English Language Arts Common Core Lesson Alignment NCAGT/PAGE Conference March 1, 2013 Lisa L. McIntosh.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Math Common Core Standards
Advertisements

Understanding the Common Core Standards and Planning Lessons to Address The Standards.
Introduction: The Structure and Scope of the 3-5 Modules November 2012 Common Core Ambassadors.
Tri-State Quality Review Rubric & Rating Process Mathematics Lessons/Units Mary Cahill, Director of Curriculum, SED Anu Malipatil, Fellow for Common Core,
Annie Michaelian Jill Okurowski Stephen Toto. Tri-State Quality Review Rubric.
Created by NWRESD Data Quality Project CCSS Stewardship Committee 2013 Created by NWRESD Data Quality Project EQuip Network Common Core Stewardship Committee.
WORKING TOGETHER ACROSS THE CURRICULUM CCSS ELA and Literacy In Content Areas.
Tri-State Quality Review Rubric & Process ELA/Literacy Lessons/Units EQuIP Collaborative Fall 2012.
Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products (EQuIP) Using the Tri-State Quality Rubric for Mathematics.
Tri-State Quality Review Rubric & Process Mathematics and ELA/Literacy Lessons/Units June 2012.
The Importance of Technology in High School Science Amy Roediger.
EQuIP Rubric & Quality Review Training Session: ELA/Literacy Grades
Overview of the CCSSO Criteria– Content Alignment in English Language Arts/Literacy Student Achievement Partners June 2014.
Instructional Implications for PARCC Assessment in the Science and Social Studies Classroom Maryland College and Career Readiness Conference Summer 2014.
 Here’s What... › The State Board of Education has adopted the Common Core State Standards (July 2010)  So what... › Implications and Impact in NH ›
Unit 2 – Making It Real Learning Objectives Reflect on your classroom instruction to identify the literacy components you are already using and how they.
Louisiana Reading Association Update April 21, 2012.
Denise Wright, BCPS Elementary Instructional Coach.
 State Standards Initiative.  The standards are not intended to be a new name for old ways of doing business. They are a call to take the next step.
A UGUST 2012 Elementary Literacy Standards. New Standards for Literacy Key Intended Learnings– Teachers will… Examine capacities of college and career.
Adapt or Adopt in ELA: Support for Districts & Schools on Curriculum Decision Making EngageNY.org.
English Language Arts Overview Created By: Penny Plavala, Literacy Specialist.
CWA Pilot Workshop: Civil Rights Investigations March 2011.
Language Arts Florida Standards (LAFS) EQuIP Rubrics Training
IMPLICATIONS FOR INSTRUCTION, ASSESSMENT AND LEADERSHIP! PRESENTED BY: SHERYL WHITE EDUCATOR LEADER CADRE- ELA CHAIR Common Core Shifts in English Language.
Session Goals Use the EQuIP quality review process to determine the quality and alignment of lessons and units to the Common Core State Standards (CCSS)
Honors Level Course Implementation Guide [English Language Arts]
Tri-State Quality Review Rubric & Process Mathematics Lessons/Units EQuIP Collaborative Fall 2012.
How do we evaluate the quality of existing and newly created text-based lessons and units of study???? Please refer to the Tri-State Review Rubric for.
EQuIP Rubric & Quality Review Training Session: ELA/Literacy Grades 6 – 8 1.
ELA Common Core Shifts. Shift 1 Balancing Informational & Literary Text.
Session 2: Informational Text Audience: 6-12 ELA Teachers.
1 An Overview of the 6 Shifts in ELA Literacy.
