Developing a Framework and a Process for Comprehensive Internationalization: Do you know where to begin? A Webinar for Campus Leadership June 16, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Comprehensive Internationalization: A U.S. Perspective
Advertisements

Arts in Basic Curriculum 20-Year Anniversary Evaluation the Improve Group.
Using the New CAS Standards to Assess Your Transfer Student Programs and Services Janet Marling, Executive Director National Institute for the Study of.
CYPRUS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Internal Evaluation Procedures at CUT Quality Assurance Seminar Organised by the Ministry of Education and Culture and.
Measuring Comprehensive Internationalization in U.S.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
Lessons Learned Central Connecticut State University Nancy Birch Wagner, Director The George R. Muirhead Center for International Education.
School College Work Initiative: Phase May 11, 2006.
The Pennsylvania State University Service Learning- Engaged Scholarship Task Force Sponsored by Interim Provost Vice President, Student Affairs Vice President,
February 21, 2012 Strategic Planning for Internationalization: A Discussion of Why to Plan, its Benefits and Issues in Implementing the Process Annual.
Advancing Campus Internationalization Through an Integrated Approach: The Role of Languages and Cultures Across the Curriculum Regional Meeting of the.
MAPPING INTERNATIONALIZATION at U.S. Colleges and Universities Dr. Madeleine Green Vice President for International Initiatives, ACE.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
UBC Senate: Supporting an integrated approach to enhancing the mental health and wellbeing of students in the academic environment Lindsey Kovacevic Academic.
Scholarly Engagement Mission Pathway Partnership Pathway Epistemological Pathway Pedagogical Pathway Production of Knowledge Improvement of LearningConnection.
Strategic Priorities for Taking Charge of our Future.
Maureen Noonan Bischof Eden Inoway-Ronnie Office of the Provost Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association Annual Meeting April 22, 2007.
Achieving Campus Diversity: The University of Central Florida Model
SAR as Formative Assessment By Rev. Bro. Dr. Bancha Saenghiran February 9, 2008.
EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY Eastern Washington University EWU ODP Maps EWU ODP Maps
Report to Professional Council June 4, 2009 By Carla Boone Planning Council: A New Way of Doing Business at COM.
Creating a Learning Community Vision
Stages of Commitment to Change: Leading Institutional Engagement Lorilee R. Sandmann, University of Georgia Jeri Childers, Virginia Tech National Outreach.
NASPA Presentation Practical Tools for Building Division-wide Assessment Capacity Adrienne Dumpe, Graduate Assistant, VPSA Katie O’Dair, Director of Assessment.
Evidence of Success: Assessing Student Learning Outcomes in International Education Dr. Darla K. Deardorff Association of International Education.
This series of five presentations has the following goals: Presentation III A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement,
A Plan for Action August 26,2008 Realizing CCSU’s Distinctive Identities.
Updates on Office of International Programs Presentation to the Faculty Senate November 8 th, 2012 Prema Arasu Professor & Vice Provost International Programs.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
THE GLOBAL UNIVERSITY By William I. Brustein Associate Provost for International Affairs The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Welcome! Please join us via teleconference: Phone: Code:
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
Strategic Academic Visioning and Empowerment (SAVE) Final Report to UWF BOT December 2011.
The Challenge We must realize that the system is the cause of weak execution due to lack of clarity, commitment, collaboration and accountability resulting.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Preparing and Evaluating 21 st Century Faculty Aligning Expectations, Competencies and Rewards The NACU Teagle Grant Nancy Hensel, NACU Rick Gillman, Valporaiso.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
Take Charge of Change MASBO Strategic Roadmap Update November 15th, 2013.
Presentation to North Carolina State Board of Education Global Education Task Force March 14, 2012  Adam Hartzell, Executive Director  Matt Friedrick,
Meeting the ‘Great Divide’: Establishing a Unified Culture for Planning and Assessment Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Presented at the 2006 Conference.
The NCATE Journey Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University AACTE/NCATE Orientation - Spring 2008.
International Leadership Team Susan Mackey-Kallis, Chair Town Hall Meeting April 26, 2013.
S AN D IEGO AND I MPERIAL V ALLEY B ASIC S KILLS N ETWORK Dr. Lisa Brewster.
How to Plan a Successful Academic Year with Your Chapter: Keeping the End in Mind JODI BROOKINS-FISHER, PHD, MCHES ESG PRESIDENT HOLLY TURNER MOSES, PHD,
1 Roles and Responsibilities of The Learning Evidence Team at CCRI Presented at CCRI Peggy Maki
+ using Integrated Planning & Budget In a Participatory Governance Context Realizing our Foothill Vision 20/20.
MDC Strategic Plan Strategic Plan Coordinating Committee October/November 2010.
Assessment of Student Learning in General Education AAHE/NCA 2003 Assessment Workshop Omaha, Nebraska ● June 2003.
Program Review Section III Training Sacramento City College Student Services Division Fall 2008.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
KSU’s Quality Enhancement Plan.  Current Core Requirement 2.12  The institution has developed an acceptable Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) that (1)
Annual Planning Task Force (APTF) Recommendations NOVEMBER 18, 2014.
CREATING A CULTURE OF EVIDENCE Student Affairs Assessment Council October 2013 Dr. Barbara Copenhaver-Bailey Assistant Vice President for Student Success.
HLC Criterion Five Primer Thursday, Nov. 5, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE DIVISION OF THE PRESIDENT Approved by the President in Spring  Provide students with a quality educational.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-PAN AMERICAN Approved by President Cárdenas November 21, 2005 Goals reordered January 31, 2006.
Cal Poly Pomona University Strategic Plan 2011 ‐ 2015 Partial Assessment of Progress Presented to the University Strategic Planning Committee (USPC) 12/4/2014.
Forward Together: UW Madison’s Framework for Diversity and Inclusive Excellence Ad Hoc Diversity Planning Committee Shared Governance (Faculty, staff,
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Principles of Good Governance
Dr. Jo Alice Blondin, President, Clark State Community College
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
ACE INTERNATIONALIZATION LAB
Presentation transcript:

Developing a Framework and a Process for Comprehensive Internationalization: Do you know where to begin? A Webinar for Campus Leadership June 16, 2010

Objectives for the Webinar Introduction of the integrated approach to comprehensive internationalization Identification and discussion the components of the integrated approach Understanding who should be involved in a cross-sectional internationalization team Learning from an institution that has successfully adapted the integrated approach to their institutional context

Introduction of Presenters Dr. Barbara A. Hill, Senior Associate & Director of the Internationalization Laboratory, American Council on Education, Washington, DC

Introduction of Presenters Dr. Carl Lovitt, Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs, Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, CT

Introduction of Presenters Dr. Nancy Birch Wagner, Director of the George R. Muirhead Center for International Education, Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, CT

ACE’s International Vision Statement In order for the United States to have a truly world-class higher education system, colleges and universities must be globally engaged and prepare students to be citizens of a multicultural community both at home and in a globalized world. Institutions accomplish this by having a multi- dimensional, comprehensive strategy that includes internationalization at home and engagement with global issues and partners.

What is the integrated approach to internationalization? An internationalization review to catalog and analyze what the institution is doing The development of student global learning outcomes and a method for assessing them to better understand the impact of what the institution is doing The integration of the results of the review and the learning outcomes process into a strategic internationalization plan

What is an internationalization review? Taking stock of the international or global initiatives on campus Collecting and analyzing information as a basis for an internationalization plan Identifying strengths, weaknesses, gaps and possibilities for synergy Engaging people across the institution in a conversation about internationalization

What does an internationalization review include? (1) Institutional Articulated Commitment: Mission, Goals, and Vision Institutional Strategic Plan The Local, State, and Broader Environment for Internationalization International Office Structure, Portfolio, and Personnel

What does an internationalization review include? (2) Faculty International Background, Interest, Activity Structures, Policies, and Practices for Faculty Development, Travel, Tenure & Promotion Attitudes of Domestic Students The Curriculum and Co-Curriculum Study and Internships Abroad International Students

What does an internationalization review include? (3) Engagement with Institutions in Other Countries Resources Synergies among all these aspects of internationalization Opportunities to deepen and improve internationalization

What does articulating global learning outcomes add to the review process? Encourages a shift away from an ad-hoc approach Offers a guide for aligning curriculum and other inputs with desired outcomes for students Helps stakeholders understand the impact of institutional activities Encourage a culture of quality improvement Satisfies accrediting agencies Helps prioritize activities in an internationalization plan.

Basic Questions Addressed by Learning Outcomes & Assessment What do we want our students to know and be able to do? (knowledge, skills, attitudes) Where would students acquire this knowledge and these skills and attitudes? What is our evidence that students are actually achieving these outcomes?

