Tier 1 Module 6 CERCLA 128(a) Tribal Response Program Public Record & Institutional Controls.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Former NAS Moffett Field
Advertisements

BoRit Superfund Site Timeline
PA One Cleanup and Land Use Controls The “Business of Brownfields” Conference April 17, 2008 Terri Smith Environmental Liability Management, Inc.
1 Presented by: Glenn Kistner USEPA Region 9 Brownfields Program Brownfields & Superfund For Tribes Overview.
INTRODUCTION TO THE USE OF CERCLA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP PROJECTS USDA FOREST SERVICE Grants and Agreements Workshop February 28, 2002 Great Falls,
 Site Assessment and Mitigation Program Department of Environmental Health – County of San Diego.
Institutional Controls Pamela Elkow and Richard Fil.
1 DEBRIS MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW PRESENTER: GREG KELLER, Disaster Recovery Branch Grants Administrator/Public Assistance Officer (614)
HUD Environmental Review Requirements November 30,2010.
Board of Standards and Appeals Community Board 3 / Manhattan June 13, 2011 Introduction Introduction Applications: Applications: –Variances –Special Permits.
1 Indiana Department of Environmental Management Budget Presentation FY
Responsible CarE® Process Safety Code David Sandidge Director, Responsible Care American Chemistry Council June 2010.
California’s New Onsite Wastewater Treatment System Policy Richard Sanchez, REHS, MPH President California Conference of Directors of Environmental Health.
Who’s Monitoring Land Use Controls on Brownfield Sites? Terri Smith Environmental Liability Management, Inc.
SDWA1 The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
Building a Compliance Risk Monitoring Program HCCA Compliance Institute New OrleansApril 19, 2005 Lois Dehls Cornell, Esq. Assistant Vice President, Deputy.
W504 - Management of asbestos containing materials.
Introduction and Overview
THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: AN INTRODUCTION TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.
Final Rule Setting Federal Standards for Conducting All Appropriate Inquiries U.S. EPA Brownfields Program.
Tier II: Module 1C CERCLA 128(a): Tribal Response Program.
Tier I: Module 4 CERCLA 128(a): Tribal Response Program Element 3: Public Participation.
Tier 1 Module 3 CERCLA 128(a) Tribal Response Program Element 2: Oversight & Enforcement.
Overview of Regulatory Changes, Policy and Implementation Colleen Brisnehan Colorado Department of Public Health And Environment Hazardous Materials and.
Tier 1 Module 7 CERCLA 128(a) Tribal Response Program Establishing a TRP.
1 Land Use Controls (LUCs) The Trust concept for long term care Paul J. Yaroschak Director, Environmental Compliance & Restoration Policy Office of the.
Tier II: Module 2 CERCLA 128(a): Tribal Response Program Other Mechanisms & Resources.
Overview of the Land Recycling Program (Voluntary Cleanup Program)
Tier I: Module 6 CERCLA 128(a): Tribal Response Program Public Record & Institutional Controls.
2010 Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Conference Institutional Controls Featuring the Pinellas Site Jack Craig U.S. Department of Energy Office of.
Enhancing a Tribal Response Program CERCLA 128(a)Tribal Response Program Training Project.
Community Development Opportunities for Alaska Brownfields: Tools to Support your Projects Susan Morales Brownfields Program USEPA - Region 10 (206)
Underground Storage Tank Compliance Act of 2005 Bill Torrey UST/LUST Regional Program Manager US EPA – New England EBCNE April 19, 2006.
SPS policy – Information Presentation Presentation to ROS June 16, 2004.
1 The Use of Institutional Controls Under the RCRA Corrective Action Program.
Tier II: Module 2 CERCLA 128(a): Tribal Response Program Other Mechanisms & Resources.
Legal Liability Regarding the BoRit Asbestos Superfund Site Community Advisory Group Meeting dated March 3, 2010 Presenters Timothy J. Bergere, Partner,
Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser – How to be a BFPP Linda C. Martin and Michael C. Wofford Doerner, Saunders, Daniel & Anderson, L.L.P.
Tier I: Module 5 CERCLA 128(a): Tribal Response Program Element 4: Verification & Certification.
Tier 1 Module 4 CERCLA 128(a) Tribal Response Program Element 3: Public Participation.
Corrective Action Program: Working with Your Local Agency to Solve Local Problems James Clay County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health Site.
New Development and Significant Development 12/21/20151 New Development & Significant Redevelopment.
1 Welcome to the CLU-IN Internet Seminar Tribal Consultation Informational Webinar - Institutional Controls in Indian Country Sponsored by: U.S. EPA Office.
Cooperating Agency Status Presented by Horst Greczmiel Associate Director, NEPA Oversight Council on Environmental Quality Washington, DC September 14,
Greener Cleanups in the Region 10 PCB Program Michelle, Mullin R10 PCB Coordinator Clu-In Webinar November 17, 2015.
Welco EPA TRIBAL PROGRAMS Cathy Villa, EPA Tribal Coordinator EPA’s Tribal Programs leads the effort to protect human health and the environment of federally.
December 2015 Detailed Presentation STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARDS CALIFORNIA Water Boards.
Reclamation of Abandoned Mine Lands: EPA Perspective.
Director’s Order 12 contains information concerning review of other agency proposals.
1 The Brownfields Grant Program and Opportunities for Revitalization of RCRA Sites Linda Garczynski, Director Office of Brownfields Cleanup and Redevelopment.
FDIC Perspective on Environmental Risk Presented by: Gordon Stoner Legal Division Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation May 6, 2008.
November Final Rule Setting Federal Standards for All Appropriate Inquiries Patricia Overmeyer EPA Office of Brownfield Cleanup and Redevelopment.
Copyright © 2009 Holland & Knight LLP All Rights Reserved Uniform Environmental Covenants Act November 18, 2009 Amy L. Edwards, Esq. (202) Brownfields.
Estimating the Costs of Implementing Institutional Controls Brownfields 2009 New Orleans November 17, 2009 John Pendergrass.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.
Institutional Controls in Pennsylvania’s Brownfields Program Presented by: Jill Gaito Director, Brownfields Action Team Office of Community Revitalization.
Wisconsin’s New Approach to Land Use Controls Presented by Mark F. Giesfeldt Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
Financial Assistance 101 Planning for Brownfields Redevelopment Gregory M. Firely, BCES Senior Project Scientist.
Long-Term Stewardship: Institutional Controls on Department of Energy Sites Steve Schiesswohl, Senior Realty Officer November 2006.
Brownfields 2004 Putting the Pieces Together - Effective and Reliable Institutional Controls September 21, 2004 Amy L. Edwards, Esq. (202)
CDBG Disaster Recovery Overview U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
1 Introduction to safety case and safety assessment: purpose and content of safety case Ian Crossland Crossland Consulting
Long-Term Stewardship: Ensuring the Safe Use of Contaminated Sites Brownfields 2006 Boston, MA.
Who I am Darren Bowling Phone: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Remediation and Redevelopment.
Nassau Association of School Technologists
“Designing an Institution to Track Institutional Controls” Federal Perspective Brownfields 2003 October 28, 2003.
Obligations of Educational Agencies: Parents’ Bill of Rights
CERCLA 128(a) Tribal Response Program Site Specific Work: Introduction
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Purpose To address the hazards to human health and the environment presented.
Tribal TAB Program Providing “Technical Assistance to Brownfields” to all U.S. Federally Recognized Tribes!
Presentation transcript:

Tier 1 Module 6 CERCLA 128(a) Tribal Response Program Public Record & Institutional Controls

2 The “Law” 128(b)(1)(C) PUBLIC RECORD….. “maintain, update not less than annually, and make available to the public a record of sites, by name and location, at which response actions have been completed in the previous year and are planned to be addressed under the State program that specifically governs response actions for the protection of public health and the environment in the upcoming year.”

3 The “Law” (cont.) “The public record shall identify whether or not the site, on completion of the response action, will be suitable for unrestricted use and, if not, shall identify the institutional controls relied on in the remedy. “

4 2 Parts of this Requirement 1) A publically available record of sites that have been remediated and those that are planned to be remediated 2) Publication of “Institutional Controls” implemented

5 PART 1: The Public Record Each tribe receiving financial assistance under 128(a) shall maintain and update, not less than annually, and make available to the public a record of sites, by name and location, at which: response actions have been completed in the previous year; and response are planned are planned to be addressed the next year.

6 US EPA Guidance Show Me the Record: Indian Tribes that receive funding under section 128(a) must establish a public record system during the first grant funding period unless a public record system that meets the requirements is already established. Prior to funding a tribe’s annual work plan for subsequent years, EPA regional offices will verify and document that a public record, as required, exists and is being maintained.

7 US EPA Guidance The Public Record must include any response action (completed or planned) under the oversight or jurisdiction of the Tribal Response Program in the previous or coming year. This would include any third party response action (completed or planned) under the oversight or jurisdiction of the Tribal Response Program.

8 US EPA Guidance The Public Record is not required to include a response action conducted under Federal or ADEC jurisdiction (i.e. LUST, Superfund or DOD), however, EPA would strongly encourage listing of these actions as well.

9 Bottom Line: Minimum EPA requirement = Include all response actions taken/planned under the Tribal Response Program. Encouraged by EPA = Include all response actions taken/planned, regardless of jurisdiction, on or near Tribal lands or communities.

10 Record vs Element 3 The Public Record is a separate requirement from Element 3 for public participation. However, it can be a component of that Element.

11 US EPA Goal & Funding EPA's goal is to enable Tribes to make the public record easily accessible. Section 128(a) funds may be used to establish and maintain and make available a public record system that meets these requirements. This includes making information available to the public on the Internet or other means that ensures that the information is readily accessible to the public. (e.g. Website)

Most Tribes have created a notebook or file designated as the “Public Record” that is available to the public at the tribal environmental office, the tribal government office, or other readily accessible public location such as a school or library.

13 AK Tribal TRP Web Sites dex.php?option=com_content&view =article&id=60&Itemid=70 dex.php?option=com_content&view =article&id=60&Itemid=70 /Default.aspx /Default.aspx et/MP.html et/MP.html

14 More than 1 year? EPA encourages tribes to maintain public record information, including data on institutional controls, on a long term basis (more than one year) for sites at which a response action has been completed. Subject to EPA regional office approval, tribes may include development and operation of systems that ensure long term maintenance of the public record in their work plans.

15 Contents of PR The Public Record should only include the required information and facts, not full response/cleanup plans or reports. However, those documents can be referenced and made available for review separately. Some related documents (work plans and reports) have been made available via web sites.

16 Tribal Options A Tribe may elect to use the Public Record to:  inform the public of all response actions in the vicinity of the village or community; and/or  nearby response actions that potentially impact the tribal community health, environment and/or welfare (including the economy).

17 Other Information The process or media used for the Public Record may also be a mechanism to inform the community of related information or actions such as: Phase I or II Assessments planned or conducted Brownfield Inventory Related Inventories (open dumps, LUST, etc.) Informal “cleanups” such as community cleanups, school lab cleanups, open dump removals, etc.

18 Tribal Issues: Many tribes have not planned or completed a response action or cleanup yet under the 128(a) Program. This has made it difficult to “establish” the Public Record when the required information does not exist yet.

19 Tribal Issues It can be difficult to manage community expectations when projecting cleanups for the coming year when a number of things can cause delays or even stop the project, such as: Funding delays Contracting delays Other agency/program delays Legal and/or federal enforcement issues Jurisdictional problems

20 Lessons Learned Do NOT put original copies of files or documents in the public record. (they will disappear!) Make sure you know where all copies of the public record are located, if there is more than one, and update them all at the same time. If you put the Public Record on a web site be sure you know how to access and update the information and, if necessary, funding is in place to do that.

21 Lessons Learned Ensure that all appropriate tribal environmental program staff, including the Director, are aware of the Public Record, it’s purpose and where it is located. A pro-active approach to providing clear understandable information via the Public Record can prevent rumors and misconceptions by community members.

