Page 1 SIP header reduction for supporting delay sensitive applications draft-akhtar-sipping-header-reduction-00.txt draft-akhtar-sipping-3g-static-dictionary-00.txt.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SIP, Presence and Instant Messaging
Advertisements

IM May 24, 2000 Introduction to SIP Jonathan Rosenberg Chief Scientist.
Internet Protocol Security (IP Sec)
SIMPLE Presence Traffic Optimization and Server Scalability Vishal Kumar Singh Henning Schulzrinne Markus Isomaki Piotr Boni IETF 67, San Diego.
Session-Independent Policies draft-ietf-sipping-session-indep-policy-01 Volker Hilt Gonzalo Camarillo
1 5 th SDO Emergency Services Workshop October 2008 “sos” URI parameter for marking emergency requests Milan Patel 5 th SDO Emergency Services Workshop.
SIP and IMS Enabled Residential Gateway Sergio Romero Telefónica I+D Jan Önnegren Ericsson AB Alex De Smedt Thomson Telecom.
IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) 江培文. Agenda Background IMS Definition IMS Architecture IMS Entities IMS-CS Interworking.
6 The IP Multimedia Subsystem Selected Topics in Information Security – Bazara Barry.
Session Initiation Protocol Winelfred G. Pasamba.
SIP and the application of SIP as used in 3GPP Keith Drage - Lucent Technologies.
SIPPING IETF51 3GPP Security and Authentication Peter Howard 3GPP SA3 (Security) delegate
Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) By: Zhixin Chen.
12/05/2000CS590F, Purdue University1 Sip Implementation Protocol Presented By: Sanjay Agrawal Sambhrama Mundkur.
CSc 461/561 CSc 461/561 Multimedia Systems Part C: 2. SIP.
SIP, Session Initiation Protocol Internet Draft, IETF, RFC 2543.
Internet Telephony Helen J. Wang Network Reading Group, Jan 27, 99 Acknowledgement: Jimmy, Bhaskar.
SIP 逄愛君 SIP&SDP2 Industrial Technology Research Institute Computer & Communication Research Laboratories Elgin Pang Outline.
1 Extending SIP Speaker: Hsuan-Ming Chen Adviser: Ho-Ting Wu Date: 2005/04/26.
A Gateway For SIP Event Interworking - Sasu Tarkoma & Thalainayar Balasubramanian Ramya.
Introduction to SIP Speaker: Min-Hua Yang Advisor: Ho-Ting Wu Date:2005/3/29.
Via contains the address at which the originator is expecting to receive responses to this request. Mandatory To contains a display name and a SIP URI.
SIP Session Initiation Protocol Short Introduction Artur Hecker, ENST.
1 RFC 3486 Compressing the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) 曾朝弘 電機系 系統組 碩士班一年級.
July 30, 2010SIPREC WG1 SIP Call Control - Recording Extensions draft-johnston-siprec-cc-rec-00 Alan Johnston Andrew Hutton.
Issues of HIP in an Operators Network Nick Papadoglou Thomas Dietz.
Arslan Munir and Ann Gordon-Ross+
Session Initiation Protocol Team Members: Manjiri Ayyar Pallavi Murudkar Sriusha Kottalanka Vamsi Ambati Girish Satya LeeAnn Tam.
NAT Traversal Speaker: Chin-Chang Chang Date:
“Securing IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) infrastructures …,” M. Tsagkaropoulos UNIVERSITY OF PATRAS Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering Wireless.
1 Kommunikatsiooniteenuste arendus IRT0080 Loeng 4 Avo Ots telekommunikatsiooni õppetool, TTÜ raadio- ja sidetehnika inst.
Authors: Jiann-Liang Chenz, Szu-Lin Wuy,Yang-Fang Li, Pei-Jia Yang,Yanuarius Teofilus Larosa th International Wireless Communications and Mobile.
Session Initiation Protocol (SIP). What is SIP? An application-layer protocol A control (signaling) protocol.
Improving the Routing Efficiency of SIP Instant Message SIP 即時傳訊之繞送效能研究 adviser : Quincy Wu speaker : Wenping Zhang date :
Jun Li DHCP Option for Access Network Information draft-lijun-dhc-clf-nass-option-01.
