Keeping Wisconsin Moving: An Overview of WisDOT’s DMS Travel Times Kelly Langer, WisDOT, Freeway Operations Supervisor.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PARK IT HERE! Real-Time Parking Information in Uptown Charlotte PARK IT HERE! Real-Time Parking Information in Uptown Charlotte Presenters: Cole Dagerhardt.
Advertisements

ITS Application of advanced sensor, computer, electronics, and communications technologies and management strategies in an integrated manner providing.
Brian Kary and Terry Haukom - RTMC.  Provide Delay Information To Motorists  Potential for Diversion  Perception Tracking Survey Results.
I-80 Robb Drive to Vista Boulevard Design-Build Project I-80 Robb Drive to Vista Boulevard Design-Build Project.
Project Construction Update August 30, 2011 I-5 North Stockton Freeway Widening and Pavement Reconstruction Project Between Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
Use of Traffic Incident Management in Intelligent Traffic Systems Mark Meints Emergency Program Specialist Nebraska Department of Roads.
Dynamic Traffic Assignment: Integrating Dynameq into Long Range Planning Studies Model City 2011 – Portland, Oregon Richard Walker - Portland Metro Scott.
February 9, 2006TransNow Student Conference Using Ground Truth Geospatial Data to Validate Advanced Traveler Information Systems Freeway Travel Time Messages.
June 16, 2004 Dr. Robert Bertini Michael Rose Evaluation of the “COMET” Incident Response Program Oregon Department of Transportation.
Month XX, 2004 Dr. Robert Bertini Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of ITS Investments: Ramp Meters Oregon Department of Transportation.
San Antonio TransGuide Travel Time Program Roger L. Strain Research Analyst Southwest Research Institute San Antonio, TX
Traffic Incident Management – a Strategic Focus Inspector Peter Baird National Adviser: Policy and Legislation: Road Policing.
Assessment and Refinement of Real-Time Travel Time Algorithms for Use in Practice January 10, 2007.
Phoenix International Raceway (PIR) Presented By: Nicolaas Swart Traffic Engineering & ITS Program Manager Maricopa County DOT April 26, 2006 Presented.
WVDOT GTI SECTION Status Update for Districts. AGENDA Introduction. Introduction. Status Update. Status Update. How to Spatially Enable Database. How.
Florida Department of Transportation District 4 TSM&O Program Advanced Transportation Management System (ATMS) Installation in South Broward County ATMS.
Assessment and Refinement of Real-Time Travel Time Algorithms for Use in Practice Nov 8, 2006.
Atlas Pitu Mirchandani Professor and Director, ATLAS Research Center Systems and Industrial Engineering Department The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Illinois Department of Transportation Emergency Management I-74 Reconstruction Project Peoria, Illinois ITS Midwest Annual Meeting February 7, 2006.
Work Zone & Incident Management in Wisconsin Process & Applications Michael S. Hardy Wisconsin D.O.T. 633 W. Wisconsin Ave, Suite 1200 Milwaukee, WI
1 Presented at 2008 North American Paramics User Group Meeting 1 TMC Operator Training Using Microscopic Simulation Lianyu Chu CLR Analytics Inc July 14,
National Road Pricing Conference June 4, 2010 Mark Burris, Texas Transportation Institute Jessie Yung, Federal Highway Administration.
Definition - CommuterLink CommuterLink is an interagency transportation management system. What does that mean? Put another way, it is the use of computer.
March 27, 2007 – Hill Farms March 28, 2007 – NE Region Wisconsin LCS Lane Closure Planning System LCS Oversight Group Meeting Steven Parker - TOPS Lab.
Kern Motorist Aid Authority Services And Operations.
Travel Times on Dynamic Message Signs Brandy Meehan Transportation Information Management Team Federal Highway Administration September 28, 2005.
1 Dixie ITS Architecture Study Section ? Utah ITS History.
Fast Forward Full Speed Ahead Presented at the Joint ITS Georgia / Tennessee Annual Meeting September 25, 2006 by Carla W. Holmes, P.E., PTOE Georgia Department.
Transpo 2012 The Future of Traffic Incident Management, October 30, 2012 Javier Rodriguez, P.E., ITS Operations Engineer Joe Snyder, TMC Manager FDOT District.
1 Modeling Active Traffic Management for the I-80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (ICM) Project Terry Klim, P.E. Kevin Fehon, P.E. DKS Associates D.
Incident Management in Central Arkansas: Current Settings and Proposed Extensions Weihua Xiao Yupo Chan University of Arkansas at Little Rock.
University of Maryland Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering By G.L. Chang, M.L. Franz, Y. Liu, Y. Lu & R. Tao BACKGROUND SYSTEM DESIGN DATA.
Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.
