Basic characteristics of stratospheric predictability: Results from 1-month ensemble hindcast experiments for 1979-2009 Masakazu Taguchi Aichi University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sub-seasonal to seasonal prediction David Anderson.
Advertisements

Impact of EOS MLS ozone data on medium-extended range ensemble forecasts Jacob C. H. Cheung 1, Joanna D. Haigh 1, David R. Jackson 2 1 Imperial College.
1NCAS-Climate, University of Reading
Potential Predictability and Extended Range Prediction of Monsoon ISO’s Prince K. Xavier Centre for Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences Indian Institute of.
Introduction to JMA’s one-month model - focusing on an extreme rainfall event during Asian monsoon season - Hiroaki MINEMATSU Tokyo Climate Center Japan.
Spring Onset in the Northern Hemisphere: A Role for the Stratosphere? Robert X. Black Brent A. McDaniel School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Georgia.
Enhanced seasonal forecast skill following SSWs DynVar/SNAP Workshop, Reading, UK, April 2013 Michael Sigmond (CCCma) John Scinocca, Slava Kharin.
Figures from: Baldwin, M.P., and T.J. Dunkerton, 2001: Stratospheric harbingers of anomalous weather regimes. Science, 294, Fig. 1. Time-height.
The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology 3.1 Prediction skill in the Tropical Indian.
Figures from : Thompson, D.W.J., M.P. Baldwin, and J.M. Wallace, 2001: Stratospheric connection to Northern Hemisphere wintertime weather: implications.
YODEN Shigeo Dept. of Geophysics, Kyoto Univ., JAPAN March 3-4, 2005: SPARC Temperature Trend Meeting at University of Reading 1.Introduction 2.Statistical.
Predictability of the Arctic Oscillation From Stratospheric Influences in Operational Forecasts Junsu Kim 1, Arun Kumar 2, and Thomas Reichler 1 ( 1 Univ.
Variability of Tropical to Extra-tropical Transport in the Lower Stratosphere Mark Olsen UMBC/GSFC Anne Douglass, Paul Newman, and Eric Nash.
1 Assessment of the CFSv2 real-time seasonal forecasts for Wanqiu Wang, Mingyue Chen, and Arun Kumar CPC/NCEP/NOAA.
Regional Climate Modeling in the Source Region of Yellow River with complex topography using the RegCM3: Model validation Pinhong Hui, Jianping Tang School.
© Crown copyright /0653 Met Office and the Met Office logo are registered trademarks Met Office Hadley Centre, FitzRoy Road, Exeter, Devon, EX1.
The speaker took this picture on 11 December, 2012 over the ocean near Japan. 2014/07/29 AOGS 11th Annual Meeting in Sapporo.
Influence of the stratosphere on surface winter climate Adam Scaife, Jeff Knight, Anders Moberg, Lisa Alexander, Chris Folland and Sarah Ineson. CLIVAR.
ECMWF Forecasts Laura Ferranti, Frederic Vitart and Fernando Prates.
The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology Red - ECMWF Green - Sintex Navy - POAMA-2.0.
EUROBRISA Workshop – Beyond seasonal forecastingBarcelona, 14 December 2010 INSTITUT CATALÀ DE CIÈNCIES DEL CLIMA Beyond seasonal forecasting F. J. Doblas-Reyes,
Stratospheric harbingers of anomalous weather regimes. M.P. Baldwin and T.J Dunkerton Science, 294:581. Propagation of the Arctic Oscillation from.
Predictability of Stratospheric Sudden Warming of 2013 SPARC-SNAP Team Om P Tripathi, Andrew Charlton-Perez, Greg Roff, Mark Baldwin, Martin Charron, Stephen.
Shuhei Maeda Climate Prediction Division
Improved ensemble-mean forecast skills of ENSO events by a zero-mean stochastic model-error model of an intermediate coupled model Jiang Zhu and Fei Zheng.
1.Introduction Prediction of sea-ice is not only important for shipping but also for weather as it can have a significant climatic impact. Sea-ice predictions.
11 Predictability of Monsoons in CFS V. Krishnamurthy Center for Ocean-Land-Atmosphere Studies Institute of Global Environment and Society Calverton, MD.
ENSEMBLES RT4/RT5 Joint Meeting Paris, February 2005 Overview of the WP5.3 Activities Partners: ECMWF, METO/HC, MeteoSchweiz, KNMI, IfM, CNRM, UREAD/CGAM,
Predictability of stratospheric sudden warming events and associated stratosphere-troposphere coupling system T. Hirooka, T. Ichimaru (DEPS, Kyushu Univ.),
3. Products of the EPS for three-month outlook 1) Outline of the EPS 2) Examples of products 3) Performance of the system.
Y. Fujii 1, S. Matsumoto 1, T. Yasuda 1, M. Kamachi 1, K. Ando 2 ( 1 MRI/JMA, 2 JAMSTEC ) OSE Experiments Using the JMA-MRI ENSO Forecasting System 2nd.
9. Impact of Time Sale on Ω When all EMs are completely uncorrelated, When all EMs produce the exact same time series, Predictability of Ensemble Weather.
Application of a Hybrid Dynamical-Statistical Model for Week 3 and 4 Forecast of Atlantic/Pacific Tropical Storm and Hurricane Activity Jae-Kyung E. Schemm.
Stratosphere-Troposhere Coupling in Dynamical Seasonal Predictions Bo Christiansen Danish Meteorological Institute.
The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology Verification and Metrics (CAWCR)
Dynamical Influence on Inter-annual and Decadal Ozone Change Sandip Dhomse, Mark Weber,
An Examination Of Interesting Properties Regarding A Physics Ensemble 2012 WRF Users’ Workshop Nick P. Bassill June 28 th, 2012.
The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology Sub-Seasonal Prediction Activities and.
Mukougawa, Hitoshi 1, Yuhji Kuroda 2 and Toshihiko Hirooka 3 1 Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, JAPAN 2 Meteorological Research.
One-year re-forecast ensembles with CCSM3.0 using initial states for 1 January and 1 July in Model: CCSM3 is a coupled climate model with state-of-the-art.
ECMWF Training course 26/4/2006 DRD meeting, 2 July 2004 Frederic Vitart 1 Predictability on the Monthly Timescale Frederic Vitart ECMWF, Reading, UK.
1 An Assessment of the CFS real-time forecasts for Wanqiu Wang, Mingyue Chen, and Arun Kumar CPC/NCEP/NOAA.
NCEP CMC ECMWF MEAN ANA BRIAN A COLLE MINGHUA ZHENG │ EDMUND K. CHANG Applying Fuzzy Clustering Analysis to Assess Uncertainty and Ensemble System Performance.
Judith Curry James Belanger Mark Jelinek Violeta Toma Peter Webster 1
Yuiko Ichikawa and Masaru Inatsu Hokkaido University, Japan 1 Systematic bias and forecast spread in JMA one-month forecast projected on the MJO phase.
1 Summary of CFS ENSO Forecast September 2010 update Mingyue Chen, Wanqiu Wang and Arun Kumar Climate Prediction Center 1.Latest forecast of Nino3.4 index.
© Crown copyright Met Office Predictability and systematic error growth in Met Office MJO predictions Ann Shelly, Nick Savage & Sean Milton, UK Met Office.
1 An Assessment of the CFS real-time forecasts for Wanqiu Wang, Mingyue Chen, and Arun Kumar CPC/NCEP/NOAA.
1 A review of CFS forecast skill for Wanqiu Wang, Arun Kumar and Yan Xue CPC/NCEP/NOAA.
Fifth Session of the South Asian Climate Outlook Forum (SASCOF-5) JMA Seasonal Prediction of South Asian Climate for Summer 2014 Hitoshi Sato Climate Prediction.
Marcel Rodney McGill University Department of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences Supervisors: Dr. Hai Lin, Prof. Jacques Derome, Prof. Seok-Woo Son.
Francois Engelbrecht, Thando Ndarana, Yushi Morioka, Swadhin Behera, Marcus Thatcher, John McGregor, Mary-Jane Bopape, Johan Malherbe Simulating the radiative.
Impact of the representation of the stratosphere on tropospheric weather forecasts Sana Mahmood © Crown copyright 07/0XXX Met Office and the Met Office.
1 Summary of CFS ENSO Forecast December 2010 update Mingyue Chen, Wanqiu Wang and Arun Kumar Climate Prediction Center 1.Latest forecast of Nino3.4 index.
1 Summary of CFS ENSO Forecast August 2010 update Mingyue Chen, Wanqiu Wang and Arun Kumar Climate Prediction Center 1.Latest forecast of Nino3.4 index.
International Workshop on Monthly-to-Seasonal Climate Prediction National Taiwan Normal Univ., October 2003 Evaluation of the APCN Multi-Model Ensemble.
JMA Seasonal Prediction of South Asian Climate for OND 2017
Seasonal outlook for summer 2017 over Japan
JMA Seasonal Prediction of South Asian Climate for OND 2017
Challenges of Seasonal Forecasting: El Niño, La Niña, and La Nada
Switching from CORE to JRA-55 forcing
WCRP Workshop on Seasonal Prediction
Why Should We Care About the Stratosphere?
Shuhua Li and Andrew W. Robertson
Progress in Seasonal Forecasting at NCEP
Predictability assessment of climate predictions within the context
Case Studies in Decadal Climate Predictability
Impact of aircraft data in the MSC forecast systems
Strat-trop interaction and Met Office seasonal forecasting
Environment Canada Monthly and Seasonal Forecasting Systems
Presentation transcript:

Basic characteristics of stratospheric predictability: Results from 1-month ensemble hindcast experiments for Masakazu Taguchi Aichi University of Education Kariya, JAPAN

Despite potential importance, stratospheric PR for days to months is relatively unexplored. Ref.: Baldwin and Dunkerton (2001) ■Suggestion Importance of stratosphere in extended weather forecasts ■Stratospheric PR for intraseasonal timescales Relatively unexplored ⇒ JMA 1-mo. ensemble HC data became available (thru MSJ). Intro

We use data from JMA 1-mo. hindcast (HC) experiments for JMA HC data Ref.: JMA ( 2010, 2011 ) ■System JMA 1-mo. EP system of March 2011 version Global model w/ TL159(Δx≈110km), L60 to 0.1hPa ■Initial conditions 10 th, 20 th, last day of each month for Perturbations in troposphere of NH and tropics 1-month ensemble predictions with N=5 ■Boundary conditions Assume persistent SST anomalies

We use some basic quantities and measures to examine stratospheric PR. Quantities and measures Ref.: None ■JRA-25/JCDAS reanalysis and HC data A JRA, A HC,n, A HC,EM where A= [U], Z10, Z500 EM: ensemble mean, [ ]: zonal mean ■Measures to evaluate HC data for Z10 or Z500 (Φ≥20N) Root of spatial mean of error 2 of EM from JRA Spatial mean of spread at each gridpoint i: index for space i = 1, 2, …, I n: ensemble n =1, 2, …, N N = 5

Winter stratosphere has larger average and variability in RMSE, with longer timescale. RMSE Normalized RMSE of Z, poleward of 20N. 10hPa 500hPa Ref.: Black lines denote SD of interannual variability of JRA monthly Z for Φ≥20N. PL Results for each year Mean wrt year SD= 59.1 SD=362.5SD= 63.6 SD= 33.7 Normalized RMSE

PL is longer on average and has larger variability at 10hPa (in winter) than at 500hPa. PL Ref.: PL is defined when RMSE exceeds 1xSD poleward of 20N. Bin widths differ between 10 and 500 hPa. PDFs of PL (Predictable Limit) 10hPa 500hPa Will be meaningless because RMSE is very small. 15.8± ±4.1 MN±SD=5.5±1.14.1±0.7

Both average increase and variability in RMSE Z10 become large around 15 days. RMSE Ref.: None. Time variations of RMSE of Z10 (Φ ≧ 20N) INITIAL=0110 MN±1xSD of RMSE RMSE for each year

SPREAD&RMSE of Z10 are positively correlated, with large skewness of RMSE (clear outliers). SPREAD-RMSE Ref.: This figure uses time means of SPREAD/RMSE for t=15±3 d, after 11/10-02/10. Scatter plot between SPREAD and RMSE of Z10 Additional lines Best-fit line At 60N, 10hPa, Δ[U] ≥ +15 m/s Δ[U] ≤ -5 m/s Δ = EM of HC – JRA. SPREAD (m) RMSE (m) R=+0.46 FREQ. (%) FREQ. (%)

SPREAD&RMSE of Z500 are positively correlated, with less marked outliers. SPREAD-RMSE Ref.: This figure uses time means of SPREAD/RMSE for t=8±3 d, after 11/10-02/10. Scatter plot between SPREAD and RMSE of Z500 At 60N, 10hPa, Δ[U] ≥ +5 m/s Δ[U] ≤ -5 m/s Δ = EM of HC – JRA. SPREAD (m) RMSE (m) R=+0.41 Best-fit line FREQ. (%) FREQ. (%)

PDFs of RMSE and DISTANCE (to best-fit lines) are more highly skewed at 10hPa. RMSE and DISTANCE Ref.: Distance is measured from each data point perpendicularly to the best-fit line. PDFs of RMSE and DISTANCE at 10/500hPa (Normalized) 10hPa 500hPa 10hPa 500hPa LevelSkew. 10hPa hPa0.62 LevelSkew. 10hPa hPa0.64

In the following, we look at meteorological conditions for a few outliers. SPREAD-RMSE Ref.: This figure uses time means of SPREAD/RMSE for t=15±3 d, after 11/10-02/10. Scatter plot between SPREAD and RMSE of Z10 SPREAD (m) RMSE (m) (4) (5)

HC data (#1) completely miss occurrence of vortex split MSSW in Jan., #1 (INIT= ) Ref.: Color shades denote Z10. Black contours denote anomalies of JRA from climatology, or error of HC EM from JRA. SPREAD Z10 (m) RMSE Z10 (m) INITIAL+1 wk+2 wks HC JRA Z10 JRA HC EM 1 (4) 2006 (5) /01/10 ↓

HC data (#2) fail to reproduce horizontal vortex structure in recovery after mSSW in ND, #2 (INIT= ) Ref.: Color shades denote Z10. Black contours denote anomalies of JRA from climatology, or error of HC EM from JRA. SPREAD Z10 (m) RMSE Z10 (m) INITIAL+1 wk+2 wks HC JRA Z10 JRA HC EM /11/30 ↓

HC data (#3) fail to reproduce horizontal vortex structure during MSSW in January, #3 (INIT= ) Ref.: Color shades denote Z10. Black contours denote anomalies of JRA from climatology, or error of HC EM from JRA. SPREAD Z10 (m) RMSE Z10 (m) INITIAL+1 wk+2 wks HC JRA Z10 JRA HC EM /01/10 ↓

Using JMA HC data, this study reveals following characteristics of stratospheric PR for NH winter. Summary Ref.: None ■SPREAD and RMSE Larger average and variability ⇒ Longer average (≈2 wks) and larger variability of PL ■SPREAD-RMSE (skill) relationship ◇ Positive correlation ◇ Large skewness in RMSE, or outliers from the relationship Contributed by SSWs in onset and also recovery phases ⇒ Suggest importance and difficulty of good SSW predictions in extended weather forecasts

Back-ups

The climatological bias of HC data from JRA reanalysis is generally small. Bias Ref.: Initial dates is 1210 or 0610, and t=34 d (last day of predictions). Dots denote 95% significance in two-tail test, i.e., HC clim differs from JRA clim. Clim. bias of [U] (m/s) in mid-January/July

Winter stratosphere has large spread on average. Yr-to-yr (case-to-case) variability is also large. SPREAD SPREAD of Z (m) poleward of 20N. Ref.: Cyan lines denote results for each year. Blue lines denote the mean for all years. 10hPa 500hPa

HC data (#4) fail to reproduce the onset of the MSSW in January, #4 ( ) Ref.: Color shades denote Z10. Black contours denote anomalies of JRA from climatology, or error of HC EM from JRA. SPREAD Z10 (m) RMSE Z10 (m) INITIAL+1 wk+2 wks HC JRA Z10 JRA HC EM

HC data (#5) mostly fail to reproduce the onset of the MSSW in Dec./Jan., 1984/85. #5 ( ) Ref.: Color shades denote Z10. Black contours denote anomalies of JRA from climatology, or error of HC EM from JRA. SPREAD Z10 (m) RMSE Z10 (m) INITIAL+1 wk+2 wks HC JRA Z10 JRA HC EM