NANOOS Workshop David L. Martin May 7, 2004 Governance Discussion.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RIRs, the NRO and ICANN Update - August So far The RIR boards have drafted an agreement to be undertaken between themselves to establish a Number.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE 802 EC Submission July 2014 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Formalizing the Wireless Chair’s Meeting Date: xx Authors:
Neighborhood Associations 101:
PROCEDURES TO USE TO ESTABLISH STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEES TO REPLACE COMMON CORE'S STANDARDS 1.
Campus Improvement Plans
©1999 Wireless Application Protocol Forum Ltd. 30 April 2015 Introduction To WAP Location Drafting Committee and Privacy Concerns Ewan Cameron, SignalSoft.
2009 Annual Winter Meeting of the GCOOS-RA Parties and Board of Directors Worth Nowlin February 2009 Orlando, FL Building the GCOOS.
1 of 5 This document is for informational purposes only. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, IN THIS DOCUMENT. © 2006 Microsoft Corporation.
Systems and Models in Curriculum Development. In this lesson, we will focus on the systems approach to curriculum development. By the end of this lesson,
Training Module 3: Articles of Incorporation and Association Bylaws Presented by the Southern Early Childhood Association.
The Dissertation Process
Doc.: IEEE /1454r7 Submission March 2013 IEEE 802 JTC1 Standing Committee Proposal for SC6 contribution process 20 March 2013 Haasz et al, IEEESlide.
1 Canadian Celiac Association Governance Workshop May 2009.
Leadership in the Financial Aid Profession Aaron Steffens MASFAA President-Elect
OSIAM4HE Proposed org structure Authored by the strategy and organization team.
Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, Inc. Chapter Operations Plan.
 Like the constitution of the country.  Filed with state to create a business.  States the purpose of the organization.  States the primary activities.
201 Money Matters. Local Unit Bylaws What do you know about local unit bylaws?
Bylaws, Rules, and Periodic Review – Updates from Standards and Practices Julie Adams, ASCCC Executive Director Craig Rutan, ASCCC South Representative.
BYLAWS VS POLICY & PROCEDURE
IEEE S2ESC Report1 Software And Systems Engineering Standards Committee (S2ESC) Paul R. Croll S2ESC Sponsor Chair June 2004 Report.
Idaho Interoperable Communications Governance Kick-Off Meeting.
AUGUST 22, 2014 STANLEY M. HUFF, MD CHIEF MEDICAL INFORMATICS OFFICER INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE Healthcare Services Platform: Business Entity.
CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION COMMITTEE. 2 Group carried over from ECAR, MAAC, & MAIN workgroups that were assembled to address 1200 Urgent Action.
PROPOSED IAM BY-LAW AMENDMENTS AND/OR REVISIONS. TERRY R. HEAD President International Association of Movers.
Northcentral University The Graduate School February 2014
Demystifying the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge Central Iowa IIBA Chapter December 7, 2005.
LAKE COUNTY COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS Governance Charter Ad-Hoc Group Update and Open Comment Period.
Election procedure for ICANN ASO Address Council in APNIC Region Sept. 5, 2002 ASO Meeting The 14th APNIC Open Policy Meeting APNIC Executive Council.
ICANN ASO AC Report to ARIN Public Policy Mtg Cathy Wittbrodt Thanks to Hans Petter Holen and Sabine Jaume.
ARIZONA-MEXICO COMMISSION Connecting Communities. Changing Business.
New Leader Training – National By-Laws Directors Director of Communications The Director of Communication shall assist the Secretary in maintaining open,
CERTIFICATION In the Electronics Recycling Industry © 2007 IAER Web Site - -
MetaArchive Cooperative Membership Agreements Martin Halbert NDIIPP Partners Meeting Washington, D.C. Wednesday July 9, 2008.
DRAFT – For Discussion Only HHSC IT Governance Executive Briefing Materials DRAFT April 2013.
Applying for AAFCS Awards, Grants, Fellowships, and Scholarships 1 American Association of Family & Consumer Sciences 106 th ANNUAL CONFERENCE & EXPO June.
International Accelerator Facility for Beams of Ions and Antiprotons at Darmstadt CBM Collaboration meeting Status Interim MoU J. Eschke, GSI.
Scalability. What organizational structure will help us achieve the key enablers while allowing us to grow and preserve our principles?
Capacity Building Committee Architecture and Data Committee Meeting Seattle – July 2006.
December_2009 Partnership building. December_2009 Partnership building within the partnering process COREGROUPCOREGROUP FORMAL LAUNCH $ $ $ $ $ cost centre.
GEO Strategic Plan : Implementing GEOSS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN WORKING GROUP GEO EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MARCH 2015 GENEVA, SWITZERLAND.
Report on the review of ACG structure The Exchange of Information Task Force October 7-9, 2009 The 13th ACG General Meeting in Hanoi.
Data, Information & Customer Support Standing Committee Report on Action Items at Close of IICWG-7 28 September 2006 Co-Chairs Florence Fetterer & Ari.
N SIM Steering Committee Meeting July 10,
Digital Signage Theme with U.Va. Alerts
Mbombela Climate Change Workshop 2 5 November 2015 Civic Centre Hall, Mbombela.
The Periodic Review Report and Middle States Accreditation PRR Workshop April 9, 2008.
STRATEGIC PLAN DEVELOPING ACTION PLANS April
CEOS Self-Study Preliminary Ideas on Implementation: Toward a Refined CEOS Michael H. Freilich Incoming Chair, CEOS-SIT
The Data Sharing Working Group 24 th meeting of the GEO Executive Committee Geneva, Switzerland March 2012 Report of the Data Sharing Working Group.
MM/DD/YYYY Proposed changes to AIAA Bylaws, TAC Charter and Chair Manual Kathleen Atkins, Jeff Hamstra, and Mark Melanson Sci-Tech January 2015.
UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND Teaching, Faith, & Service Michael Connolly, D.M.A. Workshop on Institutional Self-Study 2007.
Page  ASME 2013 Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B7. The Appeals Process.
Section 4.9 Work Group Members Kris Hafner, Chair, Board Member Rob Kondziolka, MAC Chair Maury Galbraith, WIRAB Shelley Longmuir, Governance Committee.
September, 2005What IHE Delivers 1 A New Governance for IHE-Europe David Monteau, INRIA IHE-International Meeting, Nov
Effective Committees Governing Board Online Training Module.
Domain Champion Updates New Mexico Department of Health.
SHMS User Group Issues General Discussion at Hall C User’s Summer Workshop August 5, 2008.
1. 2 The Election Processes: The OpenStack Foundation has 3 Technical leadership of PTL’s – Process set by technical community Gold Member – Director.
Work Plan Work Plan Management (Document 21)
Guidance for input to the annual reports in the context of the Enlargement Package Sonja NITA Centre of Thematic Expertise on Civil Society/ Directorate.
GCOOS Governance Team Andrew Clark, Harris Corporation Cortis Cooper, ChevronTexaco Ann Jochens, Texas A&M University Buzz Martin, Texas General Land Office.
The NICE Citizens Council and the role of social value judgements
Governance Procedures
General tripartite board composition and selection information
nd Vice Chair’s Report – Jan 2013
Formalizing the Wireless Chair’s Meeting
nd Vice Chair’s Report – Jan 2013
School Council Bylaws Governance.
CWG Membership July 30-31, 2012 – Climate Working Group Meeting.
Presentation transcript:

NANOOS Workshop David L. Martin May 7, 2004 Governance Discussion

Questions to be Addressed All Groups specified that there was to be a Governing Board of some type in their preferred structure. –How are the Board Members to be selected? Deciding on Structure and timing will help answer this question. All Groups seemed to converge on a particular desired Governance end-state (501 c(3)) though the timing/sequencing of this was less clearly expressed. –Do we draft an MOU or MOA for signing soon, or do we seek open-membership non-profit corp. and be content with status quo till then? All Groups provided input on the structure and number of Working Groups that will support the Board and NANOOS though there was not complete convergence on their focus. –Should the Working Groups be aligned FUNCTIONALLY (Science, Data, Obs, Users, Products, DMAC, etc., etc.) or should they be aligned THEMATICALLY (National Security, Marine Operations, other IOOS Pillars)?

Consensus Points There was general consensus that NANOOS should evolve towards a open- membership, non-profit entity at some point in the future –There was less consensus (expressed) on the timing of this evolution Accomplishing this in some small number of years, in keeping with the “schedule” for RA accreditation and NFRA formation was discussed in Plenary –We should seek legal counsel on issues dealing with 501c3 Now, for information – this is not our area of expertise Later, for execution We should draft an initial Governance enabling document MOA and/or Bylaws – to be determined at this Workshop Post on Web for Public Comment Provide “vetted” Document at next NANOOS Workshop

“Distilled” (by ISC) Response to Questions determined from Group Reports Do we draft an MOU or MOA for signing soon, or do we seek open- membership non-profit corp. and be content with status quo until then? –We should draft an MOA for signing by initial institutions (exact makeup TBD) soon. The enabling document should expressly articulate that this initial Governance structure will evolve towards an open-membership, non-profit corporate entity in a directed manner. How are the Governing Board Members to be selected? –Initial Board Members will be assigned from the signatory institutions on the initial enabling MOA. The MOA will detail this assignment as well as the specific intent to move towards an elected Board (to come either from the Membership or Chairs of Working Groups – no Group consensus here) as NANOOS matures. The initial Governing Board will select from among its members, an Executive Committee. Should the Working Groups be aligned FUNCTIONALLY or should they be aligned THEMATICALLY? –Working Groups should be aligned FUNCTIONALLY to maximize efficiency (data/products can serve multiple Themes) & to simplify structure.