3rd ACSF meeting Munich, September 2-3 Industry proposals for ACSF status definition and HMI Informal Document: ACSF-03-12 Submitted by the experts from.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Advanced Emergency Braking System / Lane Departure Warning System OICA POSITION 1 Informal document No. GRRF-S08-10 Special GRRF brainstorming session.

Advertisements

The necessity of New Regulations for New Technologies regarding R79 Japan September / 2012 Informal document GRRF (73rd GRRF, September 2012,

OICA/CLEPA Homework Part I HMI, Driver in/out of the Loop Submitted by the experts of OICA/CLEPA Tokyo, June 2015 Informal Document ACSF

OICA HCV industry input to ACSF informal Group #1 Meeting & 30 in Bonn Informal Document ACSF

Evaluation of ACSF during periodic technical inspection Informal group ACSF # / 17 in Tokyo Informal Document ACSF

Proposal of Automated Driving from Ad- hoc group on LKAS/RCP Submitted by the Chair of the Special Interest Group on Lane Keeping Assist Systems (LKAS)

Automatically Commanded Steering Function

ACSF Informal Group Industry proposals 1 st Meeting of ACSF informal group April 29 and 30, 2015 in Bonn 1 Informal Document ACSF

Submitted by the experts from Sweden and Japan Presentation in conjunction with GRRF Amendment proposals to UN R79 to introduce the requirements.

United States Rulemaking on Electronic Stability Control (ESC) for Light Vehicles 138 WP.29 March, 2006 Informal document No. WP (138th WP.29,

Outline of Definition of Automated Driving Technology Document No. ITS/AD (5th ITS/AD, 24 June 2015, agenda item 3-2) Submitted by Japan.

Presentation for Document ACSF-03-03_rev1 Oliver Kloeckner September rd meeting of the IG ASCF Munich, Airport Informal Document.

Difference for "Automatically commanded steering function", "Corrective steering function" and " Autonomous Steering System " Informal Document: ACSF

Traffic Accidents caused by Lane Departure in Japan  Data of Traffic Accidents around Japan Transmitted by the expert from Japan Informal document GRRF

Lane Departure Warning Human Machine Interface GRRF informal group on AEBS/LDWS 1 February 2010 AEBS-LDWS

Vehicle Safety - (R)Evolution of Driving Assist Systems Jochen Schäfer Heiner Hunold Submitted by the experts from Informal document GRRF th GRRF,

Remote Control Parking (RCP)

Identification of regulatory needs for ACSF Oliver Kloeckner 16-17th June nd meeting of the IG ASCF Tokyo – Jasic Office Informal Document.

Minimum Risk Manoeuvres (MRM)

Brief Review up to Now 1 March 11, 2011, Geneva UNECE/WP29/ITS Informal Group 19th Meeting T. Onoda & K. Hiramatsu, Japan Transmitted by expert from JAPANInformal.

Results of the Study on ACSF Transition Time Informal Document: ACSF National Traffic Safety and Environment Laboratory, Japan 4th Meeting of ACSF.

5 th ACSF meeting French views Bonn January 2016 Informal Document - ACSF Submitted by the expert of France.

Emergency Stopping Signal 80th GRRF session Submitted by the experts from IMMA Informal document GRRF th GRRF, September 2015, Agenda item.

Conditional Automation (Level 3) Use-Case Description Submitted by the Experts of OICA as Input to the IWG ITS/AD November 3, 2015 Geneva Submitted by.

CLEPA Position Special GRRF Session on Automatic Emergency Braking and Lane Departure Warning Systems Brainstorming Meeting 9 Dec UN Palais des.

Hand-off Warning Time of LKA

Informal document GRRF-84-32

7th ACSF meeting London, June 28-30, 2016

Presentation of ACSF C tests

Informal Working Group on ACSF

Initial project results: Annex 6 – 20 Sept 2016

Industry proposal Driver availability recognition system

Submitted by UNECE Document No. ITS/AD-07-07

Informal Document: ACSF Rev.1

ACSF-C2 2-actions system

Automatic Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS)

Timing to be activated the hazard lights

ACSF-C2 2-actions system

AEBS/LDW Proposed changes with regard to the implementation of technical specifications for Lane Departure Warning Systems (LDWS) GRRF st.

Transmitted by the expert from Germany

Industry views on GRVA priorities and organization

Comparison of Cat.C HMI solution and vehicle without Cat.C

ACSF Category B1 (LKAS) Concern with “Default-on” strategy

Submitted by the Expert of Sweden

Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS

ACSF C tests Prepared by JAPAN 15 November, 2017

Quintessences Proposal for Category C of Germany and Japan

ACSF B1+C functional description

Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS

Comparison of Cat.C HMI solution and vehicle without Cat.C

AEB IWG 02-XX Industry Position

Industry input to ACSF 11th meeting March 2017, Berlin

Hands-off detection warning time for B1-systems

Informal Document: ACSF-10-08

Definition of aysmax Interpretation 1

ACSF - Category C1 Definition of Sensor range and safety distances

ACSF B1+C functional description

Emergency Steering Function

Interpretation of CSF warnings #2

Proposed Definition of the Pause Function

ACSF-17 – Industry Preparation

ACSF B2 SAE Level 2 and/or Level 3

ACSF B2 and C2 Industry expectations from ACSF IG Tokyo meeting

Proposed Definition of the Pause Function

Hands-off detection versus Start of Lane Change Manoeuvre

Alternative Approach to UN R13 Type-IIA for Battery Electric Vehicles

6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016

Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF

Regulation ECE R79-03 ACSF C 2-Step HMI

Automated Lane Keeping Systems

Presentation transcript:

3rd ACSF meeting Munich, September 2-3 Industry proposals for ACSF status definition and HMI Informal Document: ACSF Submitted by the experts from OICA/CLEPA

LKAS System Status LKAS off LKAS on LKAS stand-by LKAS available on off - On but temporarily not available - Ready to intervene - Intervening GRRF ISO standard Inform the driver when the system is temporarily not available

ACSF System Status & proposed HMI ACSF standby ACSF activeACSF OFF Manual SteeringAutomatic Steering on off Note: similar to ACC or ASLD functions Auto mode shall be indicated to driver (optical information) Manual mode shall be indicated to driver, when system is ON (optical information) Manual mode does not have to be indicated to driver when system is OFF (except momentarily when the driver switches Off the system directly from Auto mode) Change from auto to manual mode shall always be indicated by a « non permanent » warning (optical for all cat. + Haptic or acoustic only for cat. B and E) Continuous intervention in case of ACSF cat B Intervention on event in case of ACSF cat C, D and E activate deactivate Note: it should be avoided to define colours for the optical information. This should be left to VM, so that he can ensure consistency with other systems’ HMI.

Backup slides

ESC – LDWS - AEBS SystemStatusHMI ESCESC activated / reinstatedthe vehicle stability function shall be automatically reinstated at the initiation of each new ignition cycle no warning indicator ESC interveningon eventESC yellow warning lamp in flashing mode ESC disabledmanual, automatically or due to failureESC yellow warning lamp in constant mode LDWSLDWS activated = standby in LKAS context Activated at power-onno warning indicator below 60km/h LDWS active = ready to intervene or intervening in LKAS context: on eventLDWS haptic, acoustical and/or optical yellow warning lamp in flashing mode LDWS offmanual, automatically or due to failureLDWS yellow warning lamp in constant mode AEBSAEBS activated = standby in LKAS context Activated at power-onno warning indicator AEBS active = ready to intervene or interveningin LKAS context: on eventAEBS haptic, acoustical and/or optical yellow warning lamp in flashing mode AEBS offmanual, automatically or due to failureAEBS yellow warning lamp in constant mode