QUALCOMM Incorporated 1 Protocol Options for BSN- BSMCS Controller Interface Jun Wang, Kirti Gupta 05/16/2005 Notice: Contributors grant a free, irrevocable.
Presented By Team Netgeeks SIP Session Initiation Protocol.
Elin Sundby Boysen Lars Strand Norwegian Defence Research Establishment (FFI) Norwegian Computing Center (NR) University Graduate Center (UNIK) November.
CP-a Emergency call stage 2 requirements - A presentation of the requirements from 3GPP TS Keith Drage.
7/6/20061 Speermint Use Case for Cable IETF 66 Yiu L. Lee JULY 2006.
1 SPEERMINT Use Cases for Cable IETF 66 Montreal 11 JULY 2006 Presented by Yiu L. Lee.
Slide title In CAPITALS 50 pt Slide subtitle 32 pt Performance of Signalling Compression in the Third Generation Mobile Network Jouni Mäenpää S
SIP:Session Initiation Protocol Che-Yu Kuo Computer & Information Science Department University of Delaware May 11, 2010 CISC 856: TCP/IP and Upper Layer.
Omar A. Abouabdalla Network Research Group (USM) SIP – Functionality and Structure of the Protocol SIP – Functionality and Structure of the Protocol By.
IMS 架構與話務分析 網路管理維運資源中心 日期 : 2013/07/25 網路管理維運資源中心 日期 : 2013/07/25 限閱.
All Rights Reserved © Alcatel-Lucent 2006, ##### 2G IMS CAVE Based Security Replay Protection Alec Brusilovsky, Zhibi Wang Alcatel-Lucent, July 24, 2007.
E Multimedia Communications Anandi Giridharan Electrical Communication Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore – , India Multimedia.
Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Chapter 5 speaker : Wenping Zhang data :
IETF 69 SIPPING WG Meeting Mohammad Vakil Microsoft An Extension to Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Events for Pausing and Resuming.
All Rights Reserved © Alcatel-Lucent 2006, ##### 2G IMS CAVE Based Security Replay Protection Zhibi Wang January, 2007.
SIP Performance Benchmarking draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-01 draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-meth-01 March 22, 2010 Prof. Carol Davids, Illinois Inst. of Tech.
User Notification Protocol Nikolai Leung, QUALCOMM Incorporated (703) Notice: QUALCOMM Incorporated grants.
September 28, 2006 Page 1 3GPP2 MMD Status for IMS Workshop Jack Nasielski
1 RFC4028 Session Timer in the Session Initiation Protocol Speaker : Ying Shun Lin Adviser : Quincy Wu.
March 20, 2007BLISS BOF IETF-681 Requirements and Implementation Options for the Multiple Line Appearance Feature using the Session Initiation Protocol.
OPTIMIZATION OF SIGNALING TRAFFIC IN CENTRALIZED CONFERENCES USING SIP Submitted by D.NEHRU S.JAYABALAN B.Tech IT II Year.
The Session Initiation Protocol - SIP
S Postgraduate Course in Radio Communications. Application Layer Mobility in WLAN Antti Keurulainen,
1 Personal Mobility Management for SIP-based VoIP Services 王讚彬 國立台中教育大學資訊工程學系
SHIP: Performance Reference: “SHIP mobility management hybrid SIP-HIP scheme” So, J.Y.H.; Jidong Wang; Jones, D.; Sixth International Conference on
1 Implementation of IMS-based S-CSCF with Presence Service Jenq-Muh Hsu and Yi-Han Lin National Chung Cheng University Department of Computer Science &
Internet Telephony 1 Reference Architecture of R00.
Session-Independent Policies draft-ietf-sipping-session-indep-policy-02 Volker Hilt Jonathan Rosenberg Gonzalo.
SIP over MANETs Introduction to SIP SIP vs MANETs Open Issues
Signaling Compression for Push-to-talk over Cellular (PoC)
Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
SigComp: Signaling Compression
IP Multimedia Subsystem & W-CSCF
OMA PoC Overview and draft-allen-sipping-poc-p-headers
SIP Basics Workshop Dennis Baron July 20, 2005.
Presentation transcript:

Page 1 SIP header reduction for supporting delay sensitive applications draft-akhtar-sipping-header-reduction-00.txt draft-akhtar-sipping-3g-static-dictionary-00.txt Haseeb Akhtar: Dave Brombal: Anthony Jones: Mohamed Khalil:

Page 2 Short call setup time –PDD (Post Dial Delay) < 4 sec for VoIP/VT applications –Push-to-beep < 1 sec for PTT (Push to Talk) application Wireless bandwidth is restrictive –Even for 3G/4G technologies the average throughput per user is in the 10s of Kbytes Number of users/sector Distance from the cell tower Interference from neighboring sectors –Use control channel to send/receive initial SIP messages Removes traffic channel acquisition delay from the call setup time Large text-based SIP messages can not be transmitted Initial call setup messages (e.g. SIP Invite, 200 OK) must be reduced to ~200 bytes to support delay sensitive applications over wireless access SIP Header Reduction Requirements for Wireless Access

Page 3 Initial SIP Invite message does not have high compression ratio –Lack of saved states results in moderate compression Register, Subscribe and Notify messages before Invite –Conservative estimate is at 50% compression ratio Persistent states across calls may not be a viable option –Limited by memory storage and scalability of the proxy server Only the active users are provisioned to store Sigcomp state at a given time Initial SIP Invite continues to be a challenge for achieving higher compression –Subsequent SIP Invites after the user terminates the call start the SigComp with the state saved at SIP Registration URI of the called party – 30 bytes Calling party’s preferred identity (P-preferred Identity) – 30 bytes URI of the calling party in ‘From’ header – 30 bytes Calling party’s ‘Contact’ information – 30 bytes Leaves 80 bytes to fit the rest of the Invite message In addition to SigComp, further optimization to initial SIP Invite is needed Using SigComp Alone

Page 4 Main Components of SIP Header Reduction Proposal Modification of SIP Registration –Establish context Exchange indexed list of Identity components –IP addresses, URIs, contact list etc. –To be used in SIP header fields: ‘Via’, ‘From’, ‘Contact’, ‘P-Preferred-Identity’ etc. Exchange indexed list of access networks supported –To be used in ‘P-Access-Network-Info’ SIP Header field Exchange indexed list of security protocols supported –To be used in ‘Security-Verify’ SIP Header field –Identify supported functions SIP Header Reduction algorithm 3G dictionary –Requires new or modified SIP Header Fields 3G Dictionary –Introduce new mobility data elements not present in RFC 3485 –Avoid dynamically building the dictionary since initial SIP Invite needs to be reduced EA Function at the UA and Proxy Server –Encode/decode SIP header fields –Maintain SIP Header Reduction state information per SIP Registration session

Page 5 Example Call Flow – IMS/MMD based Session P-CSCF (pcscf1) UE-AI-CSCF (icscf1_1) HSSS-CSCF (scscf1) Shared XDMS 2. REGISTER 5. REGISTER 3. REGISTER 9/ OK OK 8/ OK 6. Authentication 1. Initial UE Registration request and Unauthorized Response 4.Cx: User registration status query 7.Cx: S-CSCF registration notification 10*. Buddy list retrieval Establish context Check supported options Execute EA function Retrieve buddy list Create indexed lists Execute EA function 8*. Buddy list retrieval * Both of these options will work

Page 6 New Option Tags and SIP Header Fields Option Tags for ‘Supported’ Header Field –Option Tag ‘encode’ Indicates if SIP Header Reduction is supported –Option Tag ‘3G-Dictionary’ Indicates the presence/absence of 3G Dictionary P-Encode-Identities –Index of public IDs (IP addresses, URIs, E.164 etc.) P-Encode-Access-Networks –Index of supported access networks such as CDMA, etc. P-Encode-Security –Index of security protocols supported such as IPSec, TLS etc. P-Contact-List –Index of contact List P-Contact-List-Location –Location of the database (such as shared XDM) for storing the contact list

Page 7 New Data Elements of 3G Dictionary SIP Header Field parameters –‘Max-Forwards: 70’ –‘P-Preferred-Identity’ –‘P-Access-Network-Info’ –‘Require: sec-agree, precondition’ –‘Supported: 100 rel’ –‘Spi:s’ –‘Port:c=’ –‘Port:s=’ SDP parameters –‘Content-Type: application/SDP’ –‘a=des:qos mandatory, local sendrecv’ –‘a=des:qos none, local sendrecv’ –‘a=inactive’

Page 8 References [1] RFC 3320 [2] Applying SigComp to the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) draft-ietf-rohc- sigcomp-sip-01.txt

Page 9 Thank You