University – Industry relationship Gianluca Valentini Deputy Rector for IP & spin-off Politecnico di Milano Milano, training workshop Unchain Project Milano.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Summary Slide Management of Intellectual Property Rights Enterprises, R&D Organizations and Universities Wayne H. Watkins - University of Akron.
Advertisements

SOME KEY ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION IN A NATIONAL IP STRATEGY PART SIX – IP Policy for R&D Institutions and Universities OGADA TOM Innovation and Technology.
Managing Intellectual Property Assets in International Business Anil Sinha, Counsellor, SMEs Division World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)
Final Report Presentation By Mohammad Saber Sakhizada March,26 – 2009.
Technology and Economic Development Intellectual Property Issues in Research Jim Baker Director Office of Technology and Economic Development
IP Issues in Research Jim Baker, Executive Director Innovation, and Industry Engagement.
Intellectual Property Rights Margaret Lawlor Business Development Manager Faculty of Medical Sciences 2015 copyright©NewcastleUniversity 2015.
Creation of IP Culture in Universities & Advantages of Universities having an IP Culture Dr Duncan Matthews Queen Mary University of London.
Universities and Patents From Open Science to Open Innovation Gilles Capart Chairman of ProTon Europe.
2015. MITA. All rights reserved.````` Lithuanian Country Report Gintarė Narakienė The Agency for Science, Innovation and Technology.
TUTORIAL Grant Preparation & Project Management. Grant preparation What are the procedures during the grant preparations?  The coordinator - on behalf.
Managing the Technology Transfer and Commercialization Process Best thing since sliced bread.
ROLE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PARKS IN INDUSTRIALIZATION Isaac O. Nyambok University of Nairobi.
Vilnius Lithuania BSc.: Biochemistry Neuropsychology J.D.: University of Oregon LL.M.:University College London Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Intellectual Property: Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State University Research Foundation (ISURF) Director, Office of Intellectual Property.
Bringing Knowledge to the Market: IPR, Licensing and Collaborative Research Regions for economic change : innovating through EU regional policy Brussels.
Cern.ch/knowledgetransfer. Knowledge Transfer | Accelerating Innovation Charlyne Rabe CONTRACTS FOR TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Charlyne RABE KT Legal Advisor.
Management of Intellectual Property at Iowa State University Contributing to Economic Development Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State.
The use of patents by a university spin-off. Sub-module BThe use of patents by a university spin-off 2/21 Structure of the case study University technology.
The Interface between Universities Public Research Institutions and SMEs Training of Trainer’s Program, Teheran 10 June 2015 By Matthias Kuhn, MBA University.
Tech Launch Arizona Tech Transfer Arizona Rakhi Gibbons, Asst. Director for Biomedical and Life Sciences Licensing.
Presented by Vladimir Yossifov Consultant, IP Services “IP Universities” Istanbul, May 16 to 18, 2012 Albert Long Hall, BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY.
Overview OTL Mission Inventor Responsibility Stanford Royalty Sharing Disclosure Form Patent View Inventor Agreements Patent.
A Dual Role Principal (Rector) of Heriot-Watt University Chair of the regional economic development company.
Polimi Case study: Procedures, tools, facts & Figures
TTO © July 2010 – Milan training workshop Spin-off creation: guidelines and rules Ing.Sabrina Prada – Polimi TTO
WP2 Setting up and working on a TTO Giuseppe Conti TTO Director Politecnico di Milano March 23 – Casablanca meeting Unchain Project.
Invention Disclosure FITT (Fostering Interregional Exchange in ICT Technology Transfer)
1 National innovation systems Sub-regional seminar on the commercialization and enforcement of intellectual property rights Skopje, Macedonia April.
© Fraunhofer MOEZ Mathias Rauch, Deputy Director Fraunhofer Center for Central and Eastern Europe MOEZ Commercialization of Technologies in Germany: Fraunhofer.