Moving Towards an Internationalization Strategic Plan Understanding the Planning Process Configuring and Charging the Team Situating the Plan in the Institutional Context Carrying forward recommendations drawn from internationalization review process Setting Priorities & Building Support

Elements of the Internationalization Strategic Plan Vision for Internationalization Strategic Goals Performance Indicators – Outcomes and Evidence of Success Specific Action Steps and Timeline Responsible Agents Funding

Lessons Learned Central Connecticut State University Dr. Carl Lovitt, Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs, Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, CT

What do we mean by Internationalization? Manageable, finite process Clearly articulated goals Fixed timeline Defined by institutional culture

How Does the Culture Support Internationalization? ● Setting a baseline for internationalization - Embedded in Mission and Vision -A Center for International Education -Administrative support -International and Area Studies major -International course requirement -Foreign language proficiency requirement -Cultural centers

Adapt Task Force Charge to Institutional Needs Review and assess current internationalization efforts Develop a plan for increasing study abroad participation, rigor, faculty engagement, and oversight Develop a plan for integrating global education into the curriculum Recommend ways to integrate global education with community engagement Investigate external funding sources

Making the Case for Internationalization Recall national imperative Reference the Institution’s Mission Enumerate benefits for students Reinforce the message

Giving Internationalization Legitimacy and Focus Recognize as institutional priority Align with other institutional priorities Integrate within strategic plan Goal 5: Promote global awareness and respect for diversity. Objective 5.2 Increase the number of courses that integrate an international component. Objective 5.3 Increase faculty and student participation in international teaching and research experiences

Staffing the Task Force Represent diverse stakeholders Include decision makers Ignore politics and compatibility Include full-time staff members

Lessons Learned Central Connecticut State University Dr. Nancy Birch Wagner, Director The George R. Muirhead Center for International Education

Getting Started: Task Force Nuts and Bolts Where, when, and what’s for lunch? Resources, required reading, and homework Providing clear agendas and nurturing broad participation Establishing and maintaining campus-wide legitimacy

Transforming Goals Into Action Items International Competencies for CCSU Students Faculty Survey on Internationalization at CCSU Departmental Study Abroad Advising Sheets Partnerships Committee State-wide website

International Competencies for All CCSU Students Knowledge, attitudes, skills Carefully chosen battles Immediate practical implementation - Guidelines and proposal for faculty-led programs - Faculty evaluation of short-term programs - Student evaluation of long- and short-term programs - Woven into Faculty Survey Consistent standards and a baseline for the future

A Faculty Survey Simple and terse; no laundry lists please Curricular Integration focus Personal and low tech; veterans with survey fatigue Immediate practical use - Required component of every Departmental Annual Report - Truth in advertizing – baseline info shared with chairs, deans, provost - Justification for General Education reform - Recurring annually

Advising Sheets Meaningful curricular integration 40 department-specific Study Abroad Advising Sheets Merge practical, generic advice with highly specific guidelines from departments Link CCSU partner programs abroad with courses required for the major Post on websites; distribute copies across campus

Partnerships Committee A working subcommittee Avoid ‘heat of banquet’ affiliations Criteria and Faculty Proposal Form Promote partnerships - in desired locations - for underrepresented majors - with student interest - with faculty support

International Courses ●Outcome of Faculty Survey ●Remedy for a dilemma ●Meaningful study abroad promotion

The IERConn Website ●Practical consortium ●11 Connecticut institutions ●Resource sharing - Study Abroad (map and program details/photos) - International Students (social networking and statistics) - Faculty Experts (selection and linking) - Calendar of International Events URL:

2 years later - where we are ● Committed committee members ●Campus-wide, integrated, and collaborative; not ad hominem ●Systematic ●Practical

Where we are going Creative financing Outcome-based projects - Faculty promotion, sabbatical, and appointment - Program development - Program assessment ● Committed to staying connected

Opportunities for Further Learning about Internationalization at ACE (1) Webinar # 2 and # 3 of the “Building a Strategic Framework for Campus-wide Internationalization” series: › “Conducting an Internationalization Review: Do you know who is doing what and how it fits together?” › June 24, 2010, 3 p.m. (EDT) › “Developing and Assessing Global Learning Outcomes: What are your students learning and how do you know?” › June 30, 2010, 3 p.m. (EDT)

Further Opportunities at ACE (2) Leadership Network on International Education For Presidents and Provosts (Next Meeting in DC, Wednesday, November 3, 2010 from 8:30 a.m. to 3 p.m. ) To ensure your President and/or CAO is invited, send an to:

Further Opportunities at ACE (3) ACE Internationalization Collaborative  Invitational Network of Institutions  Forum for Campus Teams  For more info: ace.nche.edu  Internationalization Laboratory  Small Cluster of Institutions engaged in internationalization review and strategic planning for months  For more information:

Further Opportunities at ACE (4) Networks Research Leadership programs Publications On-line resources Thank you.