Teaching and Learning Physical Science in Urban Secondary Schools: Assessing the Assessments Joan Whipp, Michael Politano, Michele Korb – Marquette University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements

When Students Can’t Read…
Curriculum Development and Course Design
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
California Standards for the Teaching Profession
Why this Research? 1.High School graduates are facing increased need for high degree of literacy, including the capacity to comprehend texts, but comprehension.
What do you know about Effective Teaching Behaviors?
Everyday Mathematics Chapter 4 Gwenanne Salkind EDCI 856 Discussion Leadership.
ESTEEMS (ESTablishing Excellence in Education of Mathematics and Science) Project Overview and Evaluation Dr. Deborah H. Cook, Director, NJ SSI MSP Regional.
(IN)FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT August Are You… ASSESSMENT SAVVY? Skilled in gathering accurate information about students learning? Using it effectively.
APS Teacher Evaluation A SMART Process for Student and Teacher Growth.
Frog and Toad Facts Sarah Simon Quail Glen Elementary School 1st Grade Teacher.
Do we need to Assess for Learning? Concordia University Michael Pellegrin, MEESR March 2015.
Home Economics Teachers’ Readiness for Teaching STEM
Principles of High Quality Assessment
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Institute for innovation and development of learning process
Modeling Instruction Lessons from America. Mechanics Modeling Workshop 90 hours of professional development consisting of intensive immersion in the mechanics.
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
Co-Teaching as Best Practice in Student Teaching Data Collection Information 1.
Interactive Science Notebooks: Putting the Next Generation Practices into Action
The Impact of On-line Teaching Practices On Young EFL Learners' Instruction Dr. Trisevgeni Liontou RHODES MAY
ASSESSMENT& EVALUATION Assessment is an integral part of teaching. Observation is your key assessment tool in the primary and junior grades.
Family, School, and Community Partnerships: A Model for Pre-service Teacher Education Presentation at Center for Research, Evaluation & Advancement of.
Does Theory Improve Practice? Can Participation in Research Based Workshops Improve Teachers’ Practice? Ronith Klein Kibbutzim College of Education, Tel.
Contribution of a Professional Development Program for Teachers’ Learning Mónica Baptista; Ana Maria Freire
Models for Evaluating MSP Projects Evaluation of Professional Development Programs MSP Regional Conference Dallas, Texas February 7, 2007 Norman L. Webb.
AIG~IRP: Developing Instructional Resources to Support AIG Learners and the SCOS DPI RttT AIG Institute Winter Presenters Caroline C. Eidson and.
Developing teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching Challenges in the implementation and sustainability of a new MSP Dr. Tara Stevens Department of.
To Think Or Not To Think: That Is The Question Abstract Year after year, teachers recognize that many of their students lack critical thinking skills or.
A Framework for Inquiry-Based Instruction through
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
SOL Changes and Preparation A parent presentation.
Online Resources for Pre- Service Teachers Laura J. Pyzdrowski West Virginia University Anthony S. Pyzdrowski California University Of Pennsylvania
EDU 385 Education Assessment in the Classroom
The Impact of the MMP on Student Achievement Cindy M. Walker, PhD Jacqueline Gosz, MS University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee.
Evaluating a Research Report
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Chapter 8 Assessing Active Science Learning
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 17, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
Students’ and Faculty’s Perceptions of Assessment at Qassim College of Medicine Abdullah Alghasham - M. Nour-El-Din – Issam Barrimah Acknowledgment: This.
Teacher Behaviors The teacher should allow the students to figure out the main idea of a lesson on their own. (SD, D, A, SA) –SD=4, D=3, A=2, SA=1 The.
Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013.
UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE Assessing the Mathematics Knowledge of Teachers William S. Bush University of Louisville North Carolina Association of Mathematics.
Teaching to the Standard in Science Education By: Jennifer Grzelak & Bonnie Middleton.
Evelyn Wassel, Ed.D. Summer  Skilled in gathering accurate information about students learning?  Using it effectively to promote further learning?
Record Keeping and Using Data to Determine Report Card Markings.
Using a Children’s Thinking Approach to Change Prospective Elementary Teachers’ Efficacy and Beliefs of Mathematics AERA Paper Session Spring 2007, Chicago.
Using Common Core State Standards of Seventh Grade Mathematics in the Application of NXT LEGO® Robotics for CReSIS Middle School Students.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
The Relationship between Elementary Teachers’ Beliefs and Teaching Mathematics through Problem Solving Misfer AlSalouli May 31, 2005.
South Jersey Math/Science Partnership at Rowan University Dr. Eric Milou Dr. Jill Perry SJMP.
Using RTOP to Mentor Pre-service and Alternative Certification Candidates Kathleen A. Falconer, Joseph L. Zawicki, Luanna Gomez, Dan MacIsaac, Lowell Sylwester,
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
MSP Program Evaluation Carol L. Fletcher, Ph.D. TRC Project Director Meetings 1/27/09 and 2/5/09 Carol L. Fletcher, Ph.D. TRC Project Director Meetings.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
National Board Study Group Meeting Dan Barber 5 th Grade Teacher, Irwin Academic Center
The School Effectiveness Framework
National Science Education Standards. Outline what students need to know, understand, and be able to do to be scientifically literate at different grade.
Evaluation Results MRI’s Evaluation Activities: Surveys Teacher Beliefs and Practices (pre/post) Annual Participant Questionnaire Data Collection.
Developing Structures for Teacher- Lead Learning Communities Jill Cabrera, Ph.D. Western Kentucky University.
Inquiry Primer Version 1.0 Part 4: Scientific Inquiry.
1 Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013 Roanoke Virginia Department of Education Division of Teacher Education and Licensure.
Donna Lipscomb EDU 695 MAED Capstone Common Core Presentation INSTRUCTOR KYGER MAY 21, 2015.
Differentiated Instruction
Competency Assessment
  Bridging the Common Core Standards and Gifted Education: Instructional Resources Project NAGC - November 2013 Presenters Caroline C. Eidson and Sneha.
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
Presentation transcript:

Teaching and Learning Physical Science in Urban Secondary Schools: Assessing the Assessments Joan Whipp, Michael Politano, Michele Korb – Marquette University Mel Sabella, Chicago State University David Hammer, University of Maryland Kristi Gettelman, Wisconsin Conservatory of Lifelong Learning Kelly Kushner, Shorewood Intermediate School Megan Ferger, Roosevelt Middle School

Modeling in Physical Science for Urban Teachers Grades middle and high school science teachers from ten urban Milwaukee schools 2 summer institutes; 8 follow-up half-day modeling workshops; an online community; classroom mentoring Physical Science Modeling Workshop curriculum developed at Arizona State Focus on increasing teacher content knowledge and instructional strategies

Assessing Content Knowledge

Physical Science Concept Inventory (PSCI) Multiple-choice diagnostic test based on: –Lawson Test of Scientific Reasoning (Lawson), –Chemistry Concept Inventory (Mulford and Robinson), –Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), –Energy Concept Inventory (Swackhamer et al.) served as an assessment of student and teacher content understanding of topics in Physical Science

Gains on PSCI gain calculated using the formula developed by Hake 1. Participants Pre-/post-test during 1 st summer workshop Students in subset of participants ’ classes Baseline established in April 2004 Given as pre-/post-test in Fall 2004/Spring 2005 and in Fall 2005/Spring R. Hake, “ Interactive engagement versus traditional methods: a six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses,: Am. J. Phys., 65 (5) (1997).

Student Performance on PSCI baseline (N=213) (% correct) pre-test (F04) (N=610) (% correct) post-test (S05) (N=395) (% correct) pre-test (F05) (N=298) (% correct) post-test (S06) (N=262) (% correct) 31%30%31%30%36% Student performance was essentially the same for the baseline, the pre-test, and the post-test during the 1 st year of implementation. A mean post-test score of 36% was achieved at the end of the 2 nd year of implementation. Although this is a small gain, it does indicate some improvement over what had been achieved in the past. The 2nd year data focused on the teachers who used the modeling curriculum at a significant level.

