1 Full-Scale Testing of Innovative High Rate Filter Media for Plant Expansion Bob Raczko, P.E. United Water.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Amherst , MA, Drinking Water System Atkins Water Treatment Plant
Advertisements

Often water is prescreened, treated with ozone, or pre-chlorinated before entering the coagulation basin (depending on the quality of the water). Coagulation.
American Water Raw Water Quality Not Textbook? Just Pilot! Iron Removal with High pH Raw Water March 27, 2008 Sandy Kutzing, P.E., CDM Eric Hahn, P.E.,
Filtration by Douglas Rittmann, Ph.D., P.E.
Introduction to the Mini-Pilot Treatment System CEEN 572 Environmental Engineering Pilot Plant Laboratory.
CE 370 Filtration.
Benjamin C. Whitehead, PE Benjamin J. Klayman, PhD, PE Case Study: Commissioning New Rapid Sand Filters at Donald K. Shine Water Treatment Plant.
Drinking Water Filter Backwashing Backwashing – reversing and increasing the water flow to flush particles out of the filter media. Backwashing is vital.
Brushy Creek Municipal Utility District Water Facility Project Status Update Presented at April 9, 2009 Board Meeting Joseph Jenkins, P.E., CH2M HILL.
ETL Multi Media Grey Water Filters and Pre Reverse Osmosis Filtration.
Take out C42 Write up HW: None. C42 Water Purification Today’s Target: I will be able to describe how filtration and coagulation work to remove contaminants.
Filter Loading and Backwash Rates Well Yields and Chlorine Dosage in Waterworks Operation Math for Water Technology MTH 082 Lecture Chapter 4 & 8- Applied.
Water Treatment for NYC Croton Schematic. NYC Filtration Plant for Delaware and Catskill Systems  Filtration avoidance criteria  Alternatives to Filtration.
Water Treatment for NYC Croton Schematic. NYC Filtration Plant for Delaware and Catskill Systems ä Filtration avoidance criteria ä Alternatives to Filtration.
NYC Filtration Plant for Delaware and Catskill Systems ä Filtration avoidance criteria ä Alternatives to Filtration? ä Where should the plant(s) be located?
1 Agenda I.A – Show different type of soil and how they hold water I.A – Show a plant that is at wilting point and one in field capacity I.A – Show slides.
Molalla Water Treatment Plant Field Trip 4/24/07 Molalla Water Treatment Plant Field Trip 4/24/07.
1 Filter Backwash Recycling Rule FBRR Final: June 8, 2001.
City of Atlanta Department of Watershed Management Bureau of Drinking Water.
Introduction to Environmental Engineering Code No. (PE389) Lec. 5 and 6.
FILTER-AG PLUS ® Automatic backwashing unit to dramatically reduce sediment and colour in rural surface water.
Water Treatment Stations Tue. (am) Tue. (pm) Wed. (am) Wed. (pm) Thur. (am) Thur. (pm) Station 1Mini-pilot (CO 166 Greenhouse - Liz) Station 2NF.
The Kaolin Process J. Branan Homeroom Ridge Road Elementary 3 rd Grade Photo:
Equus Beds ASR Program – Wichita’s Future Water Supply September 6, 2012.
Water System Planning Study
The Orange County Water District Riverbed Filtration Pilot Project Jason Keller 1, Michael Milczarek 1, Greg Woodside 2, Adam Hutchinson 2, Adam MP Canfield.
Filtration at the Bloomington, IL Water Treatment Plant.
Future Water Supply - for the Ashley Valley D. Gerard Yates Central Utah Water Conservancy District.
