 All model structures consist of two parts: Assumptions about the physical and institutional environment Assumptions about the decision processes of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Capacity Planning. How much long-range capacity is needed When more capacity is needed Where facilities should be located (location) How facilities should.
Advertisements

Introduction to Mathematical Programming
Linear Programming Problem. Introduction Linear Programming was developed by George B Dantzing in 1947 for solving military logistic operations.
Linear Programming. Introduction: Linear Programming deals with the optimization (max. or min.) of a function of variables, known as ‘objective function’,
Linear Programming Models & Case Studies
Study Unit 10 Investment Decisions. SU – The Capital Budgeting Process Definition – Planning and controlling investment for long-term projects.
Transactions Costs.
Causal Loop Diagrams Esmaeil Khedmati Morasae Center for Community-Based Participatory Research in Health Tehran University of Medical Sciences January.
Ch 6 Project Analysis Under Certainty
Capital Budgeting Evaluation Technique Pertemuan 7-10 Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
Chapter 11 Growth and Technological Progress: The Solow-Swan Model
Planning under Uncertainty
CONCEPTS of VALUE. FACTORS OF VALUE UTILITY –THE ABILITY OF A PRODUCT TO SATISFY HUMAN WANTS. RELATES TO THE DAMAND SIDE OF THE MARKET. SCARCITY –THE.
Demand and Elasticity A high cross elasticity of demand [between two goods indicates that they] compete in the same market. [This can prevent a supplier.
Hanken Svenska handelshögskolan / Hanken School of Economics Customer Portfolios Customer Equity Helsinki Summer School 2009, Hanken Andreas.
Linear Programming Introduction. linear function linear constraintsA Linear Programming model seeks to maximize or minimize a linear function, subject.
Linear and Integer Programming Models
Basic Optimization Problem Notes for AGEC 641 Bruce McCarl Regents Professor of Agricultural Economics Texas A&M University Spring 2005.
Engineering Systems Analysis for Design Richard de Neufville © Massachusetts Institute of Technology Flaw of Averages Slide 1 of 29 Richard de Neufville.
Strategic Financial Decision-Making Framework
Linear Programming.
TOPICS 1. FINANCIAL DECISIONS, INVESTMENT DECISIONS AND DIVIDEND DECISIONS 2. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT PROCESS 3.PROFIT MAXIMIZATION AND WEALTH MAXIMIZATION.
Welcome to the Presentation on Marginal Costing
FOOD ENGINEERING DESIGN AND ECONOMICS
Financial and Cost-Volume-Profit Models
CHAPTER TWO The Nature of Costs. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. 2-2 Outline of Chapter 2 The Nature of.
Chapter 3 The McKinnon-Shaw School
Introduction to MCDM Slim Zekri Dept. Natural Resource Economics Sultan Qaboos University.
Roman Keeney AGEC  In many situations, economic equations are not linear  We are usually relying on the fact that a linear equation.
Closing the Loop: Dynamics of Simple Structures
1 The Basics of Capital Structure Decisions Corporate Finance Dr. A. DeMaskey.
Modeling.
Chapter 6 Production. ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 62 Topics to be Discussed The Technology of Production Production with One Variable Input.
5.1 Household Behavior and Consumer Choice We have studied the basics of markets: how demand and supply determine prices and how changes in demand and.
Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 12 Financial and Cost- Volume-Profit Models.
