S4/S5 Calibration The Calibration team G050430-00-Z.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LIGO-G Z S3/S4 Calibration A cast of thousands… including Peter Fritschel, Gabriela González, Corey Gray, Mike Landry, Greg Mendell, Brian O’Reilly,
Advertisements

For the Collaboration GWDAW 2005 Status of inspiral search in C6 and C7 Virgo data Frédérique MARION.
Calibration of the gravitational wave signal in the LIGO detectors Gabriela Gonzalez (LSU), Mike Landry (LIGO-LHO), Patrick Sutton (PSU) with the calibration.
Spring LSC 2001 LIGO-G W E2 Amplitude Calibration of the Hanford Recombined 2km IFO Michael Landry, LIGO Hanford Observatory Luca Matone, Benoit.
G Z 1 Block-Normal, Event Display and Q-scan Based Glitch and Veto Studies Shantanu Desai for Penn. State Burst Group And Glitch Working Group.
Calculation of and. Wanted independent method to calculate calibration factors to use in search codes. XS, Jolien Creighton, Mike Landry.
LIGO-G D LIGO calibration during the S3 science run Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory Justin Garofoli, Luca Matone, Hugh Radkins (LHO),
LIGO Reduced Data Sets E7 standard reduced data set RDS generation for future runs decimation examples LIGO-G Z Isabel Leonor (w/ Robert Schofield)
LIGO-G W Proposed LHO Commissioning Activities in May 02 Fred Raab 29 Apr 02.
LIGO-G W S5 Calibration Status and Comparison of S5 results from three interferometer calibration techniques Rick Savage LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Calibration of data in the time domain (or how to generate 1800s long SFTs from time domain data) XS, Bruce Allen, Mike Landry, Soumya Mohanty, Malik Rachmanov,
9/23/08G Z Status of the S5 calibration Michael Landry For the Calibration Committee LSC September 2008 Michael Landry For the Calibration Committee.
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Use of detector calibration info in the burst group
LIGO-G W S5 Calibration Status and Comparison of S5 results from three interferometer calibration techniques Rick Savage LIGO Hanford Observatory.
1 Time-Domain Calibration Update Xavier Siemens, Mike Landry, Gaby Gonzalez, Brian O’Reilly, Martin Hewitson, Bruce Allen, Jolien Creighton.
LIGO Response to High Frequency Gravitational Waves Implications for Calibration Hunter Elliott Mentors: Rick Savage, Greg Mendell, Malik Rakhmanov.
8/18/06Gxxxxxx Introduction to Calibration Brian O’Reilly SciMon Camp 2006 Brian O’Reilly SciMon Camp 2006.
Calibration of TAMA300 in Time Domain Souichi TELADA, Daisuke TATSUMI, Tomomi AKUTSU, Masaki ANDO, Nobuyuki KANDA and the TAMA collaboration.
ALLEGRO G Z LSC, Livingston 23 March, Calibration for the ALLEGRO resonant detector -- S2 and S4 Martin McHugh, Loyola University New Orleans.
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Use of detector calibration info in the burst group
March 17, 2008LSC-Virgo meeting1/12 Virgo Status B. Mours.
LIGO- G Z LSC ASIS Meeting LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee 1 S2 Hardware Pulsar Injections Bruce.
Calibration of LIGO data in the time domain X. Siemens, B. Allen, M. Hewitson, M. Landry.
3/19/08G D S5 Calibration Status Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC March 2008 Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC.
LIGO-G I S5 calibration status Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory for the LSC Calibration Committee LSC/Virgo Meeting May 22, 2007 Cascina,
THE EVENT DISPLAY TOOL Shantanu Desai Penn. State University Scimon Camp, Livingston, LA August 18, 2006.
LIGO-G Z Peter Shawhan, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting April 25, 2006 Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in Data from the.
Displacement calibration techniques for the LIGO detectors Evan Goetz (University of Michigan)‏ for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration April 2008 APS meeting.
Data Quality Vetoes in LIGO S5 Searches for Gravitational Wave Transients Laura Cadonati (MIT) For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration LIGO-G Z.
LIGO-G Z April 2006 APS meeting Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech) Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO’s S5 run Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech)
LIGO-G DM. Landry – Hanover LSC Meeting, August 18, 2003 LIGO S2 Calibration Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory Representing the calibration.
LIGO-G D LSC Meeting Nov An Early Glimpse at the S3 Run Stan Whitcomb (LIGO–Caltech) LIGO Scientific Collaboration Meeting LIGO Hanford.
Preparing GEO600 for Gravitational Wave astronomy (A status report) Martin Hewitson, AEI Hannover for GEO600.
Calibration in the Front End Controls Craig Cahillane LIGO Caltech SURF 2013 Mentors: Alan Weinstein, Jamie Rollins Presentation to Calibration Group 8/21/2013.
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
S5 BNS Inspiral Update Duncan Brown Caltech LIGO-G Z.
3/21/06G D S4/S5 Calibration Status Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC March 2006 Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC.
MODELING THE CALIBRATED RESPONSE OF THE ADVANCED LIGO DETECTORS Luke Burks 2013 LIGO Caltech SURF Mentors: Alan Weinstein, Jameson Rollins Final Presentation.
Martin Hewitson and the GEO team Measuring gravitational waves with GEO600.
LIGO-G Z S2 and S3 calibration status Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory for the Calibration team Justin Garofoli, Luca Matone, Hugh Radkins.
LIGO-G E1 Reviewer Report for the S2 Time-Domain Pulsar Search Teviet Creighton, Andri Gretarsson, Fred Raab, B. Sathyaprakash, Peter Shawhan.
1 Planning notes from August 2005 Burst Group Face-to-Face Meeting LHO, August 18, 2005 Peter Shawhan, scribe LIGO-G Z.
May 29, 2006 GWADW, Elba, May 27 - June 21 LIGO-G0200XX-00-M Data Quality Monitoring at LIGO John Zweizig LIGO / Caltech.
1 Locking in Virgo Matteo Barsuglia ILIAS, Cascina, July 7 th 2004.
S.Klimenko, LSC, August 2004, G Z BurstMon S.Klimenko, A.Sazonov University of Florida l motivation & documentation l description & results l.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
S.Klimenko, March 2003, LSC Burst Analysis in Wavelet Domain for multiple interferometers LIGO-G Z Sergey Klimenko University of Florida l Analysis.
LIGO-G Z GWDAW9 December 17, Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO Science Run 2 Data John G. Zweizig LIGO / Caltech for the LIGO.
LIGO-G Z SenseMonitor Updates for S3 Patrick Sutton LIGO-Caltech.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
G Z August 17, 2004 S2/S3 Calibration Gabriela González, Louisiana State University For the Calibration Team ( cast of thousands!) LIGO Science.
LIGO-G Z Inspiral Upper Limits Detector Characterization Nelson Christensen Carleton College August 15, 2001.
Calibration/validation of the AS_Q_FAST channels Rick Savage - LHO Stefanos Giampanis – Univ. Rochester ( Daniel Sigg – LHO )
LIGO-G E S2 Data Quality Investigation John Zweizig Caltech/LIGO.
LIGO-G Z S5 calibration: time dependent coefficients  Myungkee Sung, Gabriela González, Mike Landry, Brian O’Reilly, Xavier Siemens,…
Martin Hewitson and the GEO team Measuring gravitational waves with GEO600.
SEARCH FOR INSPIRALING BINARIES S. V. Dhurandhar IUCAA Pune, India.
Calibration and the status of the photon calibrators Evan Goetz University of Michigan with Peter Kalmus (Columbia U.) & Rick Savage (LHO) 17 October 2006.
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Apr 11-25, 2016
Overview of E10 / S3 Hardware Injections
Calibration of data in the time domain (or how to generate 1800s long SFTs from time domain data) XS, Bruce Allen, Mike Landry, Soumya Mohanty, Malik.
Jordi Burguet-Castell for the Calibration Team
S2/S3 calibration Gabriela González, Louisiana State University Plus
WaveMon and Burst FOMs WaveMon WaveMon FOMs Summary & plans
Calibration of TAMA300 in Time Domain
h(t): are you experienced?
John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech
LIGO Photon Calibrators
Calibration: S2 update, S3 preliminaries
Preparing GEO600 for Gravitational Wave astronomy (A status report)
Presentation transcript:

S4/S5 Calibration The Calibration team G Z

S4 Calibration V1: only reference functions V2: do not use! V3: –new H1 and H2 reference functions (added time delay); –calibration coefficients ,  (t s =60 sec and 1 sec) V4 (not ready yet - but will be final!): –LHO reference functions with filter residuals –New measurements of cavity poles –Consistency checks of DC calibrations –Error estimates –Calibration document Other news: –A cvs repository –No formal review yet –A specifications document in preparation (D. Brown) –S3 document & paper for reference in S3 papers (available in cal page)

S4 Calibration sign(s) Digital filters Pendulum  (t) Interferometer Digital/Analog filters Analog/Digital filters PD/Mixer Output matrix (-ve at L1, +ve at H1.H2 ) Input matrix (-ve) ~  (t) AS_Q DARM_ERR DARM_CTRL ETM_EXC (hw inj) External excitation (GWs!) DARM_EXC (cal line) DARM==L x - L y

Photon Calibrators Peter Kalmus (Columbia University): see talk on det char session for details! Installed and working in LHO: results consistent with present calibration Installed and ready to commission in LLO Plan to use them for pre-S5 calibration, and propose to keep a line during S5.

S4 Calibration Coefficients Myungkee Sung Uses same LAL code as h(t) (but not necessarily identical coeffs) 1sec and 1min sampling time Issues being studied: –Consistency with detector model (i.e., are the coeffs real?) –Consistency of LAL ComputeFactors.c code with independent (Matlab) estimators –Consistency of coeffs obtained from different calibration lines –Spectral analysis of fluctuations –Investigations of “outliers”

S4 Calibration Data Quality Flags CALIB_LINE_DROPOUT –2^13 Short dropout of injected calibration line (can cause transients in GW channel) –Created by John Z., 3 sec long, looking for glitches in filtered EXC channel CALIB_LINE_V01 –2^28 No calibration line or line strength out of range –Created by M. Sung, 2 sec long, looking for outliers in loop gain sampled at 16 Hz –(dropputs + glitches in loop gain) CALIB_LINE_V03_60_SEC –2^35 No calibration line or line strength out of range during minute CALIB_LINE_V03_1_SEC –2^36 No calibration line or line strength out of range during second –M. Sung, flagging zero or bad coefficients for S4 V3 calibration Effect on inspiral triggers: see inspiral log entry

The “real” calibration Hunter Elliott (+Rick Savage, Greg Mendell, Malik Rakhmanov) Also, see technical documents by Rochester group (Melissinos et al) in cal page

S5 calibration Measurements needed: –Mirrors DC actuation (vetted with photon calibrators) –Cavity poles –Hardware filters –Open loop gains –Consistency with autocalibrator –Signs (!) Models: –same as S4 (with new parameters) –Plus high frequency response Coefficients: –Calculated promptly (hours?), vetted and posted ASAP (days?) How often do we want to break and have “calibration runs” to check loop gains, DC calibrations, etc? What accuracy do we want, at what sampling rate? Online, offline? –10% systematic is ~easy (!), 1% takes years (if possible) –The shorter the sampling time, the larger the lines (+ sidebands).