Deliberative Working Document - Predecisional FOUO Supporting the Secretary’s Top Priorities Eric Coulter, Deputy Director OSD Program Analysis and Evaluation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Air Force Core Functions
Advertisements

The Military Challenge of Cyber AOC Talk on Cyber, EW and IO Dr Gary Waters, 17 April 2012.
Overview An emerging challenge A belated response Debating the alternatives – Air-Sea Battle – A distant blockade – Maritime denial Conclusions.
“However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results” Sir Winston Churchill , English statesman.
ARSOF WARFIGHTING CHALLENGES
Long-Term Trends in the Defense Budget Stephen Daggett Specialist in Defense Policy and Budgets May 5, 2010.
International CyberSecurity Collaboration: The Technical Cooperation Program Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 09 March 2010 Joshua.
Department of The Air Force
Applications in Acquisition Changing Defense Environment.
Sea Air Space Symposium PB16 Budget Issues RADM Barry Bruner Director, Programming Division OPNAV N8O April 2015.
Defense Transformation: Concepts and Affordability Jack Treddenick George C. Marshall Center DRESMARA 16 October 2006.
Quadrennial Defense Review Results February 3, 2006.
Deterrence and Dissuasion for the 21st Century Ryan Henry Principle Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Policy IFPA-Fletcher Conference December 14,
ASRR 2011/10/05 Page-1 Distribution Statement A – Cleared for public release by OSR, distribution unlimited. Affording Defense Capability: An SE- Centric.
Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release; Distribution is unlimited. 1 Electronic Warfare Information Operations 29 MAR 2011 Val O’Brien.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force 1 Meeting Strategic Challenges: Balancing Capabilities With Priorities.
Chief Information Officer Group
Principal Director, Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction, Department of Defense Represents Department of Defense on counter-proliferation and non- proliferation.
ADP 1 The Army.
AMEDD C&S CAPTAINS CAREER COURSE. OUTLINE  General Reimer Concept  TRADOC Concept  US Army War College Concept  Iraq Crucible Concept  Agile Leader.
WELCOME TO THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Perspectives on the Analysis M&S Community Dr. Jim Stevens OSD/PA&E Director, Joint Data Support 11 March 2008 v4-2.
China and space security National Defense University, PLA, China National Defense University, PLA, China Zhong Jing.
Advanced Systems and Concepts Office 20-Sep-15 What are National Security Threats? 2 nd Annual JTAC Workshop 4 April 2006 ASCO and DTRA Update and Welcome.
1 The Military in a Democracy: A U.S. Perspective.
Foreign and Defense Policymaking Chapter 20. American Foreign Policy: Instruments, Actors, and Policymakers  Instruments of Foreign Policy  Military.
Citizenship Issues C.I.4 U.S. Domestic and Foreign Policy Students are able to: 4.2 Describe U.S. foreign policy. Students may indicate this by: – Defining.
Department of Defense Priorities and Challenges John P. Roth Deputy Comptroller (Program/Budget) 7 March 2005.
Respective Roles of Nuclear and Non- Nuclear Forces as Instruments of Policy December 14, 2005 Keith B. Payne President, National Institute for Public.
Dealing with North Korea America’s Options. Threats from North Korea Direct nuclear attack on US forces or allies Sale of nuclear and missile technologies.
1 Quadrennial Defense Review SES APEX Orientation Program September 13, 2005.
