PowerHour April 2012. Goals of PowerHour What is Value Based Purchasing Review of the FFY 2013 VBP program Data Sources Data Collection Timeframes Measures.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© 2010, American Heart Association. All rights reserved. Hospital Performance Recognition with the Get with the Guidelines Program and Mortality for Acute.
Advertisements

SHIP Grant Kickoff.
Readmissions: The Final CMS Rule, Community Engagement Initiatives, and CMS Grants Kim Streit, FACHE, MBA, MHS VP/Healthcare Research and Information for.
CMS in the 21 st Century 23rd Annual HFMA Southern California and San Diego/Imperial Chapter Fall Conference David Saÿen, MBA Regional Administrator Centers.
(CAHPS) Experience of Care Surveys From Design to Implementation
Overview of Quality Reporting, Payments and Penalties October 9, 2012 Presenter: Kimberly Rask, MD PhD Medical Director.
Value - Based Purchasing Presented by Kyle Bain For Kemal Erkan HCM-401 Course.
CMS Update FY’14 Frank Briggs, Pharm.D., M.P.H. Vice President, Quality and Patient Safety West Virginia University Healthcare.
VALUE BASED PERFORMANCE: UNDERSTAND YOUR SCORECARD AND BOOST YOUR REIMBURSEMENT MARCH 06, 2013.
SOMCQuality Dashboard - FY 12 Patient-Centered Perfection is the Goal Safety  Quality  Service  Relationships  Performance IndicatorGoalHC?JulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunYTD.
Changes to Performance-Based Payment Programs
HCAHPS and Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (Hospital VBP) Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
Introduction to Core Measures Lynn Benson Preferred Nurse Staffing.
Quality Reporting: Why IT Matters September 25, 2012 Presenter: Kimberly Rask, MD PhD Medical Director.
CMS Core Measures Evidence-Based Performance Measurement.
QUALITY AND YOU GUIDE for New Physicians, Dentists, Podiatrists, and Extenders.
0 Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration (HQID) Key Facts Three year demo ( ); extended for three additional years through Oct hospitals.
The Pharmacy Care Network How Expanding The Care Continuum Improves Patient Care and Delivers Financial Benefits Mike Sanborn, President and CEO Baylor.
The “Value” in Value Based Purchasing
The HCAHPS and Competency Connection HealthStream, Inc. The HCAHPS and Competency Connection HealthStream, Inc.
Value-based Purchasing Jude Odu Senior Business Analyst, Health Care DataWorks Detlev “Herb” Smaltz, PhD Co-Founder & CEO, Health Care DataWorks September.
Your Patient Experience James Merlino, MD President and Chief Medical Officer Strategic Consulting.
DIVISION OF HEALTH CARE FINANCING & POLICY Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Provider-Preventable Conditions.
Value Based Purchasing Harry Holmes, Ph.D. Senior Policy Advisor Harris County Healthcare Alliance October 11, 2012 The Board-Leadership and Management.
APRIL HCAHPS Patient Experience Surveys: Current and Future Requirements.
Patient Experience/ Satisfaction What’s at Stake ?
Overview of Never Events and Hospital Acquired Conditions in Medicare and Medicaid Barbara Dailey, Director Division of Quality, Evaluation, and Health.
Linking Quality To Payment 17 th Annual Rural Health Conference Timothy Burrell, MD, MBA Medical Director.
Reporting hospital quality Ben Yandell, PhD, CQE System Associate Vice President Clinical Information Analysis (CIA) Norton Healthcare.
Core Measures Evidence-Based Performance Measurement Lynne Hall, RN, BSN Green Belt Six Sigma Updated: 06/16/2011.
Health Care Effectiveness Summer Quarterly Meeting July 19, 2011.
Detroit Medical Center GRAND ROUNDS UROLOGY HCAHPS: Transparency and Patient Participation In Healthcare KEVIN G. SIMOWSKI, J.D. CORPORATE VICE PRESIDENT.
HCAHPS Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems.
Nursing Excellence Conference April 19,2013
Medicare Linkage: Quality & Payment Medicare Linkage: Quality & Payment Washington State Hospital Association July 28, 2008.
Hospital Association of Rhode Island. Heart Attack or Chest Pain Heart FailurePneumonia Surgical Care Improvement ScoreRankScoreRankScoreRankScoreRank.
Achieving High-Quality, Low Cost Care Amidst Payment System Reform
Please register your attendance using this QR code or by using an IPad located at each door.
Jennifer Faerberg Director Health Care Affairs Medicare Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program – Proposed Rule Published January.
Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Update Jim Poyer Director, OCSQ/QIG/DQIPAC April 27, 2011.
Copyright ©2011 Georgia Hospital Association FLEX GRANT Kathy McGowan Vice President, Quality & Safety Samantha Dulworth Technical & Customer Specialist.
ARE YOU READY? For HAC’s – October 1, 2008 Kathy Whitmire September 2008.
To Health Reform – And Beyond! 2015 CMS National Training Program Workshop David W. Saÿen, MBA Regional Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
1 © 2013 Amphion Medical Solutions 1 B RENDA B ARTKOWSKI, CMA, CCA, BS HPA M ANAGER, C LINICAL D ATA A BSTRACTION A MY W IRTH S ALES E XECUTIVE J ULY 17,
Value - Based Purchasing Presented by Kyle Bain For Kemal Erkan HCM-401 Course.
Missouri Hospital Association Meaningful Use Quality Measure Update.
What is Clinical Documentation Integrity? A daily scavenger hunt.
Introduction to Core Measures
Surgical Care FMHGettysburgShady Grove Mont.Gen.CHCWCHS 86% of 383 pts. 90% of 337 pts 86% of 254 pts 93% of 323 pts 78% of 301 pts 93% of 874 pts Percent.
1 Hospital P4P: The CMS/Premier Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration Project March 10, 2009 Mary B. Bergerson Regional Quality Director St. Helena.
The role of nurses in new incentive-based hospital payment models
1 © 2013 Amphion Medical Solutions 1 B RENDA B ARTKOWSKI, CMA, CCA, BS HPA M ANAGER, C LINICAL D ATA A BSTRACTION A MY W IRTH S ALES E XECUTIVE J ULY 17,
Medicare Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Proposed Rule Reports and Analysis February 15, 2011.
Hospital Acquired Conditions (HACs). Overview The Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (DRA) requires a quality adjustment in Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related.
Vantage Care Positioning System®: Make Your Case with Medicare Spending Data November 2014 avalere.com.
The Hospital CAHPS Program Presented by Maureen Parrish.
Positioning Your Hospital for Pay for Performance Through Interactive Patient Care Technology David W. Wright Chief Outcomes Officer September 23, 2010.
Skilled Nursing Facility Value-Based Purchasing (SNF VBP) Program Overview of the SNF VBP Program Stephanie Frilling, MBA MPH SNF VBP Program Lead Division.
Independence Plan Update February 26, © 2009 Harvard Pilgrim Health Care2 Key Points  Independence Plan introduced in 2005 –Tiered copayment product.
The Department of Quality and Risk Management
Medicare Beneficiary Quality Improvement Project (MBQIP)
CMS Value-Based Purchasing: Methodology and Documentation Opportunities
1000 Lives Plus: National Learning Event
Information provided by: Yvette Mansion-Whittaker
Dice City Regional Hospital
Dice City Regional Hospital
Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Update Jim Poyer
Skilled Nursing Facility Value-Based Purchasing Greater Los Angeles Care Coordination Learning and Action Network Lindsay Holland, MHA, Director,
Information provided by: Yvette Mansion-Whittaker
Presentation transcript:

PowerHour April 2012

Goals of PowerHour What is Value Based Purchasing Review of the FFY 2013 VBP program Data Sources Data Collection Timeframes Measures VBP Scoring Methodology Unresolved Issues Review of the FFY 2014 Domains GHA VBP Reports Questions

What is Value-Based Purchasing? Implementation is required by the Affordable Care Act of 2010 Begins October 1, 2012 (FY 2013) Redistributes inpatient payments Budget neutral

What is Value-Based Purchasing? Transition hospitals from P4R to P4P under Medicare Medicare payment incentives/penalties to promote Achievement of high quality care Improvement in care quality Adjusts Medicare IPPS payments starting Oct. 1, 2012 (FFY 2013) based on quality performance

Review of VBP Who is Subject to the Hospital VBP Program? Acute care hospitals participating in the IQR Program Excluded hospitals: CAHs Specialty hospitals (psychiatric, rehabilitation, children’s, cancer, LTCH) Hospitals cited for “immediate jeopardy” Hospitals not participating in the IQR program Hospitals with small numbers of applicable measures/cases as determined by CMS

Review of VBP What’s at Stake Under VBP? Program is self-funded by hospital “contributions” Contribution based on Medicare FFS payments* 1.0% reduction in FFY 2013 Reduction increased by 0.25% each year 2.0% reduction for FFY 2017 and beyond VBP performance determines P4P amount Budget-neutral Redistributive Best performers win, others break even or lose VBP payments are netted against contributions

Review of VBP VBP’s Quality Measures Law requirements Must be measures reported under IQR program Measures must be publicly available Hospital Compare for at least one year prior to use in VBP CMS must publish measures and national performance standards for each measure 60 days before start of the performance measurement period Must categorize measures (domains) CMS discretion What measures to include/exclude

Review of the FFY 2013 VBP program Data Source: Analysis utilizes hospital quality measure database provide by CMS on Hospital Compare Website Will assess hospital Quality performance using two domains: Process of Care (70%) Patient Experience (30%)

Review of the FFY 2013 VBP program Data Collection Timeframes: Baseline Period Used to establish performance standards and to measure performance improvement July 1, 2009 – March 31, 2010 (9 months) Data already reported to CMS Performance Period Used to measure/calculate VBP scores July 1, 2011 – March 31, 2012 (9 months) Just started and will continue into Spring Applies to both Process and HCAHPS measures

VBP Domains FFY 2013 Program Proposed FFY 2014 Program * Domain Measure Count Domain Weight Measure Count Domain Weight Process of Care1270%1320% HCAHPS (Patient Experience of Care) 1 (using 8 HCAHPS dimensions) 30% 1 (using 8 HCAHPS dimensions) 30% Outcomes (mortality/AHRQ/HACs) N/A 1330% EfficiencyN/A 120% Other TBDN/A Totals 13 (2 domains) 100% 28 (4 domains) 100% * Only some aspects of 2014 program are final

Process Domain Measures – FFY 2013 Program Acute Myocardial Infarction AMI-7aFibrinolytic Therapy Received Within 30 Minutes of Hospital Arrival AMI-8aPrimary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Received Within 90 Minutes of Hospital Arrival Heart Failure HF-1Discharge Instructions Pneumonia PN-3b Blood Cultures Performed in the Emergency Department Prior to Initial Antibiotic Received in Hospital PN-6Initial Antibiotic Selection for CAP in Immunocompetent Patient Surgeries (as measured by Surgical Care Improvement (SCIP) measures) SCIP-Card-2 Surgery Patients on a Beta Blocker Prior to Arrival That Received a Beta Blocker During the Perioperative Period SCIP-VTE-1Surgery Patients with Recommended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Ordered SCIP-VTE-2 Surgery Patients Who Received Appropriate Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Within 24 Hours Prior to Surgery to 24 Hours After Surgery Healthcare-Associated Infections (as measured by SCIP measures) SCIP-Inf-1Prophylactic Antibiotic Received Within One Hour Prior to Surgical Incision SCIP-Inf-2Prophylactic Antibiotic Selection for Surgical Patients SCIP-Inf-3Prophylactic Antibiotics Discontinued Within 24 Hours After Surgery End Time SCIP-Inf-4Cardiac Surgery Patients with Controlled 6 AM Postoperative Serum Glucose

HCAHPs Domain Measures – FFY 2013 Program Patient Satisfaction Survey HCAHPS Eight Dimensions (using the most positive responses, “top box” responses for each question used within the HCAHPS dimension): Communication with Nurses Communication with Doctors Responsiveness of Hospital Staff Pain Management Communication About Medicines Cleanliness and Quietness of Hospital Environment Discharge Information Overall Rating of Hospital Modifications to HCAHPS on Hospital Compare: “cleanliness and quietness” – combined “would you recommend this hospital?”- not included

National Benchmarks Highest achievement levels Average performance score for the top 10% of all hospitals National Thresholds Minimum achievement levels Median performance score for all hospitals Established from baseline period data Vary by measure: VBP National Performance Standards – FFY 2013 Program MeasureBenchmarkThreshold AMI-7a - Fibrinolytic Therapy Received Within 30 Minutes of Hospital Arrival 92%65% SCIP-Inf-1 - Prophylactic Antibiotic Received Within One Hour Prior to Surgical Incision 100%97%

VBP Scoring Methodology Hospital performance for each measure is compared to national performance standards Points are awarded for: Achieving high quality goals Improving towards high quality goals Maximum = 10 points / measure Points scored for each measure are used to calculate domain scores Domain scores are weighted to calculate a Total Performance Score

VBP Scoring – FFY 2013 Program 10 point maximum / measure Performance (during performance period) compared to: National threshold (minimum performance level) National benchmark (high attainment level) Below the threshold = 0 points At or above the benchmark = 10 points Between threshold and benchmark = between 1 and 9 points Achievement Points (same for process and HCAHPS measures) 9 point maximum / measure Performance (during performance period) compared to: Prior performance (baseline period) National benchmark (high attainment level) At or below baseline period score = 0 points Above baseline period score = between 1 and 9 Improvement Points (same for process and HCAHPS measures) 20 point maximum Lowest HCAHPS measure score (during performance period) compared to: National floor (lowest score in the country) National threshold (minimum performance level) Lowest HCAHPS score at national floor = 0 points Lowest HCAHPS score at or above threshold = 20 points Lowest HCAHPS score between floor and threshold = between 1 and 19 points Consistency Points (HCAHPS only)

VBP Scoring Methodology Program is budget neutral. This means: All monies contributed to the VBP must be paid out within the same period Will be funded with 1% of hospitals Medicare IPPS operating dollars for 2013 Total payments into and out of the pool must be equal %1.25%1.5%1.75% 2.0% thereafter

VBP Scoring Methodology Scoring Hospitals must have sufficient data for calculating achievement points in order for an individual measure’s score to be included in the overall domain score When there are both achievement and improvement points for a measure, the higher of the two is taken as final points for that measure

VBP Scoring Methodology A hospital’s Total Performance Score (TPS) will be calculated: Calculating Overall Domain Score (all domains): For each domain, the overall domain score will be the sum of the final points earned for the domain divided by the maximum possible points for all useable measures in the domain Domain Weighting and Calculating a TPS: 2013: Process Measures 70% Patient Outcomes 30%

VBP Scoring Methodology CMS has established the following formulas to calculate VBP points:

Process Score Calculation – FFY 2013 VBP Program

HCAHPS Score Calculations – FFY 2013 Program

Concerns with Process and HCAHPS Measures Process measures The full range of Achievement is not possible Minimum case size is 10 Small hospitals may fall in and out of the program from year to year CMS exclusion method for “topped out” measures HCAHPS measures Bias based on region, hospital size and type Weight is too high Resulting scores are not evenly distributed, skewed low

Value Based Purchasing 2014

New Measures/Domains for the FFY 2014 VBP Program FFY 2013 Program Proposed FFY 2014 Program * Domain Measure Count Domain Weight Measure Count Domain Weight Process of Care1270%1320% HCAHPS (Patient Experience of Care) 1 (using 8 HCAHPS dimensions) 30% 1 (using 8 HCAHPS dimensions) 30% Outcomes (mortality/AHRQ/HACs) N/A 1330% EfficiencyN/A 120% Other TBDN/A Totals 13 (2 domains) 100% 28 (4 domains) 100% * Only some aspects of 2014 program are final

Outcomes Domain Measures – FFY 2014 Program Mortality Measures Mort-30-AMIAMI 30-day mortality (Medicare patients) Mort-30-HFHF 30-day mortality (Medicare patients) Mort-30-PNPN 30-day mortality (Medicare patients) AHRQ Composite Measures AHRQComplication/patient safety for selected indicators (composite) AHRQMortality for selected medical conditions (composite) HAC Measures HACs Foreign Object Retained After Surgery Air Embolism Blood Incompatibility Pressure Ulcer Stages III & IV Falls and Trauma (includes fracture, dislocation, intracranial injury, crushing injury, burn, electric shock) Vascular Catheter-Associated Infections Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) Manifestations of Poor Glycemic Control

Proposed Efficiency Domain Measures – FFY 2014 Medicare Spending per Beneficiary ACA requires use of efficiency measures in FFY 2014 or thereafter Must include total Part A and Part B spending per beneficiary Must include Medicare spending per beneficiary adjusted for age, sex, race, severity, and other factors as determined by the Secretary CMS is also considering measures of hospital internal efficiency

Concerns with Proposed Efficiency Measure Does proposal satisfy ACA mandate for a measure of “spending per beneficiary”? Holds hospitals accountable for all providers’ practice patterns Should consider future IOM report and proposal for Medicare bundling demonstrations Methodology cannot be replicated No-one can check/audit CMS’ calculations Industry does not have access to the data

Data Collection Timeframes – FFY 2014 Program Process of Care and Patient Experience of Care Domains * Baseline Period: April 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010 (9-months) Performance Period: April 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012 (9-months) Outcomes Domain – Mortality Measures Baseline Period: July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2010 (12-months) Performance Period: July 1, 2011 through June 30, 2012 (12-months) Outcomes Domain – AHRQ composite and HAC Measures * Baseline Period: March 3, 2010 through September 30, 2010 (7-months) Performance Period: March 3, 2012 through September 30, 2012 (7-months) Efficiency Domain * Baseline Period: May 15, 2010 through 90 days prior to February 14, 2011 (9- months) Performance Period: May 15, 2012 through February 14, 2013 (9-months) * Proposed

GHA Reports

GHA reports are based off of HANY’s VBP reports

Finding your GHA Report Go to Click on “Quality and Health” Click on “Hospital Data” Click on the “click here” button You will need your GHA log-in and password Only PRC (Peer Review Contacts) can view the reports and CEO’s