SGP Worksheets Workshop Winston-Salem, NC December 12, 2000 George Cushnie NMFRC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Certification of Compliance By Evita Lagard
Advertisements

NJHEPS CO 2 Calculator Worksheet Overview Fall /27/2011.
Solid Domestic Waste IB Syllabus 5.5.1, AP Syllabus Ch 21 Personal Waste Audit Trashed video.
RECYCLING OF PAINT SLUDGE
Water and Wastewater Focus Wireless Sales Push 2009.
Recycling Grease Trap Waste October 4, 2011 Ben Cowen Organics Account Executive 7651 Esters Blvd Irving, TX
ERT 319 Industrial Waste Treatment Semester /2013 Huzairy Hassan School of Bioprocess Engineering UniMAP.
Responsible Care® Performance Metrics Update Al Biggs GM, Operational Excellence/ GPCA RCC Member – Sipchem March 20 th, 2012.
Yuji MIZUNO Institute for Global Environmental Strategies Baseline for Waste Management Project Regional Workshop in Asia on Capacity Development for the.
African Centre for Statistics United Nations Economic Commission for Africa Session 5: Statistics on Air emissions and air quality Workshop on Environment.
GENERAL IDEAS IN AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
Hazardous Waste Issues Associated with Municipal Operations Dan Sowry Environmental Specialist Office of Compliance Assistance and Pollution Prevention.
Wednesday, 12/12/2007, FYROM Prevention of Contamination from Mining & Metallurgical Industries in FYROM Strategic Plan for Prevention of Contamination.
Waste management.
F006-F008 Metals Reclamation Rule Presentation to SBA Environmental Roundtable Meeting October 21, 2005.
ISO Standard is based on the management model of plan – do - check – act. Today we all be discussing the elements of the standard that deal with.
RCRA Record Keeping and Reporting For Small Quantity Generators
Susan Palachek TCEQ Pollution Prevention & Education.
Globally Recognized Indicators Sandy Brewer General Motors Corporation Supplier Partnership for the Environment Dublin, Ohio - July 24, 2003.
Company "ECO" Services (ТОВ “ЕКО”) Company "ECO" (ТОВ “ЕКО”)
March 2005 UMORS 1 UMORS Vander Kooi and Associates, Inc Ultimate Multiple Overhead Recovery System.
Pollution Prevention Toyota Industrial Equipment Mfg., Inc. December 7, 2011.
Solid and Hazardous Waste Chapter 24. Solid Waste Footprint US = 4.4 lbs per person per day 229 million tons per year.
Copyright CovalentWorks Training Guide for Invoices MYB2B Powered by CovalentWorks.
The National Metal Finishers Strategic Goals Program (SGP) formerly the Common Sense Initiative, CSI The Strategic Goals Program for Metal Finishers: New.
February 13, 2008 Scott Slesinger Environmental Technology Council 1 Suggested Improvements To EPA’s Implementation Of The Pollution Prevention Act.
OMNI FACILITY SERVICES Copyright  Progressive Business Publications Handling Hazardous Wastes.
Region 2 Healthcare Compliance Initiative 1 Region 2's Healthcare Compliance Initiative: Environmental Results From An Integrated Strategy Leveraging Limited.
How to Conduct a Government Operations GHG Emissions Inventory AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Broward County Pollution Prevention, Remediation and.
Performance Reporting to the Management Review Team Department of Energy EMS Training Workshop Columbus, OH March 7-8, 2005 Daniel L. McCollum, Quality.
ISO OBJECTIVES AND TARGETS
A Cleaner Production Project in the South African Paper Industry – Lessons learnt Iain Kerr, MSc (Env. Biotech.) University of KwaZulu Natal, School of.
FY06 Environmental Business Plan (Site Environment) Contents  Relations to each Documents  Targets for Sites’ operation in FY2010  Allotted Target Concept.
A Technology to Re-cycle and Re-Use Alkaline Cleaners PRESENTED TO THE 16 TH ANNUAL POLLUTION PREVENTION CONFERENCE SEPTEMBER 26, 2013 BY KEN FILIPEK ENERCO.
SEWAGE TREATMENT.  Sewage is the mainly liquid waste containing some solids produced by humans, typically consisting of washing water, urine, feces,
Tools Making TRI More Effective State Data Exchange 2008 Toxic Release Inventory National Training Conference Arlington, VA February 12 – 14, 2008.
Walk Through of VEEP Online System Updated June 2015 Registering as a ‘New User’ Logging On and Reporting.
Valley Chrome Plating’s Journey To Environmental Compliance through E.M.S.
Agricultural Applications of FGD Materials Jim Roewer FGD Agricultural Use Workshop September 13, 2006.
riser cutoff & gate removal
Measurement and Targeting – Design and Implement Programs to Track Results and Accountability National Environmental Partnership Summit 2006 Wednesday,
Life Cycle Assessment of Waste Conversion Technologies April 15, 2004.
Trends Under New Jersey’s Pollution Prevention Act Alan Bookman Office of Pollution Prevention & Right to Know NJDEP September 29, Northeast.
Common Sense Initiative: North Carolina Update. Common Sense Initiative - Basic Framework n Metal Finishers - agree to work toward a series of “Goals”
Performing Hospital Waste Audits Presented by Peggy Harlow, WM Healthcare Solutions, Inc. April 2, 2012.
1 Waste Conversion Technologies Life Cycle Assessment California Integrated Waste Management Board Board Meeting May 22, 2004 Keith Weitz, RTI International.
Area I Burn Pit Santa Susana Field Laboratory RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan February 19, 2008 Laura Rainey, P.G. Senior Engineering Geologist California.
ISO MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT. ISO Environmental Management Systems2 Lesson Learning Goals At the end of this lesson you should be.
Measurement and Targeting – Design and Implement Programs to Track Results and Accountability National Environmental Partnership Summit 2006 Wednesday,
1 Conducting Reasonable Progress Determinations under the Regional Haze Rule Kathy Kaufman EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards January 11,
Understanding and Organizing Activities, Processes and Environmental Impacts The key to a successful EMS and improved environmental performance.
HANNAH WALKER RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT.
24 th Annual Sustainability and Environmental, Health & Safety Symposium March 25, 2015 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE Commissioner IN Department of Environmental.
African Centre for Statistics United Nations Economic Commission for Africa Session 6: Statistics on Waste Workshop on Environment Statistics and Accounts.
The Strategic Goals Program for Metal Finishers: New Strategies for Success Environmental Management Systems (EMS) and Metal Finishers Norma Murphy DPPEA.
Iowa Strategic Goals Program For Metal Finishers.
Walk Through of VEEP Online System Updated May 2011.
2012 Emissions Inventory Workshop 1. 2  The owner or operator of any facility that is a source of air contaminants shall submit a complete emission.
NPDES Permitting for Coal Ash Ponds in North Carolina EMC Meeting January 12, 2012 Sergei Chernikov, Ph.D. 1.
Dealing with waste Part II - Incinerators. D18 Explain the short- and long-term impacts of landfills and incineration of waste materials on the quality.
Prevention of Disease Environmental Health. Key Points  According to the World Health Organization, Environmental health comprises those aspects of human.
The Planet Mark Certification Report Dunlop Systems and Components 1st January st December 2014.
Course TEN-702 Industrial waste management unit-2 Lecture -13.
BACWA – Leading the way to protect our Bay Mercury Watershed Permit Special Provisions BACWA Annual Members Meeting January 29, 2009 Michele Pla Melody.
Pollution Prevention & Management DentalBMPs. Overview Amalgam in POTW New EPA Guidelines City of Tulsa Dental BMPs.
Lecture (11): Waste Recycling
Exposure Modelling Day 1.
Average person produces 1700 lbs of MSW per year
Carbon Footprint.
Presentation transcript:

SGP Worksheets Workshop Winston-Salem, NC December 12, 2000 George Cushnie NMFRC

Overview of Today’s Workshop Calculations of Seven Core Goals 2000 Worksheet 1999 Progress Reports 1999 Cost Analysis Benchmarking

SGP Core Environmental Goals 50% reduction in water use 25% reduction in energy use 50% reduction in land disposal of hazardous sludge and a reduction in sludge generation 50% reduction in metals emissions to air and water 98% metals utilization 90% reduction in organic emissions to air and water Reduction in human exposure to toxic chemicals

50% Water Use Reduction Current year is 50% less than baseline, adjusted for changes in production. Can be based on total water purchased, water used for metal finishing, or process wastewater discharged. Zero discharge for current year automatically achieves goal. Be consistent from year-to-year. Keep records/calculations.

25% Energy Reduction Current Year is 25% less than baseline, adjusted for changes in production. Based on all sources of energy purchased (electricity, natural gas, fuel oil). Energy sources converted to BTUs for calculation. Captive shops may limit goal to metal finishing.

50% Reduction in Land Disposal & Overall Reduction in Generation Two Parts: –Current year haz. to landfill is 50% less than baseline, adjusted for changes in production. –Current year overall < baseline, adjusted for changes in production. Can achieve Part 1 by: –Decreasing hazardous sludge quantity shipped to landfill. –Switch from landfill to off-site recycle. –Delisting sludge.

50% Reduction in Land Disposal & Overall Reduction in Generation Can achieve Part 2 only by overall reduction in sludge generation. Zero sludge generation for current year automatically achieves goal.

50% Reduction in Metals to Water and Air Current year is 50% less than baseline, adjusted for changes in production. Includes TRI metals plus cyanide. Based on sum of all parameters, do not have to achieve 50% reduction individually. Based on available data, additional monitoring not required.

98% Utilization Two methods for determining achievement/ progress: –Facility is recycling 100% of sludge. –Current year sludge reduction is 50% less than baseline, adjusted for changes in production.

98% Metals Utilization: 100% Recycle Method This is a new method of calculating progress. 100% of waste treatment sludge is recycled. Zero sludge generated for current year automatically achieves goal.

98% Metals Utilization: 50% Reduction Method Sludge quantity is determined on a dry weight basis. Companies with zero sludge generation for the current year automatically achieve this goal.

90% Reduction in Organic TRI Emissions Current year is 90% less than baseline, adjusted for changes in production. Painting-related emissions are not counted. Companies with zero emissions for current year automatically achieve this goal.

Reduction in Human Exposure This has been revised for Based on responses to four human exposure questions. Only considers current year information— not compared to baseline.

Significance of SGP Worksheets Maintain active status in SGP for participating companies. Provide data for measuring progress toward seven “core goals” and other SGP objectives. Aggregated data measure program impacts at national, state, and local levels.

Strategic Goals Program/Worksheets General Suggestions: Use most current Worksheet Refer to “Worksheet Instructions” Print clearly (or type) Fill out as completely as possible Attach explanations, (when necessary) Call or George Cushnie with questions –

Data Collection Primary Data Sources Water/sewer bills Energy bills Laboratory records Purchasing/inventory records Production logs Process solution logs Financial records MSDS/Suppliers Mandated reporting and recordkeeping –CWA –RCRA –CAA –EPCRA P2 and other plans Observations Interviews

Worksheet Due Dates Existing SGP Companies: –Mailed to existing SGP companies in early January –Due by March 1 for the proceeding year 1999 data were due on Feb 15, data are due March 1, 2001 New SGP Companies: –Current year due 60 days from sign-up

I. Background Information

II. Accounting for Changes in Production

II. Accounting for Changes in Production Selecting a Baseline Year Use any year from If missing any baseline data (e.g., electricity), use data from the next closest year for which data are available.

II. Accounting for Changes in Production Provide as many as are relevant. To use a current year factor, there must be a corresponding baseline factor. Sales and labor hours--only use metal finishing related values. Most companies don’t know surface square feet---however, if they do, this is an excellent normalizing factor.

II. Accounting for Changes in Production Other Normalizing Factors Rectifier amp hours (Cr plating) Layer surface square feet (PWB) Weight of parts processed (mass finishing, barrel plating) Pounds of anodes or chemicals used Energy use UsableNot Usable

III. Water and Wastewater

Check “Yes” if company discharges process wastewater from metal finishing to either a POTW or receiving stream. If there is a discharge, enter the volume of fresh water used in metal finishing and the volume discharged.

III. Water and Wastewater Use laboratory reports, discharge summary records, and/or compliance reports. Calculate and enter average concentration of each metal for reporting year. If any parameter is not measured at end-of- pipe, attach explanation.

III. Reasonable Values for Water Use

IV. Wastewater Treatment Sludge

Refers to wastewater treatment sludge only. Do not include other hazardous wastes, such as tank bottoms or ion exchange canisters. Row 1: Amount of all WWT sludge generated during reporting year. Row 2: Amount from row 1 that is sent off-site for land disposal as hazardous waste. Row 3: Amount from row 1 that is sent off-site for recovery/recycle. Row 4: Average water content of WWT sludge. Row 5: Indicate dewatering method(s).

IV. Reasonable Sludge Values

V. Inorganic Emissions to Air

Most companies do not have air emissions data, unless they are chromium platers or chromic acid anodizers. Some companies have estimates that were reported under EPCRA. If no data or estimates are available, leave Part V blank.

VI. Organic Chemical Emissions

Most organic chemicals used by metal finishers are used for cleaning. Examples are on worksheet. Check the company’s TRI From R for applicable organic chemicals. Most releases are to the air rather than water.

VII. Energy Use

All companies use electricity and most use natural gas. About 25% of companies use fuel oil (usually #2). A small percentage use other energy sources (e.g., propane).

VII. Reasonable Data for Energy Use

VIII. Compliance with Envirn. Stds.

IX. Reduction in Human Exposure

X. Resource Utilization and Compliance Costs

Data Availability In order to preserve your confidentiality, each worksheet sent to the NMFRC is stripped of its contact and company information. Your facility is given a unique ID number before data are publicly displayed. IF YOU STILL HAVE PROPRIETARY CONCERNS ABOUT THE ANONYMOUS DISPLAY OF YOUR FACILITY’S PROGRESS, MARK YOUR WORKSHEET “CONFIDENTIAL.” If marked "confidential," your data will only be use to compile aggregate industry results.

Additional Resources SGP Web Site –SGP info. –Worksheets –Progress Reports –Cost Reports –Worksheet Database –Benchmarking