3. Post-9/11 US Strategy How much has changed? How much has stayed the same?
Deliberative Working Document - Predecisional Supporting the Secretary’s Top Priorities Brad Berkson, Director, OSD Program Analysis and Evaluation.
Foreign & Defense Policies. Discussion Questions:  Why do you think the Founders intentionally divided responsibility for foreign affairs between president.
Joint Training Challenges of Irregular Warfare/COIN and Full Spectrum Training Requirements Brief for WJTSC LtCol John Merna, J7/9-TJ 23 September.
THEME FOR 12 TH ARF HDUCIM NDU ISLAMABAD - PAKISTAN MILITARY OPERATIONS OTHER THAN WAR (MOOTW)
DSAM-08 Acquisition Management: Issues and Trends.
1. 2 USAF CONOPS & AIR AND SPACE POWER REVIEW Chap 23 & 24.
Air Force Strategy to Resources
Strategic Implications of Virtual Warfare: by Captain Terry C. Pierce USN Explaining Virtual Warfare as a Strategic Disruptive Innovation Explaining Virtual.
United States Air Force: Air Doctrine – Provide Global Capability
Office of Force Transformation Transforming National Security “A Future Worth Creating” Vision: Broad and Sustained Competitive Advantage Strategy Capabilities.
Department of Defense Budget APEX Strategic Priorities The Quadrennial Defense Review – the first conducted in an era of global terrorism – continues.
Supporting the Secretary’s Top Priorities
Headquarters U.S. Air Force Fly – Fight – Win APEX Orientation Arthur J. Lichte Assistant Vice Chief of Staff.
Deliberative document: for discussion purposes only. Not subject to FOIA release. 1 Trends and Shocks 8 March 2007.
APEX 39 CAPE Priorities & Opportunities
The Planning, Programming, Budgeting and Execution (PPBE) Process
Defense Policy Making You may not be interested in war, but war is interested in you.
PPBS Planning Programming Budgeting Systems. PPBS The Department of Defense is the only Agency to use this type of budget.budget.
Foreign and Defense Policymaking Chapter 20. American Foreign Policy: Instruments, Actors, and Policymakers Instruments of Foreign Policy – Three types.
This Briefing is Unclassified Space Situation Awareness (SSA) for the Warfighter 25 August 2005 HQ AFSPC/DRC Lt Col Troy Pannebecker.
The Navy’s Strategy VADM John Morgan 9 March 2006.
Chapter 17: Foreign Policy and National Defense Section 2.
Emerging Global Trends and Strategic Challenges in the Coming Decade Marvin J. Cetron, President, Forecasting International June 12, 2012 Emerging Global.
Winning the Next War 1 Winning the Next War: Institutionalizing Lessons Learned from Today’s Regional Conflicts The American Institute of Engineers Conference.
2 Agenda Command Mission ……………………………… Command Relationships ……………………..…….4 Fleet Assets……………………..……………………. 6 Sailors and Civilians………..……………………….
GOVT Module 16 Defense Policy.
International Security and Peace
“Existing world order is being redefined.” Henry Kissinger Jan 2015
The Evolving Strategic Environment – A View From K Street and Wall Street Precision Strike Association Winter Round Table 2005 Arlington, VA January.
DSAM-08 Acquisition Management: Issues and Trends.
Assessing the 2010 QDR: a guide to key issues
Fires Conceptual Framework Supporting Multi-Domain Battle
Joint Protection of the Sea Base
Quadrennial Defense Review Results February 3, 2006
The Future of Coalition Warfare
Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release; Distribution is unlimited. 1 Customer Advocate Airborne Electronic Warfare Systems 29 MAR 2011 Tim.
FY 2007 Department of Defense Budget
S&T Main Focus Areas Linkages to 2018 NDS
Presentation transcript:

Deliberative Working Document - Predecisional FOUO Supporting the Secretary’s Top Priorities Eric Coulter, Deputy Director OSD Program Analysis and Evaluation

Deliberative Working Document - Predecisional FOUO Agenda Financial Realities QDR Themes

Deliberative Working Document - Predecisional FOUO

Deliberative Working Document - Predecisional FOUO

Deliberative Working Document - Predecisional FOUO U.S. Defense Spending as a Percentage of GDP Source: National Defense Budget Estimates for FY 2007, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), March KoreaVietnam GWOT 0% 3% 6% 9% 12% 15% Reagan Build-up Gulf War

Deliberative Working Document - Predecisional FOUO

Deliberative Working Document - Predecisional FOUO Benefits Growth from Past Congressional Actions $22.8B $17.4B $12.7B $21.4B $20.0B $19.0B Growth between FY03 ~ FY10 $13.9 Billion $16.4B $8.9B

Deliberative Working Document - Predecisional FOUO Agenda Financial Realities QDR Themes

Deliberative Working Document - Predecisional FOUO Strategic Priorities The Quadrennial Defense Review – the first conducted in an era of global terrorism – continues this shift in emphasis by identifying strategic priorities The Fiscal Year 2007 Budget invests in capabilities and forces in these priority areas –Prevail in Irregular Warfare Operations –Defend the Homeland Against Advanced Threats –Maintain America’s Military Superiority –Support Service members and their families

Deliberative Working Document - Predecisional FOUO 1. Defeating terrorist networks 2. Defending the homeland in-depth 3. Shaping the choices of countries at strategic crossroads 4. Preventing the acquisition or use of WMD by hostile state or non- state actors QDR Four Focus Areas These areas provide a focus for the development of military capabilities to meet 21 st century security challenges

Deliberative Working Document - Predecisional FOUO Irregular  Unconventional methods adopted and employed by non-state and state actors to counter stronger state opponents. (erode our power) Disruptive  International competitors developing and possessing breakthrough technological capabilities intended to supplant U.S. advantages in particular operational domains. (marginalize our power) Traditional  States employing legacy and advanced military capabilities and recognizable military forces, in long-established, well- known forms of military competition and conflict. (challenge our power) Catastrophic  Acquisition, possession, and possible employment of WMD or methods producing WMD-like effects against vulnerable, high-profile targets by terrorists and rogue states. (paralyze our power) Security Environment: 4 Challenges LIKELIHOOD VULNERABILITY Lower Higher Lower Capabilities-based planning should apportion risk across challenges (e.g., terrorism, insurgency, civil war, and emerging concepts like “unrestricted warfare”) (e.g., conventional air, sea, land forces, and nuclear forces of established nuclear powers) (e.g., sensors, information, bio or cyber war, ultra miniaturization, space, directed-energy, etc) (e.g., homeland missile attack, proliferation from a state to a non-state actor, devastating WMD attack on ally)

Deliberative Working Document - Predecisional FOUO Disruptive Traditional Catastrophic Irregular QDR Focus Areas Today's Capability Portfolio Shape Choices Defeat Terrorist Extremism Counter WMD Defend Homeland

Deliberative Working Document - Predecisional FOUO New Investment in QDR Focus Areas –Defeat Terrorism ($12B) Increase SOF forces (10 K) and equipment, establish MARSOC, increase PYSOPS & Civil Affairs capacity Increase Predator procurement Enhance littoral warfare capability –Counter WMD ($2B) Invest in research into advanced biological threats –Homeland Defense ($2B) Invest in NAOC, conventional TRIDENT, distributed COMMS, E-6B –Shape Choices ($9B) SAP, IMINT, Long Range Strike, existing 3-Star Component Operational HQ to Deployable JTF HQ

Deliberative Working Document - Predecisional FOUO

Deliberative Working Document - Predecisional FOUO QDR Road Maps FY08-13 Irregular Warfare Locate, Tag, and Track Building Partnership Capacity Managing Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Institutional Reform and Governance Strategic Communications Joint Command and Control Authorities Focus of QDR Execution

Deliberative Working Document - Predecisional FOUO Final Thoughts Are We … In a War Likely to Fight Massed Armies / Navies Countering Nation States Dealing with a Distant, Short-Lived Problem Or … In a Struggle Likely to Fight Small Groups / Networks Countering Extremists (Supported by Nation States?) Dealing with a Threat to World Freedom While maintaining conventional forces that can deal with emerging world situations