Understanding PARCC and Disciplinary Literacy November
Linking Disciplinary Literacies to the Common Core State Standards EDC 448 Dr. Julie Coiro.
Summer 2012 Day 2, Session 6 10/13/2015R/ELA.EEA.2012.©MSDE1 Educator Effectiveness Academy English Language Arts And the journey continues… “Transitioning.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards Professional Learning Module Series.
ELA Common Core State Standards Overview of the Big Shifts in Common Core Standards for English Language Arts Overview of the Standards for Literacy in.
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Literacy in History/ Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects.
Twilight Training October 1, 2013 OUSD CCSS Transition Teams.
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
English Language Arts/Literacy Louisiana Textbook Adoption Publisher’s Orientation March 1, 2012.
EQuIP Rubric & Effective CCSS Feedback Training Session: Math.
EQuIP Rubric & Quality Review Training Session: ELA/Literacy Grades 9 – 12 1.
CCSS outlines what students are expected to learn in K-12 ELA (English language arts) and math in order to be college and career ready.
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
Understanding the Common Core Standards and Planning Lessons to Address The Standards.
12/16/2015MSDE1 “Transitioning to the CCSS by Making Strategic and Informed Choices in the Classroom” Day 1 Principals Only Session.
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Instructional Materials Quality Review Rubric Winter 2013 Presenters: Drew Hinds, ODE Jeff Coleman, Clackamas ESD Marta.
1 TEXT-BASED SYNTHESIS WRITING: INFORMATIVE / ARGUMENT OPINION NARRATIVE Silver Shores Elementary.
Looking for Rigor? Try Project-Based Learning Ramsey JHS Media Center June 1, 2012 Deborah Chapman Ines Robles Michele Walker.
The EQuIP Rubric Evaluating Quality Instructional Products.
Implementing the Common Core State Standards Monday, January 23rd - 4pm EST Deconstructing the Common Core Standards: Analyzing for Content, Level of Cognition.
ELA/ELD CCSS Content and Pedagogy Grades 7-12: ELD CCSS Shifts and Expectations for EL Programs Taken from the California Department of Education Draft.
Writing – CCSS Style AACRC – October 29, Prior Knowledge 1.I don’t know anything about the ELA CCSS 2.I have some familiarity with the ELA CCSS.
New ELA Guidelines Shifts in ELA Common Core  Rise in Nonfiction Texts.  Content Area Literacy Close and careful reading of text  Increase Complexity.
Module 1: Common Core Instruction for ELA & Literacy Informational Text Audience: Science, Social Studies, Technical Subject Teachers Area V Regional Superintendents.
NEW JERSEY COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS INSTRUCTIONAL SHIFTS KEY IDEAS.
The New Illinois Learning Standards
An Overview of the EQuIP Rubric for Lessons & Units
ELA Webinar Please check your audio settings. We will begin at 3:30.
DAY 1.
The Importance of Technology in High School Science
Session Goals Use the EQuIP quality review process to determine the quality and alignment of lessons and units to the Common Core State Standards (CCSS)
The New Illinois Learning Standards
An Overview of the EQuIP Rubric for Lessons & Units
EQuIP and Learning Forward Professional Learning Community Modules
Presented to Adamsville Primary by Ms. Skinner and Ms. Husband
Using the 7 Step Lesson Plan to Enhance Student Learning
Tri-State Quality Review Rubric & Process
Presentation transcript:

