Exploring Cognitive Demands Part 2 Rosann Hollinger Lee Ann Pruske Sharonda M. Harris Bernard Rahming January 20, 28, 2010 Math Teacher Leader Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mathematics Instruction: Planning, Teaching, and Reflecting
Advertisements

Increasing the cognitive demand in the classroom Rachel Linney Aoife Kelly.
Learning Outcomes Participants will be able to analyze assessments
Nationellt Centrum för Matematikutbildning vid Göteborgs Universitet Teaching Math through Problem Solving 1 Teaching School Mathematics through Problem.
Common Core Standards, K – 12 Kentucky Core Academic Standards Mathematics 1.
Modifying Assessment Items What is the concept/skill being assessed? How could a test item writer ask this in a TEI format? What types of classroom activities.
1 To Summarize… Lee Ann Pruske Bernard Rahming Rosann Hollinger Sharonda M. Harris April 15 & 27, 2010 MTL Meeting Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics.
Strengthening Mathematics Instruction Cognitive Complexity and Instructional Strategies Dr. Vicki Jim
Teach a Same Lesson: Teach a Same Lesson: A Professional Development Strategy in China Jun Li Deakin University
Congruency to Math Standards How do we successfully monitor and support our teachers when we can’t be an expert in every content area?
Teacher Quality Workshops for 2010/2011
Orchestrating Mathematical Discussions October 7, 2014 Welcome to Day 1! Please take 2 dot stickers and place one on each line to represent your class.
Math Assessments Increasing Rigor February 20, 2013 & February 21, 2013.
Digging into the Instructional Design Laura Maly Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez MTL Session, September 20, 2011.
Problem Solving, Protocols and Practice through the Ages Wisconsin Mathematics Council Wisconsin Mathematics Council 41 st Annual Conference 41 st Annual.
Discourse and Mathematics: Get Connected! Rosann Hollinger and Bernard Rahming Milwaukee Public Schools April 27, 2012 NCTM Annual Meeting Philadelphia.
How Do You Know Students Learned What You Just Taught? Lee Ann PruskeRosann Hollinger Bernard Rahming Mathematics Teaching Specialists, Milwaukee Public.
Kindergarten Math Curriculum and Resource Parent Night Diana Garaitonandia, Ed.D. Louise Kirsh Susan Alloway Mandi Cooper.
High Cognitive vs. Low Cognitive 1. An effective mathematical task is needed to challenge and engage students intellectually. 2.
1 Mathematics Tasks for Cognitive Instruction Based on research from the Quasar Project found in Implementing Standards-Based Mathematics Instruction:
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of.
Exploring Cognitive Demands of Mathematical Tasks Milwaukee Public School Bernard Rahming Mathematics Teaching Specialist
Providing All Students with Access to High Quality Mathematics Instruction: The Role of Tasks in Achieving Equity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’
1 From Theory to Practice: Teaching mathematics through problem solving Misfer Saud AlSalouli AlHasa Teachers’ College King Abdulaziz City for Science.
Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh February 15, 2007
Engaging Students in High Level Cognitive Tasks Marjorie Graeff April 21, 2010 Division of Teaching & Learning.
1 Improving Teaching and Learning Through Questioning Lee Ann Pruske Bernard Rahming Rosann Hollinger Sharonda M. Harris March 16 & 18, 2010 MTL Meeting.
Materials Beliefs Cut-up beliefs Answer key Adjusting support tool Tasks activity Martha’s carpeting problem (on ppt) Fencing problem (labels) 3-5 tasks.
Math rigor facilitating student understanding through process goals
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Making Sense of Numbers and Operations Fraction Standards via a Set.
Algebraic Reasoning Content Academy—Grade 5 Round Rock ISD Learning by Doing® Sami Briceño.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Study Group 7 - High School Math (Algebra 1 & 2, Geometry) Welcome Back! Let’s.
Task Analysis Connecting Math and Science through class discussions.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of.
Math & Science Collaborative Analyzing Mathematical Tasks and the Mathematical Task Framework.
Teaching Math for Learning: Standards-Aligned System, Secondary Mathematics, Year 2.
CAAT Follow Up Meeting #1 Clay County High School Clay County Middle School.
Putting the Common core math standards into action
Welcome! 1 Conduct this experiment. –Place 10 red cards and 10 black cards face down in separate piles. –Choose some cards at random from the red pile.
1 What’s the Diff? Lee Ann Pruske Bernard Rahming Rosann Hollinger Sharonda M. Harris May 18 & 20, 2010 MTL Meeting Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics.
Developing and Using Meaningful Math Tasks The Key to Math Common Core Take a moment to record on a sticky: What is a meaningful Math Task?
Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’
Bernard Rahming Lee Ann Pruske Rosann Hollinger Sharonda Harris Assessment Session PRIME Framework: Teaching and Learning Leadership Principle MTL Meeting,
Analyzing Mathematical Tasks. Developed under the auspices of the NSF-funded ESP Project (ESI ) -- Directed by Margaret Smith, University of.
Successfully Implementing High- Level Tasks Based on work by Dr. Margaret S. Smith, University of Pittsburgh.
Amy Jones Lewis November 2010 Green River Regional Educational Cooperative MathPLUS Content Day 1: Student-Centered Problem Solving.
Developing and Using Meaningful Math Tasks The Key to Math Common Core Take a moment to record on a sticky: What is a meaningful Math Task?
Materials l Ppt slides (5) as handout Tasks books for principals Form for data collection Form for additional input Outcomes for project by session (Eoline)
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Enacting Instructional Tasks:
HSTW MMGW/TCTW Southern Regional Education Board Numeracy Across the Curriculum Friday, July 17, 2015 Jason Adair Amanda Merritt.
Getting to Know Webb’s. Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Level One (recall) requires simple recall of such information as fact, definition, term, or simple procedure.
Thinking about the ways students encounter mathematics.
Classroom Discourse and Classroom Practice Pandora Bedford Rosann Hollinger Bernard Rahming Hank Kepner Connie Laughlin October 12 & 14, 2010 MTL Meeting.
Find a Partner … … whose template/lesson is in the same grade band as yours. You’ll work with that person for the session. Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics.
Planning for Discourse in the Classroom Pandora Bedford Rosann Hollinger Bernard Rahming Hank Kepner Connie Laughlin December 9 th and 16 th, 2010 MTL.
Laura Maly Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez Explore Explore Explore Math Teacher Leaders October 18, 2011.
Improving Mathematical Number Sense & Technology Integration Teacher Quality Grant Peyton Forest Elementary Atlanta Public Schools Atlanta, GA July 23,
How can the examination of student/educator work be supported as a routine for continuous improvement?
The Mathematical Education of Inservice Teachers: Lessons Learned Opportunities & Challenges Diane J. Briars NCSM Immediate Past President Co-Director,
Using High-Level Tasks to Become Better Mathematicians
MELT: Fraction, Ratio, Proportion and Geometry
Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical Knowledge and
Examining Productive Talk
Are All Math Tasks Created Equally?
Are All Math Tasks Created Equally?
MATHEMATICAL TASKS TO SKILLS
Are All Math Tasks Created Equally?
Mathematical Tasks, Cognitive Demand and Higher Level Mathematics
Presentation transcript:

Exploring Cognitive Demands Part 2 Rosann Hollinger Lee Ann Pruske Sharonda M. Harris Bernard Rahming January 20, 28, 2010 Math Teacher Leader Meeting Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) with support by the National Science Foundation

2 We Are Learning To Further our understanding of the cognitive demands of mathematical tasks. 2. Explore the factors associated with the decline or maintenance of cognitive demands.

3 Success Criteria You will be successful if at the end of the session you can – identify the cognitive demand levels of mathematical tasks –describe the factors that lead to the maintenance or decline of high-level cognitive demands during setup and implementation of mathematical tasks.

4 Cognitive Demands… “The kind and level of thinking required of students in order to successfully engage with and solve the task.” Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, (2000)

5 The Fencing Task Ms. Brown’s class will raise rabbits for their spring science fair. They have 24 feet of fencing with which to build a rectangular rabbit pen to keep the rabbits. a)If Ms. Brown’s students want their rabbits to have as much room as possible, how long would each of the slides of the pen be? b) How long would each of the sides of the pen be if had only 16 feet of fencing? c) How would you go about determining the pen with the most room for any amount of fencing? Organize your work so that someone else who reads it will understand it. Source: Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, (2000)

6 Math Task Discussion Individually work on the problem Share your problem solutions at your table

7 Math Task Cognitive Demand Level Individually work on the problem Share your problem solutions at your table Using the handouts from December, determine the cognitive demand level of the math task.

8 Four Levels of Cognitive Demands in Mathematical Tasks Low Level Cognitive Demands Memorization Tasks Procedures Without Connections to understanding, meaning or concepts Tasks High Level Cognitive Demands Procedures With Connections to understanding, meaning or concepts Tasks Doing Mathematics Tasks

9 Reading: “Using Cognitively Complex Tasks in the Classroom” Individually read pages Reading Lens: In what ways do teacher actions during the setup and implementation phases impact the cognitive demands of mathematical tasks?

10 Mathematical Tasks Definition “…not only the problems written in the textbook or a teacher’s lesson plan, but also the classroom activity that surrounds the way in which those problems are set up and actually carried out by teachers and students.” Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, (2000)

11 Tasks in the Classroom Setup Phase: Teacher communicates to students expectations- what to do, how to do it, and with which resources. Implementation Phase: From the time students begin to work until the next task begins.

12 Mathematical Tasks Framework Figure 1.3 TASKS As they appear in curricular/ instructional materials TASKS As set up by teachers TASKS As implemented by students Student Learnin g A representation of how mathematical tasks unfold during classroom instruction. (Stein & Smith, 1998, Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School)

13 Cognitive Demands and Features TaskLevel of Cognitive Demand Explanation of Categorization Features Fencing Problem Doing Mathematics There is no pathway suggested by the task. The focus is on looking for the underlying mathematical structure. Requires an explanation Involves multiple steps Uses a diagram

14 Group Reading Activity Table Group Readings 1~ “Maintenance of high-level cognitive demands” 2~ “Decline into procedures” 3~ “Decline into unsystematic exploration” 4~ “Decline into nonmathematical activity”

15 Group Poster Activity 1~Maintenance 2~Procedures 3~Unsystematic 4~ Nonmathematical Individually read your section As a group discuss the highlights of the section Create one poster per section capturing the important points (What Teachers do/Students do)

16 Poster Presentations In your notebook create a graphic organizer for note taking Maintenance of high-level cognitive demands Decline into procedures Decline into unsystematic exploration Decline into nonmathematical activity

17 Mathematical Tasks Framework Figure 1.3 TASKS As they appear in curricular/ instructional materials TASKS As set up by teachers TASKS As implemented by students Student Learnin g A representation of how mathematical tasks unfold during classroom instruction. (Stein & Smith, 1998, Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School)

18 December Homework Mathematical Tasks Discussion Each person presents one of their tasks. Justify why it is Doing Mathematics or Procedures with Connections As a table group, discuss the possible factors involved in maintaining or declining the level of cognitive demands in the set up or implementation phases of the math task in the classroom.

19 “When teachers take the opportunity to analyze the tasks, they become more alert to the potential for slippage between intentions and actions in their teaching. Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, (2000)

20 Building Academic Vocabulary Cognitive Demand Step 5: Think – Pair - Share

21 Success Criteria You will be successful if at the end of the session you can – identify the cognitive demand levels of mathematical tasks –describe the factors that lead to the maintenance or decline of high-level cognitive demands during setup and implementation of mathematical tasks.

22 Feedback Form Question In what ways have you used your knowledge and understanding of cognitive demands in your roles of “leader of self” and “leader of others”?