Minnesota I-394 ICM Corridor. What is Integrated Corridor Management? Independent Network of Transportation Systems –Freeways, including managed lanes.
Rural Intersection Collision Avoidance System (RICAS) US Highway 53 and State Highway 73 Minong, Wisconsin Additional information Project Website:
July 29, 2009 George Saylor, PE ODOT Senior ITS Engineer.
Accuracy in Real-Time Estimation of Travel Times Galen McGill, Kristin Tufte, Josh Crain, Priya Chavan, Enas Fayed 15 th World Congress on Intelligent.
NATMEC June 5, 2006 Comparative Analysis Of Various Travel Time Estimation Algorithms To Ground Truth Data Using Archived Data Christopher M. Monsere Research.
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Planes, Trains, Automobiles and More Ardrey Kell High School February 23, 2012.
Moving People Overview. Key Themes Road Hierarchy/Classification Strategic freight corridors Strategic public transport corridors Review and implementation.
Smart Work Zone Systems Presented by Prahlad D. Pant, Ph.D. PDP Associates Inc.
SMARTZONE Deployment on I-95 North Carolina Department of Transportation STAY ALERT Work Zone.
Enhanced 511: Beyond the Basics Jerry Woods Florida DOT – District 5 iFlorida - Automated Message Generation Based on Travel Times.
California Department of Transportation Transportation Management Systems (TMS) and their role in addressing congestion Discussion Materials Lake Arrowhead.
CrossTown Traffic - “Braking News You Can Use” Steven W. Cummins, P.E. Traffic Signal Systems Manager Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government Division.
Travel Time and Reliability: Is Data Quality a Showstopper? The Georgia Navigator Experience Angshuman Guin URS Corporation
Southeast Michigan Council of Governments. Working Together to Improve Regional Operations through Traffic Incident Management Working Together to Improve.
January 23, 2006Transportation Research Board 85 th Annual Meeting Using Ground Truth Geospatial Data to Validate Advanced Traveler Information Systems.
Georgia’s Intelligent Transportation System
Brian Kary Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Tennessee DOT SmartWay Update Presented by: Don Dahlinger, P.E. – TDOT September 2006 Presented by: Don Dahlinger, P.E. – TDOT September 2006.
Corridor Congestion Management Innovation for better mobility sm.
2004 Transportation M etropolitan A tlanta P erformance Report – Congestion Measures Presentation to ITS Georgia August 29, 2005.
Office of Traffic, Safety, and Operations 1 Reference Location Signs and Enhanced Ref. Loc. Signs –Enhanced Reference Location Signs, which enhance the.
July 13, 2005ITE District 6 Annual Meeting Using Ground Truth Geospatial Data to Validate Advanced Traveler Information Systems Freeway Travel Time Messages.
Regional Concept for Transportation Operations: An action plan to address transportation operations in Southeast Michigan Talking Technology & Transportation.
(is it necessary?) By: Tim Torrini per. two Ramp meters are the “stop and go signals located at the entrance ramps of freeways to regulate the amount.
Rainier Avenue South Pilot Project Update Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board Project Manager Jim Curtin September 2, 2015.
ITE District 6 June 27, 2006 Incorporating Incident Data into a Freeway Data Archive for Improved Performance Measurement ITE District 6 June 27, 2006.
Work Zone Operational Enhancements Jennifer Livingston, P.E. ADOT – Senior Project Manager.
ITE District 6 June 27, 2006 Incorporating Incident Data into a Freeway Data Archive for Improved Performance Measurement ITE District 6 June 27, 2006.
COMMUNICATING PERFORMANCE TO VDOT Sanhita Lahiri, P.E., PTOE 1.
Brian Kary Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Abstract Dynamic Message Signs (DMS) on freeways are used to provide a variety of information to motorists including incident and construction information,
Work Zone & Incident Management Strategies Denise Markow, PE, TSMO Administrator Susan Soucie, PE ITS Project Manager ACEC/NHDOT 2016 Technical Exchange.
TMCs – The Next Generation ITS Tennessee Annual Meeting / October 8, 2009 Dr. Robert Edelstein, PE, PTOE.
ITS Virginia Annual Conference April 20, 2012 Sensys Networks and the Sensys Networks logo are trademarks of Sensys Networks, Inc. Other product and company.
The I-465 West Leg Reconstruction Project
Nevada Next Generation 511 System 9 months to design, test and deploy
Using Ground Truth Geospatial Data to Validate Advanced Traveler Information Systems Freeway Travel Time Messages CTS Transportation Seminar Series, January.
Presentation transcript:

Keeping Wisconsin Moving: An Overview of WisDOT’s DMS Travel Times Kelly Langer, WisDOT, Freeway Operations Supervisor

Southeast Wisconsin at a glance City of Milwaukee population: 676,000 Milwaukee Co. population: 1,500,000 Heavily traveled freeway corridors: I-94 EB / WB from downtown to Hwy 100 (*AADT: 153,000) USH 45 NB / SB North of I-94 (AADT: 137,000) I-94 NB / SB South of I-894 (AADT: 143,000) *AADT= Average Annual Daily Traffic

WisDOT Traffic Operations Center 36 DMS on freeways and major arterials 125 ramp meters in metro Milwaukee 100 cameras on Milwaukee area freeways and major arterials Control Room operated 24/7 Highway Advisory Radio (HAR) Crash Investigation Sites Media Partnerships

Traffic Incident Management Enhancement Program - TIME Bi-monthly meetings of law enforcement, public partners, private partners, universities Sub-committee sessions for special events, incident management, corridor traffic management, outreach and public information ITS allows the freeway corridor to be viewed and operated as a single entity, which aids in managing congestion Dealing with 30% increase in volume over the past ten years

WisDOT DMS Timeline 1993 Local traffic reporter began giving travel times as part of his traffic reports via airplane 1994 WisDOT began using loop detectors that were installed in 1970’s to calculate speed/volume 1995 Began limited DMS travel time publishing Only published after heavily verified by test drives Only displayed during control room hours – aprox. 10 hours per day

WisDOT DMS Timeline 1998 Improved r eliability of travel times and computer network 1999 More DMS added – more travel times added Some new travel times based on public input Travel times added to WisDOT internet pages 2000 Travel times displayed 24/7 on every DMS Continue to monitor travel times and adjust as appropriate 2004 “Time of Day” travel times began

WisDOT DMS Usage Travel Times Incidents Amber Alert Special Events Construction and weather information Congestion information

How Travel Times are Calculated Website updates every 3 minutes Updates every 60 seconds FTMS* Server: Average Speed/Known Distance = Time Traffic Operations Center In pavement detection: ¼ mile spacing in urban areas 2 mile spacing in rural areas *FTMS= Freeway Traffic Management System

WisDOT Travel Times All corridors in metro-Milwaukee have at least one travel time (Four inbound corridors and five outbound corridors) Destinations for travel times were chosen by interchanges or major cross streets – frequently use static signed streets to allow travel times to be useful for visitors as well as commuters No data from “probe” vehicles, detector data only Arterial DMS - Roadside

WisDOT Travel Times Simple requirements were developed for each travel time – travel times on DMS round up Travel Times will not display if 33% of the links are invalid WisDOT internet site displays travel times to the second

Travel Time Calculations The shorter the travel time distance (Point A to Point B), the more accurate the travel time is likely to be for the driver If the FTMS server is not operating properly, computer program removes travel times from the DMS’ within 10 minutes 66% of the detectors have to be reporting valid data for travel times to be published (i.e. at least one lane of data can be non- reporting or have 33% detector failure to display the travel time)

Data Extractor  Enables WisDOT to retrieve volume, speed, and occupancy data from the SE Wisconsin Freeway  Used to retime Ramp Meters while using up-to-date data  Used to prepare reports for various different agencies (Sheriff’s Dept., media, public)

Obstacles to posting Travel Times Maintenance of detectors and verifying detector accuracy (Making sure reporting links are sending accurate data to the communications server) Developing consensus among WisDOT staff with public and media input as to which initial routes to display Developing meaningful travel time messages that would fit on signs Putting confidence in reliability of network and software before allowing messages to display without immediate oversight Ongoing travel time verification

Public Involvement and Feedback No formal campaign for introducing travel times due to the length of time of implementation News agencies requested several interviews over the course of implementation Initial skepticism regarding accuracy was quickly replaced by motorists depending on the travel times No formal study of public perception has been conducted “You’ve spoiled us with the travel time availability…” “I love your travel time website! I surf it every day!” “The travel times help me determine which route to take when I get to the Hale Interchange; if both routes are backed up I can exit at Layton Ave.” “I do appreciate the ability to view this travel time information. It is very helpful to the general public.”

WisDOT’s Future Travel Time Plans WisDOT is developing software to report travel times via Highway Advisory Radio – AM 1610 (“Text to Voice”) Travel Time Facts Longest DMS travel time route is 20 minutes in free-flow traffic Shortest DMS travel time route is 6 minutes in free-flow traffic 33 DMS and ADMS signs display travel times in southeastern Wisconsin (of 36 signs) Travel time routes are displayed on the public WisDOT website – various news agencies and other sites link to the data

THANK YOU! QUESTIONS?? Kelly Langer – Wisconsin Department of Transportation Traffic Operations Center 633 W. Wisconsin Ave. Suite 1200 Milwaukee, WI –