English Language Arts Common Core Lesson Alignment NCAGT/PAGE Conference March 1, 2013 Lisa L. McIntosh

Tri-State Quality Review Rubric

Materials  Go to our Resources LiveBinder at:  Click on the tab, Quality Review Rubric  Open a copy of the ELA 3-12 Quality Review Rubric

What is the Quality Review Rubric? 1. It is a rubric used to evaluate lessons that include instructional activities and assessments aligned to the CCSS that may extend over a few class periods or days AND to evaluate units that include integrated and focused lessons aligned to the CCSS that extend over a longer period of time. 2. The primary purpose of the Quality Review process is to provide specific input for the improvement of instructional materials so that teaching and learning are aligned with the CCSS. Note: The Tri-State Rubrics and DPI do not require a specific template for lesson or unit design. The Rubrics are not designed to evaluate a single task.

Four dimensions: I.Alignment to the rigors of the CCSS II.Key areas of focus in the CCSS (the “shifts”) III.Instructional Supports IV.Assessment

I. Alignment to the rigors of the CCSS The lesson/unit aligns with the letter and spirit of the CCSS:  Targets a set of grade-level ELA/Literacy CCSS for teaching and learning. **  Includes a clear and explicit purpose for instruction.  Selects texts that measure within the grade-level text complexity band and and are of sufficient quality and scope for the stated purpose.** (i.e., present vocabulary, syntax, text structures, levels of meaning/purpose, and other qualitative characteristics similar to CCSS grade-level exemplars in Appendices A & B) In addition, for units:  Integrates reading, writing, speaking and listening so that students apply and synthesize advancing literacy skills.  (Grades 3-5) Builds students’ content knowledge and their understanding of reading and writing in social studies, the arts, science or technical subjects through the coherent selection of texts. [NOTE: Disciplinary rubrics for grades 6-12 are under development.]

Alignment to the Standards  The Standard(s) selected are clearly evident and explicitly taught in the lesson.  Make sure the entire Standard is addressed.

Language Reading Speaking and Listening Writing Integration of Standards  Standards from each Strand may be addressed in a lesson or unit.

Text Complexity  In the CCSS, text is the focus of instruction.  All students should have extensive opportunities to encounter grade-level complex texts.  Shorter challenging texts that elicit close reading and rereading should be a part of regular instruction.

II. Key areas of focus in the CCSS The lesson/unit addresses key areas of focus in the CCSS:  Reading Text Closely: Makes reading text(s) closely, examining textual evidence, and discerning deep meaning a central focus of instruction. **  Text-Based Evidence: Facilitates rich and rigorous evidence-based discussions and writing about common texts through a sequence of specific, thought-provoking, and text-dependent questions (including, when applicable, illustrations, charts, diagrams, audio/video, and media).**  Writing from Sources: Routinely expects that students draw evidence from texts to produce clear and coherent writing that informs, explains, or makes an argument in various written forms (notes, summaries, short responses, or formal essays).**  Academic Vocabulary: Focuses on building students’ academic vocabulary in context throughout instruction.

In addition, for units:  Increasing Text Complexity: Focuses students on the close reading of a progression of complex texts drawn from the grade-level band. Provides text- centered learning that is sequenced, scaffolded, and supported to advance students toward independent reading of complex texts at the CCR level.  Balance of Texts: Includes a balance of informational and literary texts as stipulated in the CCSS [p.5] and indicated by instructional time (may be more applicable across a year).  Building Disciplinary Knowledge: Provides opportunities for students to build knowledge about a topic or subject through analysis of a coherent selection of strategically sequenced, discipline-specific texts.  Balance of Writing: Includes a balance of on-demand and process writing (e.g. multiple drafts and revisions over time) and short, focused research projects, incorporating digital texts where appropriate.

Close Reading  Teachers provide students with multiple opportunities to read rich texts.

Text-Based Evidence  Teachers facilitate learning that stays deeply connected to the text.  Students develop the ability to make arguments based on evidence found in the text.

Text-Dependent Questions  Teachers facilitate evidence-based discussions using text-dependent questions.  Text-dependent questions can serve to scaffold learning.

Writing From Sources  Students are asked to make a claim and use evidence from the text in their writing.

Academic Vocabulary  Focus vocabulary instruction on Tier 2 words in context.

Balance of Informational and Literary Texts  In elementary grades, the CCSS call for a balance of literary and informational texts.  In ELA classes 6-12, there should be a blend of literature (fiction, poetry, and drama) and literary nonfiction

III. Instructional Supports The lesson/unit is responsive to varied student learning needs:  Cultivates student interest and engagement in reading, writing, and speaking about texts.  Addresses instructional expectations and is easy to understand and use.  Provides all students with multiple opportunities to engage with text of appropriate complexity for the grade level; includes appropriate scaffolding so that students directly experience the complexity of the text.  Focuses on challenging sections of text(s) and engages students in a productive struggle through discussion questions and other supports that build toward independence.  Integrates appropriate supports for students who are ELL, have disabilities, or read well below the grade level text band.  Provides extensions and/or more advanced text for students who read well above the grade level text band.

