Programming in Rural Development 2007 - 2013 Jela Tvdonova NR 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
European Commission - Directorate General for Agriculture EU rural development policy
Advertisements

Rural Development Policy
Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, October 2005 Rural Development.
1 PROGRAMMING TRANSITION From SAPARD to RDPs and SPDs/OPs.
Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, July 2005 Rural Development.
Rural Development in Lithuania from to Jurgita Stakėnienė Rural Development Department Ministry of Agriculture of The Republic of Lithuania.
Zuzana Sarvasova National Forest Centre Zvolen
The Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development Department of the Rural Development Polish perspective Dr Dariusz Nieć International Conference „Future.
Cyprus Project Management Society
RURAL DEVELOPMENT POLICIES IN BULGARIA Nedka Ivanova UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, November 2005 Rural Development.
Presentation of the workshop results to the plenary session A) Strengthening rural entrepreneurship by connecting the local production with other economic.
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development Department of Rural Development LEADER+ TYPE MEASURE IN POLAND International Conference: „Future of European.
Rural Development Programme 2014 – 2020 Local Government Practioners Workshop 12 th February Lorraine Lynas RDP Managing Authority.
The EU rural development plan and the international context Sabine LARUELLE Ministre des Classes Moyennes et de l’Agriculture FSAGx – November.
CAP Second Pillar: From structural policies to rural development Lecture 15. Economics of Food Markets Alan Matthews.
CAP Second Pillar: From structural policies to rural development Lecture 10. Economics of Food Markets Alan Matthews.
EU Rural Development Policy and Tourism Jean-Michel Courades DG Agriculture and Rural Development European Commission.
Axis 3: Diversification of the rural economy and Quality of Life in rural areas Axis 4: The Leader approach DG AGRI, October 2005 Rural Development
Nic Lampkin Institute of Rural Sciences
Rural Development Programme for Ireland – Pat Moynan, Dept. of Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs.
Preparation for the next programming period DG AGRI, November 2005 EU rural development policy.
Rural Development policy
1 MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FOOD Rural Development Policy
EUROPEAN COHESION POLICY AT A GLANCE Introduction to the EU Structural Funds Ctibor Kostal Sergej Muravjov.
EU Rural Development Policy
The implementation of the rural development policy and its impacts on innovation and modernisation of rural economy Christian Vincentini, European Commission.
A project implemented by the HTSPE consortium This project is funded by the European Union SUSTAINABLE GROWTH LIFE
Riga – Latvia, 4 & 5 December 2006
EU rural development policy – today and after 2013
Technical meeting for LFA in Bulgaria MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY National Program for Rural Development in Bulgaria Bonn, Germany.
European Commission Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development EU rural development policy.
Ignacio Seoane Unit AGRI F6: Bioenergy, biomass, forestry and climate change EU Forestry Strategy Screening of Chapter 27, Brussels 5 April 2006.
Rural Development in Sweden Rural areas have been depopulated rapidly Farming and forestry used to be dominant in rural economy 60% of the farmers are.
The LEADER approach to integrated rural development in the EU UNDP International Conference, Kosice, 5 October 2009 Jean-Michel COURADES AGRI G1 - Consistency.
Tbilisi, 5 th March 2015 The LEADER Approach. Practical information and implementation The Leader method - transferring V4 experiences to Georgia (No.
European Commission Introduction to the Community Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity PROGRESS
Perspectives of Rural Development Programmes in Poland Nina Dobrzyńska Perspectives of Rural Development Programmes in Poland Nina Dobrzyńska The Ministry.
European Commission - Directorate General for Agriculture 1 EU rural development policy Nikiforos SIVENAS European Commission Directorate General.
1 Improving the competitiveness of the agricultural and forestry sector Imre Wayda Senior counsellor Ministry of Rural Development 27th June 2011.
To involve persons who have second home in rural areas Kristine Hindriks Ministry of Agriculture/ Rural Development Department
Wageningen International Introduction agri environment measures Pleven Agri environment in the Netherlands Background Natura 2000 and agricultere Common.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.
1 LIFE+ COUNCIL WORKING GROUP 4 OCTOBER Discussion Points 1. LIFE+ in Context: Environment funding under the Financial Perspectives.
Mara Lai ENRD CP, Birštonas, November 15th, 2013 EAFRD: SUPPORT TO YOUNG PEOPLE IN RURAL AREAS.
“One year of EU 25 – Nature Conservation policy experience regarding the 2nd pillar of the CAP and reform prospects” The main points of the new EAFRD Regulation.
NATIONAL STRATEGIC PLAN OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT FOR THE PROGRAMMING PERIOD 2007 – 2013 SLOVAK REPUBLIC.
Introduction Following the Rural Development Regulation agreed in Sept 2005, the new RD policy for the period is characterised by continuity and.
KAJ MORTENSEN, HEAD OF SAPARD UNIT, DG AGRI EUROPEAN COMMISSION Pre-accession Assistance for Rural Development.
Rural Development The Second Pillar of the Common Agricultural Policy Dr. Rolf Moehler.
Loretta Dormal Marino Deputy Director General DG for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission IFAJ Congress 2010 – Brussels, 22 April 2010.
Commission proposal for a new LIFE Regulation ( ) Presentation to Directors Meeting DK 22 May 2012.
Jela Tvrdonova, The EU priorities:  Use the Leader approach for introducing innovation in the thematic axis  better governance at the local level.
The delivery of rural development policies: Some reflections on problems and perspectives in EU countries INEA conference: The territorial approach in.
National strategic plan for rural development SR Jela Tvrdoňová.
European Commission Directorate General Environment Page 1 Regulation (EC) No 2152/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning monitoring.
TAIEX Workshop on Agricultural Advisory Services in the EU Kiev, Ukraine February 2016 Peculiarities of legal regulation of the advisory service.
European Commission Agriculture and Rural Development Rural Development Policy in the period and in the Future Financial Perspectives Pedro.
"The role of Rural Networks as effective tools to promote rural development" TAIEX/Local Administration Facility Seminar on Rural Development Brussels,
Leader Axis Rural Development Policy by Jean-Michel Courades AGRI-F3.
Adaptation to climate change in the Common Agricultural Policy
EU Rural Development Policy Budapest, September 2006
Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development
Approaches to fund Roma inclusion from the
Practical information and implementation
Title: EastAgri Workshop
Sergiu Didicescu, Unit H1 DG Agriculture and Rural Development
How the proposed new delivery model for the CAP will provide the ground for the further development of Smart Villages’ approaches? Beata Adamczyk European.
EU rural development policy
Strategic Steering Group on Agriculture & Water Framework Directive
Presentation transcript:

Programming in Rural Development Jela Tvdonova NR 2007

Heading - management and protection of natural resources The sustainable management and protection of natural resources covers following parts: Common agriculture policy CAP New Common Fishery Policy Rural Development Policy Environmental matters are also of great importance and the Commission suggests increasing funding in this area and developing an instrument which would allow strictly environmental measures to be taken ("Life+"). The Commission proposes simplifying the financing arrangements and structures of these policies.

3 Regulations and 3 Funds CAP: European Agriculture Guarantee Fund, EC Regulation 1290/2005 on the CAP implementation and financial instruments CFP: European Fishery Measures and EC Regulation 861/2006 for the implementation of the Common Fishery Policy in the areas of te Law of the Sea RDP: European Agriculture Fund for Rural Development, EC Regulation 1698/2005 on the implemntation of rural development policies

Funds ObjectivesFinancial instruments ObjectivesFinancial instruments LEADER plusEAGGF Leader in mainstream p. EAFRD RDEAGGF – guarantee, guidance (accompaning measures) RD – outside Cohesion Policy CAPEAGGF - guarantee CAPEAF Fishery restructuring FIFGCommon Fishery PolicyEFF

Strategic guidelines for new RD policy The strategic approach European strategy for RD National strategic plans

Rural development and the EU’s overall aims Placing the CAP and rural development in context - Strong economic performance must go hand in hand with the sustainable use of natural resources. (residency Conclusions, European Council, Göteborg 2001 ) The New CAP is replacing the Old CAP. Improving international competitiveness Increasing market orientation through decoupling Bringing agricultural policy into line with consumer expectations Making the new CAP work for Lisbon

Priorities for Rural Development Horizontal/cross cutting priorities (all axes): focus on the human capital aspect (knowledge, training, information and entrepreneurship) and on the participation of particular groups such as women and young/elderly people because of the specific role they can play in rural development; increased integration of rural areas into the Information Society (use of broadband technologies and ICT); improved governance (coherent programming, integrated approaches, integration of regional and sub- regional development strategies and in particular of the Leader approach in overall programming).

Priorities for Rural Development Priorities linked to competitiveness (axis 1): knowledge transfer and innovation in the food chain, targeting in particular small and medium sized enterprises; priority sectors for capital investment in view of restructuring pressures, in particular in the new MS. Targets and indicators will need to be set for the agriculture and food sector to measure progress in increasing competitiveness and show the contribution of axis 1 to the Community Lisbon Action Programme.

Priorities for Rural Development Priorities linked to environment/land management (axis 2): the conservation of natural resources and the protection of the environment in rural areas. This should also allow, through adequate land management, a contribution of agriculture and forestry to already agreed (international)/EU environmental strategies and legislation (Natura 2000, Water Framework Directive, Kyoto Protocol), relating in particular to biodiversity, water and climate change. Targets and indicators will be have to be set to measure how axis 2 contributes to halting biodiversity decline, achieving the WFD objectives and climate change mitigation (emission reduction, renewable resources, carbon sinks).

Priorities for Rural Development Priorities linked to wider rural development (axis 3): creation of employment opportunities in the fields of diversification and quality of life. Targets and indicators will be have to be set to measure how axis 3 contributes to the Community Lisbon Action Programme in terms of jobs and participation rates through diversification and small scale infrastructure. A certain differentiation by type of rural area (peri-urban, intermediate, remote) will be needed in the light of their specific problems and opportunities.

Priorities for Rural Development Priorities for Leader (axis 4): the above priorities adapted for local strategies and cooperation.

Objectives Support for rural development shall contribute to achieving the following objectives: (a) improving the competitiveness of agriculture and forestry by supporting restructuring, development and innovation; (b) improving the environment and the countryside by supporting land management; (c) improving the quality of life in rural areas and encouraging diversification of economic activity.

The EU rural development policy principles Complementarity RD policies (CAP II Pillar) accompany market and income support policies (CAP I Pillar), consistent with cohesion policies RD funds should not substitute national funds and private resources

The EU rural development policy Principles Partnership Programme priorities and eligibility criteria have to be developed in close consultation with => economic and social partners => regional and local authorities => civil society organisations The role of economic and social partners in the Programme Monitoring Committee

The EU approach to RD Institutional bodies involved: a.Programme Managing Authority (usually MoA) b.Programme Monitoring Committee (MoA, economic and social partners, other Ministries, Research Institutes, etc.) c.Paying Agency (implementing, monitoring, controlling) d.Sub-regional offices of PA e.Programme monitoring institutions (to be designed) f.Experts in sub-committees (e.g. linked to individual measures) g.Local authorities h.Programme evaluators (independent)

The EU approach to RD National Strategy Plan a.Evaluation of economic, social and environmental situation in the country b.Thematic and territorial priorities c.Description of RD programmes (incl. Budget) d.The means to ensure coordination of RD programme with other EU co-financed programmes and policies e.Description of arrangements for establishing the national rural network

The EU approach to RD Rural Development Programme a.Evaluation of economic, social and environmental situation in the country b.Justification of selected priorities c.Description of RD measures d.Financing plan (by measures) e.Description of monitoring and evaluation system f.Results of consultations with economic and social partners

The EU approach to RD Monitoring and Evaluation (ex-ante, mid- term, ex-post, on-going) –Agreement as to the objects and areas of an ongoing monitoring of programme performance; –Clear definition of monitoring indicators –Data to be collected to calculate above indicators; –Institution responsible for monitoring reports, description of applied indicators, etc. –Monitoring analysis; –Formal discussion of monitoring results; –Division of institutional responsibilities (data collection, data processing, data transfer, etc.).

RD Axes and Measures Axis 1: Improving competitiveness of farming, forestry, agri-food economy A minimum of 10% of the national envelope has to be spent on Axis 1. Measures: Measures aimed at promoting knowledge and improving human potential through: vocational training and information actions, including diffusion of scientific knowledge and innovative practises, for persons engaged in the agricultural,food and forestry sectors; setting up of young farmers; early retirement of farmers and farm workers; use of advisory services by farmers and forest holders; setting up of farm management, farm relief and farm advisory services, as well as of forestry advisory services; measures aimed at restructuring and developing physical

RD Axes and Measures Axis 1: Improving competitiveness of farming, forestry, agri-food economy A minimum of 10% of the national envelope has to be spent on Axis 1. Measures: Measures aimed at restructuring and developing physical potential and promoting innovation through: modernisation of agricultural holdings; cooperation for development of new products,processes and technologies in the agriculture and food sector and in the forestry sector; improving and developing infrastructure related to the development and adaptation of agriculture and forestry; restoring agricultural production potential damaged by natural disasters and introducing appropriate prevention actions;

RD Axes and Measures Axis 1: Improving competitiveness of farming, forestry, agri-food economy A minimum of 10% of the national envelope has to be spent on Axis 1. Measures: Measures aimed at improving the quality of agricultural production and products by: helping farmers to adapt to demanding standards based on Community legislation; supporting farmers who participate in food quality schemes; supporting producer groups for information and promotion activities for products under food quality schemes;

RD Axes and Measures Axis 1: Improving competitiveness of farming, forestry, agri-food economy A minimum of 10% of the national envelope has to be spent on Axis 1. Measures: Transitional measures for the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia concerning: supporting semi-subsistence agricultural holdings undergoing restructuring; supporting setting up of producer groups.

RD Axes and Measures Axis 2: Environment and countryside Agri-environmental measures remain compulsory. Beneficiaries must respect 19 obligatory EU environmental regulation and national mandatory requirements for agriculture (good agricultural practices – codex) A minimum of 25% of the national envelope has to be spent on Axis 2. Measures targeting the sustainable use of agriculturalland through: natural handicap payments to farmers in mountain areas; L 277/18 EN Official Journal of the European Union payments to farmers in areas with handicaps, other than mountain areas; Natura 2000 payments and payments linked to Directive 2000/60/EC; agri-environment payments; animal welfare payments; support for non-productive investments

RD Axes and Measures Axis 2: Environment and countryside Agri-environmental measures remain compulsory. Beneficiaries must respect 19 obligatory EU environmental regulation and national mandatory requirements for agriculture (good agricultural practices – codex) A minimum of 25% of the national envelope has to be spent on Axis 2. Measures targeting the sustainable use of forestry land through: first afforestation of agricultural land; first establishment of agroforestry systems on agricultural land; first afforestation of non-agricultural land; Natura 2000 payments; forest-environment payments; restoring forestry potential and introducing prevention actions; support for non-productive investments.

RD Axes and Measures Axis 3: Improving quality of life and diversification of the rural economy A minimum of 10% of the national envelope has to be spent on Axis 3. Measures: diversify the rural economy, comprising: diversification into non-agricultural activities, support for the creation and development of microenterprises with a view to promoting entrepreneurship and developing the economic fabric, encouragement of tourism activities; improve the quality of life in the rural areas, comprising: basic services for the economy and rural population, village renewal and development, conservation and upgrading of the rural heritage; training and information measure for economic actors operating in the fields covered by axis 3; skills-acquisition and animation measure with a view to preparing and implementing a local development strategy.

RD Axes and Measures Axis 4: the LEADER approach Each RD programme must have a LEADER element for the implementation of bottom-up local development strategies of local action groups. A minimum of 5%(2,5 for NMS) of national programme funding is compulsory for LEADER. Measures: The support granted under the Leader axis shall be for: implementing local development strategies as referred to in Article 62(1)(a), with a view to achieving the objectives of one or more of the three other axes defined in Sections 1, 2 and 3; implementing cooperation projects involving the objectives selected under point (a); running the local action group, acquiring skills and animating the territory as referred to in Article 59.

Unified system of programming, financing and monitoring EU Rural development fund 1.axis Competitiveness 2. axis Protection of environment + Land management 3. axis Quality of life + diversification “ LEADER” Axis Rural development

Thank you for your attention! Jela Tvrdonova k