NECAP DATA ANALYSIS 2012 Presented by Greg Bartlett March, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Discovery Education ThinkLink Assessment. Founded by Vanderbilt University Acquired in March 2006 by Discovery Education Specializes in Predictive Assessment.
Advertisements

Making the Connection to Assessment. Three components: Common Core State Standards Excellent Matches to State Curriculum Essential Skills and Knowledge.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Winchester School District In Need of Improvement Plan DINI Team: Mel Harrison, Valerie Wilber, Hannah Gagnon, Dee Salonen, Amanda Nordberg, Jane Cardinale,
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Building Level Benchmark Data This represents the percent of students who demonstrated the following proficiency levels on benchmark assessments. AP-Advanced.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
Maryland School Assessment (MSA) 2012 Science Results Carolyn M. Wood, Ph.D. Assistant Superintendent, Accountability, Assessment, and Data Systems August.
Narragansett Elementary School Report Night Gail Dandurand, Principal Lisa Monahan, Assistant Principal.
Understanding Changes to Assessments for APPR Purposes Theresa L. Gray, Coordinator Integrated Education Services (IES) Erie 2-Chautauqua-Cattaraugus BOCES.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
Executive Summary  Did not meet API/AYP goals in language arts for the school or significant subgroups.  Did not meet API/AYP goals in math for the school.
Measures of Student Achievement Appoquinimink School District November 2007.
Developing a Data Informed Culture Derry Cooperative School District’s “Story” Presented by: Mary Ellen Hannon, Superintendent, Derry Cooperative School.
Common Core Implementation Plan Whittier City School District Board of Education Meeting April 7, 2014.
Poetry Collaboration between Reading and English.
Silas Deane Middle School Steven J. Cook, Principal Cynthia Fries, Assistant Principal October 22, 2013 Wethersfield Board of Education.
RTI 2 Murfreesboro City Schools Lessons Learned Linda Gilbert, Director of SchoolsLinda Gilbert, Director of Schools Caresa Brooks, Coordinator, Reading/InterventionCaresa.
Horizon Middle School June 2013 Balanced Scorecard In a safe, collaborative environment we provide educational opportunities that empower all students.
1 Curriculum and Instruction Report Pocantico Hills School February 28, 2005.
The Common Core: Moving Ohio Forward Stan W. Heffner Superintendent of Public Instruction February 15, 2012.
Maximizing Reading Gains to Meet AYP Targets: Decision Support Analytics for School Board Providence School District, RI April 2014.
5-Step Process Clarification The 5-Step Process is for a unit, topic, or “chunk” of information. One form should be used for the unit, topic, etc. The.
November, 2013 Next steps – Need to look at new assessment rubric and start looking at monitoring measurable objectives, identifying sub groups and targeted.
Assessment: Purpose, Process, and Use HMR Grade 1.
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
NECAP Ramp-Up Programs Math Grade 4  4 /5 Students Improved 2/5 Improved 2 levels 2/5 Improved 1 level 1/5 No Change Reading Grade 4  8/9 Students Improved.
Mathematics Indicators and Goals. Math Tier II Indicator Indicator 1.8: All junior high students will meet or exceed standards and be identified as proficient.
The Results of an Effective Character Education Program on School Climate and Student Success at Lincoln Elementary School By: Christina Garland and Kimberly.
SB : The Great Teachers and Leaders Act State-wide definition of “effective” teacher and principal in Colorado Academic growth, using multiple measures.
WELCOME TO PARK VIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL NECAP REPORT NIGHT.
Berlin Elementary School Spring 2014 Assessments and Initiatives March 26, 2014.
English Language Arts Single Plan for Student Achievement.
Using the 2007 NECAP Reports February, 2008 New England Common Assessment Program.
School-wide Data Team Meeting Winter NSIF Extended Cohort February 10, 2012.
Vision Statement All children have the right to a rigorous, high-quality education which meets their individual needs. UCS will respect, encourage and.
Math Update Cambrian School District January 12, 2012.
The Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework: What’s in it for you? COSA Special Education Fall Conference October 6, 2011 Julie Anderson, ODE Lori Rae Smith and.
Standards-Based Assessment Overview K-8 Fairfield Public Schools Fall /30/2015.
Jackson County School District A overview of test scores and cumulative data from 2001 – 2006 relative to the following: Mississippi Curriculum Test Writing.
NECAP 2007: District Results Office of Research, Assessment, and Evaluation February 25, 2008.
The PLC Team Learning Process Review Step One: Identify essential (key) learning standards that all students must learn in each content area during each.
Rochester Area Math Science Partnership Our Mission: To support high student achievement through world class standards in math and science Continuous.
NECAP Results and Accountability A Presentation to Superintendents March 22, 2006.
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
BROMWELL COMMUNITY MEETING November 17, SCHOOL PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK (SPF)
Granite School District Multi-Tiered System of Support Part I: Moving Between Tier 1 Differentiation and Tier 2 Interventions and Extensions Teaching and.
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
GEORGIA’S CRITERION-REFERENCED COMPETENCY TESTS (CRCT) Questions and Answers for Parents of Georgia Students February 11, 2009 Presented by: MCES.
“ Let us not be content to wait and see what will happen, but give us the determination to make the right things happen”- Horace Mann 2014 MCAS Overview.
White Pages Team Grey Pages Facilitator Team & Facilitator Guide for School-wide Reading Leadership Team Meetings Elementary.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP TEAM CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLANNING MARCH 3, 2016.
Presentation to the Nevada Council to Establish Academic Standards Proposed Math I and Math II End of Course Cut Scores December 22, 2015 Carson City,
Intervention and Supports for Students.  Strong core instruction for all students in reading and math  Supplementary instruction and supports for students.
Curriculum Night Middle School. What do I as a parent need to know to support student assessments at CCAS? Essential Question.
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
Overview of Network Team Plan.  Deliverable Metrics are being finalized  Assessment of Network Team Deliverables ◦ Principals ◦ Teachers ◦ District.
Milestones Results August 2016 Bibb County School District P-1.
RSU #38 Response to Intervention
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Augusta School Department School Board Presentation
Professional Learning – October 12, 2015
NECAP PRESENTATION.
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Danvers Public Schools: Our Story
PARCC Results: Spring 2018 Administrations Maywood School District
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Presentation transcript:

NECAP DATA ANALYSIS 2012 Presented by Greg Bartlett March, 2013

“Education, then, beyond all other devices of human origin, is the great equalizer of the conditions of men, the balance-wheel of the social machinery.” -Horace Mann QUOTE

Test administered in October – Test is designed to measure the content and skills learned during the teaching year of in Reading, Math, and Writing. Basic Question is: “How are we doing compared to: Standard? Self? Others? Snapshot in Time. This is only one indicator – Need “multiple measures” Test Context

Data for Accountability: Lagging indicators are assessments OF Learning Data for Continuous Improvement: Leading indicators are assessments FOR learning Seeking improvement means using data as a flashlight, not as a hammer. Purpose of Data Collection and Analysis

Grade 3: Reading 67% of all third grade students (118 of the 177 tested), are either Proficient with Distinction or Proficient on the NECAP Reading Assessment. 12% (21 students) are Proficient with Distinction and 55% (97 students) are Proficient. 18% (31 students) are Partially Proficient and 16% (28 students) are Substantially below Proficient on the NECAP Reading Assessment.

Grade 4: Reading 72% of all fourth grade students (101 of the 140 tested), are either Proficient with Distinction or Proficient on the NECAP Reading Assessment. 24% (34 students) are Proficient with Distinction and 48% (67 students) are Proficient. 21% (30 students) are Partially Proficient and 6% (9 students) are Substantially below Proficient on the NECAP Reading Assessment.

Grade 5: Reading 73% of all fifth grade students (112 of the 153 tested), are either Proficient with Distinction or Proficient on the NECAP Reading Assessment. 16% (25 students) are Proficient with Distinction and 57% (87 students) are Proficient. 18% (28 students) are Partially Proficient and 8% (13 students) are Substantially below Proficient on the NECAP Reading Assessment.

Grade 6: Reading 76% of all sixth grade students (132 of the 173 tested), are either Proficient with Distinction or Proficient on the NECAP Reading Assessment. 15% (26 students) are Proficient with Distinction and 61% (106 students) are Proficient. 17% (29 students) are Partially Proficient and 7% (12 students) are Substantially below Proficient on the NECAP Reading Assessment.

Grade 7: Reading 79% of all seventh grade students (132 of the 166 tested), are either Proficient with Distinction or Proficient on the NECAP Reading Assessment. 36% (60 students) are Proficient with Distinction and 43% (72 students) are Proficient. 14% (23 students) are Partially Proficient and 7% (11 students) are Substantially below Proficient on the NECAP Reading Assessment.

Grade 8: Reading 90% of all eighth grade students (158 of the 175 tested), are either Proficient with Distinction or Proficient on the NECAP Reading Assessment. 44% (77 students) are Proficient with Distinction and 46% (81 students) are Proficient. 7% (12 students) are Partially Proficient and 3% (5 students) are Substantially below Proficient on the NECAP Reading Assessment.

Grade 3: Mathematics 57% of all third grade students (101 of the 177 tested), are either Proficient with Distinction or Proficient on the NECAP Mathematics Assessment. 10% (17 students) are Proficient with Distinction and 47% (84 students) are Proficient. 23% (40 students) are Partially Proficient and 20% (36 students) are Substantially below Proficient on the NECAP Mathematics Assessment.

Grade 4: Mathematics 63% of all fourth grade students (89 of the 140 tested), are either Proficient with Distinction or Proficient on the NECAP Mathematics Assessment. 29% (41 students) are Proficient with Distinction and 34% (48 students) are Proficient. 20% (28 students) are Partially Proficient and 16% (23 students) are Substantially below Proficient on the NECAP Mathematics Assessment.