Summary Implementation 1 (F04-S05) Looking at the entire set of PSCI data from year 1, there is little evidence for improvement in performance on the diagnostic. There does seem to be clear improvement in student responses to question 13, which deals with the concept of area. Looking at the data for individual sections, one section does seem to show some significant gain – scores went from 37% to 47%. Implementation 2 (F05-S06). Looking at the entire set of data from year 2, there is a greater degree of improvement, but the gain is still small. In one case (section 9), students went from a pre-test score of 33% to a post-test score of 60%, a 39% gain. There does seem to be clear improvement on a greater number of individual questions.

Assessing Attitudes about Science

Student Attitudes Attitudes Survey –consists of twenty-two statements, in which participants are asked whether they agree or disagree on a five point Lickert Scale. –Given as a pre and a post test. Statements from the Attitudes survey were obtained from the: –Maryland Physics Expectations Survey (MPEX, University of Maryland PERG), –the Epistemological Beliefs Assessment for Physical Science (EBAPS, Elby) and –the Epistemological Questionnaire (M. Schommer.)

Sample Statements from the Attitudes Survey I developed a better understanding of science by discussing my ideas with my classmates and my teachers. Learning science makes me change some of my ideas about how the physical world works.

Summary of Results There was little change toward expert-like views after approximately one year of modeling instruction. Researchers have found that attitudes toward science and science learning science are typically very difficult to change in the course of a semester or a year. E. F. Redish, J. M. Saul, and R. N. Steinberg, “ Student expectations in introductory physics, ” Am. J. Phys. 66 (3), (1998).

Middle School Student Responses (revised version of instrument) Results from six sections employing the Modeling Method. –over 64% of the students stated that this course was different than other science courses they have taken (Q2). (Ranged between 64% to 81%.) –Generally students seemed to feel that discussing ideas with their classmates and teachers helped them learn the material (Q11). (Ranged between 50% to 100%.) –Students also seemed to feel that they were ready for their next science course (Q17) and many felt that they were capable of learning science (Q20). (In most cases more than half the class responded favorably to these statements.)

Teacher Self-Assessment Interviews Surveys

Interviews with focus group: Summary Teachers –who participated in the focus group were very committed to the Modeling approach –were comfortable modifying the instructional materials so that it better fit their students –felt that students did have a better understanding - based on classroom observations and alternate forms of assessment. the modeling method created a classroom environment in which: –the classroom was more interactive, –their students began to realize that that they were partly responsible for their learning –the teachers recognized that their students were capable of constructing their own understanding –the teachers were able to better see where their students were in their understanding.

Changes in Teaching Describe how your teaching has changed as a result of the modeling curriculum. The two statements that the teachers agreed with the most: –my knowledge of concepts in physical science has improved. –I now engage my students in more group-work in the classroom.

Changes in Teaching Describe how your teaching has changed as a result of the modeling curriculum. Almost all teachers seem to have adopted the technique of using whiteboards in in their classes to stimulate group interaction. In addition, the use of a standard text book also decreased. 47% of the teachers stated that they used the textbook regularly or frequently before being engaged in modeling and 18% stated regular or frequent use after. In general, these results, show a shift toward the approach emphasized in the modeling curriculum.

Using an Observation Tool to Assess Teaching Reform: The RTOP

Purpose of using the RTOPs To maintain a standard for observation of modeling in the classrooms To provide a common language as reference when evaluating the effectiveness of and implementation of modeling curriculum. To provide a standard for evaluation of dialogue among teachers and mentors (in summer workshops and during online discussions)

Typical Evaluation Items on the RTOP and how they informed the evaluation: Lesson Design and Implementation (1 & 2) Content (6 & 7)

RTOP example questions Procedural Knowledge (11- 14)

Other typical RTOP evaluation points Classroom Culture Communicative Interactions (16 & 17) Student/ Teacher Interactions (22-24)

Results from RTOP and RTOP discussion Teachers –improved most on understanding the modeling approach –struggled with initial implementation due to student resistance Students –use of hands-on manipulatives and experimental design improved –student ability to communicate results did not improve in most cases. The RTOP was only a “ snap shot ” of teacher implementation of modeling, yet fostered discussion and understanding of this method of instruction.

Fascinating results Classroom observations showed that fifth graders ’ response to Modeling were very mature and developed. This occurred in a public school setting. Highest gains in the PSCI were in a classroom where a teacher (according to RTOP data) scored the lowest on modeling skills and implementation of curriculum.

Using Action Research to Assess the Improvement of Teaching and Learning Physical Science

Three Action Research Projects Kushner, K.M. (2006). A comparison of constructivist and traditional methods on students ’ scientific measurement skills. Unpublished master ’ s action research study, Cardinal Stritch University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Gettelman, K. (2006). The use of a modeling method to teach physical science concepts at the elementary/intermediate level. Unpublished master ’ s action research study, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Ferger, M.L. (2007). Traditional vs. modeling instruction of eighth grade chemistry students. Unpublished master ’ s action research study, Cardinal Stritch University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

Questions How did student understanding of physical science and related math concepts change? How, if at all, did student attitudes toward science change? In what ways, if any, has student engagement n the scientific process increased – i.e. making hypotheses, collecting and analyzing data, and forming conclusions to understand and explain physical science concepts? What is the impact of a modeling curriculum on student achievement, in comparison to a traditional science curriculum?

Action Research Designs Researcher Kelly Kushner Kristi Gettelman Megan Ferger Subjects & Sample Population 45 – 8 th Grade Students th Grade Students 100 – Eighth Grade Students in 4 Science classes School at which study took place midwestern suburban public intermediate school Midwestern urban public elementary school midwestern urban public middle school

Researcher Kelly Kushner Kristi Gettelman Megan Ferger Content TaughtMeasurementPhysical ScienceChemistry Teaching Techniques Used Modeling vs. Traditional ModelingModeling vs. Traditional Assessment instruments implemented Measurement Pre and Post Test Student Science Attitudes Pre/Post Survey – all participants Properties of Matter Pre/Post- Assessment – all participants Classroom Observations and Reflections Student Reflections in Science Log – all participants Student Interviews – 6 participants A combined fact and critical thinking pre and post-test

Findings Students showed greatest gains when they were taught with a blended approach of traditional and modeling methods Students showed greatest gains in their understanding of principles of matter and the least in their understanding and ability to apply advanced measurement principles Student resistance to modeling was a barrier that needed to be addressed initially; students were too used to being given right answers rather than thinking for themselves. Student attitudes toward science became more positive. Student engagement in scientific processes has increased.

What We Have Learned through Action Research Better understanding of the physical science concepts we are teaching Constructivist principles which underlie the modeling approach to teaching science

Understanding Our Learners Common student misconceptions about physical science and how to address those misconceptions in teaching How changing our practice can impact student learning; Middle school students vary greatly in ability to reason abstractly

Understanding Our Instruction A blended model of traditional and constructivist methods is most effective Became more conscious of our own instructional design and planning and how to use student work samples and classroom discussion to guide and inform planning Changed our focus from teacher to student- driven instruction and assessment. Applied scientific principles to instruction, measured benefits to student learning

Where do we go from here? What will we, as science educators, take forward from this experience?

Ongoing Action Research We will continue to use action research methodology to monitor student learning and inform our teaching Pre/post testing Multiple data sources Comprehensive data analysis

Continuing the Modeling Method Using modeling methods to teach variety of science content, rather than just physical science Using whiteboard presentations in other areas of curriculum to promote student-to-student questioning and understanding

Extending the Modeling Method Sharing findings with colleagues, in order to improve science instruction in other areas of school/district Connecting physical science and math instruction, particularly measurement and geometry strands, to promote deeper student understanding