22 Further Implementation Using a multi-media approach that will reach all of the community. Improved coordination with other cleanup authorities (EPA, ADEC & DoD) and the use of the Public Record as a means to inform the community of all response actions that have or will take place in, or in the vicinity of, their community.

23 Part 2: Institutional Controls Tribes that receive 128(a) funding must establish a Public Record and identify in the Public Record whether or not the site, upon completion of the response action, will be suitable for unrestricted use. If not, the Public Record must identify the Institutional Controls relied upon in the remedy.

24 Institutional Controls? What are they? What are they used for ? Who implements them? Who enforces them? How long do they last?

Administrative or legal controls that help minimize the potential for human exposure to contamination on a site; or protect the integrity of a response action. I.C.s are:

26 Example I.C.s Notice in the Deed, Zoning, Resolutions, Lease Terms & Signs

G overnmental, Administrative and/or Legal Controls and/or Conditions need to be placed upon the use of a property when remaining or residual contaminants may pose a hazard if they are disturbed or if the land use changes and that would cause unacceptable exposures or new releases. WHY?

WHO?: Federal Agencies (BIA, BLM, NPS, etc.) ADEC or other State office? Tribal Council Tribal Court Village Corp. Tribal Land/Real Estate Office Incorporated towns or Borroughs Other local non-tribal govt.? Property owner

Why are contaminants left on a site? When total cleanup is: too expensive or not feasible not necessary based upon planned land use Cleanup would cause more environmental damage would damage historical or cultural sites Delayed Cleanup (not done yet)!

Examples of I.C.s Signs Notices in Deed, Lease, etc. BIA Title Status Reports (TSRs) General area land use restrictions Site specific land use restrictions Land use review and approval

Examples of Physical or Engineering Controls Fence Ground water controls Surface water controls Caps and covers(paving) Solidification Chemical treatment Vicious Dog!

Failure of I.C.s: Love Canal, NY Love Canal, NY had Institutional Controls They were ignored by the developers and local govt.

What can happen without I.C.s? Tribal housing built above a prior landfill resulting in the abandonment & demolition of the houses.

34 Fundable Activities EPA considers activities related to maintaining and monitoring institutional controls to be eligible costs under section 128(a). This may include installing, maintaining and monitoring engineering controls necessary to implement and enforce the institutional controls such as: fencing, gates, earthen berms or other barriers, signage, boarding of buildings and monitoring equipment.

35 Monitoring & Enforcement Signs are a form of Institutional Control Someone must monitor And enforce the controls

Monitoring of I.C.s Inspections Pre-approvals of changes in land use Pre-approval for construction Notification of change in ownership Notification of change of lease Notification in change of land status

37 Tribal Issues: Very little precedent for I.C.s on tribal lands by a Tribe, therefore not many tribal legal procedures have been developed. I.C.s must often be coordinated with multiple Tribal government departments and functions as well as the BIA, ADEC and other federal agencies. Authority, responsibility and jurisdiction for enforcement and monitoring of I.C.s can be a problem.

38 Tribal Issues (cont.) Checker-boarding of land ownership and relevant jurisdictions, as well as unclear land ownership, can make effective controls difficult, especially when use of adjacent lands or waters can affect the contaminated area or water or visa versa.

39 Lessons Learned: The lack of land use controls or institutional controls had led to some serious problems and impacts on the health of tribal members and communities. Tribal Councils and attorneys generally need to be educated on the purpose of institutional controls and the procedures or coordination that may be necessary to establish, implement and monitor such controls.

40 Further Implementation The sharing of tribal legal research and implementation issues between tribes is important. Coordination with ADEC and federal agencies will be important to implement this requirement and include it in the Public Record.

41 EPA Guidance “A Citizen’s Guide to Understanding Institutional Controls at Superfund, Brownfields, Federal Facilities, Underground Storage Tank, and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Cleanups” OSWER , EPA- 540-R , February 2005 EPA's institutional controls web site at: m m

The End