1 PARENTS and TESTING: Myth or Reality (What they really think) Presenter: David Bryant, Parent Liaison Division of Accountability Services, NCDPI 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IDEA® English Language Proficiency Tests (IPT)
Advertisements

1 The 2010 Assessment Literacy Team Campaign: Increasing Understanding of Testing in the 21 st Century Presenters: Dr. Iris Garner, NAEP Coordinator, NCDPI.
___________________________ NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program North Carolina Alternate Assessment Academic Inventory.
Outcomes At the end of the training session, participants will have an in-depth knowledge of state and local student accountability standards, understand.
Secondary LEP Students Administrative Best Practices for meeting the needs of middle and high school LEP students May 26, 2005 The Office of ESL/International.
Compliance Monitoring Orientation. Monitoring Components Focus Site Review/Fiscal Monitoring SPAM.
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Dr. Tracy Tucker Thomas Coy Arkansas Department of Education
Coordinating Equitable Services for Private Schools Christine T. Miller Red Clay Consolidated School District December 7, 2010 DSU – Martin Luther King.
10 Things to Expect Regarding Your Child’s Individualized Education Program (IEP) Meeting.
Title I LEA and Peer Review Process of School Improvement Plans Kokomo Center Schools Kokomo, IN.
Test Monitor Training Administering Minnesota Assessments “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Parents Need To Know About… HB 656 Georgia Academic Placement and Promotion Law Revised 7/08, Department for Elementary Instruction, DeKalb County School.
Alamance-Burlington Schools
Title I Parental Involvement
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program May 7, 2013.
IDENTIFICATION 1 PROPOSED REGULATORY CHANGECOMMENTS Implement a four step ELL identification process to ensure holistic and individualized decisions can.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE) Administration.
Confidentiality… important facts to know and critical things to do!
Information on Grades 3-8 Testing Steven Katz Director Office of State Assessment.
Louisiana’s USDOE AP Test Fee Program Rima Duhon Louisiana Virtual School AP® Program Coordinator.
1 Policy No Child Left Behind of 2001 HSP-C-005/State Board of Education –Annual Language Proficiency Assessment –No Exemptions –Same standard, Same content.
1 Sarah McManus and Hope Tesh-Blum North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Division of Accountability Services/Testing Section North Carolina High.
2014 ALACASE CONFERENCE Preschool Indicators 2014 EI Preschool Conference.
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program CCSA March 25, 2013.
Successful Program Implementation: Meeting Compliance Statutes Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title.
Initial Referrals NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Department November 24 th, 2008.
Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) UNION COLLEGE.
Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs
Future Ready Schools English Language Proficiency Testing in North Carolina: English Language Proficiency Testing in North Carolina: A Brief Introduction.
BOCES Data Collection & Reporting October 10, 2013 Lisa Pullaro Mid-Hudson Regional Information Center.
New EMIS Coordinator Training 12/13/13 Presenters: Brenda Hartley – OMERESA EMIS Support Tammy Hrosch – MDECA EMIS Services Manager.
Confidentiality A Training Without the Video. Laws FERPA (1976) or the Buckley Amendment (1994) IDEA (1991) KY Safe Schools (1998)
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE) Program.
1 Reporting Section Update North Carolina Accountability Conference February 11-13, 2008 Greensboro, NC.
Welcome to the Title I Annual Meeting for Parents Preclarus Mastery Academy September 29, 2015.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
Suggested training for region, district, and campus professionals 9/24/2014Texas Education Agency – Student Assessment Division 1.
On Site Review Process. 2 Overview of On Site Review Materials and Process.
1 Exit Standards that Empower & Equip More ESTEEM.
Research, Accountability and Grants Orange County Public Schools Florida Standards Assessment.
New Directors’ Training Session Miami, Florida -- September 23-24, 2010 Michelle Kelley, Associate Director Boise State University HEP.
NCEXTEND1 Alternate Assessments of: English Language Arts/Reading 3  8, Mathematics 3  8, and Science 5 & 8 English II, Math I, and Biology at Grade.
Special Education Regulations and Law Exceptional Children Division December 2015.
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
Literacy-Based Promotion Act & 3 rd Grade Summative Assessment Parent Information Night September 29, 2015.
 This presentation does NOT replace reading the Updated for Student Success Initiative Manual.
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
Student Data Privacy and Security
Huntsville City Schools Centralized Registration
MANUALS READ THE MANUALS!!
Family Engagement Coordinator Meeting July 25, 2018
Parent & Family Engagement Policy
Proctoring In Our Schools St Johns County School District
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parental Involvement
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parental Involvement
Florida Standards Assessment
that Empower & Equip More
Proctoring In Our Schools St Johns County School District
Parental Involvement Policy
Parent & Family Engagement Policy
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parent and Family Engagement
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parent and Family Engagement
Family Engagement Policy
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parent and Family Engagement
Student Records Montana Association of School Business Officials
Presentation transcript:

1 PARENTS and TESTING: Myth or Reality (What they really think) Presenter: David Bryant, Parent Liaison Division of Accountability Services, NCDPI 2008 Accountability Conference February 11-13, 2008

2 Introduction This session will provide the opportunity for participants to gain insight into the world of testing from the parents’ perspective. How differing state and local policies create confusion What parents view as myths versus reality in the local school districts Review of North Carolina General Statutes and SBE policies Available resources to help address their concerns

3 Angry Stressed Anxious Frustrated Confused Resentful Understanding Grateful Satisfied

4 Sources of Inquiries Telephone Letters State Superintendent’s Office State Board of Education NCDPI’s Main Switchboard Legislators (State and Federal)

5 Protocol for Responding to Parent Calls Know that you may not be able to accurately ascertain the caller’s actual identity. Limit your comments to questions designed to help you understand the details of their concern. Assure them that you are hearing their concerns but also understand that the caller may not have complete information or may not provide you with all the details. Remain neutral in your comments.