Filtration. Filtration Single Media Rapid Sand Dual Media Rapid Sand.
The Drinking Water Treatment Process
AIU Day 4. Water, Water, Everywhere!! Water Treatment in SW Pennsylvania.
Water in the Community: From Lake Ontario to us Thursday, March 25 th.
E NVIRONMENTAL E NGINEERING 441 Lecture 5: Water Treatment (3) Sedimentation & filtration Philadelphia University Faculty of Engineering Department of.
Aquifer Storage Properties CVEG 5243 Ground Water Hydrology T. Soerens.
Considerations for Brackish Groundwater Use as a Water Supply for Small Water Systems and Municipalities Eddie C. Livingston, MSCE, P.E. Livingston Associates,
Seasonal variation in surface- groundwater exchanges in an urban floodplain with active gravel-bar formation Dorothea Lundberg Karen Prestegaard University.
Considerations and operational challenges in choosing Membrane Filtration for a Water Treatment Plant Upgrade Ed Cross Division Manager, Water Supply and.
The Orange County Water District Riverbed Filtration Pilot Project Jason Keller 1, Michael Milczarek 1, Greg Woodside 2, Adam Hutchinson 2, Robert Rice.
The Los Angeles Aqueduct Filtration Plant An Overview of Facilities and Operations.
Assignment You need to draw and label each step of the water treatment process Under each label explain what is happening in that step.
December 10, 2009 TOWN OF PALM BEACH WATER COMMITTEE Discussion of Water Plant Options.
 Water Quality Variability in a Bioswell and Concrete Drainage Pipe, Southwest Lincoln, Nebraska Jessica Shortino, B.S. University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
 Asia’s largest environment solutions provider, with a strong international presence  Total water & environment management solutions for all sectors.
Lecture4_introduction to drinking water, Chemeng, KKU, M.Thabuot      M. Thabuot CIP, Chemical Engineering KHONKAEN UNIVERSIT Y 1.
On removing little particles with big particles
Zeosorb - The Clean Solution. AMAZING REVOLUTION!! LATEST STATE OF THE ART 3 IN 1 SOLUTIONS Zeosorb FOR YOUR WATER FILTERATION UNITS.
Safe, Clean and Drinkable
Construction of On-Site Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control Facilities Dan Cloak, P.E. Principal Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting.
AquaSel Brine Concentration Pilot Project Update
Groundwater Pilot Treatment System Update May 2017
Amherst , MA, Drinking Water System Atkins Water Treatment Plant
Redahegn Sileshi1, Robert Pitt2 , and Shirley Clark3
Chapter 10 Groundwater.
Slow Sand Filter Basics
Water Treatment.
Microfloc Products Adsorption Clarifier/Trident/Tri-Mite
Lecture # 11 Water treatment:.
ENG421 (9ab) – Filtration Filtration Types of Filters Filter Media
Vertical Pressure Filters
Jim Flechtner, PE Executive Director April 26, 2018
DRINKING WATER.
Pilot testing services and a case study to reduce organics Devendra Borikar, Laura Zettler, Jeff Avedesian, Lindsay Ariss, Luc Léonard, Denis Dolbec,
Enhancing Rapid Sand Filtration by Backwashing with Alum
Microfloc Products Adsorption Clarifier/Trident/Tri-Mite
مبانی کار تصفیه‌خانه‌های آب
Formation of Organic Fuels
Water Treatment.
Observation on Trials at TAFE Doddaballapur
Water purification in water treatment plant.
Adapting to a New Era: Declining Flow and Deteriorating Water Quality
Presentation transcript:

1 Full-Scale Testing of Innovative High Rate Filter Media for Plant Expansion Bob Raczko, P.E. United Water

2 UWMX WTP Location: Manalapan, NJ Size: 5 mgd (790 m 3 /hr), but needs to be expanded to 8 mgd (1,260 m 3 /hr) to meet increasing water demands within next several years Plant Processes: -Coagulation/flocculation/two-stage sedimentation/filtration/disinfection/finished storage/finished water pumping -Powdered Activated Carbon (PAC) added to second stage sedimentation for seasonal taste and odor (T&O) control Filters currently are major limiting step in process: -6 filters (5 with 1 out of service for backwashing) operate at a nominal rate of 3 gpm/sf (7.3 m/hr) -Based on previous Filtralite testing at Haworth, NJDEP will allow testing up to 7 gpm/sf (17 m/hr) -Also evaluating larger anthracite/sand media, NJDEP will allow testing up to 5 gpm/sf (12 m/hr) If successful, new media will allow filtration capacity to be expanded without increasing the number of filters, which will significantly reduce capital expenditures

3 HAWORTH WTP – PREVIOUS PILOT TESTING Compared: Conventional anthracite/sand Filtralite – expanded clay media: – Larger size media – Larger macropore size for solids capture Findings: Filtralite achieved comparable performance at 7.5 gpm/sf compared to anthracite/sand at 5 gpm/sf Filtralite achieved longer filter runs, less headloss development

4 UWMX WTP DEMONSTRATION TESTING Received approval from NJDEP to modify two filters for demonstration test: New underdrains Provide additional depth for both anthracite/sand and Filtralite medias Received approval from NJDEP to conduct demonstration test: Anthracite/sand – test up to 5 gpm/sf Filtralite – test up to 7 gpm/sf Evaluating: – Turbidity – Particle count – Headloss development – Volume Treated, Run Time

5 Parameter Filter 4 Existing Filter 5 Filtralite Filter 6 Anthracite/Sand Top Layer12” No. 1 anthracite21” 2.0 mm Filtralite 21” mm anthracite Bottom Layer 12” mm sand 10” 1.0 mm Filtralite 10” mm sand Support Gravel 17” (graded)10” pea gravel FILTER MEDIA SPECIFICATIONS

6 EXISTING MEDIA AND UNDERDRAINS

7 NEW ANTHRACITE/SAND MEDIA AND UNDERDRAIN

8 FILTRALITE MEDIA AND UNDERDRAIN

9 NEW UNDERDRAIN - NOZZLES

10 TESTING TO DATE Initial Testing (11/10/12 – 1/12/13): – Target flow ~ 1 mgd – Filter 5 (Filtralite) and Filter 6 (new A/S) – premature turbidity/particle breakthrough, believed to be caused by PAC addition in second clarifier; Filter 4 (existing filter) is fine – Added PACl as filter aid – Improved turbidity/particle performance – Initially plant operated 16 hr/day (low demands); switched to 24/7 operation on 1/6 (shut down on weekends); turbidity/particle performance more stable; Filter 6 more stable than Filter 5 1/13/13 – 1/24/13: – Increased Filter 5, Filter 6 in steps: 1.2 mgd, 1.4 mgd, 1.5 mgd, 1.6 mgd – PACl filter aid continued – Maintained turbidity/particle performance; shorter filter runs (as expected); Filter 6 more stable than Filter 5 Testing stopped on 1/25/13: – High TDS in raw water (road salting) – Plant switched to Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) wells

11

12

13

14 INITIAL TESTING OBSERVATIONS Filter 5 (Filtralite): Lowest Headloss Development Can operate at higher flowrates Concern with stability of turbidity/particle performance Filter 6 (new anthracite/sand): Lower headloss development than Filter 4 (existing media) Can operate at higher flowrates More stable turbidity/particle performance than Filter 5 (Filtralite)

15 TESTING 4/22/13 – 9/14/13 Longer term (two - three week) operation at each flowrate Goal is to establish acceptable performance at flowrate of mgd in order to be able to high rate filters and avoid need to provide additional filters Eliminating need for additional filters would save approx. $3 million in capital costs Also evaluate performance w/o filter aid (is media seasoned?)

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24 OBSERVATIONS 4/22/13 – 9/14/13 Medias appear to be seasoned (generally operate without filter aid) Filter 5 (Filtralite): Lowest Headloss Development Can operate at higher flowrates Concern with stability of turbidity/particle performance; susceptible to changes (hydraulic, water quality), especially near end of run Filter 6 (new anthracite/sand): Lower headloss development than Filter 4 (existing media) Can operate at higher flowrates More stable turbidity/particle performance than Filter 5 (Filtralite)

25 FUTURE WORK Continue testing at higher rates (currently at 1.4 mgd) Plant is currently on a blend of surface water and ASR water because of low streamflow and need to maintain passing flow. This results in high run times and volumes treated, which are not representative. Will evaluate higher flowrates when plant is back on full surface water (no ASR) Consider addition of small layer of sand (about 4 inches) to Filter 5 (Filtralite) to see if that improves stability of turbidity/particle performance

26 THANK YOU! Any Questions?

27

28

29

30