Growth and Land Use Planning Analysis for Washington County, Utah Presented by: Eric D Zimmerman.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Forest Legacy Assessment of Need Identifying Future Forest Legacy Areas Governors Commission for Protecting the Chesapeake Bay through Sustainable Forestry.
Advertisements

Griffith Park Fire Draft Recovery Plan May 30, 2007 Mayor Antonio R. Villaraigosa Councilman Tom LaBonge, CD 4 General Manager Jon Kirk Mukri City of Los.
080820_v1DP TRAVEL MANAGEMENT - PROCESS ON THE GILA NATIONAL FOREST.
Community Engagement Survey Report Budget Priorities FY
Evaluating Bids in the U.S. Conservation Reserve Program Ralph E. Heimlich Deputy Director for Analysis, Resource Economics Division, Economic Research.
Land or Site Description Wayne Foss, MBA, MAI, CRE Foss Consulting Group
Bald Eagle Wildlife Study Using Geographical Information Systems.
Evacuation Safety Planners * Jason HaycockRobert Broussard Colleen Grentz Project Manager Analyst & Webmaster Analyst & Project Designer.
Potential Sites in Virginia For Red Wolf Re-introduction Picture courtesy of NPCA.
 Matt Gates.  Forecast sprawl  Guide long-range population and employment forecasts o For the region o For individual counties  Allocate growth to.
1 WATERSHED FLOOD MAPS Apalachee Bay – St. Marks River.
Environmental Science
Every Acre Counts The Newfound Watershed Master Plan Land Conservation Priorities In the Newfound Lake Watershed January 23, 2015 Dan Sundquist GreenFire.
Simulating Future Suburban Development in Connecticut Jason Parent, Daniel Civco, and James Hurd Center for Land Use Education and.
46 2. Describing and Mapping Land In this module, we will discuss: Three means of describing real estate Types of maps available to land-use professionals.
Watershed Location l The Gales Creek Watershed is located on the Tualatin Basin of Washington County, Oregon. It is situated on the eastern side of the.
Gray Wolf Range Analysis: Michigan and Wisconsin Masters Project Presentation November 8, 2002 Damon Hearne, Karen Lewis, Marisa Martin, Beth Mitton, Carly.
Low-Density Urbanization and Southern California Critical Habitats Steven Guerry UP206a Final Project Winter 2011.
What Resources Should We Protect? Maryland Coastal Bays Aquatic Sensitive Areas Initiative Mary Conley Habitat Restoration Meeting January 16, 2002.
Burl Carraway. Purpose of Redesign Shape and influence use of forest land on a scale and in a way that optimizes public benefits from trees and forests.
Lecture 9 Managing a GIS project. GIS analysis Collect and process data to aid in decision making  Use the data to make decisions  Identify alternatives.
GIS2: Geo-processing and Metadata Treg Christopher.
Landscape Classification System & Environmental Macro-Siting GIS Mark Lotts James Madison University Office of the Virginia Wind Energy Collaborative.
Prioritizing Agricultural Lands for Riparian Buffer Placement in the Raritan Basin: A Geographic Information System (GIS) Model Project Partners: North.
Predicting Sediment and Phosphorus Delivery with a Geographic Information System and a Computer Model M.S. Richardson and A. Roa-Espinosa; Dane County.
Data Development Common Issues for UPLAN and I-PLACE3S.
Applying Stream Buffer Science to the Lake George Watershed Lake George Stream Corridor Management Stakeholder Meeting May 28, 2008.
Potential Scenic Sites Analysis for the Hill Country Conservancy Nancy A. Heger, ManagerGene Sipes, Assistant Manager Matt Broadaway, GIS AnalystMatt Gray,
Selecting the Right Site for New Nuclear Generation Southern Nuclear Operating Company Tom Moorer – Nuclear Development Environmental Manager.
A GIS-Based Model to Identify Sensitive Water Resource Properties in Need of Protection 2009 Watershed Science and Technical Conference September 14 &
BRAC RTF CGIA Progress Report July 26, BRAC RTF Task #10 CGIA role Mapping and analysisMapping and analysis Geographic Information SystemsGeographic.
UPlan: How It Works and How to Get Started A description for the rest of us Nathaniel Roth Information Center for the Environment University of California,
