Research Questions & the “Language” of Variables & Hypotheses Baxter & Babbie, 2003, Chapters 3 & 4 (Mostly)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 3 Introduction to Quantitative Research
Advertisements

Chapter 3 Introduction to Quantitative Research
The Logic of Social Science Research Sociology Jan Dr Christopher Kollmeyer A lecture by.
Allyn & Bacon 2003 Social Work Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches Topic 6: Basic Social Work Research Designs View.
Secondary Data, Literature Reviews, and Hypotheses
Conceptualization and Measurement
Designing Research Concepts, Hypotheses, and Measurement
Post-Positivist Perspectives on Theory Development
1 Language of Research Partially Adapted from: 1. The Research Methods Knowledge Base, William Trochim (2006). 2. Methods for Social Researchers in Developing.
Identifying Different Types of Research (Paradigms) Intended Use, Treatment of Time & Units of Measurement.
Specifying a Purpose, Research Questions or Hypothesis
Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, 5e This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following.
Research Methods I Psychology 241 David Allbritton
Neuman & Robson Chapters 5, 6, & (some of) 12 (p )
Specifying a Purpose, Research Questions or Hypothesis
Developing Ideas for Research and Evaluating Theories of Behavior
PPA 415 – Research Methods in Public Administration Lecture 1 – Research Design.
The role of theory in research
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 3: Marriage and the Family: Disciplinary and Theoretical Approaches.
Specifying a Purpose, Research Questions or Hypothesis
Measurement of Abstract Concepts Edgar Degas: Madame Valpincon with Chrysantehmums, 1865.
Measuring Social Life Ch. 5, pp
The Practice of Social Research
Links Charles Tilley Interview on Paradigms in the Social Sciences:
Paradigms of Research.
PARADIGMS These are frames of reference that are used for understanding things Different paradigms suggest different theories that in turn inspire different.
RESEARCH PROPOSAL: THEORY, RESEARCH QUESTION & HYPOTHESIS
Chapter 1: The What and the Why of Statistics
1 Research Design The Basics of Social Research Babbie.
Copyright © 2008 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. John W. Creswell Educational Research: Planning,
Ch. 2: Planning a Study (cont’d) pp THE RESEARCH PROPOSAL  In all empirical research studies, you systematically collect and analyze data 
The What and the Why of Statistics The Research Process Asking a Research Question The Role of Theory Formulating the Hypotheses –Independent & Dependent.
Advanced Research Methods Indices, Scales and Typologies By David Warren Kirsch.
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK and Hypothesis Development
Chapter 1: The What and the Why of Statistics  The Research Process  Asking a Research Question  The Role of Theory  Formulating the Hypotheses  Independent.
Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Developing and Evaluating Theories of Behavior.
The Structure of Inquiry Research Design.
LECTURE 3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY Research framework and Hypotheses development.
22 February From Theory to Evidence. Hypothesis vs. Research Question When no expected direction to relationship. Exploratory research, not deductive.
Chapter Two: Explaining Winston Jackson and Norine Verberg Methods: Doing Social Research, 4e.
LECTURE 5 HYPOTHESIS TESTING EPSY 640 Texas A&M University.
Planning A Research Study Neuman and Robson Ch. 4 and 5: Reviewing the Scholarly Literature and Planning a Study.
META-ANALYSIS, RESEARCH SYNTHESES AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS © LOUIS COHEN, LAWRENCE MANION & KEITH MORRISON.
Scientific Methods and Terminology. Scientific methods are The most reliable means to ensure that experiments produce reliable information in response.
Theory and Research Chapter 2.
Graduate School for Social Research Autumn 2015 Research Methodology and Methods of Social Inquiry socialinquiry.wordpress.com Irina.
1 Measuring Social Life Ch. 5, pp Measuring Social Life Connecting the specifics you observe in the empirical world to an abstract idea you.
EAD 800 Organization Theory Valbonne 2004 Susan Printy Michigan State University.
Introduction to Research
Chapter 1 Introduction to Research in Psychology.
© 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Chapter 1 Introduction to Research in Communication Research: –Process of asking questions.
Concept Explication.
CHAPTER 1 HUMAN INQUIRY AND SCIENCE. Chapter Outline  Looking for Reality  The Foundation of Social Science  Some Dialectics of Social Research  Quick.
ACCOUNTING THEORY AND STANDARDS
Theory and Research Chapter 2. Concepts, Variables and Hypotheses Concepts W ords or signs that refer to phenomena that share common characteristics.
Chapter 1: The What and the Why of Statistics
Chapter 3 Designing Research Concepts, Hypotheses, and Measurement.
The What and the Why of Statistics
Ch. 2: Planning a Study.
Logic Systems and Theory in Communication Research
THEORY IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Chapter 1 Definition Theory Causality
Measuring Social Life: How Many? How Much? What Type?
WELCOME HEIDI VAN DER WESTHUIZEN Cell:
Developing and Evaluating Theories of Behavior
The Fundamentals of Political Science Research, 2nd Edition
The Scientific Method.
4. Theory & Social Research
Research Design Research Methodology and Methods of Social Inquiry
Presentation transcript:

Research Questions & the “Language” of Variables & Hypotheses Baxter & Babbie, 2003, Chapters 3 & 4 (Mostly)

Recall: Research Questions n Questions researchers ask themselves, not the questions they ask their informants n Must be empirically testable n Not u too vague u too general u untestable (with implicit, untested assumed outcomes)

Relationship of Theory & Empirical Observation (Wheel of Science)

Conceptualization & Operationalization  Conceptualization  Conceptual, abstract (or theoretical) definition - a careful, systemic definition of a construct that is explicitly written to clarify one’s thinking  Operationalization  linking a conceptual definition to specific measurement technique(s) or procedure(s)  operational definition - the definition of a variable in terms of the specific activities to measure or indicators in the empirical world

Matching Theoretical Concepts & Empirical (Operational) Measures n Example: (Which county had “worst” damage from bad weather?)

Conceptualization Issues: Distinguishing between Theory & Ideology n Similarities u Set of assumptions or starting point u System of concepts/ideas u Specifies relationships between concepts (usually “causes”) n But social scientific theories u Recognize uncertainly u Process oriented u Based on evidence u Seek logical consistency etc..

Elements of Theory n Concepts n Assumptions n Propositions/Hypotheses u about relationships, association

Which Theory is Best? n Fewest assumptions (parsimony) n Covers widest range of phenomena n More accurate predictions # 1

Measurement?  systematic observation  can be replicated (by someone else)  Measures:  Concepts (constructs), theories  measurement instrument/tools  Need to recognize concept in observations (measures) ??(# of library holdings as a measure of quality of university?) MacLeans Magazine survey results, 2000.

Concepts n Symbol (image, words, practices…) n definition n must be shared to have social meaning n Some only have one value (homelessness) n Concepts with more than one possible value or attribute sometimes called variables n Concept clusters (ex. ethnic minorities) n Constructs (in operational stage-- use multiple measures or indicators)

Assumptions n not necessarily explicit (may be implied-- implicit) n not tested through observation in the context used n concepts and theories build on assumptions Example: Some communication research “deconstructs” assumptions in everyday life– can do the same with scholarly research

Classification as conceptualization n typology u intersection of simple concepts forms new concepts u broader, abstract concepts that bring together narrower, more concrete concepts ex. Emile Durkheim’s 4 types of suicide u Varies by degree of integration to and regulation by society u Altruistic (+I), Anomic (-I), Egotistical (- R), Fatalistic (+R) Photo: R. Drew, AP

Propositions n logical statement about a (usually causal) relationship between two variables n i.e. “Increased television watching leads to more shared family time and better communication between children & their parents”

From Concept to Measure Neuman (2000: 162)

Examples of Developing Conceptual & Operational Definitions  Construct = alienation  if you theorize 4 components (family, work, community, friends) then operational definition must take all into account & measures  Construct= green consumer?

Rules for Creating Measures  Measures must be:  mutually exclusive  possible observations must only fit in one category  exhaustive  categories must cover all possibilities  composite measures must also be:  uni-dimensional

Operationalization Issue: Choices in Level of Measurement Based on n purposes of the study & conceptual definitions u What is range in variation of “attributes” is necessary for measuring your concept? n Practical constraints

Variable n Must have more than one possible “value” or “attribute” n context important, ex. u Religion (variable) F Possible Attributes: protestant, catholic, muslim, jewish, etc… u Protestant (variable) F Possible attributes: baptist, united, presbyterian, anglican etc...

*Types of variables* n dependent variable (effect) n independent variable (cause) n intervening variable n control variable

Causal Relationships n proposed for testing (NOT like assumptions) n 5 characteristics of causal hypothesis u at least 2 variables u cause-effect relationship u can be expressed as prediction u logically link to research question+ a theory u falsifiable

Examples of 2 possible Relationships between Two Variables (p.52)

Types of Hypotheses (note plural form) n null hypothesis u predicts there is no relationship u if evidence support null hypothesis then???? n Direct relationship (positive correlation) n Indirect relationships (negative correlation)

Ways of stating causal relationships n causes, n leads to, n is related to, n influences, n is associated with, n if…then…, the higher….the lower n etc…

Hypothesis Testing

Possible outcomes in Testing Hypotheses (using empirical research) n support (confirm) hypothesis n reject (not support) hypothesis n partially confirm or fail to support n avoid use of PROVE

Causal diagrams X Y Direct relationship (positive correlation) Indirect relationship (negative correlation)

Types of Errors in Causal Explanation n ecological fallacy n reductionism n tautology n teleology n Spuriousness

Double-Barrelled Hypothesis & Interaction Effect OR Means one of THREE things 1 2

Interaction effect

Ecological Fallacy & Reductionism ecological fallacy--wrong unit of analysis (too high) reductionism--wrong unit of analysis (too low)

Teleology & Tautology tautology--circular reasoning (true by definition) teleology--too vague for testing Neuman (2000: 140)

Spurious Relationship spuriousness--false relationship (unseen third variable or simply not connected) Neuman (2000: 140)

Examples n Storks and babies u Lots of storks seen around an apartment building u An increase in number of pregnancies u ??? ?

But... n The relationship is spurious. u The storks liked the heat coming from the smokestacks on the roof of the building, and so were more likely to be attracted to that building. u The tenants of the building were mostly young newlyweds starting families. u So…the storks didn’t bring the babies after all.

Causal Diagram for Storks n Stork = S n Baby = B S B + n Newlywed = N n Chimneys on Building = C NB + CS +

Examples (cont’d) n The larger the number of firefighters, the greater the damage

But... n A larger number of firefighters is necessary for a larger fire. Of course, a larger fire will cause more damage than a small one.

Causal Diagram n Firefighter = F n Damage = D n Size of Fire = S FD + F S + + D

Examples from research (cont’d) n tall 15 yr. olds like shopping more than basketball

But... n Fifteen year old girls are likely to be taller, since they are having a growth spurt at that age. n Fifteen year old girls are more likely to prefer shopping to sports. n Thus, it is gender, not height, that is the deciding factor.