In addition, for units:  Includes a progression of learning where concepts and/or skills advance and deepen over time.  Gradually removes supports, requiring students to demonstrate their independent capacities.  Provides for authentic learning, application of literacy skills, student-directed inquiry, analysis, evaluation, and/or reflection.  Integrates targeted instruction in such areas as grammar and conventions, writing strategies, discussion rules, and all aspects of foundational reading for grades 3-5.  Includes regular independent reading based on student choice and interest to build stamina, confidence, and motivation; indicates how students are accountable for that reading.  Uses technology and media to deepen learning and draw attention to evidence and texts as appropriate.

Engagement and Differentiation  Lessons include instructional strategies and supports to engage ALL students in the content being studied. (ELL, EC, AIG)  Expectations are clearly communicated to students.

 Students are provided with opportunities to engage in a “productive struggle” with challenging sections of text.

IV. Assessment The lesson/unit regularly assesses whether students are mastering standards-based content:  Elicits direct, observable evidence of the degree to which a student can independently demonstrate the major targeted grade level CCSS standards with appropriately complex text(s).  Assesses student proficiency using methods that are unbiased and accessible to all students.  Includes aligned rubrics or assessment guidelines that provide sufficient guidance for interpreting student performance. In addition, for units:  Uses varied modes of assessment, including a range of pre, formative, summative, and self-assessment measures.

Use these steps to complete your rubric: 1.Record the grade and title 2.Scan the lesson 3.Identify the grade-level standards 4.Study and measure the text(s) used in the lesson 5.Analyze the lesson for evidence of the dimensions 6.Check the box for each criteria met or make suggestions for improvements

Where Do I Go When My Lessons Are Not Aligned?

Remember…. The purpose of the rubric is to:  Align lessons and units to the CCSS  Evaluate lessons and instructional resources  Serve as a guide to develop new lessons

Differentiating for Gifted Learners in the ELA Common Core Focus on the skills of argument. Provide lessons that integrate the ELA Standards of reading, writing, speaking and listening, and language as well as standards of other disciplines. Adjust texts so that students are reading texts that are slightly above their documented reading level – (text complexity). Promote students’ development of research skills, Standards 7, 8, and 9 in the ELA Common Core.

Lesson Examples for Gifted Learners Elementary: Kindergarten: Evaluation of Book Characters: Who Would You Want to Be? Writing opinion pieces Strengthening writing with guidance and support Grade 2: Debating Current Issues - Banning Junk Food at School Debating Using evidence from the text Comparing two or more texts on the same topic Real life situation – authentic Grade 3 : Growing up Batty: Bats & Humans – Are we that different? Staying in the text, but going deeper Finding evidence from the text.

Lesson Examples for Gifted Learners Middle: Grade 7: “The Star Spangled Banner”, 200 years later Writing arguments Integrating standards (Reading, Speaking and Listening, Writing) Using Socratic Seminar Higher-level questioning Using the standards as the criteria for the writing assessment

High School: Honors English 10: “Using Rhetoric to Make Public Addresses” Writing arguments Research English III: “Analyzing Structure in T.S. Eliot’s The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” Integrating standards Text-dependent questions

Evidence Let’s find evidence in the standards! color coding Click evidence to see where it occurs in the standards.

Evidence Resource Intel Showing Evidence Tool ation/k12/thinking-tools/showing-evidence/try- the-tool.html

Empowerment in implementation means knowing what to keep and what to let go. Shoulders can quickly get heavy in education. It can feel like every new idea is added to the heap of “everything to accomplish in a single day.” In order to implement the Core with success we’ll not only need to make sense of what it is, but we’ll also need to empower ourselves to determine what we let go of. Whether we decide to let go of a textbook we’ve always taught from in favor of a primary text or to keep the narrative piece of writing that sparks creativity in our students, we must remember that when our choices are purposeful we’ll find ways to intersect the Common Core Standards with the integrity of our classrooms. - Sarah Wessling's Top Ten Common Core Insider Secrets

Julie Joslin, Ed.D. Section Lead Grades 9-12 English Language Arts Consultant Lisa McIntosh, MSA K-5 English Language Arts Consultant Contact Information: