Diameter Extended NAPTR Thursday, November 11, 2010 draft-ietf-dime-extended-naptr Mark Jones Jouni Korhonen IETF 79 Beijing, China.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Draft-ietf-pim-port-06. port-06 update Changes made in response to second wglc comments and following discussion Many minor editorial issues fixed Changed.
Advertisements

1 IETF Network Management Framework and Standards draft-ersue-opsawg-management-fw-01 draft-ersue-opsawg-management-fw-01 IETF #79, Beijing O&M Area Working.
Lionel Morand DIME WG IETF 79 Diameter Design Guidelines Thursday, November 11, 2010 Lionel Morand.
TSVWG #1 IETF-92 (Dallas) 24 th March 2015 Gorry Fairhurst David Black WG chairs.
1 Behcet Sarikaya Frank Xia July 2010 Flexible DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation in Mobile Networks IETF 78
DIME WG IETF 78 Agenda and WG Status Tuesday, July 27, 2010 Jabber room: Audio:
PPSP Working Group IETF-89 London, UK 16:10-18:40, Tuesday, Webex: participation.html.
Runtime LMA Assignment Support for Proxy Mobile IPv6 draft-ietf-netext-recirect-03 Jouni Korhonen, Sri Gundavelli, Hidetoshi Yokota, Xiangsong Cui IETF.
Doc: Submission September 2003 Dorothy Stanley (Agere Systems) IETF Liaison Report September 2003 Dorothy Stanley – Agere Systems IEEE.
IETF 531 DNS Discovery Update draft-ietf-ipv6-dns-discovery-04.txt Dave Thaler
DIME Rechartering Hannes Tschofenig & Dave Frascone.
1 Notification Rate Control draft-ietf-sipcore-event-rate-control th IETF,
Rfc7180bis: Further TRILL Clarifications, Corrections, and Updates Donald Eastlake Mingui Zhang, Radia Perlman, Ayan Banerjee, Anoop Ghanwani, Sujay Gupta.
IETF71 DIME WG RFC3588bis and Extensibility Status Victor Fajardo (draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-10.txt)
DIME WG IETF 79 DIME WG Status & Other Stuff Thursday, November 11, 2010 Jouni Korhonen, Lionel Morand.
Dime WG Status Update IETF#81, THURSDAY, July 28, Afternoon Session I.
DIME WG IETF 82 Dime WG Agenda & Status THURSDAY, November 17, 2011 Jouni Korhonen & Lionel Morand.
DIME WG IETF 84 DIME WG Agenda & Status Tuesday, July 31 st, 2012 Jouni Korhonen, Lionel Morand.
Diameter Group Signaling Thursday, November 07 th, 2013 draft-ietf-dime-group-signaling-02 Mark Jones, Marco Liebsch, Lionel Morand IETF 88 Vancouver,
NETCONF WG IETF 92 - Dallas TUESDAY, March 24, CDT Mehmet Ersue Mahesh Jethanandani 3/24/ IETF #92- NETCONF WG session.
1 STUN Changes draft-ietf-behave-rfc3489bis-03 Jonathan Rosenberg Dan Wing Cisco Systems.
TSVWG IETF-68 James Polk Lars Eggert Magnus Westerlund.
TSVWG IETF-76 (Hiroshima) James Polk Gorry Fairhurst With an assist for this meeting from **Magnus Westerlund**
Dime WG Status Update IETF#80, 1-April Agenda overview Agenda bashing WG status update Active drafts Recently expired IESG processing Current milestones.
Extended Attributes RADEXT - IETF 79 Alan DeKok FreeRADIUS Avi Lior Bridgewater.
Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery using Domain Name System(DNS) draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-04 Qin Wu ) Dhruv Dhody
RADEXT WG IETF 91 Rechartering. Why? Current charter doesn’t allow us to take on new work that is waiting in the queue Has an anachronistic Diameter entanglement.
PAWS Protocol to Access White Space DB IETF 83, Paris Gabor Bajko, Brian Rosen.
4/26/2017 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Response to WG request regarding TC ERM requested.
RADEXT WG RADIUS Attribute Guidelines Greg Weber March 21 st, 2006 IETF-65, Dallas v1 draft-weber-radius-attr-guidelines-02.txt draft-wolff-radext-ext-attribute-00.txt.
Mobility for IP: Performance, Signaling and Handoff Optimization (MIPSHOP) IETF 73, November 2008 Vijay Devarapalli
ISMS IETF72 David Harrington. Status IETF72 Transport Subsystem for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) –IETF69: draft-ietf-isms-tmsm-09.txt.
RADEXT WG IETF 81 Agenda July 25, Please join the Jabber room:
Early copy-edit experiment Experiences with the Diameter SIP application draft-ietf-sip-diameter-sip-app IETF 64 Vancouver, 6-11 November,
Softwire Security Requirement Update draft-ietf-softwire-security-requirements-02.txt IETF Meeting, Prague March 19, 2007 Shu Yamamoto Carl Williams Florent.
Design Guidelines Thursday July 26, 2007 Bernard Aboba IETF 69 Chicago, IL.
IETF #65 Network Discovery and Selection Problem draft-ietf-eap-netsel-problem-04 Farooq Bari Jouni Korhonen.
SCTP as a transport for Diameter draft-pascual-dime-sctp-00 IETF 79 - DIME WG November 2010,
Diameter Group Signaling Thursday, August 02 nd, 2013 draft-ietf-diameter-group-signaling-01 Mark Jones, Marco Liebsch, Lionel Morand IETF 87 Berlin, Germany.
Diameter Group Signaling draft-jones-diameter-group-signaling-00 Mark Jones Taipei, Taiwan November 2011.
Service location & discovery: S-NAPTR Open APPs Area Meeting November 10, 2003 Leslie Daigle.
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: IETF Liaison Report Date Submitted: September 16, 2010 Presented at IEEE session.
Draft-ietf-pim-port-03 wglc. WGLC responses Thomas suggested a long list of changes, mostly editorial –I believe I addressed all Dimitri also had comments.
6LoWPAN Meeting 66 IETF Dallas Format Document changes July 11, 2006.
Multiple Interfaces (MIF) WG documents status MIF WG IETF 80, Prague Problem statement and current practices documents.
SPPP Transport Session Peering Provisioning Protocol draft-ietf-drinks-sppp-over-soap-04.
San Diego, November 2006 IETF 67 th – mip6 WG Goals for AAA-HA interface (draft-ietf-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-03) Gerardo Giaretta Ivano Guardini Elena Demaria.
SIEVE Mail Filtering WG IETF 70, Vancouver WG Chairs: Cyrus Daboo, Alexey Melnikov Mailing List: Jabber:
DIME WG IETF 83 DIME WG Agenda & Status Thursday, March 29, 2012 Jouni Korhonen, Lionel Morand.
Draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-02.txt Link Management Protocol (LMP) LMP draft updates…  draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-07.txt  draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-wdm-01.txt  draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-test-sonet-sdh-00.txt.
RSVP-TE Extensions to Realize Dynamic Binding of Associated Bidirectional LSP CCAMP/MPLS WG, IETF 79th, Beijing, China draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-01.
draft-ietf-simple-message-sessions-00 Ben Campbell
IETF#67 – 5-10 November 2006 FECFRAME requirements (draft-ietf-fecframe-req-01) Mark Watson.
AAA and AAAS URI Miguel A. Garcia draft-garcia-dime-aaa-uri-00.txt
IETF80, Prague Diameter Maintenance and Extensions (DIME) WG
Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery using Domain Name System(DNS) draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-03 Qin Wu ) Dhruv Dhody
RADEXT WG RADIUS Attribute Guidelines draft-weber-radius-attr-guidelines-01.txt Greg Weber November 8th, 2005 v1 IETF-64, Vancouver.
IETF #99 Broadband Forum (BBF) YANG Update
Joe Clarke (presenting)
Encapsulation for BIER in Non-MPLS IPv6 Networks
STIR WG IETF-100 PASSPorT Extension for Resource-Priority Authorization (draft-ietf-stir-rph-01) November, 2017 Ray P. Singh, Martin Dolly, Subir Das,
GeneRic Autonomic Signaling Protocol draft-ietf-anima-grasp-08
draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-00
A Minimal Set of Transport Services for TAPS Systems draft-ietf-taps-minset-02 Michael Welzl, Stein Gjessing IETF
draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-00
WG Document Status Compiled By: Matt Hartley, Lou Berger, Vishnu Pavan Beeram IETF TEAS Working Group.
James Polk Gorry Fairhurst
IETF Montreal BFD YANG Data Model
Diameter ABFAB Application
Presentation transcript:

Diameter Extended NAPTR Thursday, November 11, 2010 draft-ietf-dime-extended-naptr Mark Jones Jouni Korhonen IETF 79 Beijing, China

I-D in a nutshell The I-D specifies an extended RFC3403 NAPTR service field format that permits discovery of Diameter peers that support a specific Diameter application or applications: "AAA+AP" : Example: 'AAA+AP5:diameter.sctp’ Means that the Diameter node in the SRV record supports the Diameter EAP Application ('5') and SCTP as the transport protocol. Builds on S-NAPTR usage defined in RFC3588bis-21. NAPTR query procedure remains backwards compatible with RFC3588.

I-D Changes Since IETF#78 Rev -03 was published on November 9 th. Addresses the comments received during WGLC. Added a problem statement to abstract/introduction. Added reference to RFC3958 to pickup S-NAPTR terminology. Fixed a bunch of editorial nits (rewording/ grammar/ spelling).

Open Issue Re-use of the existing S-NAPTR registry may deter non- IETF SDOs from using this mechanism. Current IANA policy is “Specification Required” but specification MUST be an RFC of any category. Could we relax the requirement for an RFC? If not, what is the minimal process for a non-IETF SDO to satisfy the RFC requirement? Two reviews in WGLC  Short, simple draft...this ain’t no 3588bis.

Feedback? RFCs for dummies