DAS Guidelines 2015 Update January 2015 For your views via

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Science Research Group 4 Project.
Advertisements

Communicate Coordinate Collaborate Hawaii Strategy Institute 2011.
Shenagh Gleisner November 6 th Introduction What I will cover A picture of HASANZ five years out My visits and what I learnt From you all From WorkSafe.
DAS Guidelines update April 2015
Pitch Guidelines Lesson 8. Modules 8.1Revise potential revenue based on feedback 8.2Pitch Guidelines 8.3Plan Your Pitch 8.4Continue working on prototype.
Tenure and Promotion The Process: –Outlined in Article 15 of the FTCA. When you are granted tenure, you are also promoted to Associate (15.7.6). One application.
WCAG 2.0 Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Update Last Updated July 2007.
Computational Biology Journal Club aka “Current Topics in Computational Biology” aka “02-701” William Cohen Organizational Meeting Sept 6, 2007.
TRANSLINK Training Effective Management and Supervision of PhD Candidates University of Indonesia, 9-10 May 2006 Postgraduate Supervision Dr. Paul Timms.
Rejection Blues by Mirella M. Moro. Outline Submitting your work is important Factors influence paper selection What to do if paper rejected What rejection.
The Cover Letter. Length: typically 3-4 paragraphs Never longer than one page. Format as a formal letter.
Writing Letters to the Editor. What is a letter to the editor? A written way of talking to readers of a regularly printed publication Generally found.
AIMS & OBJECTIVES AIM: To allow delegates an opportunity to practise Teamwork in a practical way using a series of outdoor activities OBJECTIVE: To develop.
Problem solving in project management
Searching and Developing an Outline for the Paper.
Human Resource Management (HRM) The Basics of Performance Management.
Software Engineering Process I
Time Mastery Profile ® The Time Mastery Profile ® helps people understand how they think about and use their time. This understanding is the foundation.
6 th IFAC International Conference on Management and Control of Production and Logistics Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil, September 11-13, 2013 TITLE Author(1)
Dr. Dinesh Kumar Assistant Professor Department of ENT, GMC Amritsar.
Procedures for reviewing and/or editing an article Role of the members of the editorial board in the reviewing process:. 1.Role of the editor in chief.
RITMechanical Engineering PLEASE TAKE A SEAT, BUT NOT WITH YOUR TEAM:
Unit 6 – Designing Multimedia The design part must be done before any implementation. Mark band 3 The candidate has produced designs for multimedia products.
Michigan Cooperative Directors Association Cooperative Members Research Survey-AAU Final Report December 2011.
Unit 6 – Designing Multimedia and graphics The design part must be done before any implementation. Structure of this section could be as follows. 1)Stimulus.
When I’m at work: Teamwork. Alan and his team What do you think are the good things about work teams? 2.
Researching & Writing a Literature Review Karen Ciccone NCSU Libraries.
What Does it Take to Publish in the AJAE? Get a good idea. Turn the idea into a well-posed, answerable question. Do the research right. Write Effectively.
Some of the main changes
 Introductions  Subcommittee Updates  Strategic Planning for 2013  Highlights from our Roundtable Discussion in November  DRCOG Recommendations for.
O Gets the team off to a quick start o Make sure everyone understands the task o Makes sure that everyone's voice is heard o Organises and motivates their.
INF5181 / Project Fall 2013 Project – Details of submission Deadline: November 18 th, Format: PDF Together with the project report you must submit a declaration.
Applied Software Project Management Andrew Stellman & Jennifer Greene Applied Software Project Management Applied Software.
IMPORTANT: Instructions Please read carefully the Instructions for the "Components of Web Accessibility" Presentation and Step-by-Step Guide ww.w3.org/WAI/presentations/components/
Basics of Presentation Skills Presenting Effectively and Accurately.
1 Introducing… Version Dec 2015, 9am. 2 Objectives  Agree reasons why this is important  Practise ways to make speaking up easier  Our choice.
Feedback + Services Justine, Katie, Jude and Angela.
Beyond the algorithm... John Moore Teaching the teachers Tracheostomy Safety Project 2011.
Successful Presentations A guide to preparing and delivering your presentation and avoiding common problems.
A SCIENTIFIC PAPER INCLUDES: Introduction: What question was studied and why? Methods: How was the problem studied? Results: What were the findings? and.
Dana Nau: CMSC 722, AI Planning Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License:
PREPARING YOUR PHD PROPOSAL. Outline  Content  Format  Schedule/Timeline  Committee  Paperwork Disclaimer: The content of this presentation does.
Facilitation fiesta Ilona Luukko Hi, my name is Ilona.
Delegating 101.
Journeys into journals: publishing for the new professional
Facilitation 101: Skills for Chapter Leaders
Paul Stocks. Centre for English Language & Academic Writing.
How to write a paper (and communicate scientific information)
How to write successfully for IATEFL Conference Selections
Sign critical appraisal course: exercise 1
Physical Space Group Update
Session 5 Review Home Study Presentations Group Work Group Evaluation
Academic representative Committee CHAIR training
Inviting Teachers to the Policy Table to Speak for Students
Asurint User Alliance Myron M. Shawala III
Emergency Surgical Airway Success & Failure
Part 2 of ‘Starting to Lead: An introduction to middle leadership’
Using networks to be more effective
Quality Improvement Initiative Title Presenter Name(s)
Group Norms.
Guidelines Dear author(s),
Customising Your Club Meeting
Proposal Title Group Members Names
Writing Letters to the Editor
Navigating Graduate School and Beyond:
Evaluate Positive Interpersonal Skills in a Variety of Workplace Settings Career Management 2.02 – 2.03.
HIGHLIGHTS FOR READERS
Fed-IP Assessor Training: Module 3 Assessing an application for Fed-IP
The Poultry Research Centre
Food Webs and Ecosystems Part 2
Presentation transcript:

DAS Guidelines 2015 Update January 2015 For your views via

There was a slot at the DAS Scientific meeting in Stratford in November 2014 to encourage members to share views and ideas on how the guidelines were progressing and areas that needed attention. Questions were invited from the floor and the following slides cover briefly what came up….. DAS Guidelines 2015 Feedback from the Stratford meeting

Plan A – Facemask Ventilation and Intubation Q. I like the idea of maintenance breaths during RSI; will you include in the text that control of CO2 is important? A. The guidelines focus on the importance of oxygenation, we currently feel that control of C02 is less time critical but agree that it is a benefit of maintenance breaths DAS Guidelines 2015 Feedback from the Stratford meeting

Pre-oxygenation Q. Are you going to include nasal oxygen, like in Levitan’s talk, in the new guidelines? A. Currently a discussion around nasal oxygen supplementation is in. Some of the benefits are in the published literature and we need to make sure the guidelines are future proofed for potential developments in anaesthesia practice. DAS Guidelines 2015 Feedback from the Stratford meeting

Plan D – Front of Neck Access Q. It’s very important to ensure neck extension when performing a cric, are you going to be clear about positioning A. We will attempt to provide advice on optimal performance of a number of techniques including cricothyroidotomy DAS Guidelines 2015 Feedback from the Stratford meeting For your views via

Plan D – Front of Neck Access Q. What do you think about having two teams for the CICV – one to continue oxygenation attempts while the other attempts the cric? A. The call for help is still very much in. It may be useful to have two teams, or for the role of surgical airway to be delegated but to suggest a requirement for a second team might introduce an unnecessary and undesirable delay. DAS Guidelines 2015 Feedback from the Stratford meeting For your views via

Q. Have you seen the VORTEX stuff from Australia and do you think it has any role in the new guidelines? A. We have seen it - it’s been included in our literature search and has (along with loads of other published material) influenced our thinking as we develop the guidelines. DAS Guidelines 2015 Feedback from the Stratford meeting For your views via

Q. Are you going to incorporate something about human factors into the new guidelines? A. Yes, currently there’s some discussion of human factors in the introduction (and in some of the plan sections). At the meeting there was a “DAS co-pilot” presentation and poster. We are working with the authors on how improved teamworking can be highlighted in relation to the guidelines DAS Guidelines 2015 Feedback from the Stratford meeting For your views via

Q. Is follow up after a difficult airway mentioned in the new guidelines? A. We will be discussing the importance of follow up in the guidelines. Current thinking is that we probably won’t be including a detailed approach of how it should be done as this is part of a separate ongoing DAS project. DAS Guidelines 2015 Feedback from the Stratford meeting For your views via