STDM - Linear Programming 1 By Isuru Manawadu B.Sc in Accounting Sp. (USJP), ACA, AFM
1 DSCI 3023 Linear Programming Developed by Dantzig in the late 1940’s A mathematical method of allocating scarce resources to achieve a single objective.
Types of IP Models All-integer linear programs Mixed integer linear programs (MILP) Binary integer linear programs, mixed or all integer: some or all of.
Managerial Decision Making and Problem Solving
BUSINESS MATHEMATICS & STATISTICS. LECTURE 45 Planning Production Levels: Linear Programming.
1 Chapter 7 Applying Simulation to Decision Problems.
Chapter 5 Choice Under Uncertainty. Chapter 5Slide 2 Topics to be Discussed Describing Risk Preferences Toward Risk Reducing Risk The Demand for Risky.
Chapter 13, Sterman: Modeling Decision Making Powerpoints by: James Burns.
Basic Principles of Economics Rögnvaldur J. Sæmundsson January
Chapter 1 Introduction n Introduction: Problem Solving and Decision Making n Quantitative Analysis and Decision Making n Quantitative Analysis n Model.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 9 A Real Intertemporal Model with Investment.
IT Applications for Decision Making. Operations Research Initiated in England during the world war II Make scientifically based decisions regarding the.
1 Optimization Techniques Constrained Optimization by Linear Programming updated NTU SY-521-N SMU EMIS 5300/7300 Systems Analysis Methods Dr.
INVESTMENTS: Analysis and Management Third Canadian Edition INVESTMENTS: Analysis and Management Third Canadian Edition W. Sean Cleary Charles P. Jones.
Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) Dr. BALAMURUGAN MUTHURAMAN Chapter
Adeyl Khan, Faculty, BBA, NSU 1 Introduction to Linear Programming  A Linear Programming model seeks to maximize or minimize a linear function, subject.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Accounting for Managers, 1Ce, Ch 8 1.
LINEAR PROGRAMMING. Linear Programming Linear programming is a mathematical technique. This technique is applied for choosing the best alternative from.
Output, growth and business cycles Econ 102. How does GDP change over time? GDP/cap in countries: The average growth rates of countries are different.
CHAPTER TWENTY-ONE Portfolio Management CHAPTER TWENTY-ONE Portfolio Management Cleary / Jones Investments: Analysis and Management.
Capital Budgeting Tools and Technique. What is Capital Budgeting In “Capital budgeting” capital relates to the total funds employs in an enterprise as.
Aggregate Supply What is aggregate supply? Short run aggregate supply
P4 Advanced Investment Appraisal. 2 2 Section C: Advanced Investment Appraisal C1. Discounted cash flow techniques and the use of free cash flows. C2.
Demand Estimation and Forecasting Dr. Nihal Hennayake.
Structure and Behavior of Dynamic Systems
1 2 Linear Programming Chapter 3 3 Chapter Objectives –Requirements for a linear programming model. –Graphical representation of linear models. –Linear.
UNIT 6 COSTS AND PRODUCTION: LONG AND SHORT-RUN, TOTAL, FIXED AND VARIABLE COSTS, LAW OF DIMINISHING RETURNS, INCREASING, CONSTANT AND DIMINISHING RETURNS.
Decision Making Decision - making a choice from two or more alternatives. Problem - an obstacle that makes it difficult to achieve a desired goal or purpose.
Chapter 14 of Sterman: Formulating Nonlinear Relationships
Chapter 21 Jones, Investments: Analysis and Management
Concepts and Objectives of Cost Accounting
Delay A process where output lags behind its input in some fashion
Linear Programming Introduction.
Linear Programming Introduction.
Dr. Arslan Ornek MATHEMATICAL MODELS
Presentation transcript:

 All model structures consist of two parts: Assumptions about the physical and institutional environment Assumptions about the decision processes of the agents

 Includes the model boundary and stock and flow structures of people, material, money, information, and so forth that characterize the system  Forrester’s Urban Dynamics sought to understand why America’s large cities continued to decay despite massive amounts of aid and numerous renewal programs

 Refer to the decision rules that determine the behavior of the actors in the system  In Urban Dynamics, these included decision rules governing migration and construction

 Institutional structure of a system is relatively straightforward.

 Subtle and challenging  To be useful simulation models must mimic the behavior of the real decision makers so that they respond appropriately, not only for conditions observed in the past but also for circumstances never yet encountered

 Modelers must make a sharp distinction between decisions and decision rules  Decision rules are the policies and protocols specifying how the decision maker processes available information  Decisions are the outcome of this process

 It is not sufficient to model a particular decision.  Modelers must detect and represent the guiding policy that yields the stream of decisions  Every rate in the stock and flow structure constitutes a decision point, and The modeler must specify precisely the decision rule determining the rate

 Can be thought of as an information processing procedure  The inputs to the decision process are various types of information or cues The cues are then interpreted by the decision maker to yield the decision Decision rules may not use all available information

 Cues used to revise prices in the department store case include wholesale costs, inventory turnover, and competitor prices  Department store pricing decisions do not depend on interest rates, required rates of return, store overhead, trade-offs of holding costs against the risk of stock-outs, estimates of the elasticity of demand, or any sophisticated strategic reasoning.

 Is our model a descriptive model or is it a prescriptive one?  Recall: Descriptive models…tell it like it actually is Prescriptive models…tell is like it should be

 Mental models of the decision makers  Organizational, political, personal, and other factors, influence the selection of cues from the set of available information  The cues (information) used is not necessarily processed optimally

 All human behavior can be viewed as involving participants who maximize their utility from a stable set of preferences and accumulate an optimal amount of information

 Not only do people make optimal decisions given the information they have, but they also invest exactly the optimal time and effort in the decision process, ceasing their deliberations when the expected gain to further effort equals the cost

 The Baker Criterion: The inputs to all decision rules in models must be restricted to information actually available to the real decision makers  Senator Howard Baker: What did he (Nixon) know and when did he know it??

 Must ask, “What did they know and when did they know it?”  To properly mimic the behavior of a real system, a model can use as an input to a decision only those sources of information actually available to and used by the decision makers in the real system

 First, no one knows with certainty what the future will bring  Second, perceived and actual conditions often differ  Third, modelers cannot assume decision makers know with certainty the outcomes of contingencies they have never experienced

 All variables and relationships should have real world counterparts and meaning  The units of measure in all equations must balance without the use of arbitrary scaling factors  Decision making should not be assumed to conform to any prior theory but should be investigated firsthand

 Fractional Increase Rate  Fractional Decrease Rate  Adjustment to a goal

 R I = g * S  Here, R I is an input rate, g is some fraction (<1) and S is the stock that accumulates R I  Examples  Birth rate = birth rate normal * Population  Interest Due = Interest Rate * Debt Outstanding

 These examples all generate first-order, ________ loops.  By themselves, these rates create exponential growth  It’s never a good practice for these rates to be anything other than non-negative

 R O = g * S  Here, R O is an output rate, g is some fraction (<1) and S is the stock that is depleted by R O  Examples  Death rate = death rate normal * Population  Death rate = Population / Average Lifetime

 Left to themselves these rates generate exponential decay  Left to themselves, these rates create first-order, negative feedback loops

 R I = Discrepancy / AT = (S* - S) / AT  Examples Change in Price = (Competitors price – Price) / Price Adjustment time Net Hiring Rate = (Desired Labor – Labor) / Hiring Delay Bldg heat loss = (outside temp – inside temp) / temp adjustment time

 Generates exponential goal-seeking behavior  Is also considered a first-order, negative feedback loop  Often the actual state of the system is not known to decision makers who rely instead on perceptions or beliefs about the state of the system In these cases, the gap is the difference between the desired and the perceived state of the system

 The Stock Management Structure: Rate=Normal Rate + adjustments  Flow = Resource * Productivity  Y = Y * Effect of X1 on Y * Effect of X2 on Y* … * Effect of Xn on Y

 Rate = Normal Rate + Adjustments  If the input rate is R I = (S* - S) / AT, and the output rate is R O, then the steady state equilibrium will be S = S* - R O * AT  To prevent this the stock management structure adds the expected outflow to the stock adjustment to prevent the steady state error:  Inflow = Expected outflow + Adjustment for Stock

 The flows affecting a stock frequently depend on resources other than the stock itself  The rate is determined by a resource and the productivity of that resource  Rate = Resource * Productivity, or  Rate = Resource/Resources Required per Unit Produced

