European Supervisory Bodies and Patient Safety Presented by Sandra Eismann (CQC)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Safer IT Systems for the NHS Dr. Maureen Baker CBE DM FRCGP Special Clinical Adviser NPSA Clinical Safety Officer CfH.
Advertisements

Cancer Registration and Health Service Regulation Dr Jenifer A E Smith.
The Healthcare Commission and Patient Safety AvMA NPSA Patients for patients safety partnership event Richard Elson 18th March 2008.
European Supervisory Bodies and Patient Safety First results presented by Sandra Eismann (CQC)
Improving outcomes for older people: Monitoring and regulating standards Ann Close 8 th June 2011.
The Voice of Carers Developing carer organisations across Europe Sebastian Fischer VOCAL - Voice of Carers Across Lothian Coalition of Carers in Scotland.
© Safeguarding public health Adverse incident reporting now and the future, roles and responsibilities Mark Grumbridge.
NHS Services, Seven Days a Week Professor Sir Bruce Keogh National Medical Director NHS England.
STROKE AUDIT Why? What? Who? Sandi haines Stroke Coordinator NHS Borders.
About CQC Sarah Seaholme Ram Sooriah 1 1.
OSH professionals in European countries: an overview Andrew Hale Chairman Certification Committee ENSHPO Emeritus professor TU Delft, Netherlands Chairman:
External assessment and peer review of healthcare in Europe Dr Charles Shaw April 2012EPSO Paris1.
Care Options for NHS Continuing Health Care (CHC) Wirral PCT Board – 12 February 2008 Tina Long - Director of Strategic Partnerships Sheila Hillhouse -
Taskforce Implementation – Progress and Results Chris Rudge FRCS National Clinical Director for Transplantation Renal CDs Meeting 12 March 2010.
Peer Evaluation of the Danish Health and Medicines Authority by the Peer Evaluation Team of the European Partnership for Supervisory Organisations.
1 EUROPA DONNA – The European Breast Cancer Coalition Susan Knox, Executive Director KEEPING BREAST CANCER ON THE EUROPEAN HEALTH AGENDA.
National Standards for Safer Better Healthcare
International Review – Use of Information for the regulation of health and social care Barbara Foley, PhD Tracy O’Carroll Health Information and Quality.
EPSO: Peer evaluation: EPSO: History(1),Scope(5), Aims & Functions(5) Activities(1),Topics(1). Peer evaluation: Peer evaluation(8), Norms(7), Follow up(1).
1. Basic terms 2. Council of Europe recommendations for patient safety
Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland Multidisciplinary An Introduction to the Support available to Nurses, Midwives and Allied Health Professionals.
Safeguarding Adults Board 6 th Annual Conference Adult Safeguarding and the NHS Alison Knowles Commissioning Director NHS England, West Yorkshire.
SAFE Care - ‘Safety Express’ – Mental Health & Learning Disabilities
Medical Audit.
Assessment for improvement [Name] [Title] [Date / Event] V4.5.
Commissioner Feedback for SLAM CQC Inspection in September 2015 Engagement with Member Practices 1.
Aligning professional and systems regulation: Can the whole be greater than the sum of its parts? Jon Billings Director of Strategy, Nursing and Midwifery.
Improving Nutrition on the Wards Nutrition and Patient Safety Implementing the 10 Key Characteristics of Good Nutritional Care.
Federation for Healthcare Science (FHCS). Scientific/Technical/Therapy 10% NHS workforce data 2003: Total of 1.3M people employed 1.1M of these involved.
1 HERCA: Heads of the European Radiological protection Competent Authorities – Working Group Medical Applications Clinical Radiology Audit Forum
Health Promotion as a Quality issue
Modernising Pharmacy Regulation An inspector calls: A new regulatory model in pharmacy Deborah Hylands Inspector, GPhC 19th February 2014.
1 8 th Meeting 13, 14, 15 June 2005 Oulu – Finland Marinus Verweij, MD Chairman EuHPN.
Registering the care sector – next steps Dr Linda Hutchinson Director, Care Quality Commission National Care Association Conference, 21 October 2010.
Schools for Health in Europe SHE Goof Buijs NIGZ 8 June 2008 Vancouver, partnership track.
Healthcare Commission update Sue Fraser-Betts Senior Assessment Manager October
S.A.F.E Situation Awareness For Everyone
HTA Benefits and Risks Dr Bernard Merkel European Commission.
Anne Mette Dons, MD Head of Department Supervision and Patient Safety
Peer Evaluation of the Norwegian Board of Health Supervision (Statens helsetilsyn) First of its kind. Performed by EPSO Peer Evaluation Team Norway (July.
Our Vision & Mission 1 OUR MISSION Advancing health and wellbeing for you and your family OUR VISION To become a Foundation Trust with a passion for quality,
CQC activity in Coventry Coventry Cares Learning Network 1 March 2013.
Overcoming the Challenges & Promoting Positive Benefits Julie Davies.
Governance & Standards What is happening internationally Triona Fortune, March 2016.
Quality and Patient Safety Presented by Jane Foster-Taylor, Chief Nurse Annual General Meeting 2015.
Assuring quality in health services for people with learning disabilities Dr Theresa Joyce CQC National Professional Advisor – Learning Disabilities.
Measurements and indicators for healthcare IT
Health and Social Care Act 2008 Registration and Compliance Monitoring Maggie Hannelly Compliance Manager Bedfordshire 6 December 2010.
HEALTH AND CARE STANDARDS APRIL Background Ministerial commitment 2013 – Safe Care Compassionate Care Review “Doing Well Doing Better” Standards.
Care Quality Commission (CQC) Registration. Background The Care Quality Commission (CQC) is the health and social care regulator for England. From 1 April.
Registration and monitoring compliance Michele Golden Compliance Manager 2 November 2010.
Safety in Medicines: Raising the profile with the Royal Pharmaceutical Society Liz Rawlins Communications Officer 9 May 2011.
Acting on concerns Ralph Tomlinson Head of Invited Reviews.
Administrative burdens in EU agriculture: an evidence base CAP Simplification Expert Group 24 April 2007 Jenny McInnes Department for Environment Food.
Title of the Change Project
Continuing Professional Development of Health Professionals & Patient Safety 28 October 2016 Caroline Hager Team Leader Cross Border Cooperation Healthcare.
IPHA Switch-on to Self-Care From Primary Care to Self-Care
Minimal Information Model for Patient Safety on Incident Reporting and Learning by WHO and experts from various countries   Introduction of this.
Raj Kumar   Raj Kumar    
Raj Kumar   Raj Kumar    
Workforce Planning Framework
Patient Safety Guidance- development, implementation and compliance
Preventing VTE in hospitalised patients
The EPSO Peer Evaluation of the Danish Health and Medicines Authority
Restraints and Coercive methods Working Group: Results and Impact Pristhina, 3rd June, 2016 European Partnership for Supervisory Organisations in health.
Velindre Cancer Centre
11 Safeguarding Vulnerable Adults
Supporting learners with special needs or disabilities through inclusive education RIGA 2 June 2015.
Assessing and regulating patient safety Sandra Eismann via Alex Mears
Patient Safety Guidance- development, implementation and compliance
Presentation transcript:

European Supervisory Bodies and Patient Safety Presented by Sandra Eismann (CQC)

2 Research proposal Objective: The study aims to identify and compare the overall approach European health regulators take in regulating and assessing patient safety; and to identify further areas for collaborations between EPSO (European Partnership for Supervisory Organizations in Health Services and Social Care) members.

3 EPSO working group Jan Vesseur/ Dutch Health Care Inspectorate Geir Sverre Braut/ Norwegian Board of Health Supervision Vaida Momkuviene/ Lithuanian State Medical Audit Inspectorate Katja Peters/ Academy of Public Health in Düsseldorf Sandra Eismann/ Care Quality Commission England

4 Responses from 15 countries/regions Norway Netherlands Belgium France Lithuania Northern Ireland England Scotland Slovenia Estonia Ireland Denmark Germany Finland Sweden

5 Findings Divided into 3 sections: Patient safety initiatives in hospitals in different countries The approach EPSO members take when supervising hospitals in relation to patient safety; and The approach EPSO members take when supervising infection control.

6 Patient safety initiatives in hospitals Patient safety programmes aiming explicitly to reduce adverse events or mortality rates: For example, the Scottish Patient Safety Programme aims to reduce adverse events by 30% and mortality rates by 15%. The NHS Quality Improvement Scotland is leading and co- ordinating this programme.

7 Wider quality management programmes, including patient safety For example, in Norway, a nationwide campaign on patient safety was launched in autumn 2010 and is set to run through The campaign is co-ordinated by Norwegian Knowledge Centre for Health Services and focuses on acute as well as primary health services. The campaign focuses on safe practices at the intersection between patients and services. Norwegian Board of Health Supervision has no direct role in the campaign, but will implement some initiatives in their regular supervisory activity co- ordinated with issues promoted through the campaign. Patient safety initiatives in hospitals

8 Individual complaints or concerns For example, in Denmark, the National Board of Health receives information from the ombudsman and, if appropriate, undertakes disciplinary action against individual professionals. Project on patient safety For example. in Finland, VALVIRA issues guidance for health services on the importance of patient record keeping. Its senior officers also provide lectures in healthcare organisations. Patient safety initiatives in hospitals

9 Area of Patient safety supervised Area of patient safetyNo of supervisory bodies focusing on this area Infection control14 Work force (staff levels and/or qualifications)13 Medicine Management12 Safety and suitability of premises10 Reporting of adverse events (to an external national body) 10 Clinical audits (i.e. inter-hospital comparisons of clinical activity and/or outcomes) 9

10 What next? A further piece of research could focus on how supervisory bodies use these reporting systems, including: Are supervisory bodies pro-active or reactive when following up on incidents? If pro-active, which approach do they take? Do they use a risk assessment to decide which incidents to follow up? Do supervisory bodies review the implementation of patient safety alerts? The Northern Ireland RQIA has undertaken a review which has considered the implementation of some NPSA safety alerts. Further research could expand this review.

11 More depths work into how supervisory bodies approach patient safety more widely, or hygiene control more specifically. A case study could be undertaken to compare the Scottish and Dutch patient safety programmes, highlighting their features and identifying any early findings on what is and is not working well. Work has been undertaken already to share the approach the UK and Ireland take in regards to hygiene and inspection control, further work could be undertaken to systematically analyse different approaches taken across Europe. What next?