Intro to Threat & Error Management

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CABIN CREW HUMAN FACTORS TRAINING IN MALAYSIA AIRLINES
Advertisements

ENROUTE COCKPIT INSPECTIONS
Crew Compliment. OBJECTIVES The importance of Safety & the effects of reduce crew.
The LOSA Archive: The data and how it can be used
Captain Dan Maurino Flight Safety and Human Factors – ICAO
Mount Cook Airline LOSA What Will Be Discussed Demographics Why we did a LOSA How we did a LOSA What we learned from LOSA What we intend doing.
TEM & LOSA: The State of Affairs
Robert L. Helmreich, Ph.D. FRAes The University of Texas
Normal Operations Data: Air Traffic Facility Evaluations and NOSS
“Threat & Error Management (TEM) Workshop”
“Line Operations Safety Audit (LOSA)”
Normal Operations Safety Survey Airservices Australia Marcus Knauer Normal Operations Safety Survey Airservices Australia Marcus Knauer.
Qantas Flying Operations Audit
A Glimpse at Archie: The LOSA Archive
NOSS: The Methodology and Early Findings
A Glimpse at Archie: The LOSA Archive
ICAO Global TEM & NOSS Symposium EUROCONTROL IANS Luxembourg November 9, 2005 Threat and Error Management Training for Air Traffic Control Officers Greg.
TEM as an Analytical Tool
Airservices Australia The NOSS Experience Airservices Australia The NOSS Experience Marcus Knauer – NOSS Project Manager.
Advanced Qualification Program - AQP
Boeing’s Perspective on FCF Risk Mitigation
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 1.
Management Of Human Factors Risk Conference - RAeS 11 th May 2006 Managing Human Factors Risk Captain Steve Sheterline General Manager Training British.
Threat & Error Management
Incident Review Meeting Guidance Material & Presentation Template
Can Commercial Airlines Achieve “One Level of Safety” By Embarking on a Program of “One Level of Training” ? What is the relationship between Training.
Runway Incursion’s Affect on FAA Approved Pilot Training and Pilot and Flight Instructor Certification and Part 121 Pilot Checking – Andy Edwards – Manager.
An Introduction to Threat and Error Management 1.
P-2028 Minnesota Wing Aircrew Training: Tasks P-2028 Crew Resource Management.
AERONAUTICAL DECISION MAKING
Human Factors for Part 135 Air Operators
17-MAR-2010 Meeting SMS Goals Through AQP and Risk Management John Ross CEO OK3 Group Inc. The Spectrum Group Civil Aviation Team Associate.
Safety Management Simon Roberts SMS Programme Manager UK CAA.
Executive Briefing This briefing is designed as a stand alone briefing for Airline Senior Executives / CEOs. Minor text amendments following review at.
FAA Industry Training Standards FITS Overview. 2 Outline FAA Industry Training Standards Problems with Current Training FITS Flight Training Scenario.
Standard Operating Procedures Why do pilots not (always) follow procedures?
Aviation English Skills On-line Crew Room A Brand-new Style of Learning Online! Crew Room Professional Development of English Language Skills for ICAO.
Downloaded from AERONAUTICAL DECISION MAKING THE FLIGHT INSTRUCTORS’ LESSON PLAN.
Incident Review Meeting Example  The next slides are an example of how to complete the template and identify latent conditions, threats, errors, UAS and.
Monitoring Normal Operations and the Line Operations Safety Audit (LOSA): The Perspective of ICAO Captain Dan Maurino Captain Dan Maurino Flight Safety.
Threat and Error Management in Aviation
Downloaded from 9/14/2015 Aeronautical Decision Making - The Theory Behind the Practice 1 AERONAUTICAL DECISION MAKING The Theory Behind The.
SAFETY.
The University of Texas at Austin Threat and Error Management Model Robert Helmreich Capt. Bruce Tesmer University of Texas Continental Airlines ATA CRM.
Slide 1Lesson 14: Fundamentals of the CAP Flying Safety Program Fundamentals of the CAP Flying Safety Program.
Presented to: FAASTeam Representatives By: FAASTeam National Resource Center Date: December 6, 2008 Federal Aviation Administration FAA Safety Team (FAASTeam)
Lesson Timeline AHF 2203 – Aviation Human Factors  24 Credit hours per semester Class duration: (4 hrs /week)  Week 1-3: Lecture  Week 4: Mid term.
A Strategy for an Effective Accident Prevention Program
Hazard Identification
Runway Safety in Japan Katsuyuki Nakatsubo Electronic Navigation Research Institute, Japan.
Gretchen Haskins Chief Exec. Safety Through Collaboration What is HeliOffshore? An alliance of global Helicopter Operators & their stakeholders. Committed.
Safety Regulation Group Slide 1 CABIN CREW CRM TRAINING BEST PRACTICE Aviation House 29 January 2009.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level TOOLBOX TALK MANAGING AIRSIDE SAFETY.
Threat and Error Management. What is TEM?  “Defensive flying”
Trainings to Avoid Deviations and Incursions. Trainings to Avoid Deviations and Incursions A Big Training Challenge Looking for a Solution.
Evolution Cabin Crew Training & Assessment for the Future.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Southern Region Runway Safety Program 2006 IA Renewal Program A review for the IA & AMT Inspector.
School of Aviation Application of Threat and Error Management Paul Kearney.
AVIATION HUMAN FACTOR LECTURE 1: INTRODUCTION TO HUMAN FACTOR
Downloaded from SINGLE PILOT CRM Sun-N-Fun FAA Safety Center Lakeland, Florida April 17, 1999.
Flight Operations Research Centre of Excellence Dr. Hazel Courteney Head of Research & Strategic Analysis.
Glass cockpit safety initial transition training recurrent training ongoing proficiency program.
LECTURE 7 AVIATION SAFETY & SECURITY
PST Human Factors Jan Shaw Manchester Royal Infirmary CMFT.
ERRORS Module 2, Topic 1 Human factors.
Error.
Data Science for Safety Intelligence
NBAA Single Pilot Working Group
NBAA Single Pilot Working Group
Unit 4 Unmanned Aircraft
Presentation transcript:

Intro to Threat & Error Management Welcome

One of the advantages of being captain is being able to ask for advice without necessarily having to take it. Peace or utter destruction, its up to you. If you’d keep your nose off my bridge, I’d be thankful.

You can see from the graph, that the accident rate has gone down significantly. Most of the early accidents were largely attributable to unreliable aircraft equipment.

Accident Causal Factors Over Time Human Causes Source: ICAO 1984 Human Error has remained a major contributing factor in aviation accidents Machine Causes Time

The Tip of the Iceberg Once you see it, its too late.

The Tip of the Iceberg What is happening here?

What is CRM? Effective use of all resources, to achieve the highest possible level of safety and efficiency. (Transport Canada)

Heinrich Safety Triangle 1 Accident Serious Accident Minor Accident with Damage and Injury Incidents and Near Misses Observed Work Errors Lagging Indicators ~ 29 Incidents Leading Indicators ~ 300 Hazardous Conditions ~ 3,000 Unreported “Unsafe“ Acts Mr. Heinrich was an Industrial Safety Engineer, who in 1931 developed a model describes how major injuries/industrial accidents occur.  For a given population of workers, his model proposes that for every 300 unsafe acts (defined as FAR violations, Hazardous Attitudes, Safety Reports) there are 29 minor injuries and one major injury.  Heinrich's theory accounts for the first three levels of the model.  For more than 75 years, industrial safety managers have tried to reduce such accidents and injuries by attacking the problem from different ends of a three level pyramid. If investigative efforts are focused only on those rare occurrences where there is serious injury, or significant damage, its a wasted opportunity. The latent factors contributing to such accidents may be present in hundreds of other incidents, and could be identified – before serious injury or damage ensues. We all understand close calls.  We've all had them.  Some more than others.  And that's the point.  Some folks simply have more close calls, take more shortcuts & unnecessary risks.  Sometimes they are lucky.  Sometimes luck runs out.  If you keep playing darts, eventually you'll get a bulls eye.  Out of 3,000 unreported “unsafe” acts, one is going to be the winner that awards the pilot a check in the fatal column.  Those are defined as taking shortcuts, unnecessary risks, and close calls. Even more insidious is the "Pilot Qualifications" layer.  Imagine an employer reviewing all your flights, all the decisions you made on those flights, and all the little things that surprised you on all those flights.  Would the employer select you to be a pilot for them?   This layer includes (but not limited to): Pilot qualifications Decision making skills Legally qualified & current? Proficient & skilled? Hazardous Attitudes? Flying habits Current Life Stress Events Psychological make-up Substance use? Medically qualified?  Healthy? Mature thinking style? Conservative? Risk adverse? Personal Lifestyle Choices (Credit-Criminal-Educational) (Source: cfidarren.com) Just remember the cost to learn the lesson grows as you get to the top of the triangle. Intervening at the lowest level saves more lives, pain and suffering. ~ 30,000 Pilot Qualification – Selection Issues

Strategies Continental Airlines RESIST RESOLVE ERRORS CONSEQUENCE THREATS Strategies ERRORS RESIST HARDWARE & SOFTWARE THAT EXISTS BEFORE THE HUMAN ENTERS RESOLVE WHAT THE HUMAN BRINGS TO THE SYSTEM Resist Resolve CONSEQUENCE

Anything that increases operational complexity What’s a Threat? Anything that increases operational complexity Definition of a threat: A threat is anything that makes a flight more complicated. Threats are not always a danger to a flight, but can cause distractions if not managed properly. Distractions increase the chance that a crew will commit an error. Facts of life about threats: Inevitable - part of the territory External conditions or events that must be managed during normal, everyday flights, in order to maintain safety margins. Events which increase operational complexity, posing a safety risk to the flight at some level

Example Threats Passenger Events Distractions ATC Cabin Crew Terrain Weather Similar Call Sign Maintenance Time Pressures Ground Crew Flight Diversion You’ve all seen this chart… Let’s dig into error more indepth. I want to show you a video on medical errors because it similar to what we do. It has similar: Complexity Training intensity Time constraints Scrutiny Teamwork dependency [Show CBS HealthWatch clip, Medical Error] Heavy Traffic System Malfunction Unfamiliar Airport Missed Approach Automation Event

Real Threats Child Support Spouse(s) Work Rules Chief Pilot Pay Management Flight Attendants Sleep Parent Airline Ground Crew Schedule You’ve all seen this chart… Let’s dig into error more indepth. I want to show you a video on medical errors because it similar to what we do. It has similar: Complexity Training intensity Time constraints Scrutiny Teamwork dependency [Show CBS HealthWatch clip, Medical Error] 14 Hour Day Friends Inexperienced Crewmembers Merger? My career isn’t going the way I thought it would

What’s the Threat? KWOK 14

ICAO

Northwest Airlines Undesired Aircraft State Trap: Managing Error Here’s a simplified model of Threat & Error Management. You spend your time managing threats, and if you don’t manage the threat, it becomes an error, and a mismanaged error becomes an undesired aircraft state (incident/accident). Just remember the cost to learn the lesson grows as you get to the top of the triangle. Intervening at the lowest level saves more lives, pain and suffering. Let’s define a few of these things properly… Avoid Error: Managing Threats

Layered System of Defenses Undesired Aircraft State Elements of layered system (e.g., Preflight) Read and sign paperwork (weather, clearance) Conduct exterior inspection Conduct cockpit inspection Brief cabin crew Preflight checklist Threats

TEM Toolkit

Error Types Intentional Noncompliance – violations ex) Performing a checklist from memory Procedural – Followed procedures but wrong execution ex) Wrong altitude setting dialed into the MCP Communication – Missing information or misinterpretation ex) Miscommunication with ATC Proficiency – Error due to a lack of knowledge or skill ex) Lack of knowledge with automation Decision – Discretionary decision that unnecessarily increased risk ex) Unnecessary navigation through adverse weather Source Flight Safety Foundation

When Do Errors Occur? 49.4% 10.7% 16.3% Source: Helmreich, 1998 23.6%

Case Study What we did at NWA

What we did at NWA Recurrent Training CBT

What we did at NWA Instructor Briefing Guides

What we did at NWA Briefing Room Posters

What we did at NWA 7-hole cards to all 5500 pilots Mailbox Briefing Rooms Jumpseat Handout Lounges 7-hole cards

Video Training & Scenario What we did at NWA Video Training & Scenario

Integrating Threat & Error Management Flight Standards Line checks to reinforce threat recognition, error avoidance and management Flight Operations Review/revise SOPs and policies Safety Error reporting system (ASAP) for data Safety Programs (HF, FOQA) Ongoing QA Audits Training Threat recognition & error avoidance and management Captain Leadership Focus on technical and procedural excellence

Because Flying IS our Business: Threats must be identified and reduced or eliminated. Crew Errors must be avoided and managed. -- Therefore -- Threat & Error Management must be integrated into Flt Ops culture.

More Info… WATS www.cfidarren.com

Darren Smith www.cfidarren.com 813-503-3322 Thanks Darren Smith www.cfidarren.com 813-503-3322