Translating Science into Improved Health Care: Cancer as a Model William S. Dalton, Ph.D., M.D. Center Director H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The U.S. Health Information Technology Agenda – and the Web John W. Loonsk, MD Director of Interoperability and Standards Office of the National Coordinator.
Advertisements

PERSONALIZED MEDICINE: Planning for the Future You, Your Biomarkers and Your Rights.
January 12-13, 2006 Montpelier, VT Chronic Care Management for all Vermonters Kenneth E. Thorpe, Ph.D. Robert W. Woodruff Professor and Chair Department.
Update on Recent Health Reform Activities in Minnesota.
PERSONALIZED MEDICINE. What is Personalized Medicine? Information-based healthcare –Person-by-person: high content, resolution & fidelity –Ushered in.
Genomic Medicine Pilot Demonstration Projects
UK Clinical Research Network (UKCRN) UK Clinical Research Network Maxine Stead PhD UKCRN Assistant Director – Clinical Trials.
Introducing PCORnet: The National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network Presenter Name, Affiliation Event/Venue, Date Presenters – Don’t’ forget to.
Personalized Medicine - Implications for Medical Technology
Achieving Data Liquidity in the Cancer Community: A Coalition of All Stakeholders Marcia A. Kean, Feinstein Kean Healthcare Spring 2012 Internet2 Member.
Informatics And The New Healthcare System Information Technology Will Provide the Platform for Quality Improvement in Healthcare for the 21 st Century.
Mark Schoenbaum, Office of Rural Health & Primary Care The Minnesota e-Health Initiative e-Health Initiative Smart Health.
YALE MASTER SLIDE HERE Clinical Research Management – Is not just a handshake deal? Jamie Caldwell, MBA Director Office of Research Services for the Health.
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting November 9, 2004 Research Use of Stored Data and Tissues.
Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine.
Documentation for Acute Care
Cancer Program Standards 2012: Ensuring Patient-Centered Care
July 3, 2015 New HIE Capabilities Enable Breakthroughs In Connected And Coordinated Care Delivery. January 8, 2015 Charissa Fotinos.
St. Joseph Hospital Cancer Center & Cancer Institute NCCCP Pilot Project.
Clinical Trials The Way We Make Progress Against Disease.
Who is SDOP  A non-partisan, multi-faith organization  Represents 35 congregations and over 50,000 families all over San Diego County  We teach people.
The NIH Roadmap for Medical Research
The IRB's Position on Quality Projects vs. Research R. Peter Iafrate, Pharm.D. Chairman, Health Center IRB University of Florida.
Genomics Alexandra Hayes. Genomics is the study of all the genes in a person, as well as the interactions of those genes with each other and a person’s.
Working across sectors Building collaborative eco-systems Lars Sundstrom SARTRE.
Presented by: Kathleen Reynolds, LMSW, ACSW
Interoperability to Support a Learning Health System HL7 Learning Health Systems Workgroup.
Consent2Share Linking Cohort Discovery to Consent David R Nelson MD Assistant Vice President for Research Professor of Medicine Director, Clinical and.
HRSA’s Oral Health Goals and the Role of MCH Stephen R. Smith Senior Advisor to the Administrator Health Resources and Services Administration.
EF on IST in FP6 in Greece Information Day Athens-Thessaloniki, December 2002 The IST Priority in FP6 Erastos Filos
EHR Clinical data repository and pharmacovigilance Suzanne Markel-Fox 12 October 2007.
Implementing universal Lynch Syndrome screening in a large healthcare system.
Connecting South Carolina: The Gibbs/Hollings Cancer Center An NCCCP/NCI Designated Center Connection Anita L. Harrison, MPH Associate Director, Administration.
The Role of Research in Osteopathic Medical Education American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine June 25, 2004 David B. Moore Associate Vice.
Planned Emergency Research Exception from Informed Consent Requirements September 2007.
A Systems Approach: BIG Health Consortium™ “The world we have created today has problems which cannot be solved by thinking the way we thought when we.
The analyses upon which this publication is based were performed under Contract Number HHSM C sponsored by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid.
Precision Medicine A New Initiative. The Concept of Precision Medicine (PM) The prevention and treatment strategies that take individual variability into.
Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes of Health National Center for Research Resources Division of Research Infrastructure Extending.
Access to Personalised Medicine for PDAC patients STSM of the application of an EU-index for barriers Denis Horgan (EAPM) & Angela Brand (IPHG) on behalf.
Universal Screening for Lynch Syndrome with Cascade Screening for Relatives September 7, 2012 Deb Duquette, MS, CGC Michigan Department of Community Health.
Baltimore Buprenorphine Initiative Advancing Recovery Project Baltimore City, Maryland January 14, 2010.
Building Clinical Infrastructure and Expert Support Michael Steinberg, MD, FACR ULAAC Disparity Project Centinela/Freeman Health System.
The Technology Exchange for Cancer Health Network (TECH-Net) AHRQ Annual Conference: Improving Healthcare, Improving Lives September 27, 2007 Teresa M.
Bringing Genomics Home Your DNA: A Blueprint for Better Health Dr. Brad Popovich Chief Scientific Officer Genome British Columbia March 24, 2015 / Vancouver,
Clinical Research Informatics at the University of Michigan Daniel Clauw M.D. Professor of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology Assistant Dean for Clinical.
Accountable Care Organizations: What is the role of the pathologist? What are the public policy implications?
CDRP Program Steering Committee Dwight E. Heron, MD UPMC McKeesport February 2, 2007 Tampa, FL.
Improving the Health Literacy Environment of Wisconsin Hospitals – A Collaborative Model Sue Gaard, RN, MS Wisconsin Primary Care Research & Quality Improvement.
Why Write A Grant? Elaine M. Hylek, MD, MPH Professor of Medicine Associate Director, Education and Training Division BU CTSI Section of General Internal.
NIH and the Clinical Research Enterprise Third Annual Medical Research Summit March 6, 2003 Mary S. McCabe National Institute of Health.
Mt. Hood. IOM Report: 10 Years After & More Coming Mitch Greenlick, Ph.D. Oregon State Representative April 21, 2010.
Health Care Connected: Next Generation Pharmacy February 13, 2016.
Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) and Patient- Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR) Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy.
Health Management Information Systems Unit 3 Electronic Health Records Component 6/Unit31 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010.
The opportunities and challenges of sharing genomics data with the pharmaceutical industry Shahid Hanif, Head of Health Data & Outcomes, ABPI DNA digest.
This study is funded by a contract from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Cancer.
1 Population Science SIG: Vision and Goals Paul K. Courtney Pop Sci SIG Lead Dartmouth College/Norris Cotton Cancer Center.
PRAGMATIC Study Designs: Elderly Cancer Trials
Semantic Web - caBIG Abstract: 21st century biomedical research is driven by massive amounts of data: automated technologies generate hundreds of.
The Essentia Institute of Rural Health (EIRH) is
Prospects for New Delivery Systems and Reimbursement Models
Better Science, Better Health: New Healthcare Models
Trial Innovation Network Uncovering Grand Opportunities
Bozeman Health Clinical Research
Finland, a Global Testbed for Personalized Cancer Research?
Accountable care organizations
Medical Research Funding and Regulation Third Annual Medical Research Summit March 6, 2003 Mary S. McCabe National Institutes of Health.
Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program
REACHnet: Research Action for Health Network
Presentation transcript:

Translating Science into Improved Health Care: Cancer as a Model William S. Dalton, Ph.D., M.D. Center Director H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute

The Future of Medicine Where we are today:Where we are today: Sequencing of the human genome has dramatically improved molecular technology and our understanding of disease The potential is HUGE!The potential is HUGE! New technology will ultimately improve molecular diagnosis, identify new targets for therapy, create personalized therapies, and identify populations at risk of disease, especially cancer. The challengeHow do we translate new molecular technologies into clinical benefits for our patients?The challenge: How do we translate new molecular technologies into clinical benefits for our patients?

The Scenario The Answer: Develop a new approach to deliver cancer care that integrates research at every step of a patients journey dealing with cancer, and create alliances with academia, the cancer care community, and patients. The Opportunity: Develop a novel delivery system to incorporate new technologies and define their value in the care of cancer patients.

Barriers Lack of platform/grids for development and exchange of information: Create eco-system for discovery and data generation Fragmentation of information/ Need Integration of datasets Need for real-time access of information Need for clinical outcomes analysis/affect of intervention Lack of standards: Performance of assays Databases No common lexicon

Barriers Lack of collaboration and inter- disciplinary approach Create cross-culture environment Improve entrepreneurial culture in academia Gap between the Ivory Towers and the point of impact: the community where vast majority of patients are treated

Two Translational Roadblocks on the Way Toward Improved Public Health JAMA. 2004;291: …whereas the National Institutes of Health has been consistently targeting the bench-to-bedside block, no one is taking responsibility for the second, which is integrally tied with the funding of the health care delivery system

The Future of Medicine The future of medicine is based upon new molecular insights into cancer and other diseases. Current Model of Delivery: develop technology at research institutions and carry the tablets to the masses or build it and they will come. Proposed Model of Delivery: early involvement of the community in assessing the value of new technologies. Capitalize on economy of scale and real world experience from the beginning.

From Vision To Reality: Cancer as a Model

The Vision The right treatment, for the right patient, at the right time and the right place

The Requirements Enrollment of large patient populations in prospective efforts to collect clinical histories and molecular data; Expansion of information technology infrastructure to integrate large data sets from multiple sources; Experienced multi-disciplinary research teams to perform data-mining and modeling; New healthcare networks capable of reducing new methods to standard practice; Federal, State and private health insurance payers to embrace new health care models.

The Challenges – Cost Infrastructure cost Bio repositories Large integrated and interoperable databases Human Resources Researchers, clinicians, biostatisticians, bioinformaticians Clinical trials staff, IRB, consenters, abstractors Public-private partnerships needed

The Challenges – Patient Understanding Patient participation in clinical trials Consenting & patient survey logistics Understanding timing of developing personalized cancer care Overcoming concerns Tissue use – Honest Broker system Tissue & data ownership Privacy Genetics Access by collaborators (NFP & FP)

Challenges – Data Collection Interoperability - limited Robust data collection without interfering in clinical care process Precious little data available in a discrete formatPrecious little data available in a discrete format Few electronic sources of data for direct accessFew electronic sources of data for direct access Data often manually abstracted retrospectivelyData often manually abstracted retrospectively Data may be in the MDs office paper chart rather than the hospitals electronic medical recordData may be in the MDs office paper chart rather than the hospitals electronic medical record High investment in capital Navigating HIPAA & Human Subject Research requirements

Other Challenges Reimbursement Conducting the research Integration into clinical practice Training future clinicians and researchers

The Approach Data Information Knowledge Wisdom Improved medical practice Create a delivery system that will integrate new technologies into the standard of care and develop evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of cancer.

Total Cancer Care Will provide an approach to identify the best treatment for individual patients based on clinical and biological characteristics of a patients cancer. Integrates new technologies into the standard of care in an evidence-based fashion to personalize treatment and improve individual outcomes. Addresses cancer as a public health issue and seeks to improve access, affordability and quality of care by creating an information system to assist in making clinical decisions based on outcomes and comparative effectiveness. Creates a network of health care providers and researchers who contribute and share information from individual patients to ultimately improve care of patients from Florida and beyond.

Progress Total Cancer Care Protocol 33k+ consented patients tissues collected since 2006:6500+ profiled 17 contracted consortium sites contributing 70% of tumors Database & data collection enhanced Data Warehouse

Total Cancer Care: The Future Further expansion of TCC Consortium Sites (FL, US, Internationally) Development of a dynamic information-learning system Integrated model for personalized medicine Personalized Health Record Cancer Biomarker & Drug Target Discovery Patient Treatment Matching Comparative Effectiveness Research

Why Personalized Medicine? …when doctors can truly prescribe the right treatment, to the right person, at the right time, we will have a new level of precision and effectiveness that will provide the knowledge-driven power that is necessary to achieve our highest goals in healthcare reformincluding more effective disease prevention and early disease detection. HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius Written testimony given during Senate confirmation hearings, April 2, 2009