Participation in Planning and Land Use Chapter 6 Presentation Tina Nabatchi & Matt Leighninger.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Navigating in a Multi-Channel Environment A Check-list Prepared by Channel Management Professionals © 2008 Channel Management Professionals.
Advertisements

Civics: Government and Economics in Action
 Community Engagement For Local Government Councillors It is the business of council to involve the public in the business of government Presentation.
Strategies and Structures for Research and Policy Networks: Presented to the Canadian Primary Health Care Research Network, 2012 Heather Creech, Director,
Wade E. Kline, AICP Community Development Planner.
Good Evaluation Planning – and why this matters Presentation by Elliot Stern to Evaluation Network Meeting January 16 th 2015.
Partners Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice National Sheriffs’ Association.
BUILDING BETTER COLLABORATION BETWEEN THE STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AS A TOOL FOR EFFECTIVE GRASSROOT DEVELOPMENT FACILITATED BY AA PEACEWORKS, A NON.
The geographical configuration of a city is not an outcome of chance. Rather, it is the result of pressure from various dependent needs such as that of.
Raising Your Voice for Children: An Advocacy Training Davida McDonald Director, State Policy NAEYC.
Alachua County Post-Disaster Redevelopment Plan Alachua County Board of County Commissioners Meeting April 27, 2010.
The Maryland 4-H Youth Development Program
Goal 3, Volunteer Development and Systems to Support Youth: Logic Model and Communications Plan Situation Statement During 2005, over 11,218 adult volunteers.
Urban Planning and Management Tools for Poverty Alleviation
Public Engagement: Perspectives and Experiences in North America Tina Nabatchi, Ph.D. Maxwell School of Citizenship & Public Affairs Syracuse University.
Information Assurance and Higher Education Clifton Poole National Defense University Carl Landwehr National Science Foundation Tiffany Olson Jones Symantec.
, Asset Based Community Development
Designing Influential Evaluations Session 2 Topics & Timing Uganda Evaluation Week - Pre-Conference Workshop 19 th and 20 th May 2014.
Penny Worland, Senior Policy Planner District Council of Mount Barker Feb 2015.
Julie 80 Grassroots Movement Building: What it is, Why it matters Mark Pertschuk Project Director Preemption and Movement Building in Public Health.
Parent Leadership Lisa Brown and Lisa Conlan Family Resource Specialists Technical Assistance Partnership.
Capital and Community u Capital is any resource capable of producing other resources u Capital can be placed in a few broad categories u capital goods.
From Digital Divide to Digital Opportunity – Policy Issues Kelly Levy, Associate Administrator National Telecommunications and Information Administration.
National Head Start Association Leadership Institute January 29, 2009 Presentation by Joan Lombardi, Ph.D. Early Childhood Development: At the dawn of.
Internet Based Information Sources on Urbanism - Tutorial - Authors: D. Milovanovic, D. S. Furundzic, yubc.net.
Sustaining Places Bruce A. Knight FAICP President American Planning Association.
Indicators of Success -- Applying the TOC What will change? You must be able to test your theory!
1 Participatory Public Policies Placing Grassroots Women’s Groups at the Center of Community Resilience Sandy Schilen, Global Facilitator GROOTS International.
Using Information for Community Action Kathryn Pettit, The Urban Institute National Neighborhood Indicators Partnership.
Quality of the VET Workforce Dianne Wallace 20 June 2012.
E151U: Housing and Urban Development Policy Housing Planning.
Approach and Key Components. The Goal of Cities for Life: To help community groups and primary care providers create an environment that facilitates and.
EGovernance: Tools and Benefits ‘Gbenga Sesan Nigeria’s Information Technology Youth Ambassador | eGovernance for.
Volunteerism in Hungary Presentation: Emese Marosszéki Manager of Volunteer Center Debrecen.
Assembling Participation Infrastructure Chapter 9 Presentation Tina Nabatchi & Matt Leighninger.
The Urban Affairs Center Building Upon Existing Strengths & Identifying New Opportunities A Vision.
NGA Center for Best Practices: Policy Academy on Land Use and Transportation Planning State of Illinois Team Lynne Padovan—Governor’s Office Randy Blankenhorn—IDOT.
Urban Politics Federal Policy 7. Overview Reagan Era Retrenchment Clinton Continuity W in the City.
Claire Brindis, Dr. P.H. University of California, San Francisco Professor of Pediatrics and Health Policy, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Adolescent.
Ted Price, Ph.D. West Virginia University Workshop Facilitator September 16, 2010.
The Long Road between Small Towns: Barriers to Building Community Development Partnerships in Rural BC Laura Ryser and Greg Halseth.
VISIONING IN YOUR COMMUNITY Remember: unique needs capabilities of YOUR community Stick to the budget and listen to community residents.
Peter B. Bloland, DVM, MPVM Director Division of Public Health Systems and Workforce Development Global Health Leadership Forum November 10, 2011 National.
KANSAS COUNTY HEALTH RANKINGS: Understanding the Health of Atchison County Caitlin McMurtry Analyst Kansas Health Institute.
Alain Thomas Overview workshop Background to the Principles Definitions The National Principles for Public Engagement What.
Rappahannock-Rapidan Regional Visioning Process Counties and Towns of Culpeper, Fauquier, Madison, Orange and Rappahannock Bruce Dotson Tanya Denckla Institute.
Transforming Patient Experience: The essential guide
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
From Information to Action: Lessons from NNIP for Place-based Initiatives National Neighborhood Indicators Partnership Better Data. Better Decisions. Better.
SEA in New Zealand1 Developments on Two Converging Paths Martin Ward, Independent Advisor, New Zealand.
Getting Rural Virginia Connected: Louisa Electronic Village (LEV) An Initiative of the Technology Opportunities Program (TOP) Prepared by: Connie S. Laws,
Connect2Complete Theory of Change Development for Colleges and State Offices November 10, 2011 OMG Center for Collaborative Learning.
CHAPTER 18 How Community Organizations Affect Change.
Transforming the Adult Social Care Workforce 7 th December 2010 Virginia McCririck – DH - SW.
Community Covenant “A heartfelt “thank you” to the Town of Chelmsford and the surrounding area. Our friends, co- workers, neighbors, and fellow townspeople.
The Deliberative Democracy Consortium The big picture: Two impacts of the Internet 1.Empowering individual citizens (web, – wrapped up in other.
Florita Montgomery West Virginia University Extension Allison Nichols West Virginia University Extension Teresa McCoy University of Maryland Extension.
An Introduction to the National Neighborhood Indicators Partnership (NNIP) DALLAS, TX OCTOBER 21, 2015.
Presented By Tasnuva Nashtaran Miusi Priyangwada Abdullah Shibli Sadiq CAPACITY BUILDING APPROACHES FOR PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION.
Experience from H2020 Proposals (a personal assessment)
planning aid for scotland unique national charity helping people engage with planning impartial & independent not part of Scottish Government or any Local.
NNIP Network Update Tom Kingsley NNIP/Urban Team & Executive Committee April 7, 2016.
New England Management Institute. Thank you for the invitation  In my time with you … The Maine Commission for Community Service Civic Participation.
UNITY and the RoadMap for urban youth violence prevention American Public Health Association Annual Meeting 2007 Session.
An Introduction to the National Neighborhood Indicators Partnership (NNIP) SAN ANTONIO, TX APRIL 6, 2016.
Betsy Graham Military Community and Family Policy
An exciting new development for the profession
Promoting Civic Engagement Through Analytical Work in the The World Bank Meeting of the External Advisory Group on the Enabling Environment for Civic.
Building a vision for tomorrow from the grassroots
Community Organizing: The Path to Building Power
Presentation transcript:

Participation in Planning and Land Use Chapter 6 Presentation Tina Nabatchi & Matt Leighninger

Participation in Planning and Land Use  Issues relating to planning, land use, and the “built environment” are hot topics for participation:  People care about where they live and want to influence decisions and plans that impact their communities  Buying a home and protecting property values is a motivator for involvement in public life  Land use decisions often have highly visible impacts  Community attachment impacts community health and success  Technology is impacting the demand and capacity for participation  Numerous institutions and groups deal with land use, but often fail to host effective participation opportunities

The Development of Participation in Planning and Land Use  Participation in planning and land use has been more contentious than in other areas, and has centered on four main areas:  Major Zoning Decisions  Community and Neighborhood Visioning  Community Development Planning  Reporting Problems and Prioritizing Improvements  Different aspects of an adult-adult relationship are critical in each of these issue areas

The Development of Participation in Planning and Land Use  Major Zoning Decisions  In the “urban renewal” era, residents had little say in zoning decisions and there were devastating impacts on low-income communities  Since then, arguments for resident control over zoning and the built have become more forceful and extensive, and led to a variety of participation opportunities  Community and Neighborhood Visioning  People’s desire to envision and build the community they want has driven participation  These efforts usually involve thick participation

The Development of Participation in Planning and Land Use  Community Development Planning  Planning for the development (or redevelopment) of “distressed,” “underserved,” and “at risk” communities is an important area of participation  These efforts involve decisions pertaining to funding allocations, safety, resident attachment, and economic growth  Reporting Problems and Prioritizing Improvements  Technology has aided people’s ability to raise concerns, gather data, and suggest improvements to their physical surroundings  New online platforms for assistance have emerged See Box 6.1 for examples of online assistance platforms

Aspects of an Adult-Adult Relationship in Participation in Planning & Land Use Issues Common Planning & Land Use Issues Characteristics of an Adult-Adult Relationship Provide Info Give Chance to Tell Stories Provide Choices Sense of Political Legitimacy Support People to Take Action Major Zoning Decisions XXX Community / Neighborhood Visioning XXXXX Community Development Planning XXXXX Reporting Problems & Prioritizing Improvements XX

Official Settings for Participation in Planning and Land Use Community Level Planning, Zoning, or Land Use Commissions Development Authorities Neighborhood Level Neighborhood Associations Homeowner Associations Neighborhood Councils Neighborhood Online Networks

Official Settings for Participation in Planning and Land Use  Numerous official settings for participation in land use and planning already exist  Within these officials settings are numerous participation leaders: government planners, commissioners, public officials, developers, residents  In the vast majority of settings, opportunities for participation are conventional and often contentious  We need to strengthen the infrastructure for participation in planning and land use

Strengthening the Infrastructure: Leaders and Networks  Numerous networks are common to planning and land use  The most active networks are “official;” more should be done to involve other kinds of networks See Box 6.2 a set of questions readers can use to assess the state of participation in their community

Strengthening the Infrastructure: Building Blocks for Participation  6 Building Blocks  Many of the settings and tools within each block already exist to some extent, but need to be strengthened  Others may need to be built over time

Strengthening the Infrastructure: Building Blocks for Participation  There are many ways to disseminate information, but communication lags are still common  This is because people and platforms are disconnected and messages are poorly transmitted See Box 6.3 for a case study on “Detroit 24/7”

Strengthening the Infrastructure: Building Blocks for Participation  There is potential for a “civic upsell” strategy to connect information dissemination and input gathering  The possibilities for online participation are proliferating

Strengthening the Infrastructure: Building Blocks for Participation  There are more ways of belonging to community and more potential communities to join than ever before  Connections to those closest to us will always be critical See Box 6.4 for a case study on “Create Buckhannon” in West Virginia

Strengthening the Infrastructure: Building Blocks for Participation  This is where top-down governmental efforts meet bottom-up grassroots organizing and mobilization  This area can be rife with both conflict and innovation See Box 6.5 for information on Revitalizing a Neighborhood Group

Strengthening the Infrastructure: Building Blocks for Participation  This is the category where citizens move from the most immediate, visible problems they face to broader questions about what kind of place they want to live in  Realizing the potential of participation in this category requires that it be built into the regular functioning of government See Box 6.6 for information on Revamping the Public Meeting

Strengthening the Infrastructure: Building Blocks for Participation  Public work can have positive impacts on neighborhoods, communities, and residents  Coordinate these efforts is often done by neighborhood and homeowner associations  Tracking and quantifying such efforts can help neighborhood leaders connect and negotiate with public officials

Strengthening the Infrastructure: Systemic Supports  Systemic supports are needed to enable people to take on new roles, connect the different building blocks to one another, and institutionalize participation  Training and Skill Development  Professional Incentives for Planners and other Participation Leaders  Policies and Procedures  Funding and Budgeting