MSJC Assessment Scores FA’06 as Baseline and includes SP’07/FA’07/SP’08 Updated 7/22/08 Compiled by MSJC R&D Dept.- C. Hawkins / IT MIS WO# XBRO.BSI.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MSJC Stats BOT Workshop R.C. Economic Recap MSJC -Headcount -Available seats College Going Rates City/Zip Codes Transfers Assessment MSJC Stats.
Advertisements

Achieving the Dream: Baseline Data Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment December 2007 Research Report No
Achieving the Dream Advisement Initiative Evaluation September 21, 2011.
SCC BASIC SKILLS INITIATIVE Using Data to Support the Initiative Nga Pham May 22, 2009.
Student Success Pilot Project Overview Student Success Pilot Project ITS Workgroup March 8, 2010.
MSJC SLO/DLO/ILO Accreditation Midterm Report Questionnaire SP08- Recap 5/21/08 The following data consisted of 67 self administered questionnaires from.
Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges 2010 Report: Moreno Valley College Calculation presented by presented by David Torres, Dean Institutional.
MSJC Educational Partners Breakfast 2010 Institutional Goal… Year of Student Success Data Driven Decision Making … to Drive Student Success
EXPLORE Academic Results 8 th Grade EXPLORE Test Results #1.
Achieving the Dream Using Data at SFCC Developing a Culture of Evidence Presentation to the Retention Committee February, 2006.
The Creation of Two Comparison Groups to Facilitate Evidence-Based Decision Making Prepared and Presented by Keith Wurtz Dean, Institutional Effectiveness,
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts and Mathematics Results August 8, 2011.
Harnessing the Power of Alternative Assessment to Advance the Completion Agenda Eloy Ortiz Oakley Superintendent-President, Long Beach City College Terrence.
(SI) Supplemental Instruction MSJC Results SP’09 Source: MSJC MVC Math & District SI Coordinator – Janice Levasseur - Compiled: MSJC R&P Dept. – XCHAS.
Demographics SP’09 Presentation “Get to Know MSJC Students from the Perspective of the Facts and the Stats” Key Focus Areas: Age Gender Ethnicity Key Focus.
MSJC Stats Headcount Demographics Diversity Repeaters College Going Rates Assessment Success Rates On-Line LRC Transfers Programs MSJC Stats Headcount.
ARCC /08 Reporting Period Prepared by: Office of Institutional Research & Planning February 2010.
ASA 1/26/2006 A CHIEVING THE D REAM SM Student Success February 1, 2006 Integrating the Project into the Core College Operations.
De Anza Research, May 19, LinC Research Site visit with Marybeth Mason and Sally Murphy  Feedback on Retention and Success Assessment  Discussion.
Background of Performance Measures identified 12 Performance Measures Baseline data collected in Performance Funding in Results.
College Success Program Fall 2010 Annual Report College Success Program.
Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges (ARCC) Presentation to the Mt. San Jacinto College Board of Trustees Thursday – Oct. 9, 2008 Dr. Dennis.
 Senior timeline  Graduation Plans  College Information  Career Planning  College Selection & Admissions  SAT & ACT  Financial Aid.
1 (SI) Supplemental Instruction MSJC – SJC & MVC Results Spring 2009 Basic Skills Initiative Source: MSJC MVC Math Coordinator – Janice Levasseur Compiled:
ABLE + COLLEGE EQUALS SUCCESS OAACE April
ARCC Accountability Report for the Community Colleges Focus on Quality.
MSJCD American Indian/Alaskan Native Enrollment by Academic Year MSJC’s American Indian & Alaskan Native population has consistently ranged from 200 to.
Accountability Reporting for Community Colleges (ARCC) 2007 Report for Cerritos College Bill Farmer and Nathan Durdella.
Cuesta College ARCC Data Report to the San Luis Obispo Community College District Board of Trustees May 5, 2010.
Six CCC districts met the selection criteria as comparable college districts to MSJC. Spring 2008 headcount & FTES were used for the analysis. The districts.
Diversity SP’09 “Get to Know MSJC Students from the Perspective of the Facts and the Stats” Key Focus Areas: Diversity Key Focus Areas: Diversity MSJC.
MSJC BSI Baseline Measures using FA’06 as Baseline and includes SP’07/FA’07/SP’08 Prepared for Instructional Services Updated 7/22/08 Compiled by MSJC.
November 12, 2009 Grossmont - Cuyamaca Community College District Grossmont - Cuyamaca Community College District.
Brand Review SP’09 “Get to Know MSJC Students from the Perspective of the Facts and the Stats” Key Focus Areas: Headcount Key Focus Areas: Headcount MSJC.
MSJC Fall 2009 BSI Supplemental Instruction (SI) MSJC SI Coordinator: Janice Levasseur, M.S. MVC Math Center Coordinator Instructor of Mathematics.
Local / Neighboring College Comparison. % chg vs. yr ago CAGR for past 10 yrs % chg vs. 10 yr sago CCC Districts % chg vs. 10 yrs ago CAGR for past 10.
What Did We Find - Challenges Homogenous population High levels of poverty High number of first generation college students High levels of math dual placement.
 California community colleges serve over 2.9 million students each year  70 to 80% of students enrolled in California community colleges need developmental.
1 MSJC Instructional Presentation TBD, 2008 Supplemental Instruction (SI) MSJC - MVC Fall’06 - Spring’07 - Fall’07 - Spring’08 Source: MSJC MVC Math Coordinator.
Pierce College Students: Who They Are & How They’re Doing Carol Kozeracki Student Success Mini-Conference February 9, 2007.
Accountability Measures 2008 Central Piedmont Community College.
BASIC SKILLS & Budget Cuts Mike Orkin Educational Services October, 2011.
Institutional Effectiveness at CPCC DENISE H WELLS.
MSJC Growth Transfers to UC & CSU College Going Rates MSJC Enrollment.
Glendale Community College: Statewide Accountability Reporting Edward Karpp Associate Dean, Institutional Research & Planning January 24, 2008.
Glendale Community College: Statewide Accountability Reporting 2010 Data Edward Karpp Dean of Research, Planning, and Grants November 15, 2010.
Legislative Requirement 2013 House File 215. Category Cut Scores Based on a Normal Distribution across Measures.
Glendale Community College: Statewide Accountability Reporting 2009 Data Edward Karpp Associate Dean, Institutional Research & Planning December 21, 2009.
Updated Friday, October 31, 2008
Edward Karpp Dean of Research, Planning, and Grants November 15, 2010
Edward Karpp Dean of Research, Planning, and Grants November 19, 2012
Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges (ARCC)
SCC Basic Skills Initiative
MSJC Growth Transfers to UC & CSU College Going Rates MSJC Enrollment
Accelerated Pathway at Leeward CC: Early Results
Educational Master Plan
California Community College Basic Skills Initiative
Brand Review SP’09 Key Focus Areas: Diversity
Prepared for Instructional Services Updated 7/22/08
SCC Basic Skills Initiative
Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges (ARCC)
AB 705 Implementation requirements
Presentation to the Mt. San Jacinto College Board of Trustees
Brand Review SP’09 Key Focus Area: Online Update
MSJC Fall 2009 BSI Supplemental Instruction (SI)
MSJC Educational Partners Breakfast 2010
MSJC Demographics AY 2007-’08
CCC Operational Definitions
Edward Karpp Dean of Research, Planning, and Grants January 17, 2012
Glendale Community College: Statewide Accountability Reporting Data
Presentation transcript:

MSJC Assessment Scores FA’06 as Baseline and includes SP’07/FA’07/SP’08 Updated 7/22/08 Compiled by MSJC R&D Dept.- C. Hawkins / IT MIS WO# XBRO.BSI

CCC Operational Definitions Success rate = # of “A, B, C and CR” grades divided by (the # of all grades) “A, B, C, CR, D, F, NC, I and W” grades multiplied by 100 Retention rate = # of “A, B, C, CR, D, F, NC and I ” grades divided by (the # of all grades) “A, B, C, CR, D, F, NC, I and W” grades multiplied by 100 Persistence rate = # of students in a particular fall semester who were counted as a student the following fall semester, divided by the total # of students in the initial fall semester, multiplied by 100 Repetition rate = # of students who earned (a non-successful grade) “D, F, NC, I or W” who subsequently re-enrolled in the same course multiplied by 100 Development Educational = DEV = course section # < 100* aka ‘below college level’ courses 1 FTES = 15 contact hr/wk x 17.5 wk/semester x 2 semesters = 525 contact hr Source: Basic Skills as a Foundation for Student in California Community Colleges (CCC) - Assessment Tool for Best Practices in Basic Skills – p103 *MSJC definition of DEV MSJCD R&P Dept. XCJH

1 St Time MSJC Students Total # Assessed 2,830 1,701 3,580 1,333 On average, 3 out of 4 (76%) of 1st time students were assessed each semester ranging from a low of 3 out of 5 in SP’08 to a high of 8.5 out of 10 (85%) in FA’07. On average, 3 out of 4 (76%) of 1st time students were assessed each semester ranging from a low of 3 out of 5 in SP’08 to a high of 8.5 out of 10 (85%) in FA’07. Source: MSJC- IT MIS DataTel WO# XBRO.BSI.Report

MSJC - Students % Assessed into DEV Total # Assessed into DEV: 2,725 1,650 3,276 1,299 On average, 95% of all 1st time students that were assessed, assess into a DEV courses, ‘below college level’ course (course sections #s < 100) Q1 Baseline Source: MSJC- IT MIS DataTel WO# XBRO.BSI.Report

MSJC - Students % Assessed Below College Level Source: MSJC- IT MIS DataTel WO# XBRO.BSI.Report The % of students assessed in Developmental Educational (DEV) English and math courses have remained relatively constant from the FA’06 baseline of 87% and 93%, respectively. The % of students assessed in Developmental Educational (DEV) English and math courses have remained relatively constant from the FA’06 baseline of 87% and 93%, respectively. English 98 or below Baseline Math 96 or below Q1a

MSJC - Students % Assessed Pre-collegiate Basic Skills 1 level below college level The percentage of students assessed in pre-collegiate Basic Skills English and math decreased from the FA’06 baselines of 38% and 30%, respectfully. The percentage of students assessed in pre-collegiate Basic Skills English and math decreased from the FA’06 baselines of 38% and 30%, respectfully. English 98 Baseline Math 96 Source: MSJC- IT MIS DataTel WO# XBRO.BSI.Report Q1b

MSJC - Students % Assessed Below Pre-collegiate Level Source: MSJC- IT MIS DataTel WO# XBRO.BSI.Report The % of students assessed in Developmental Educational English courses below pre- collegiate level increased considerable from the FA’06 baselines of 49%. Math remained relatively unchanged. The % of students assessed in Developmental Educational English courses below pre- collegiate level increased considerable from the FA’06 baselines of 49%. Math remained relatively unchanged. English 62 or below Baseline Math 90 or below Q1c

MSJC - Course Sections English & Math # DEV Sections Baseline Baseline The baseline of DEV English sections has increase from 98 (46% of total sections) to 113 (50%). The baseline of DEV math sections, 115 is also up slightly but accounts for a smaller % of total sections (74% in FA06 vs. 71% in SP08). E n g l i s h M a t h Source: MSJC- IT MIS DataTel WO# XBRO.BSI.Report Q2a Q3a