 Production = Labor Force * Average Productivity

These are called MULTIPLICATIVE EFFECTS Examples:  Rate = Normal Fractional Rate * Stock * Effect of X1 on Rate * … * Effect of Xn on Rate  Birth Rate = Birth Rate Normal * Population * Effect of Material on Birth Rate * Effect of Pollution on Birth Rate * Effect of Crowding on Birth Rate * Effect of Food on Birth Rate

 A reference year of 1970 was defined  Normal fractional birth rate was the world average in the reference year  All of the effects were normalized to their 1970 values, making those normalized values equal to 1

 Create nonlinearities  Forrester really believes the effects are multiplicative  As an alternative consider additive effects:

 Example:  Change in wage = Fractional Change in Wage * Wage  Fractional Change in Wage = Change in Wage from Labor Availability + Change in Wage from Inflation + change in Wage from Productivity + Change in Wage from Profitability + Change in Wage from Equity

 Linear formulations are common because such formulations are simple  Multiplicative formulations are generally preferable and sometimes required  The actual relationship between births and food, crowding, or pollution is typically complex and nonlinear

 Both are approximations to the underlying, true nonlinear function: Y = f(X1, X2, …, Xn)  Each approximation is centered on a particular operating point given by the reference point Y* = f(X1*, X2*, …, Xn*)

 Will be reasonable in the neighborhood of the operating point but increasingly diverge from the true, underlying function as the system moves away from it

 Additive assumes the effects of each input are strongly separable  Strong separability is clearly incorrect in extreme conditions  In the birth rate example, births must be zero when food per capita is zero no matter how favorable the other conditions are  The additive formulation can never capture this

 Fuzzy MIN Function  Fuzzy MAX Function  Floating goals

 A rate or auxiliary is determined by the most scarce of several resources  Production = MIN(Desired Production, Capacity)  Generally, Y = MIN(X, Y*), where Y* is the capacity of the process

 The sharp discontinuity created by the MIN function is often unrealistic  Often the capacity constraint is approached gradually due to physical characteristics of the system  A fuzzy MIN function will accomplish this for us so that there is not sharp discontinuity

 Analogous to fuzzy MIN function  Hiring Rate = MAX(0, Desired Hiring Rate) prevents Hiring Rate from ever gong negative  Useful in situations where decision makers want to keep a variable Y at its desired rate even as X falls to zero

 The goal moves toward the actual state of the system while the actual state of the system moves toward the goal.

 Nonlinear Weighted Average  Modeling Search: Hill-Climbing Optimization  Resource Allocation

 Decision makers must optimize a system but lack knowledge of the system structure that might help them identify the optimal operating point  Examples: A firm wants to maximize profit Minimize costs Maximize the mix of labor and capital  Can do this in simulated real time using a variant of floating goals

 The model adjusts the mix in the right direction, toward a desired state.  This is called hill-climbing

 Converges to local optima  Must start it from a number of different points in the search space to ensure that a global optimum is found  But that is NOT WHAT IS GOING ON HERE— THE SIMPLE TECHNIQUE USED HERE IS JUST A VARIANT OF THE 1 ST ORDER NEGATIVE FEEDBACK GOAL SEEKING STRUCTURE

 All outflows require First-Order Control  Avoid IF..THEN..ELSE Formulations  Disaggregate Net Flows

 Real stocks such as inventories, personnel, cash and other resources cannot become negative  Outflow rates must be formulated so these stocks remain nonnegative even under extreme conditions  Do so requires all outflows to have first- order control

 Means the outflows are governed by a first- order negative feedback loop that shuts down the flow as the stock drops to zero  Examples: Outflow = MIN (Desired Outflow, Maximum Outflow) Outflow = Stock / Residence time Maximum Outflow = Stock / Minimum Residence time

 Sterman doesn’t like these because they introduce sharp discontinuities into your models, discontinuities that are often inappropriate.  Individual decisions are rarely either/or  In many cases the decision is a compromise or weighted average of competing pressures

 They create conditional statements that are often difficult to understand, especially when the conditions are complex or nested with others

DISCUSSION