Transfer of Development Rights Policy

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proposed Amendments to Chapter 32, Article V, Solid Waste Management Ordinance Case No. PH-ORD-041 Presented by the Orange County Environmental Protection.
Advertisements

Transportation Strategy Board July 28, 2010 Responsible Growth.
Real Property Disposition Dudley Whyte and Tiffany Gallegos Region IV and Region VIII May 19-21, 2014.
+ Proposed Lockwood Targeted Economic Development District 2015 Yellowstone County.
CPA-02-14/ZOM Parker 26, LLC Small Scale Comp Plan Amendment and Rezoning.
Northeast Corridor Greenway Acquisition – Mitigation Feasibility Study Results City Council Workshop June 24, 2014.
Proposed Modification of Policies for Rural Employment Centers Policy 6.3 of the Future Land Use Element of the Alachua County Comprehensive plan CPA
Sarasota 2050 Policy Revisited This presentation is #1 in a series of presentations on 2050 Policy: 1.The community effort on 2050 Policy to date. 2.The.
PRESERVATION and PROGRESS IN THE DRAGON RUN SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS PRESERVATION and PROGRESS IN THE DRAGON RUN SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS PARADIGM.
Fiscal Analysis of the Fair Rent and Home Ownership Initiative A Presentation to the Fillmore City Council June 23, 2006.
Neighborhood Preservation and Revitalization Division Board of County Commissioners March 10, Neighborhood Improvement Plan.
Farm and Forest Land Preservation with Conservation Easements.
Conservation Easements and Appraisals. Congressional Hearings on Conservation Easements  Joint Committee on Taxation issued proposals in a report January.
Albemarle County, Virginia Office of the County Assessor.
Vacant Surplus City Property Administration & Finance Committee August 6, 2014.
1 Preservation Parcels Investigation Report to the Board of County Commissioners September 19, :30 PM.
8/29/20151 Docket Z (Easter Mountain, LLC) A Request to Rezone 556 Acres From RU-4 to SR-2 Cochise County Board of Supervisors October 25, 2011.
Sector Planning Process Alachua County Commission July 8 th,
University of Kentucky College of Agriculture Landscape Architecture Franklin-Simpson County Purchase of Development Rights (PDR) “Landowners voluntarily.
TDR Today Current Programs Throughout the U.S.. Calvert County 74,563 Population (2000 Census) Sending Sites: –Agriculture Preservation District (APD)
 A way of dealing with rights instead of land possession exclusion transfer compensation economic gain.
Noe Valley Town Square Proposed New Park Property Acquisition Presentation to the Recreation and Park Commission April 18, 2013.
Consistency Determination: City of Seaside Local Coastal Program FORA Board Meeting March 15, 2013 Agenda No: 8a.
Hazard Mitigation Planning and Project Funding. Agenda Objectives Overview of Hazard Mitigation Hazard Mitigation Planning Mitigation Project Funding.
The Community Preservation Act in Harwich – July 28, 2004.
Transfer Payment and Financial Reporting Branch Ministry of Education Implementation of Tangible Capital Asset (TCA) Reporting TPFR Information Sessions.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion March 20, 2012.
Developing and opening a new facility. Stages in hospitality facility development There are five (5) steps in the development of a hospitality facility:
CPA-14-08: Transfer of Development Rights Large Scale Text Amendment Adoption Hearing Board of County Commissioners September 23, 2008.
Planning and Community Development Department Housing Element City Council February 03, 2014.
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Planning & Land Development Regulation Board May 21, 2014.
February 20, 2007 Macon County Planning Board. Structure Height Ordinance Allows construction to 4 stories or 48 feet, whichever is greater Measured from.
Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendments Wekiva Parkway and Protection Act December 18, 2007 Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendments Wekiva Parkway and Protection.
Community Development Department FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT GRAND HAVEN NORTH CONSERVATION AREA APPLICATION # 2604.
Amendments to the Unified Land Development Code Section Multifamily Residential Requirements Section (d) – Planned Developments with Transfer.
The Community Preservation Act in Sutton – May 27, 2004.
TRANSFERRING DENSITY AND DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS. PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY OVERVIEW Creating an effective TDR Program Creating an effective TDR Program Steps.
The Community Preservation Act in Kingston. Open Space Historic Preservation Affordable Housing Allows communities to establish a dedicated fund for:
Application CPA (Large Scale Map Amendment) A request initiated by the County to amend Future Land Use Map 2030 from Rural/ Agriculture to Preservation.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion June 19, 2012 Growth Management Legislative Discussion June 19, 2012.
Community Development Department COUNTRY CLUB HARBOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL-2 AND PARKS & GREENWAYS ZONING DISTRICTS REZONING APPLICATION #2511.
Department of Public Works Recommended Residential Impact Fee Distribution Methodology Change October 26, 2015.
Valuation and Rating of Conservation Land and properties Policy issues and options 11 June 2003.
Community Development Department FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT LU-MIN & RZ-OTH
The Community Preservation Act. Open Space Historic Preservation Affordable Housing Allows communities to establish a dedicated fund for: The Community.
Mississippi Headwaters Board Land Protection Process Mississippi River Protection Through Partnership.
Community Redevelopment for Eastside Report on Advisory Committee Input and Request for Board Direction June 26, 2012.
Community Development Department FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT GRAND HAVEN NORTH CONSERVATION AREA APPLICATION # 2604.
PORT OF TACOMA. Request adoption of Resolution , amending the Port’s Master Policy and superseding Resolution Master Policy Resolution.
Surplus City Property – Request for Proposals Administration & Finance Committee February 1, 2012.
Presentation and public hearing review of Zoning Map Amendments pursuant to Zoning Code Rewrite Planning and Zoning Board Hearing.
Community Development Department Rezone Application #1783 Parcel ID No RPOF-0031.
Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMUD) Introduction for Sending Land Owners COMMUNITY PLANNING PLANNING AND ZONING.
Joint Public Hearing - Closed Redevelopment Agency & City Council Amended and Restated Redevelopment Plan for the North Stockton Redevelopment Project.
Community Development Department FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT GRAND HAVEN NORTH CONSERVATION AREA APPLICATION # 2604.
CITY OF STOCKTON CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: PRESENTORS : AGENDA ITEM: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: PRESENTORS : 9.02Agricultural.
Orange County Government Adoption Public Hearing May 10, 2016 Board of County Commissioners School Impact Fee Update.
Wetlands Focus Group. Responsibilities and Goals   Growth Managements Act (Chapter 163, FS) of 1985   Included the adoption of the State Comprehensive.
Application CPA (Large Scale Map Amendment)
What is Tax Increment Financing?
Growth Management Amendments Land Use & Transportation
Pilot Project Concept 30-Minute Emergency Response Service (ERS)
Environmental Critical Areas Regulations
The Community Preservation Act in Northborough
Erosion Hazard Near Sensitive Waterbodies
Updates to the Traffic Reduction and Transportation Improvements Fee (TR/TIF) City Council July 24, 2017.
Groundwater Management Area 12: Consideration of the Impact on
The Community Preservation Act in Topsfield – August 31, 2004
Transfer of development rights
Presentation transcript:

Transfer of Development Rights Policy Environmentally Sensitive Lands Oversight Committee June 7, 2012

Stages of TDR Program 2050 policies adopted by Commission contain a TDR program 2050 required codification of program Zoning Code codified 2050 TDR policy TDR program implementation process required Commission directed staff to develop process Implementation process considerations

Commission Direction ESLOC to consider program elements and make a recommendation(s) to the Commission Pricing Methodologies Pilot Program Implementation Revenue Distribution Amendment

Today’s Presentation Overview of TDR program Introduction to 2050 framework Introduction to TDR policies Chronology of events Discussion of current proposal

Transfer of Development Rights Basics One TDR unit represents the right to build one housing unit. The basic concept of a TDR program is to transfer the development right from one property to another with the purpose being to preserve environmentally sensitive lands. Lands with the most sensitive habitats are assigned relatively high transfer rates to lands with lesser environmental value.

Sarasota County’s TDR Program Sarasota County’s transfer of development rights program is designed to effectuate Village, Hamlet, and Settlement development anticipated in the Sarasota 2050 plan while augmenting the purchase of environmentally sensitive lands and protect our most valuable habitats and habitat corridors. Open Space (1000 acres) Greenway RMA Off Site Transfer Open Space (1000 acres) Greenway RMA Off Site Transfer

County-owned TDRs Involves shifting development rights from one private property to another private property seeking to develop at a more intensive level with the result being preserved lands. Sarasota 2050 policy established the ability for publicly- owned TDRs to be derived from publicly acquired lands. The County currently owns many acres of land acquired by the County through programs such as the Environmentally Sensitive Lands Protection Program (ESLPP) that have the potential of producing publicly-owned TDRs It has been estimated that the County may have the ability to establish close to 10,000 publicly-owned TDRs.

County-owned TDRs

Village/Open Space RMA Sarasota 2050 Policy Sarasota 2050 establishes Resource Management Areas (RMA) for both sending and receiving TDRs. Village/Open Space RMA Greenway RMA

Sarasota 2050 Policy Villages Hamlets Greenway Sarasota 2050 Figure RMA-3 Village/Open Space RMA Land Use Map Villages Hamlets Greenway

TDR Policies - Zoning Code Sarasota County Zoning Regulation Sec. 11.2.13. Sec. 11.2.13 b3 states that TDRs shall only be from County designated sending sites to so designated receiving sites. Sec. 11.2.13 c2 qualifies those lands eligible to be designated a sending site for publicly-owned TDRs as those acquired by the County after July 7, 2002. Sec. 11.2.13 c4iii states that the County Commission shall set the price for publicly-owned TDRs based on current market values and any recommendation of Planning & Development Services. Sec. 11.2.13 c5 provides that all revenue from the sale of publicly-owned TDRs shall be allocated to the Environmentally Sensitive Lands Acquisition Program.

Chronology Jan. 2011: County Commission initiates discussion and establishes Board Assignment BA11005 ‘ESLIPP Development Rights’. Mar. 2011: Board Assignment Report Presented. Background on TDR Program provided. Inventory of potential County-owned TDRs provided. Long-term cost of preserved land management raised. County-owned TDR valuation methods discussed. County Commission requested: further information on TDR valuation methods a separate report on land management costs

Chronology continued Apr. – Sept. 2011: Firm of Hettema Saba LLC hired to analyze and report on a suggested method for the County to set a price on County-owned TDRs. Sept. 2011: Report on Land Management Operations Oct. 2011: Hettema Sabe report presented with recommendations for County-owned TDRs: That TDR pricing be percentage based. That it be tied to the receiving site enhanced value. That it be calculated on actual unit selling prices. That the percentage range be 1.5% to 3.5% of unit sale. County Commission request: further information on TDR valuation methods used by other jurisdictions.

TDR Pricing Methodologies Method One: TDR price based on county acquisition cost of sending site. Method Two: TDR price based on receiving site enhancement value. Method ‘A’: TDR price based on future market conditions of receiving site enhanced value. Method ‘B’: TDR price based on market conditions both current and future of receiving site enhanced value.

TDR Pricing Methodologies Method One is based on the value derived from the sending site. Hettema Saba example: $6,615 Gross Av. County Cost: $5,128 Method Two Receiving Site Method One Sending Site Method Two is based on the value added to the receiving site. Hettema Saba example: $3,438 representing a percentage of the enhanced value added to the receiving site by the TDR.

TDR Pricing Methodologies Method ‘A’ is based on the value added to the receiving site collected as a development is constructed to allow for changing market conditions. Method ‘A’ & ‘B’ Receiving Site Method ‘B’ is based on the value added to the receiving site partially collected with the establishment of the sending and receiving sites, and the remaining portion when the resulting unit is sold.

TDR Pricing Methodologies Other Jurisdictions Findings Other jurisdictional methods for pricing publicly-owned TDRs: 35 jurisdictions contacted 30 responded King County of Washington State had incorporated the ability to sell publicly-owned TDRs within their program and had sold them. King County bases the TDR price on individual site appraisals for each sending site. There may be other TDR programs in existence that incorporate the selling of publicly-owned TDRs, however the selling of publicly-owed TDRs is not a common practice.

TDR Pilot Program Identify all eligible ‘sending zone’ lands acquired Quantify potential TDRs from said acquisitions Determine plausibility from relevant acquisition documentation. Select acquisition(s) with minimal complications

TDR Pilot Program (continued) Calculate TDRs derivable utilizing ground verified habitat data Determine the actual county cost per TDR Prepare a draft conservation easement document. Board declares ‘surplus TDRs’ Hold for potential implementation Promote pilot program through County’s web site

TDR Revenue Distribution 2050 (Policy TDR 1.2) “proceeds of any sale shall be used to purchase additional environmentally sensitive lands” Zoning Code (Section11.2.13.c.5) “The revenue from the sale of Development Rights from the TDR bank shall be allocated to the Environmentally Sensitive Lands Acquisition Program”

TDR 2050 Policy Amendment 2050 policy Zoning Code policy Only purchase of real property/CE Zoning Code policy References the “program” The “program” includes management Currently program revenue allocated 90% Acquisition 10% Management

TDR 2050 Policy Amendment 2050 amendment would create consistency with Zoning Code Authorize use of a % of any TDR revenue for management Recommended proportion = same as program (90% acquisition: 10% management)

TDR Program Implementation Recommended Action That County policy for the value of a publicly-owned TDR be up to 5% of the end unit sales price collected in two payments, with the 1st at initial establishment of sending/receiving sites and the 2nd at the time of actual unit sales. That a pilot program be initiated in accordance with the steps provided within the staff report dated May 23, 2012. That a proposed County-initiated Comprehensive Plan amendment be prepared that modifies policy TDR 1.2 to allow for a portion of sales revenue from County-owned TDRs to be used for land management costs associated with those lands being preserved, pursuant to Sarasota County Code Section 94-85.

Commission Direction ESLOC to consider program elements and make a recommendation(s) to the Commission Pricing Methodologies Pilot Program Implementation Revenue Distribution Amendment