Grade 5: Mathematics 58% of all fifth grade students (89 of the 153 tested), are either Proficient with Distinction or Proficient on the NECAP Mathematics Assessment. 20% (31 students) are Proficient with Distinction and 38% (58 students) are Proficient. 19% (29 students) are Partially Proficient and 23% (35 students) are Substantially below Proficient on the NECAP Mathematics Assessment.

Grade 6: Mathematics 69% of all sixth grade students (119 of the 173 tested), are either Proficient with Distinction or Proficient on the NECAP Mathematics Assessment. 23% (39 students) are Proficient with Distinction and 46% (80 students) are Proficient. 14% (25 students) are Partially Proficient and 17% (29 students) are Substantially below Proficient on the NECAP Mathematics Assessment.

Grade 7: Mathematics 71% of all seventh grade students (119 of the 167 tested), are either Proficient with Distinction or Proficient on the NECAP Mathematics Assessment. 38% (64 students) are Proficient with Distinction and 33% (55 students) are Proficient. 14% (23 students) are Partially Proficient and 15% (25 students) are Substantially below Proficient on the NECAP Mathematics Assessment.

Grade 8: Mathematics 76% of all eighth grade students (133 of the 175 tested), are either Proficient with Distinction or Proficient on the NECAP Mathematics Assessment. 26% (46 students) are Proficient with Distinction and 50% (87 students) are Proficient. 15% (26 students) are Partially Proficient and 9% (16 students) are Substantially Below Proficient on the NECAP Mathematics Assessment.

Overall Performance: Reading 984 Brunswick students in grades 3 – 8 participated in the Fall 2012 NECAP Reading Assessment. Of the 984 students tested, 77% (753 students) were found to be Proficient or Proficient with Distinction on the 2012 NECAP Reading Assessment. 25% (243 students) earned Proficient with Distinction scores, while 52% (510 students) earned Proficient scores. 16% (153 students) of Brunswick students in grades 3 – 8 earned Partially Proficient scores, and 8% (78 students) achieved scores that placed them in the Substantially below Proficient range.

Overall Performance: Mathematics 985 Brunswick students in grades 3 – 8 participated in the Fall 2012 NECAP Reading Assessment. Of the 985 students tested, 66% (650 students) were found to be Proficient or Proficient with Distinction on the 2012 NECAP Mathematics Assessment. 24% (238 students) earned Proficient with Distinction scores, while 42% (412 students) earned Proficient scores. 17% (171 students) of Brunswick students in grades 3 – 8 earned Partially Proficient scores, and 17% (164 students) achieved scores that placed them in the Substantially below Proficient range.

Grades 3 – 8 Reading

Grades 3 – 8 Mathematics

The percentage of special education students has risen from 14% to 17%. The percentage of lower socioeconomic students district wide has been at 30-31% the past 3 years. Homeless students: 2008 = = = 20 (as of February 1) Changing Demographics

Continued K-8 intervention provided for identified students in Reading and Math. All teachers (grades K-5) provide a minimum of 60 minutes per day of direct Reading and Math instruction. Intentional review and reinforcement of skills prior to the NECAP assessment administration in the Fall Interventions

Continue to implement the RTI system with both school-wide and district-wide data teams to review individual, school, and system data. Data review conducted at each school to examine school trends (i.e., attendance, test scores, discipline, etc.) K-5 standards based report card being refined to reflect common benchmarks and assessments. Continued Interventions

Continue to move to prepare for the implementation of the new Smarter Balance test. ( ) Continue to prepare of the implementation of the New Maine Common Core of Learning Standards. Continued Interventions

Coffin School – Grades K-2 K-2 teachers will continue to review and examine the NECAP test items in Reading and Mathematics in Grade - 3. Ongoing staff development training in the M.I.F. Leveraging internal expertise to target most effective instructional practices for all classrooms. Benchmark Review: K-2 staff will work with the building principal, Next Steps:

Asst. Superintendent, and Curriculum Coordinator to review reading and math benchmarks. Comprehensive review of K-2 math and reading data- April, Recalibration of K-2 reading/math benchmarks, as necessary – May, Next Steps:

Harriet Beecher Stowe HBSS will conduct a thorough data review (individual, school, and subgroup) to develop a plan to support students based on the answers to these questions: Individual Student Data: Are there students who need additional interventions? Are we providing the right intervention to the right students? What do other data points tell us? (i.e. Classroom, NWEA, BAS, etc. Next Steps:

School Data: What do the release items tell us? What are the trends? What concepts do we need to emphasize in our teaching? What concepts do we need to reteach? Subgroup Data: What is happening with our subgroups over time? What should our instructional emphasis be? Next Steps:

HBS - Instructional Emphasis Continue emphasis on implementing Math in Focus with fidelity. Continue staff development training for Math in Focus. Continue development of common assessments in reading and writing. Next Steps:

B.J.H.S. Continue the current level of support with RTI (Response To Intervention) for struggling students. Continue to investigate new structures to ensure students feel connected to B.J.H.S. Provide systematic and purposeful staff development in mathematics. Next Steps: