years Coordinators role –Document exit –Document reasons for exit –File evidence of compliance with improvement requirements

23 School Improvement Year 4 District continues to offer –School Choice –Supplemental services –Technical assistance –Parent notifications

24 School Improvement Year 4 Begin planning restructuring –Major reorganization of school –Make fundamental reforms –Significant changes in staffing and governance

25 Planning Restructuring Planning team includes –Teachers in the school –Principals –Parents –District administration team

26 Planning Restructuring Coordinator’s role –Assist planning team –Inform district/school of requirements –Document compliance

27 Restructuring Plan Restructuring plan includes : –Replace all/most school staff or –Contract out school governance and operation or Implement other major restructuring

28 Restructuring Delayed School makes AYP for 1 year –Restructuring delayed School makes AYP for 2 years –Exit restructuring Coordinator’s role –File documentation of requirements

29 Improvement Status Year 5 District responsibilities Implement restructuring plan Continue transfer option Continue supplemental services Continue technical assistance Parent notifications

30 Improvement Status Year 5 Restructuring (cont.) Coordinator’s role: Assist district and school staff Document improvement activities

31 For More Information Title IA Handbook “School Improvement” Training Documents –Includes NCLB text,Guidance, Links to information

32 For More Information “Supplemental Education Services” Training Documents –Includes NCLB text,Guidance, Links to information “Public School Choice” Training Documents –Includes NCLB text, Guidance, Links to information