6 Protocol for Responding to Parent Calls Encourage the caller to work through the leadership structure in their school and school system. Many calls involve issues that are local and over which the Department of Public Instruction does not have authority.  Examples: Student school assignment, student grades and placement, student discipline, local policies regarding promotion and retention decisions and the like. After screening information, direct the caller to the appropriate division within the agency. If the caller says that he or she has tried to engage the leadership structure in their school or school system without success, offer to share the caller’s concerns with the local school district.

7 Protocol for Responding to Parent Calls Make no promises Share the concern with the appropriate local school district superintendent’s office. When responding to parents or guardians, be sure to provide contact information that includes your name and title.

8 Available Resources State Board of Education policies North Carolina General Statutes Division of Accountability Services The “For Parents” website Testing Policy and Operations Regional Accountability Coordinators (RACs) Local Test Coordinators Division of Exceptional Children Policy, Monitoring and Audit Dispute Resolution Consultants

9 Typical questions or comments Will my son/daughter fail if they don’t pass the test? Why can’t they be promoted if they have maintained an A/B report card all year? Can I see the test so I can help my child do better? They told me I can’t see the test. Can I see my child’s writing paper?

10 Typical questions or comments They said the State Department said……. Why do they have to take the course over because they failed the test? My child can’t go to college because of that competency test. They’re just teaching to the test.

11 What’s myth or reality for parents and students? All students must score level III to be promoted. Promotion/retention is based on a single test score Any student not scoring level III must go to summer school. Principals not allowed to make promotion decisions Teachers are teaching to the test. Students with disabilities must take the same test. Tests can’t be viewed by the public. Students must pass the competency to receive a diploma.

12 Why can’t they be promoted if they have maintained an A/B report card all year? Curriculum pacing Delivery of curriculum content Rigor Teacher experience Student retention

13 Will my son/daughter fail if they don’t pass the test? Review Procedures for Promotion Requests (HSP-N-005) Students shall be given retest no later than three weeks from receipt of results. Teachers or parents may request a promotion for students after the second or third test. Teachers shall provide documentation Student work samples, other test data, information supplied by parents, for students with disabilities, information that is included in IEP, and other information that verifies that a student is at grade level. Students not promoted after the second or third administration shall be given focused intervention. The LEA shall appoint a committee to review student promotion requests. The principal makes the final decision regarding promotion. Note: There are parents unaware of the review process.

14 Local Accountability Procedures (SBE Policy # HSP-N-006 )HSP-N-006 Promotion decisions shall be made according to local policy and discretion Shall include statewide student accountability standards Local Board of Education shall adopt procedures to ensure that students are treated fairly Policy shall recognize the authority of the principal to make promotion decisions Local Board of Education policies shall be consistent with statewide student accountability policies Shall include notification and involvement of parents and agreement of parental expectations signed by parents School districts shall provide focused intervention to all students who do not meet statewide student accountability standards NC standardized high school transcript shall certify a level of proficiency in high school courses through both grades and test scores

15 Can I see the test so I can help my child do better? “They told me I can’t see the test” (Process for Stakeholders to View Secure Test Materials) Request directed to NCDPI Test Development Section Chief. Stakeholder contacted by staff member to set review date May not view secure materials at the district or school site Secure test materials include, but are not limited to: Test blueprints; test layout forms; item pools; operational or field test books, test questions, or test book sections; operational, field test, or make-up writing prompts; answer documents; and test administrator manuals. If the stakeholder is a parent they will be informed: The test will be a parallel and equivalent form of the test, but not necessarily the same test form The parent will not be able to view child’s completed answer document or actual test book. The completed test books and answer documents are maintained at the district level and are securely destroyed soon after the test administrations are completed.

16 (Process for Stakeholders to View Secure Test Materials) Stakeholder may take notes on information shared prior to viewing the secure test materials, no note taking is permitted during the actual viewing. Prior to viewing secure test materials, the stakeholder is required to read and sign a test security agreement form. While viewing secure test materials, the stakeholder may not duplicate, scan, copy, photograph, or otherwise create a record of information contained within the secure test materials.

17 Can I see my child’s writing paper? Confidentiality of Student Scores (Writing) Note: The following information is based on The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). Schools are not to send home copies of the student writing responses. If schools print copies of students’ actual written responses to the test, the copies should be placed in the students’ cumulative folder and should not be sent home with the student score reports. Parents may view their child’s writing at the school. If a parent requests a copy of their child’s writing, schools should require written permission from the parent prior to releasing the actual writing. The parent letter of request should be kept at the school as documentation.

18 Why do they have to take the course over because they failed the test? (Graduation Requirements and High School Exit Standards) Students entering the ninth grade for the first time in and beyond will be required to meet new High School Exit Standards. Students entering ninth grade prior to , EOCs are to count 25% of the students final grade. What’s myth or reality for parents and students? Local policies require students to score Level III who entered ninth grade prior to Level III cut scores made higher for students in honor classes.

19 What This Means Better communication Distribution of state and local policies Access to local policies Information in student handbook Direct parents to websites for information Available resources Staffing for focused intervention Scheduling Programs

20 QUESTIONS

21 Contact Information David Bryant Parent Liaison/Education Consultant Accountability Services Division Help Desk: or Web Address: For Parents