Making Communities Safer Population Management/Control Strategies ASCA All Directors Training Session 2 December 3, 2010 CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS COMMISSIONER.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
July CPOC Meeting. Key Changes to AB 109 AB 109 is modified by AB 117 Realignment is now operative on October 1, 2011 (budget also establishes the community.
Advertisements

AB 109 Public Safety Realignment December 5, 2013.
Sentencing Structure Comparisons Barb Tombs July 16, 2007 Presentation to the CT Sentencing Task Force Subcommittees.
Public Safety Performance Project October 2, 2012 Less Crime at Lower Costs Special Council on Criminal Justice Reform for Georgians.
Section Eight Sexual Offenses and Classifications.
1 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION 2012 National Association of Sentencing Commissions Terri McDonald, Undersecretary, Operations.
New Directions in Prosecution
Chapter 12 Preparing for Prisoner Reentry: Discretionary Parole and Mandatory Release.
Background The Sentencing Commission is a public governor and legislature- appointed body whose purpose is to study Louisiana sentencing and incarceration.
Sheriff K.C. Clark County Attorney Brad Carlyon. Protect our Citizens Reduce the Crime Rate Punishment Rehabilitation.
1 _____ March 5, 2009 SC Sentencing Reform Commission Presenter South Carolina Attorney General Henry McMaster S206/H3166 _____.
RREC – The Public Policy Perspective
Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA): Treatment and Supervision
Study of Virginia’s Parole- Eligible Inmate Population.
Agenda HB 1006 TimeActivityPresenter 10:00-10:30 Greeting and Opening Remarks Commissioner Bruce Lemmon Deputy Commissioner James Basinger Executive Director.
Reducing the Prison Population: The Sentencing Project
Public Safety Realignment Local custody for non-violent, non- serious, non-sex offenders Changes to State Parole Local Post-release Supervision Local.
Sentence Credits and Inmate Release
Texas Correctional Office on Offenders with Medical or Mental Impairments (TCOOMMI) Medically Recommended Intensive Supervision (MRIS) FY12 Annual Report.
THE IMPACT OF AB 109 ON LAPD. Overview AB 109 impact on the LAPD Statistical information AB 109 impact on LAPD jail facilities Securing the safety of.
Virginia’s Geriatric Release Provision. 2 Geriatric Release Provision & Truth-in-Sentencing  The Geriatric Release Provision was adopted as part of the.
TOP TEN WAYS TO LOSE YOUR TEACHING CERTIFICATE
BOPPPS W&M Presentation - 1 Key Performance Measure #1 Parole Recidivism  Percentage of Matrix Inmates (applies to offenders whose crime(s) were.
Second Chances: Housing and Services for Re-entering Prisoners National Alliance to End Homelessness Annual Conference Nikki Delgado Program Manager Corporation.
September 20, 2011 Criminal Justice Realignment OCTOBER 1, 2011.
1 Division of Adult Parole Operations MARGARITA PEREZ Deputy Director Enhancing Public Safety through the Successful Reintegration of Offenders.
When Does Criminal Justice Realignment Take Effect? 1 Eligible felonies sentenced to county jail: applies to any person sentenced on or after October 1,
1 THE MINISTRY OF THE SOLICITOR GENERAL Office of the Correctional Investigator Royal Canadian Mounted Police Solicitor General Department National Parole.
September 8, 2014 VIRGINIA CRIMINAL SENTENCING COMMISSION Two Decades of Truth-in- Sentencing in Virginia Update.
The Rhode Island Experience Ellen Evans Alexander Assistant Director RI Department of Corrections.
1 The MDOC Five Year Plan to Control Prison Growth Phase III: Long Term Policy Options SUMMARY BRIEF SUMMARY BRIEF Preliminary MDOC Proposal Revising Michigan’s.
Snohomish County Sheriff’s Office Special Investigations Unit n 98% of our investigations involve crimes where the victim has been assaulted by someone.
Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections
1 A Presentation to Senate Judiciary B And Judiciary C Committees February 15, 2000 Kari Belvin, Senate Fiscal Services Chris Keaton, Legislative Fiscal.
ANALYSIS OF LOUISIANA PRISON SYSTEM 1 Main Office: 720 Kearney St. Denver, CO Ph Wendy Naro-Ware October2012.
Click Here to Add Text This could be a call out area. Bullet Points to emphasize Association for Criminal Justice Research (California) 76th Semi-Annual.
Salient Factor Score CTSFS99. What it is How to use it.
1 Legislative Impact Analysis for the 2005 Virginia General Assembly.
Purpose of Punishment Corrections. Retribution – An eye for an eye; a tooth for a tooth. – Society, through the criminal justice system, taking on the.
Presentation of Sentence Credits for Persons Convicted of Certain B Felonies Materials to Advisory Commission on the Administration of Justice (NRS )
CHAPTER LOCAL FACILITIES FOR DETENTION County to maintain county jail; location; agreements for detention of prisoners Duties of.
Legislative Impact Analysis for the 2008 General Assembly.
Justice Alternatives for Wisconsin: Reducing the Costs of the Criminal Justice System Presentation to the Wisconsin Joint Legislative Council May 9, 2007.
Texas Correctional Office on Offenders with Medical or Mental Impairments (TCOOMMI) Medically Recommended Intensive Supervision (MRIS) FY13 Annual Report.
Immediate Sanction Probation Pilot Project Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission June 8, 2015.
INTENSIVE SUPERVISION AND THE ROLE OF GPS Thomas H. Williams, Associate Director Community Supervision Services July 14-15, 2008 United States Sentencing.
Proposed Recommendations for Guidelines Revisions.
Connecticut Department of Correction Division of Parole and Community Services Special Management Unit Parole Manager Frank Mirto October 14, 2015.
Task Force on Public Safety OREGON CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMISSION OCTOBER 30, 2013.
The Correctional System Lesson 50. The Correctional System “Most people come out of jail eventually. So you have to consider what’s going to be the effect.
BJS ReEntry Highlights (note: yearend 2002). BJS ReEntry At least 95% of all State prisoners will be released from prison at some point; nearly 80%
Criminal Justice in Indiana Impact of 1006 David N. Powell Executive Director IPAC.
Reclassifying Nonviolent, Small Quantity Possession Potential Impact on Alaska’s Budget and Society.
The Impact of Mandatory Supervised Release (MSR) Violators & Time Served on IDOC’s Population David E. Olson, Ph.D. & Donald Stemen, Ph.D. Department of.
Corrections May 5, United States World Leader The United States has the largest prison system in the world with 2.2 million prisoners behind bars.
Corrections Also known as community-based corrections Community corrections: Refers to a wide range of sentences that depend on correctional resources.
Department of Sociology & Criminal Justice What is an appropriate punishment or response? What do you expect your response to do for the offender, potential.
Senate Bill 64 Omnibus Crime/Corrections Bill To improve public safety, slow the growth of Alaska’s prison population, and save money. 1.
Criminal Justice Policy Development and Resource Reinvestment Len Engel, Esq. December 10, 2010 What Works Conference Portland, OR Crime and Justice Institute.
When Discrimination is Legal: The Social Costs of Felony Convictions
South Dakota: Criminal Justice Reform
Corrections GOVT 2306, Module 10.
Corrections May 4, 2017.
Graduate School of Social Work
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Prisoners: Characteristics of U.S. Inmate Populations
Reducing the Prison Population: The Sentencing Project
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Washington State Three Strikes Law
A brief overview of the Act’s impact on federal criminal defendants.
Presentation transcript:

Making Communities Safer Population Management/Control Strategies ASCA All Directors Training Session 2 December 3, 2010 CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS COMMISSIONER MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

AGENDA Changes in Mississippi Parole and Earned Time Laws Number of Inmates Eligible for Parole Cost Avoidance Number of Inmates Eligible for Medical Release Cost Avoidance Number of Inmates Eligible for Intensive Supervision Program (House Arrest) Cost Avoidance Questions and Comments Closing Remarks

We needed to figure out…. Who we were mad at… AND Who we were afraid of. Mississippi has plenty of people locked up. We have 2.9 million citizens in Mississippi with about 21,000 of these citizens locked up behind bars. By comparison, the state of Arkansas has 2.8 million citizens with 16,400 behind bars. We had to figure something out….. 3

Mississippi’s Truth In Sentencing Law Five jurisdictions - the District of Columbia, Mississippi, New York, Tennessee, and Wisconsin - made larger changes to their truth-in-sentencing (TIS) structure than was required for federal dollars. The crimes initially required under the TIS guidelines were: Murder, Negligent Manslaughter, Rape, Other Sexual Assault, Robbery and Assault. In addition to increasing the percentage of sentence served requirements, some states also altered their release by eliminating parole for violent offenders. In Mississippi prior to 1995, most offenders were eligible for parole after they completed 25 percent of their sentences. The new law, passed in 1995, abolished parole and the percent of sentence to be served was increased to 85 percent. Sentencing for sex offenses was made mandatory in Current Fiscal Strategy and Environment A little background information…

June 30, 1995 Abolished parole eligibility for all offenders who committed crimes on or after July 1, (Previously most offenders were eligible for parole after serving 25% of their sentence). Reduced the earned time allowance from 50% to 15% and established Earned Release Supervision. (Previously most offenders discharged their sentence after serving 50%. After this amendment, most offenders had to spend 85% of their sentence incarcerated and then serve the last 15% on ERS). April 15, 1999 Established the 10/30 Trusty Earned Time Allowance. July 1, 2001 Reinstated parole eligibility retroactive to January 1, 2000 for first time non-violent offenders. April 28, 2004 Increased the trusty earned time allowance to 30 days for every month served. Excluded most drug crimes except simple possession and precursor offenses from trusty eligibility. April 7, 2008 Amended parole law to make all offenders who had never been convicted of a violent crime or a crime with an enhanced penalty parole eligible regardless of the number of prior convictions. Also made sale or manufacture of a controlled substance parole eligible unless the crime had an enhanced penalty or involved over one kilogram of marijuana. March 9, 2009 Removed the 180 day cap off of meritorious earned time. April 7, 2009 Made those convicted of sale and manufacture of a controlled substance eligible for house arrest. (Previously the only drug crimes eligible for house arrest were simple possession and precursor offenses). Changes in Mississippi Parole and Earned Time Laws since

MISSISSIPPI TRUSTY EARNED TIME April 28, 2004 § (1) In addition to any other administrative reduction of sentence, an offender in trusty status as defined by the classification board of the Department of Corrections may be awarded a trusty time allowance of thirty (30) days' reduction of sentence for each thirty (30) days of participation during any calendar month in an approved program while in trusty status, including satisfactory participation in education or instructional programs, satisfactory participation in work projects and satisfactory participation in any special incentive program. Prior to April 28, 2004 the trusty earned time allowance was ten (10) days reduction of sentence for each thirty (30) days of participation in an approved program while in trusty status. Pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § , from and after April 28, 2004, a trusty earned time allowance of thirty (30) days reduction of sentence may be granted for each thirty (30) days of participation in an approved program while in trusty status. Most drug crimes except simple possession and precursor offenses were excluded from trusty eligibility. 6

7 SNAPSHOT Mississippi Trusty Earned Time § Number of offenders released from April 28, 2004 to October 31, 2010 who were receiving Trusty Time: 24,408 Of that number, 8,568 have returned to inmate status:  5,886 Technical Violation  2,682 New Sentence  35.1% Percent Returned Fiscal Impact MDOC has realized an annual cost avoidance of $20,607,988 due in large part to the passage of the 30 for 30 trusty earned time law.

8 MISSISSIPPI PAROLE LAW April 7, 2008 § AN ACT TO AMEND SECTION , MISSISSIPPI CODE OF 1972, TO PROVIDE THAT NONVIOLENT OFFENDERS CONVICTED AFTER JUNE 30, 1995, MAY BE ELIGIBLE FOR PAROLE; TO PROVIDE THAT OFFENDERS CONVICTED FOR THE SALE OF A CERTAIN QUANTITY OF DRUGS UNDER THE UNIFORM CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES LAW MAY BE ELIGIBLE FOR PAROLE; TO PROVIDE THAT AN HONORABLE DISCHARGE FROM THE ARMED SERVICES SHALL BE A FACTOR CONSIDERED IN PAROLE ELIGIBILITY. New parole law extended parole eligibility to all non-violent offenders irrespective of his/her first time offender status and extended parole eligibility to certain drug sale offenders.

9 SNAPSHOT Mississippi Parole Law § Number of Offenders Released to Parole as a result of the law modification on April 7, 2008:9,098 Number of Returns:813 Technical 368 New Sentence Percent Returned:12.9% Fiscal Impact The average annual cost avoidance of the parole law for 2008 – 2010 is $8,296,798.

Based on the MDOC population projections, our prison system was slated to grow approximately 5,000 inmates over the course of one decade. That’s a cost avoidance of $400 million. 10 Population Projection

11 MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL RELEASE July 1, 2004 § The commissioner and the medical director of the department may place an offender who has served not less than one (1) year of his or her sentence, except an offender convicted of a sex crime, on conditional medical release. However, a nonviolent offender who is terminally ill may be placed on conditional medical release regardless of the time served on his or her sentence. Upon the release of a nonviolent offender who is terminally ill, the state shall not be responsible or liable for any medical costs that may be incurred if such costs are acquired after the offender is no longer incarcerated due to his or her placement on conditional medical release. The commissioner shall not place an offender on conditional medical release unless the medical director of the department certifies to the commissioner that (a) the offender is suffering from a significant permanent physical medical condition with no possibility of recovery; (b) that his or her further incarceration will serve no rehabilitative purposes; and (c) that the state would incur unreasonable expenses as a result of his or her continued incarceration. Any offender placed on conditional medical release shall be supervised by the Division of Community Corrections of the department for the remainder of his or her sentence. An offender's conditional medical release may be revoked and the offender returned and placed in actual custody of the department if the offender violates an order or condition of his or her conditional medical release. MDOC has 91 offenders who have been approved for conditional medical release (CMR). Eighty-four (84) offenders have been released on CMR. Fifty-six (56) of the released offenders have been released since May Fiscal Impact Medical cost avoidance is $3,800,000 Incarceration cost avoidance is $1,218,808 Total Cost Avoidance = $5,018,808

MISSISSIPPI INTENSIVE SUPERVISION LAW (HOUSE ARREST) April 7, 2009 § AN ACT TO AMEND SECTION , MISSISSIPPI CODE OF 1972, TO REMOVE THE ONE-YEAR LIMITATION ON PLACEMENT IN THE INTENSIVE SUPERVISION PROGRAM; TO REMOVE THE RESTRICTION AGAINST PLACING OFFENDERS CONVICTED OF CERTAIN DRUG OFFENSES IN THE PROGRAM. The intensive supervision program may be used as an alternative to incarceration for certain offenders who are low risk and nonviolent as selected by the department or court. The court or the department may place the eligible offender on intensive supervision. 12

13 SNAPSHOT Mississippi Intensive Supervision Law (House Arrest) § Number of Offenders Released to House Arrest as a result of the law modification on April 7, 2009: 729 Number of Returns:69Technical 7New Percent Returned:10.4% Fiscal Impact Cost avoidance through 2011: $1,223,700

14 Cost Avoidance Summary Trusty Earned Time$20,607,988 Mississippi Parole Law$8,296,798 Population Projections$400,000,000 Mississippi Medical Release$5,018,808 Mississippi Intensive Supervision Program$1,223,700 TOTAL COST AVOIDANCE $435,147,294

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

The Realistic Fundamentals 22

23

Questions and Comments 24

25 Closing Remarks