Evacuation Safety Planners * Jason HaycockRobert Broussard Colleen Grentz Project Manager Analyst & Webmaster Analyst & Project Designer.
Community Youth Center URP 4273 Survey of Planning Information Systems Final Group Project: Team Two Spring 2003.
MARYLAND’S SMART GROWTH and LAND CONSERVATION PROGRAMS/PARTNERSHIPS State of Maryland Parris N. Glendening, Governor Kathleen Kennedy Townsend, Lt. Governor.
Green Infrastructure Network Design Analysis Beaufort County, North Carolina.
Potential Scenic Sites Analysis for the Hill Country Conservancy Nancy A. Heger, ManagerGene Sipes, Assistant Manager Matt Broadaway, GIS AnalystMatt Gray,
San Luis Obispo County Planning and Building Department Jeff Legato Mapping and Graphics Specialist
Our Nation’s Forestlands On the Edge Susan Stein USDA Forest Service FREMO Workshop, Annapolis FREMO Workshop, Annapolis September 18, 2007.
Final Report Assessing biodiversity concerns of urban sprawl and projecting smart growth in Hays County, Texas Prepared by: Project Manager Stephanie Rosson-
Brad Barber Project Manager for SCFA Texas Forest Service Brad Barber Project Manager for SCFA Texas Forest Service.
Site Suitability for Lake Overholser Cassi Poor CRP 551.
Environmental Decision Making SC.912.L Why have environmental laws?  To regulate activities that are harmful to the environment. a. E.g., Clean.
T28 N R4 W S01 T 5 N R 4 E S 15 T31 N R4 E S20.
CH 14 SECT 1 & 2 LAND USE. LAND USE AND LAND COVER We use land for many purposes, including farming, mining, building cities and highways, and recreation.
 Kevin Behm – Addison County Regional Planning Commission  Kevin Behm – Addison County Regional Planning Commission Community Build-Out.
Krystal Zwinggi Project Manager John McClintock GIS Analyst Lance English Webmaster Michael Stanley GIS Analyst.
Helping Communities Protect Wildlife Habitat Emily Brunkhurst Wildlife Biologist NH Fish and Game Taking Action for Wildlife.
RVCOG Advisory Committee Meeting Discussion on Draft Interpretation of The Urban Reserve Rule Location Factors And Analysis of RPS Growth Areas February.
Introduction The City of San Marcos is proactively developing a plan integrate GIS to help the San Marcos Fire Department prepare for and assess future.
Land, Public and Private Chapter 10. Human Activities Affecting Land and Environment  Extensive logging – mudslides  Deforestation – climate change.
TOPICS IN LAND SURVEYING: SUBDIVISIONS TREC #7220 TIM HOWELL, RLS TREC INSTRUCTOR #1556.
Progress Report Assessing biodiversity concerns of urban sprawl and projecting smart growth in Hays County, Texas Prepared by: Project Manager Stephanie.
Plans for Bigfoot Research Station Jared McDonald, Allison Petsche, Kyle Wilcox.
Land Chapter 14, section 1&2 How We Use Land. Background California, (8 yrs), nearly 210,000 acres of rural land had been converted into urban.
Colorado River Water Resources Vulnerability Project for Hill Country Conservancy Daniel Zavala Araiza.
Green infrastructure includes intact forests, tree canopy, wetlands, dune systems, parks and rivers, or agricultural soils that provide clean water, air.
Capstone Project GI Analysis C Team. Leadership Forum Local/State GIS planners Planning/ZoningUtilities Citizen Groups USACoE Local Developers Parks &
International Airport Site Evaluation St. George, Utah TYREL EDWARDS - JOSH GATHRO - MATTHEW HALES - PLOY SAMRANJIT 25 APRIL 2016 CEE 5190 – GIS FOR CIVIL.
Land Development in Pierce County ArcGIS for Civil Engineers CEE 424 Joss Gramstad, John Wright, Brynn Carr December 8, 2006.
Land Use Ch. 14. Land Use and Land Cover Urban land –Land covered mainly with buildings and roads Rural land –Land that contains relatively few people.
Low-Density Urbanization and Critical Habitats
Where critical areas & agriculture meet
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and the Conservation and Use of Plant Genetic Resources Summary of
Texas Surface Water Resources
Finding Wind Turbine Locations in Northwest Lower Michigan
Newberry Cultural Center Site Location Project
Assessing Likelihood of Development in Countywide Corridors
NJ-GeoWeb Interactive Basics Workshop
GIS & Land Preservation
Presentation transcript:

Growth and Land Use Planning Analysis for Washington County, Utah Presented by: Eric D Zimmerman

Study Area Southern Washington County, Utah

Purpose of the Study 1)To determine the amount of land available for growth and development 2)To determine where land use conflicts and preferences would most likely occur

Analysis Geoprocessing and Analysis was done in ArcCatalog using ESRI ArcToolbox The analysis was Raster based using 10 meter cells The model was based on the Land-Use Conflict Identification Strategy (LUCIS ® ) methodology Raster layers were combined, ranked and weighted for further analysis

Data Sources U.S. Geological Survey Utah Automated Geographic Reference Center Utah Department of Natural Resources Bureau of Land Management Fish and Wildlife Service Washington County City of Santa Clara City of St. George Washington City Hurricane City

Data Used NED data Threatened and endangered species habitat data Hydrology data Roads data Conservation Land data Parks data Census data Hazardous rock and soil data Wetland data Slopes greater than 25%

Determining Developable Land Parcel Data City and county Land Use Plans City and county Master Plans City and county zoning maps and data Smart growth practices Land ownership/parcel data Aerial photography Existing developed land

Growth Analysis Results Existing Developed Land

Modeling / Analysis Exclusion Criteria: Existing developed land Conservation land Forest Service land Wilderness areas Flood planes Wetlands Areas with slope >25% TES Habitat Open water Scenic lava beds Dry washes Federal land 100 ft setbacks from ridgelines and mesa tops

Growth Analysis Results Hazardous Rock and Soil

Growth Analysis Results Favorable and Unfavorable Development Area Demographic Indicator Growth Study Area Population251,517373,242502,579637,156772,606.0 Growth Study Area Housing Units96,788142,916195,188250,904309,273 Growth Study Area Household Size Growth Study Area HU/mi ,2241,5731,939 Growth Study Area HU/acre Notes: HU/mi 2 = Housing Units per square mile; values include existing and future development HU/acre = Housing Units per acre; values include existing and future development Population and housing data was compiled using the Governor’s Office of Planning and Budget, 2008 Baseline Projections.

Growth Analysis Results Favorable and Unfavorable Development Area Demographic Indicator Growth Study Area Population 251,517373,242502,579637,156772,606.0 Growth Study Area Housing Units 96,788142,916195,188250,904309,273 Growth Study Area Household Size Growth Study Area HU/mi ,0171,3891,7862,201 Growth Study Area HU/acre Notes: HU/mi 2 = Housing Units per square mile; values include existing and future development HU/acre = Housing Units per acre; values include existing and future development Population and housing data was compiled using the Governor’s Office of Planning and Budget, 2008 Baseline Projections.

Growth Analysis Results Land Use Conflict Analysis Figure-1

Growth Analysis Results Land Use Conflict Analysis Figure-2

Growth Analysis Results Land Use Preference Area Figure-1

Growth Analysis Results Land Use Preference Area Figure-2

GIS - Analyzing GIS - Analyzing and understanding our world Conclusion

Questions? Questions