Patient Safety in Primary Care The Linneaus Collaboration www. linneaus-pc.eu Aneez Esmail Professor of General Practice University of Manchester (UK)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Reporting & Learning System (NRLS) Reporting systems are vital in providing a core of sound, representative information on which to base analysis.
Advertisements

The Risk Management Process (AS/NZS 4360, Chapter 3)
Common Assessment Framework for Adults Demonstrator Programme Social Worker Access to Clinical Information 26 April 2012.
Pregnancy and complex social factors
Diabetic Foot Problems
Aim of programme to apply the principles of risk management to practical situations and relate these to personal experiences to improve the quality of.
Critical Incidents PRIMARY CARE. AGENCIES CHI-Commission for Health Improvement CHI-Commission for Health Improvement NPSA National Patient Safety Agency.
LIFE, LEARNING AND ACHIEVEMENT
Patient Safety in Primary care Tina Eriksson. “All doctors have a moral and professional responsibility to ensure that the healthcare that they provide.
Building the highest quality services in the country Nigel Barnes March 2008.
An Introduction to Patient Safety
Developing Patient Safety in Primary Care in Scotland Neil Houston, Arlene Napier.
Seeing safety through the patient’s eyes The trajectory of harm Charles Vincent Department of Experimental Psychology, Nuffield Department of Surgical.
Standard 6: Clinical Handover
Monday 17 September (Materials presented to the Mayoral Team on 28 August 2012)
Dr. ABDULLAH ABDU ALMIKHLAFY Assistant professor & Head of community medicine department Presented By University of Science & Technology Sana’a – Yemen.
Protecting patients- now and in the future Linda Matthew Senior Pharmacist National Patient Safety Agency.
SERIOUS CASE REVIEW PROCEDURE NICKY BROWNJOHN DESIGNATED NURSE FOR SAFEGUARDING CHILDREN SEPTEMBER 2009.
The Australian/New Zealand Standard on Risk Management
Laboratory Management - 1
Safety Basic Science December 22 nd, Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) I am encouraged by my colleagues to report any patient safety concerns.
Learning about Safe Systems Dr. Maureen Baker CBE DM FRCGP Clinical Director for Patient Safety NHS Connecting for Health.
Safety First – Accidents a Close Second!
Topic 5 Understanding and learning from error. LEARNING OBJECTIVE Understand the nature of error and how health care can learn from error to improve patient.
Module 3. Session DCST Clinical governance
Educational Solutions for Workforce Development Pharmacy Significant Event Analysis Analysis of an event to change practice Val Reilly SEA Reviewer NHS.
NPSA Incident Decision Tree RCA Tool (the representatives perspective)
Clinical Audit as Evidence for Revalidation Dr David Scott, GMC Associate, Consultant Paediatrician and Clinical Lead for Children’s Services, East Sussex.
Medical Audit.
Quality Directions Australia Improving clinical risk management systems: Root Cause Analysis.
Supporting Quality Care
Advancing Quality in Primary Care – What is Quality Improvement? 10 March 2011 Powys THB/IRH Paul Myres- Chair Primary Care Quality Forum.
Clinical Risk Unit University College London International Perspectives Feedback from the review board Charles Vincent Clinical Risk Unit University College.
Preventing Surgical Complications Prevent Harm from High Alert Medication- Anticoagulants in Primary Care Insert Date here Presenter:
Topic 6 Understanding and managing clinical risk.
Mapping and Implementing a Safe Medicines Pathway Jennifer Dorey Pharmaceutical Adviser, NHS South --- South Central.
Commissioning for Health Improvement - Achieving Health Improvement Liz Fisher Health Improvement Manager Elaine Allan Matron Practice.
Occurrence Reports. An occurrence report is a document used to record an event when it occurs Occurrences are reported each time an occurrence occurs.
Safety and Quality in Maternity Care
CUSP for VAP: EVAP Shadowing Another Professional Kathleen Speck, MPH November 14, 2013.
Lessons Learned on Patient Safety
Significant Events. Significant Event Analysis (SEA) An SEA is concerned with investigating any occurrence which are identified by any practice members.
On the CUSP: STOP BSI Improving Situational Awareness by Conducting a Morning Briefing.
UNDERSTANDING AND DEFINING QUALITY Quality Academy – Cohort 6 April 8, 2013.
Older People’s Services The Single Assessment Process.
The Risk Management Process
Significant Event Analysis Paul Myres Primary Care Quality Information Service March 2011.
General practice – risky business?
StagesOf Assessment Stages Of Assessment. The Stages of Assessment for the Single Assessment Process §Publishing information about services. §Completing.
Is avoidable mortality a good measure of the quality of healthcare? Dr Helen Hogan Clinical Senior Lecturer in Public Health London School of Hygiene and.
Educational Solutions for Workforce Development Pharmacy Significant Event Analysis Fiona McMillan Lead Pharmacist Educational Development April 2014.
Strengthening the commitment
Content from National Patient Safety Agency material 2 Day Lead Investigator.
RCA Report Writing.
1 Module 4 Learning From When Things Go Wrong A Resource to Support Training Activity in Clinical Settings.
Self-reflecting on our safety culture INSERT FACILITATORS NAME HERE.
To Learn & Develop Christine Johnson Lead Nurse Safeguarding (named nurse) - STFT Health Visitors Roles and Responsibilities in Domestic Abuse.
Patient Safety Culture Tools. Bristol Royal Infirmary Report Final report It is an account of people who cared greatly about human suffering, and were.
The Linneaus implementation in Greece Yannis Skalkidis MD, PhD, MPH, FACS Athens University Medical School ΕΘΝΙΚΟ & ΚΑΠΟΔΙΣΤΡΙΑΚΟ ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ ΑΘΗΝΩΝ NATIONAL.
Content from National Patient Safety Agency material Analysing the Problems Identifying.
Content from National Patient Safety Agency material 1 Day Support Investigator.
The Art of the Possible – Implementing an Error Reporting and Learning System in Germany Kerstin Klemp, Martin Beyer LINNEAUS EURO-PC Conference Frankfurt.
PST Human Factors Jan Shaw Manchester Royal Infirmary CMFT.
Facilitator: Prof. Dianne Parker University of Manchester and
[NAME CCG] [DATE] [FACILITATOR] Early Diagnosis of Cancer Quality Improvement using Cancer Significant Event Analysis [CCG MAP]
Patient Safety Take a little time to read through these slides, where a question is asked stop and consider it for a few moments before going on to the.
CARRYING OUT SIGNIFICANT EVENT AUDITING & LEARNING FROM COMPLAINTS
Understanding and learning from errors and managing clinical risks
Learning from Significant Events
Chemotherapy Services in England: Ensuring quality and safety
Presentation transcript:

Patient Safety in Primary Care The Linneaus Collaboration www. linneaus-pc.eu Aneez Esmail Professor of General Practice University of Manchester (UK)

What I am going to cover The epidemiology of error in primary care The challenges that we face Three things that you can do when you leave here –Understand your safety culture –Set up a reporting system –Undertake a root cause analysis

My typical Monday morning! Imagine that it is always a busy day…..

Why is patient safety important in primary care?

1. It’s where most episodes of care take place 95% of all NHS contacts take place in primary care 300 million general practice appointments per year 750,000 people consulting GPs every day Primacy of primary care in most European countries

2. Mistakes happen… safety incidents per consultations Between 37 – 600 incidents per day 4 main categories Diagnosis Prescribing Communication Organisational Sandars and Esmail, 2001

Why is primary care different? 1. The environment Lower profile than acute sector Low technology environment Different organisational structures Mode and site of care delivery – telephone, home visits Interfaces important Increasing complexity Consultation skills and interpersonal skills critical

Practice Organization and its relationships

Why is primary care different? 2. The processes Less obvious implications 50% no consequences 20% non-clinically important delay in diagnosis 10% upset patients Up to 20% could have serious implications Less litigatious Different professional dynamics

Frequency of errors (Primary Care) CodeError descriptionFrequency% 14Failure/delay in diagnosis49450% 48Medication inappropriately prescribed565.6% 23Failure/refusal/delay in referral515.17% 46Failure to warn/recognise side effects of drugs % 22Failure to monitor condition464.66% 41Unsatisfactory performance of procedure % 50Failure to diagnose complications in pregnancy %

Frequency of outcomes (Primary Care) CodeOutcomeFrequencyPercent 33Death % 35Deterioration in clinical condition505.81% 86Unnecessary pain343.95% 3Amputation of limb313.60% 88Appendicectomy232.67% 10Brain damage202.33%

Why is primary care different? 3. The underlying philosophy Variation more acceptable Different approach to risk and uncertainty

Primary care…. Accept uncertainty Explore probability Marginalise danger Marshall Marinker

So what are we going to do? My mistake! Yes it happens to all of us!!!

The problem Much can go wrong in general practice, so it is important to have a system to learn from your mistakes. After a number of close-calls you agreed to make improving patient safety a priority a year ago, but nothing has changed. How can you establish a new system to manage risk?

Starting Put someone in charge and agree a timetable of key activities and deadlines. Their first task should be to carry out an audit to assess your practices’ safety culture.

Safety culture Your practice must have a culture where staff are encouraged to evaluate risk, mistakes are acknowledged and there is a system to take action when things need putting right. It requires a good understanding of your practice’s approach to risk management and a broad discussion about the ‘safety culture’ in your practice

How to assess safety culture Put someone in charge and agree a timetable of key activities and deadlines Carry out an audit to assess your practices’ safety culture. Build a safety culture MaPSaF (

MaPSaF (Manchester Patient Safety Framework) Set aside about two hours as a practice team to do this. It is a worthwhile exercise to stimulate discussion about the strengths, weaknesses and differences of the patient safety culture in your practice. At the end of the process, you will have a shared understanding of where the main problems are, the barriers to improving things and also some of the strengths of the practice.

Lack of formal procedures We are a small practice and have rather an ad- hoc way of recording events that impact on patient safety. How can we formalise this process?

Reporting For a four-week period you will report on adverse events that take place within the practice. Give all staff the ability to anonymously report incidents that disrupt the delivery of best quality care in the practice Defining safety –‘something that should not happen in my practice, and I don't want it to happen again’

Incident reporting form National Patient Safety Agency. Incident Report Form. –In a typical group practice of 5,000 patients, over a four-week period, you will expect to collect about 15 patient safety incidents. should read the reports and present them to the practice. At this point you should not analyse the incidents, but get an agreement on which of them should be studied in more depth

Too much information We are drowning in information, with a series of reports of significant events and our incident reporting system, but how can we learn from them?

Significant Event Audit SEA –Dilemmas in significant event auditing, Pulse =24&storycode= &c=4 =24&storycode= &c=4 –Have a formal process and keep a record

Root cause analysis Root cause analysis shows where systems need to be developed to prevent future harm, by identifying the chain of events and the contributory factors which caused the incident. It works best when the whole practice team is involved in agreeing to the investigation and learning lessons from it. Used for more serious outcomes (serious harm or death).

Five Whys? Root Cause Analysis: Five whys tool - Cause Analysis: Five whys tool –to consider what control measures can be implemented to prevent the incident happening again. You may have to revisit your protocols and checklists to see if they need to be modified or if new ones need to be developed –For example: If the problem identified is a delay in diagnosis, identify which systems could be improved to ensure that abnormal results are appropriately dealt with. It is important that any changes that are made are piloted and then reviewed

Finally Keep a record of what you have done. People leave and things get forgotten. Having an organisational memory is a critical part of learning from things that go wrong.

A charter for action (with a little help from Atul Gawande) Count something Change something Write about it Keep the conversation going