OPEN DAYS 2008 Brussels, 07 October 2008 Effective Regional Strategies and Policies for open innovation.
IP Institutional Policy “Ten Questions Method” Santiago, October 21 – 24, 2013.
University Technology Transfer: Issues and Opportunities Mark Crowell Research Administration for Scientists (T. Quigg) 7 December 2001.
Policies Promoting IP Development in Universities and Higher Institutions of Learning In Africa OGADA Tom WIPO National Workshop on Intellectual Property.
THE ROLE OF THE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER OFFICE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MILAN: disseminating IP culture and organizing training program for researchers by Roberto.
“IP Universities” Istanbul, May 16 to 18, 2012 Albert Long Hall, BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY IP Policy for Universities Tamas Bene, IP manager University.
1 WIPO – Geneva – April 2005 European Commission – Research DG D. Dambois European Patent Attorney IPR disputes in international.
Commercializing Scientific Research and development Legislation, Contracts, Royalty rates Anne K. S. Jensen Senior Examiner, M. Sc. EE Danish Patent and.
Commons, Networks, and Technology Transfer Gerald Barnett Director, Intellectual Property Management University of California, Santa Cruz.
Ignite Technology Transfer NUI Galway Technology Transfer Office Seamus Coyne, Ph.D Neil Ferguson, Ph.D Commercialisation Executives Technology Transfer.
Conclusion: European strategy and responsible partnering Riccardo Pietrabissa, Politecnico di Milano 19th Seminar.
The structure of an IP Institutional Policy “Ten Questions Method” Sofia, Bulgaria November 25 and 26, 2015.
Academic Technology Transfer Operations and Practice Knowledge Economy Forum IV Istanbul, Turkey March 22-25, 2005 Alistair Brett Oxford Innovation.
Wyoming Research Products Center Technology Transfer and Licensing Senator Enzi’s Inventors Conference April 20, 2013 Phillip Wulf, Intellectual Property.
Intellectual Property Right Bernard Denis, DG-KTT.
NATIONAL CONFERENCE Intellectual Property Policies for Universities and Innovation dr. sc. Vlatka Petrović Head, Technology Transfer Office Acting Head,
Policy on the Management of Intellectual Property in Technology Transfer Activities at CERN CERN/FC/5434/RA Technology Transfer Network Meeting – 10 th.
Industry’s Perspective on Industry-University Intellectual Property External Research Directors Network Industrial Research Institute, Inc. April 17, 2001.
Intellectual Property Valorization
Kuzeyhan Özdemir Director Bilkent TTO IPR Conference October 2015 Istanbul CBTT Turkish - perspective.
Wayne Huebner Vice Provost for Research University of Missouri-Rolla Rolla, MO presentation to: F 3 August 15, 2006 Research UMR: Serving the needs.
Technology transfer – The Hungarian experience Legal background Innovation Act: - Public R&D institutions are required to establish IP policy - IP created.
1 Commercialization Segment Introduction Ralph Heinrich UNECE Team of Specialists on Intellectual Property Skopje, 1 April 2009.
Review of Research-Related Agreements Between Academic Institutions and Other Entities. Manoja Ratnayake Lecamwasam, PhD Intellectual Property and Innovation.
How to establish a successful IP Policy for Universities and Research Institutes Anton Habjanič, D.Sc. director of TechnoCenter at the UM ERF-FEMISE Expert.
ip4inno Module 4C IP Licensing Name of SpeakerVenue & Date.
Patent Review Overview Summary of different types of Intellectual Property What is a patent? Why would you want one? What are the requirements for patentability?
ip4inno Case Study Concentrate Design – design products for schools SpeakerLocation, date.
Technology Transfer Office
Fostering Valorisation of Publicly Funded Research Dr Pat Frain
Technology Transfer Office
Towards a roadmap for collaborative R&D
Nicholas S. Argyres and Julia Porter Liebeskind
From research to markets : why and how
National Contact Points (NCP) Training
University & Industry Collaborative IP Development
Jakob Wested and Helen Yu and Timo Minssen
Knowledge Transfer Office
Intellectual Property &Technology Transfer
Presentation transcript:

University – Industry relationship Gianluca Valentini Deputy Rector for IP & spin-off Politecnico di Milano Milano, training workshop Unchain Project Milano – July 12th 2010

