School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

Using the PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory (TFI) E-12
Measuring Performance within School Climate Transformation Grants
Comprehensive, Integrated, Three-Tiered (CI3T) Models of Prevention: Why does my school – and district – need an integrated approach to meet students’
Current Status and Emerging Directions for PBIS
MARY BETH GEORGE, USD 305 PBIS DISTRICT COORDINATOR USD #305 PBIS Evaluation.
Coaching: Tier 2 and 3 Rainbow Crane Dr. Eleanore Castillo-Sumi.
John Carter Project Coordinator PBIS Idaho: Menu button: Idaho PBIS Presentations and Webinars.
School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory
PBIS Applications NWPBIS Washington Conference November 5, 2012.
Coming June 30,  Purpose of PBIS Assessment  Implications of the move from PBIS Surveys  Overview of available Tools and Surveys  Criteria for.
Progress Monitoring and Action Planning Using the Team Implementation Checklist The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges.
Washington PBIS Conference Northwest PBIS Network Spokane, WA November 2013 Nadia K. Sampson & Dr. Kelsey R. Morris University of Oregon.
PBIS Coaches Network pbis.sccoe.org
V 2.1 Tier II Critical Features Building the Infrastructure to Support Tier 2.
Building A Tier Two System In An Elementary School: Lessons Learned Tina Windett & Julie Arment Columbia Public Schools, Missouri Tim Lewis & Linda Bradley.
Coaches Training Introduction Data Systems and Fidelity.
V 2.1 Evaluation Tools, On-Line Systems and Action Planning.
PBIS Tier 1 Coaches Training
New Coaches Training. Michael Lombardo Director Interagency Facilitation Rainbow Crane Behavior RtI Coordinator
Brockton PBIS: Tier 2 Coaches Meeting March 2014 Adam Feinberg
Targeted and Intensive Interventions: Assessing Process (Fidelity) Cynthia M. Anderson, PhD University of Oregon.
Wisconsin PBIS Leadership Conference E8 ISIS/SWIS Overview Marla Dewhirst ISIS/SWIS Trainer of Trainers
Monitoring Advanced Tiers Tool (MATT) University of Oregon October, 2012.
Student and Family Engagement within SWPBIS Rob Horner and Celeste Rossetto Dickey University of Oregon Slides available at as well as at.
IN NORTH THURSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS KATY LEHMAN PBIS SPECIALIST MAY 22, 2013 PBIS Implementation.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: Data Systems Northwest AEA September 7, 2010.
V 2.1 TFI Wordle. V 2.1 Objectives of Session: 1.Not bore you to sleep 2.Types of PBIS Data 3.pbisapps.org 4.PBIS Evaluation Tools 5.Action Planning.
PBIS Assessment Benchmarks for Advanced Tiers 2.5 Information & Instructions.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
Establishing Multi-tiered Behavior Support Frameworks to Achieve Positive School-wide Climate George Sugai Tim Lewis Rob Horner University of Connecticut,
School-Wide PBIS: Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut August 11, 2008.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR SWPBS Rob Horner and Bob Algozzine.
1 Module L R ole of Coaches Coaches’ Monthly Meeting Add DC Name Here.
“Sustaining & Expanding Effective Practices: Lessons Learned from Implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Supports” Susan Barrett Cyndi Boezio,
Preparing for Advanced Tiers using CICO Calvert County Returning Team Summer Institute Cathy Shwaery, PBIS Maryland Overview.
Data-Based Decision Making: Using Data to Improve Implementation Fidelity & Outcomes.
Evaluation Planning & Reporting for School Climate Transformation Grant (SCTG) Sites Bob Algozzine University of North Carolina at Charlotte Steve GoodmanMichigan's.
“Kids are here to maintain our humility.” Dr. Rob Horner
OSEP Project Director’s Meeting: Establishing, Sustaining and Scaling Effective Practices Rob Horner University of Oregon OSEP TA Center on PBIS
Notes for Trainers (Day Training)
ORGANIZATION & DELIVERY OF TERTIARY SYSTEMS AT THE DISTRICT LEVEL Cynthia M. Anderson & Kimberli Breen University of Oregon & Illinois PBIS.
Evaluation Tools and On-Line Systems Adapted from the Illinois PBIS Network.
Leadership Teams Implementing PBIS Module 14. Objectives Define role and function of PBIS Leadership Teams Define Leadership Team’s impact on PBIS implementation.
Aligning PBIS to Achieve Educational Excellence Rob Horner University of Oregon Acknowledge: George Sugai, Lucille Eber, Susan Barrett, Justyn Poulos,
Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network PAPBS Network Coaches Day January 28, Fidelity Measures Lisa Brunschwyler- School Age- School.
Edit the text with your own short phrases. The animation is already done for you; just copy and paste the slide into your existing presentation.
Implementing School-wide Positive Behavior Support Rob Horner and George Sugai University of Oregon and University of Connecticut OSEP TA Center on Positive.
SW-PBIS Cohort 10 Spring Training & Celebration February and March 2016.
Module 2 : Using Data to Problem-Solve Implementation Issues Session 3 Phase I Team Training Presented by the MBI Consultants.
District Implementation of PBIS C-1 Rob Horner Brian Megert University of Oregon Springfield School District.
PBIS Coaches Training Day 3. OUR NORMS Confidentiality * Active participation * Professional use of technology * Assume best intentions Agenda Welcome.
V 2.1 Version 2.1 School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory.
VTPBiS Coordinators as Coaches Learning and Networking Meeting 1 May, 2016.
School Climate Transformation Grant. SSAISD Learner Profile ▪Reflects to set personal goals ▪Is an accomplished reader ▪Employs digital skills ▪Is an.
PBIS DATA. Critical Features of PBIS SYSTEMS PRACTICES DATA Supporting Culturally Knowledgeable Staff Behavior Supporting Culturally Relevant Evidence-based.
“Are We at Fidelity?”: Annual Evaluation and Action Planning.
Version 2.1 School-wide Evaluation Tool (SET).  Define  Purpose of the School-wide Evaluation Tool (SET)  Process  Who participates?  Duration and.
Overview: Evaluation Tools, On-Line Systems and Action Planning
School-Wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory (TFI)
Introduction to Model School & the Tiered Fidelity Inventory (TFI)
School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory
School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory
Monitoring Your Progress
NC DPI Exemplar Recognition Criteria
TFI Wordle This presentation is intended to introduce the PBISApps site and the types of data teams will be working with. The teams will take their first.
PBIS Coaches Training Day 3
Tiered Fidelity Inventory (TFI) Tier III Slide Deck
Facilitator Institute
PBIS Coaches Network pbis.sccoe.org
Presentation transcript:

School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory Version 2.1 T

Purpose of the School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory The purpose of the School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory is to provide an efficient and valid index of the extent to which PBIS core features are in place within a school. Tier I (Universal PBIS) Whole School Universal Prevention Tier II (Targeted PBIS) Secondary, Small Group Prevention Tier III (Intensive PBIS) Tertiary, Individual Support Prevention

Flexibility for All Three Tiers The TFI can be used to assess any or all of the three tiers at any time. Most focus on Tier 1 and add advanced tiers over time.

Subscale Reports This example shows a school that started only using Tier I for at least the first year. Once Tier I scored above 70 (almost 80) they decided to assess Tier 2. Once Tier 2 scored above benchmark, they added Tier 3.

SWPBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory is a Self-Assessment Primary purpose of the instrument is to help school teams improve Primary audience for instrument results is the team, faculty, families and administrators of the school. Effective use of the instrument requires multiple administrations (progress monitoring)

Uses of the SWPBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory Formative Assessment Determine current PBIS practices in place and needed prior to launching implementation Progress monitoring Self-assess PBIS practices by tier to guide implementation efforts, and assess progress by tier Build action plan to focus implementation efforts Annual Self-Assessment Self-assess annually to facilitate sustained implementation of PBIS State Recognition Determine schools warranting recognition for their fidelity of PBIS implementation.

Data-Based Decision Making Action Planning •Focus on Tier 1 •Choose 1-3 items to take action on •Develop a plan to share with staff to increase their knowledge and willingness to participate •Your External Facilitator will help guide your action planning

Nuts & Bolts The TFI is located on PBISApps.org Username and log-in required

1.1 Team Composition Subscale: Teams Feature Data Sources Scoring Criteria 0 = Not implemented 1 = Partially implemented 2 = Fully implemented 1.1 Team Composition: Team Composition: Tier I team includes a Tier I systems coordinator, a school administrator, a family member, and individuals able to provide (a) applied behavioral expertise, (b) coaching expertise, (c) knowledge of student academic and behavior patterns, (d) knowledge about the operations of the school across grade levels and programs, and for high schools, (e) student representation. School organizational chart Tier I team meeting minutes   0 = Tier I team does not exist or does not include coordinator, school administrator, or individuals with applied behavioral expertise 1 = Tier I team exists, but does not include all identified roles or attendance of these members is below 80% 2 = Tier I team exists with coordinator, administrator, and all identified roles represented, AND attendance of all roles is at or above 80% Main Idea: Teams need people with multiple skills and perspectives to implement PBIS well.

Quick Check: Team Composition Are all necessary roles/functions represented on the team? Scoring 0 = Tier I team does not exist or does not include coordinator, school administrator, or individuals with applied behavioral expertise 1 = Tier I team exists, but does not include all identified roles or attendance of these members is below 80% 2 = Tier I team exists with coordinator, administrator, and all identified roles represented, AND attendance of all roles is at or above 80% Self-Assessment Coordinator Behavioral expertise Administrative authority Coaching expertise Knowledge about academic/behavior outcomes Knowledge about school operations Family/Student perspective included