The Millennial Instructor The Net-generation Student... OK, but the Net-Gen Instructor??? Carl Berger Copyright by the author, 2007. This work is the intellectual.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

What Students Say About Emerging Practices and Learning Technology Anthony Potoczniak - Rice University Sarah E. Smith - North Carolina State University.

Advertisements

Copyright Joann Martyn, 2007.This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial,

How Faculty Like to Learn And What Should Be Done About It Carl Berger Jeff Bohrer Cheryl Diermyer Copyright by the authors, This work is the intellectual.

© Scordias & Morris, 2005 Virtual Classroom Visits: Using Video Conferencing Technology to Enhance Teacher Education Dr. Margaret Scordias Pamela B. Morris,

While You Were Out: How Students are Transforming Information and What it Means for Publishing Kate Wittenberg The Electronic Publishing Initiative at.

1 Panel: National Research Agenda “Research” “Research” 1. Kinzie: NSSE as one example of current national research 2. Ehrmann: national.

Eliminating the Barriers to Pervasive Computing A Pilot Project Sandy Bennett Coordinator of Instructional Technology Development Copyright Sandra M. Bennett,

Online and on-campus: Proximity and Empowerment for Learning ELI Annual Meeting 2006 Advancing Learning: Insights and Innovations Louise Thorpe and Paul.

An Online, Interactive Approach to Copyright and Intellectual Property Law Education EDUCAUSE Midwest, March 2007, Chicago Christine Greenhow, Ed.D. J.D.

The Milliennial Instructor The Milliennial Student... and now... The Milliennial Instructor? Carl Berger Copyright by the author, This work is the.

UNIWERSYTET MIKOLAJA KOPERNIKA Turon, Polen – Subject integration through Transitions and boundary crossing Assistant Professor Vibeke.

"Cyberspace Education: Challenges and Opportunities" Presented by: Bob Diveley Manager of Administrative Systems Columbus State University Copyright Bob.

Beyond Basic Computer Skills: Implementing Technology Fluency Cynthia Edwards, Professor of Psychology Kristin Watkins, Computer Applications Specialist.

INSTITUTE FOR DISTANCE AND DISTRIBUTED LEARNING Three Approaches to Distance Learning Support Services EDUCAUSE 2002 Copyright Bridget Moore and Mark Raby,

Copyright Statement © Jason Rhode and Carol Scheidenhelm This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission is granted for this material.

Chatham College Community and Computers Pervasive Computing at a Liberal Arts College Charlotte E. Lott, Ph. D. Lynda Barner West, Ed. D. Copyright Charlotte.

Three Approaches to Distance Learning Support Services New River Community College College of Health Sciences Virginia Tech Copyright Bridget Moore and.

Summer Online Courses A Distance Learning Alternative for Traditional Campuses North East Regional Computing Program Annual Conference (NERCOMP) Boston.

Interactive Learning: Teaching Geographic Information Systems (GIS) with WebCT By: Andrew Clark University of Arizona Department of Geography and Regional.

Developing a Successful Model for Online and Tech-Enhanced Learning Mamie How Janet Willett Patricia Delich Presented April 27, 2005 Copyright Patricia.

NLII Mapping the Learning Space New Orleans, LA Colleen Carmean NLII Fellow Information Technology Director, ASU West Editor, MERLOT Faculty Development.

Five Berkeley Campuses Three in NJ; Two in NY Bachelor of Science in Business Administration Degree Online Online Courses Hybrid Courses Web Enhanced Courses.

Enhancing In-Class Learning Out of the Classroom: Using ‘Out-of-Classroom’ Technology Donna Hamilton, Michelle Villeneuve, Jeff Hanlon, Jonathan Rose,

Student Technological Mastery: It's Not Just the Hardware Wm. H. Huffman, Ph.D. Ann H. Huffman, Ph.D.

Faculty and Student Expectations for Students’ Information Technology and Information Literacy Knowledge & Skills: One Institution’s Assessment Linfield.

Copyright notice  Copyright Victoria Mantor and Wangui Njuguna This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this.

Haute Software: Juggling Open Source and Vendor Software Jeshua Pacifici, Manager, Learning Systems Kim Gausepohl, Assistant Manager, Online Course Systems.

Learning technology center Preparing Faculty and Students for Hybrid Courses Copyright Alan Aycock, Carla Garnham & Robert Kaleta, This work is the.

The Team Approach: A Paradigm Shift for Designing Successful Online Courses NERCOMP 2005 College for Lifelong Learning, Manchester, NH.

Washington and Lee University Lexington, Virginia EDUCAUSE 2002 "Juggling Opportunities in Collaborative Environments" October 1 ‑ 4, Atlanta, Georgia.

Exploring Faculty Learning Communities: Building Connections Among Teaching, Learning and Technology Nugent, J., Smith, F., & Rhodes, J., Virginia Commonwealth.

Sharing Information and Controlling Content: Continuing Challenges for Higher Education Susanna Frederick Fischer Assistant Professor Columbus School of.

Preparing for and Teaching Hybrid Courses Midwest EDUCAUSE March 25, 2003 Mary Sudzina, Ph.D. University of Dayton Robert Kaleta, Ph.D. & Carla Garnham.

Catalyst Portfolio Tool Copyright Tom Lewis, This work is the intellectual property.

Julie Evans, Project Tomorrow CEO Speak Up 2012 Results Online and Blended Learning Views of Ohio’s K-12 Students, Parents, Teachers and Administrators.

How CMC transitioned from incorporating technology into curriculum to adopting technology in everyday life. Micheal Malsed, Assistant Director for Student.

Making Big Classes Small: Penn State’s Blended Learning Initiative Renata Engel John T. Harwood January 30, 2006 Copyright Penn State, This work.

HumaniTech®: Educause, Seattle October 24, 2007 Bridging Divides, Building Collaborations

NERCOMP 2002, College for Lifelong Learning What Students, Faculty and the College are Learning about Teaching and Learning Online Managing the 24x7 Classroom.

Campus Technology 08 Shootout! Bracing for the Next-Gen Student Wave: Myth or Mandate? Next-Gen Students “Speak Up” – Are we listening? Julie Evans Project.

Julie Evans, Project Tomorrow CEO Speak Up 2012 National Findings June 26, 2013 Speak Up Findings & Trends: Informing the changing role of educators 9.

Inspiring the Next Generation of Innovators: Students, Parents and Educators Speak Up about Science Education National Report Release NECC – July 1, 2008.

“Would Someone Say Something, Please?” Increasing Student Participation in College Classrooms Jane L. Kenney & Padmini Banerjee Presented by Amy Stonger.

The Great Waltz: Career Advancement in IT Strategies for individuals and institutions in the match-making process EDUCAUSE ‘02 Carrie Regenstein Mark Hale.

Addressing Our Long Tail Learners: Findings from the Speak Up National Research Project 13 th Annual CoSN K-12 School Networking Conference March 11, 2008.

Copyright 2008, Elizabeth A. Evans. This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial,

Copyright Copyright University of Washington This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be.

Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies.

A Tale of Two Collaborators: Successful Collaboration Between IT and Library Services Pat Kohrman, Deena Morganti, John Shank Copyright Pat Kohrman, Deena.

An Assessment of the TA Web Certification Program: Four Years of Supporting the Use of Instructional Technology at the University of Minnesota Brad Cohen,

George Mason University Assessing Technology Support: Using Portfolios to Set Goals and Measure Progress Anne Agee, Star Muir, Walt Sevon Information Technology.

NLII05 Annual Meeting Professional Development of Faculty and Instructional Technology Staff through Communities of Practice University of Memphis: Technology.

Student Learning when Teaching with Technology: Aligning Objectives, Methods, and Assessments Copyright Information Copyright Karen St.Clair & Stan North.

Student Learning when Teaching with Technology: Aligning Objectives, Methods, and Assessments Copyright.

Integration is Critical for Success Curriculum Course Delivery Ongoing Support Instructor & Learner.

Improving the Social Nature of OnLine Learning Tap into what students are already doing Tap into what students are already doing Educause SWRC07 Copyright.

EDUCAUSE 2003 Copyright Toshiyuki Urata 2003 This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared.

Quickly Establishing A Workable IT Security Program EDUCAUSE Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference January 10-12, 2006 Copyright Robert E. Neale This.

COUNTING NEW FORMS OF SCHOLARSHIP TOWARD TENURE AND PROMOTION Peter Angelos and Linda Deneen University of Minnesota Duluth October 2010 This work is the.

Improving Campus IT Accessibility Dr. Jonathan Lazar Dept. of Computer and Information Sciences Towson University Copyright Jonathan Lazar This work.

Chief Information Officer Effectiveness in Higher Education Wayne Brown, Ph.D. Copyright Wayne Brown This work is the intellectual property of the.

Copyright Michael White and Sylvia Maxwell, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared.

© Scottsdale Community College Leveraging the Power of E-Learning Taking your course to a higher level Presented by Sidne Tate Director, Instructional.

1 Carl Berger NlII Spring Focus: Survey results Copyright Carl Berger This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted.

Redefining Wellness Education for Millennials Balkan Spa Summit, Lasko, Slovenia November 7th 2015.

How many of you use Blackboard?

Counting New Forms of Scholarship Toward Tenure and Promotion

Malia Crouse Regis University January 22, 2009

Project for OnLine Instructional Support (POLIS)

myIS.neu.edu – presentation screen shots accompany:

Presentation transcript:

The Millennial Instructor The Net-generation Student... OK, but the Net-Gen Instructor??? Carl Berger Copyright by the author, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial, educational purposes, provided that this copyright statement appears on the reproduced materials and notice is given that the copying is by permission of the authors. To disseminate otherwise or to republish requires written permission from the author.

The Net-Gen Student? Lots of anecdotes, common observations Comfortable with technology Multitasking Intensive use But what of the downsides?

What do we know today? Technology used for –Communication –Social interaction –Shopping –Education? What technology? –Cell phone voice txtng –iPod Music Podcast Video ? –IM

The downsides Cognitive dissonance Breadth versus depth Lack of focus Lack of veracity The upsides Engagement Breadth of source Integration of multiple disciplines Expertise

But what of faculty? Cell phones? iPods? MySpace? Flickr? Multitasking? More personal integration? More research integration? More teaching integration?

Informing, yet Perplexing The curse of successful traditional teaching Time, effort, relevance to teaching... critical Reward, recognition, count toward... crucial Awareness of not reaching student may be tipping point... or may be totally irrelevant

All faculty? Variety of learning styles Culture of local department or field of study Variety of “faculty types”? And something new.... Could there be an new group emerging? The millennial instructor???

A funny thing happened on the way… 2005 gave same survey to faculty and students Role and affiliation, hmm... more responses then sample Interesting group, faculty with student roles and students with faculty roles Some unusual comparisons but just a fluke?

A look at three samples Students Faculty This new group! A chance to directly compare by: –looking at responses to the same themes –comparing responses within those themes Drawing some tentative conclusions Asking for your

2006 Survey Looked to make sure results were similar Yes, not identical but very much the same. A few more of this hybrid group.

How we discovered Section on demographics (Association and Title) Freshman, Sophomore, Junior, Senior, Graduate Student, Post-graduate Student, Tutor, Teaching Assistant, Research Assistant, Adjunct, Lecturer, Instructor, Professor, Researcher, Librarian, Clinical, Assistant, Associate, Full Part-time, Full-time, Visiting, Post-doc, Adjunct, Student, Faculty, Researcher, Librarian AssociationTitle

Unusual combinations Students who teach –Tutors, TA’s, Lecturers Faculty involved in formal learning –Finishing degree, new degree, yet another... Would this group look different? –Probably an older student group? –Probably a younger faculty group? –Just echo faculty but more skill? –Just echo students?

How many? 404 Millennium 16% 1731 Students 391 Faculty 321 Students with faculty roles 83 Faculty with student roles

What distinguishes the Millennium Instructor? Age? Expertise? Use/need for support? Patience? WINWINI?

Age In-between From % from % from Millennial Instructors not limited to youth only!

Expertise? Novice Expert Student MI Faculty Education Research Personal

Expertise? Novice Expert Student MI Faculty Education Research Personal

Expertise? Novice Expert Student MI Faculty Education Research Personal

Expertise? Not in-between More expertise on all categories Significantly differ on Education and Personal Like faculty on Research Millennial Instructors have strong perception of expertise Novice Expert Student MI Faculty Education Research Personal

Learn About Using Technology for Teaching and Learning Explore/experiment Colleges/friends Books/Web sites On the job IT Support staff Computer seminars UM class UM Hot-line Online class Least Most

Learn About Using Technology for Teaching and Learning Explore/experiment Colleges/friends Books/Web sites On the job IT Support staff Computer seminars UM class UM Hot-line Online class Least Most

Learn About Using Technology for Teaching and Learning Explore/experiment Colleges/friends Books/Web sites On the job IT Support staff Computer seminars UM class UM Hot-line Online class Least Most

Learn About Using Technology for Teaching and Learning Explore/experiment Colleges/friends Books/Web sites On the job IT Support staff Computer seminars UM class UM Hot-line Online class Least Most

Learn About Using Technology for Teaching and Learning Explore/experiment Colleges/friends Books/Web sites On the job IT Support staff Computer seminars UM class UM Hot-line Online class Least Most

Learn About Using Technology for Teaching and Learning Explore/experiment Colleges/friends Books/Web sites On the job IT Support staff Computer seminars UM class UM Hot-line Online class Least Most

Learn About Using Technology for Teaching and Learning Explore/experiment Colleges/friends Books/Web sites On the job IT Support staff Computer seminars UM class UM Hot-line Online class Least Most

Learn About Using Technology for Teaching and Learning Explore/experiment Colleges/friends Books/Web sites On the job IT Support staff Computer seminars UM class UM Hot-line Online class Least Most

Learn About Using Technology for Teaching and Learning Explore/experiment Colleges/friends Books/Web sites On the job IT Support staff Computer seminars UM class UM Hot-line Online class Least Most

Learn About Using Technology for Teaching and Learning Explore/experiment Colleges/friends Books/Web sites On the job IT Support staff Computer seminars UM class UM Hot-line Online class Least Most

Learn About Using Technology for Teaching and Learning Explore/experiment Colleges/friends Books/Web sites On the job IT Support staff Computer seminars UM class UM Hot-line Online class Least Most

Learn About Using Technology for Teaching and Learning Least Most Self taught! Like students Like faculty Not telephone Certainly not computer classes IT support? Explore/experiment Colleges/friends Books/Web sites On the job IT Support staff Computer seminars UM class UM Hot-line Online class

Instructors don’t know how Extra work, little connection Takes too much time Students don’t know how Too complicated Don’t have tech support Don’t have the skills Barriers in Using Technology for Teaching and Learning

Both students and faculty together see instructors as a high barrier but... The faculty see students as far less a barrier than the students themselves Instructors don’t know how Extra work, little connection Takes too much time Students don’t know how Too complicated Don’t have tech support Don’t have the skills

Barriers in Using Technology for Teaching and Learning Instructors are the Problem A faculty problem Mile wide, 1inch deep? Not complicated Have Tech Support! Have skills! Text Instructors don’t know how Extra work, little connection Takes too much time Students don’t know how Too complicated Don’t have tech support Don’t have the skills

Characteristics of the Net- Instructor Younger but not exclusively Expertise strong in all areas Preference on how to learn See instructors as a problem Have support Not complicated Still a time problem And must be connected!

How do we guide such folk? Get out of their way? Meet special needs Recognize and reward? Maybe I should just retire?

Future Investigation We didn’t design a survey to find such a group. Should ask directly What kind of themes? What kind of questions?

Themes and Questions Multitasking Ease with technology Fits all of life style Always connected Life long learning (just this group?) OK... what do you think???

Questions? By the way, this presentation is available at Look on the right side for presentations. –it’s the first one! You may also take a look at other surveys and evaluation tools at the site. Feel free to use them for ideas, analysis and presentation.