TTO © 2009 Summary The Technology Transfer models How University and Industry contribute to the innovation The Technology Transfer strategy and The importance of University – Industry research agrements for the social development Final remarks

TTO © RESEARCH (results, inventions, innovation) Research contracts Industry funding Public funding research innovation development Industry IP Publications In the “open science” model: 1.Broad circulation of ideas through conferences and publications as the most important KT channel 2.Universities not involved in entrepreneurial initiatives 3.Results of research funded by industry belong completely to industry 4.Concern about changes which might contribute to “close” the system The “open science” model Source: Pietrabissa (2008)

TTO © SELECTION PROTECTION COLLABORATION WITH INDUSTRY Company INCUBATION Licences Royalties New products New technologies Spin-offs Start-ups Seed capital ricerca innovazione sviluppo Research contracts Industry funding Public funding Publications RESEARCH (results, inventions, innovation) EU research projects A more comprehensive model research innovation development

TTO ©  Universities are progressively fostering the valorization of their research results, through the IP management carried out by dedicated offices  Most of pre-competitive research activities are carried out within university-industry networks. Therefore, IP management is becoming highly complex.  The Market of Technologies is growing at international level. New business models between university and industry are constantly introduced.  Some of the more experienced universities are challenging their current model for KT (e.g. maximize license fees vs. maximize research revenues) Rather than a choice between Open Science and “Triple Helix”, we suggest to integrate open science into a more comprehensive model Trends in Technology or Knowledge Transfer

TTO © 2009 What is Technology Transfer in a University? high education scientific research Professionists Scientists Managers Entrepreneurs Knowledge Innovation Benefits: social economic cultural Knowledge Transfer Technology Transfer or Professionists Scientists Managers Entrepreneurs Knowledge Innovation Benefits: social economic cultural...

TTO © 2009 Industries, enterprises,... third companies start up spin off other (joint projects)... industrial skills (technology, market,...) Managing models New knowledge production New knowledge application KT 1 KT done by external agents Research centers Universities PROs Scientific parks other (projects)... scientific skills (knowledge, vision,...) Service companiesskills ? (mixed)

TTO © 2009 New knowledge production New knowledge application KT 1 KT done by external agents New knowledge production New knowledge application KT 4 KT for demanding knowledge New knowledge production New knowledge application KT 3 KT for offering knowledge New knowledge application New knowledge production KT 2 integrated KT (company with a research center, PRO with spin off) New knowledge production New knowledge application KT 1 KT done by external agents New knowledge production New knowledge application KT 4 KT for demanding knowledge New knowledge production New knowledge application KT 3 KT for offering knowledge New knowledge application New knowledge production KT 2 integrated KT (company with a research center, PRO with spin off) Managing models

TTO © 2009 A model invention right know how PATENT 1 €10 € innovationindustrial productneed INDUSTRY develop. UNIVERSITY research UNIVERSITYINDUSTRY 1 €10 € invention right know how PATENT develop.researchinnovationindustrial productneed

TTO © 2009 Industry (Research) (Market) industry entry university exit University SPIN OFF RESEARCH CONTR. The gap

TTO © Education & Research UI University and Industry do different things for different purposes  but they are not competitors More concretely: the vision Development & Production KT Profit TOOL GOAL Source: Pietrabissa (2008) they can collaborate

TTO © Solution Product Need U I The Bricks of the Innovation Line Source: Pietrabissa (2008)

TTO © gap U I The Castle of the Innovation Line Source: Pietrabissa (2008)

TTO © Need Product U I The Castle of the Innovation Line Source: Pietrabissa (2008)

TTO © The Roles of the Actors of the “model” should generate research-based inventions should develop and industrialize new products should generate the rules and direct the actors should invest in research-based ventures Source: Pietrabissa (2008) It is possible to generate an effective and efficient TT process only if all the actors are pushed to work together, playing their roles and taking their responsibilities

TTO © Solution Need Product The Castle of Innovation Source: Pietrabissa (2008)

TTO © Technology Transfer model  Transfer by publications  Transfer by contracting  Transfer by cooperating (joint labs)  Transfer through infrastructures (test facilities)  Transfer by training  Transfer by head (Phd, spillover)  Transfer by licensing  Transfer by spinning off Handled by TTO Driven by Research Dept.

TTO © 2009 Tools for University – Industry relationships Research agreements between University and Industries are win-win tools to foster innovation and social development … but … The differences between players must be undestood respected and valorised

TTO © 2009 Industry Mission Organization: Targets and rules are shared all over the company Hierarchical decision processes University and Industry are different players with their own mission and structure High Education Scientific Research Technology Transfer Profits Production of goods and services University and Industry have complementary objectives and scopes  Conflicts of interest can be easily managed There exist wide diffences in the culture and language  Relationships are sometimes difficult and uneffective University Mission Organization: University grants high autonomy to Departments, research groups and single researchers

TTO © 2009 The main reasons for signing University-Industry research agreements Simplification of the administrative processes  Researches do not care of administrative and legal issuses (the just need to do good science !) The lag time for the signature of specific reasearch contracts is strongly reduced  General conditions are approved in advance, only scientific and financial issues need to be negotiated The ownership of results and IP right are pre-defined according to agreed policies  The University and the Industry feel more confident  Researchers must pay great attention to their obligations “Innovative approach” for the University-Industry relationship  The University Central Administration (not single researchers) negotiates with the Company Headquarters to establish long- term wide-scope research agreements

TTO © 2009 The specific terms for Intellectual Property mgt. The terms referring to the ownership of research Results and Intellectual Property Rights are amongst the most important ones The ownership and the terms of use for Know-how and IPR are predefined  Know how Industry  Patents [Industry University] We strongly suggest that co-assignment in patent applications is warranted to the University in order to defend the Researchers and University reputation  After patent filing, University must grant the freedom of operation to the industry by perpetual license agreements Publication rights must be granted to the University  Reasonable confidentiality conditions must be negotiated The IPR provisions apply for 6-12 months after the expiration of the contract

TTO © 2009 What does University wants? Moral reputation for its research activity  co-assignment in patents ! Reasonable money awards to reward its Researchers The possibility to continue the research in the same field after the expiration of the contract The free of charge use of the results for teaching and research The possibility to publish part of the results in scientific journals Long-term relationship with the Industry instead of sporadic collaborations What does Company wants? The complete ownership of the know- how generated within the contract The unlimited freedom of operation for industrial and commercial purposes The co-ownership of IPR (patents) The complete control of patent filing and international extensions The right to pursuit the legal defense in case of patent infringement Confidentiality about all trade secrets Delay in public disclosure of scientific results to allow patent filing Negotiation of University-Industry IPR agreement Is there a real conflict of interest between University and Industry for what concerns IPR ?... much less than people believes !

TTO © 2009 Typical provisions of IPR agreement The property of all non patentable results goes exclusively to the Industry that can exploit them without any limitation In case of patentable inventions the following procedure applies:  Researchers must disclose the invention to the industrial partner as soon as possible and should collaborate to define novelty and claims  The Industry must confirm the interest for the invention and decides wheter to file a patent application or keep a trade secret  The Company should take care of: patent text and claims payment ofall taxes and expenses payment of a reasonable award to the University  Co-ownership is granted to the University  University grants the Industry the complete freedom of operation

TTO © 2009 Confidentiality committments University undertakes proper actions to prevent confidentiality breaks by its Researchers University keep the rights to use (for free) the results of the research for educational and scientific purposes  Researchers must submit to the Industry the paper drafts before publication in order to achieve the approval  The Industry should not deny the authorization without motivations Confidentiality on trade secrets should last for a time long enough to prevent any damage to the industry (usually 5-10 years) The University Name and Logo should be used only in scientific and technical publications  The Industry should refrain to use the University logo in advertising unless specifically authorized  University should provide the proper credit to the funding Company in public disclosure of the scientific results

TTO © 2009 Final Remarks Universities should play a responsible role in the development of the society through technology transfer and cooperation with industries Relationship between University and Industry should be properly managed Intellectual Property Rights are key issues for the relationship between Universities and private Companies