Marine Operations Using Space Transportation Terry Phillips Schafer Corp 13 July 05.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Advanced Hypersonic Weapon Flight Test Overview to the Space & Missile Defense Conference 14 August 2012 Ms. Debra G. Wymer Director, Technical Center.
Advertisements

Analysis of Rocket Propulsion
United States Military Space Systems – The Road Ahead Matthew Hoey, Research Associate The Institute for Defense and Disarmament Studies.
Hypersonic Flight With Rocket Power and Air Breathing Propulsion Presented to Iowa State University Aerospace Engineering Department October 17, 2013 Ames,
TERRY PHILLIPS Schafer Corp HOT EAGLE High Operations Tempo Energetic Access to Globe and Launch Experiment Marine Operations Using Space Transportation.
M. R. Tetlow and C.J. Doolan School on Mechanical Engineering
© The Aerospace Corporation 2011 NRC Workshop on NASA Technology Roadmaps TA01 - Launch Propulsion Systems Randy Kendall General Manager Launch Systems.
Robert J. Collier Trophy Nominee: X-51A WaveRider
Aerion Supersonic Business Jet Market, Environment and Technology HISAC Final Conference Paris, June, 2009 Richard R. Tracy Chief Technology Officer Aerion.
In the design process, fast modeling using high-level- primitives is applied, which enables modifications happen very quickly, which becomes the base of.
Kennedy Space Center Shuttle Operations Team New Employee Orientation Training KLASS.
GSFC/Wallops Flight Facility 1 Small Satellite Opportunities at Wallops Flight Facility Dr. John Campbell Director, Wallops Flight Facility.
Introduction Over the past 20 years there have been numerous attempts to develop a new RLV All failed or prematurely canceled All share a common issue:
Launch Vehicles. LAUNCH SYSTEM CONCEPTS SHROUD PROTECTS THE SPACECRAFT SHROUD PROTECTS THE SPACECRAFT MAIN VEHICLE PRIMARY LIQUID OR SOLID ROCKET PROPELLANT.
Architecture Team Industry Day Briefing 17 January, 2002.
HLV Industry Day Hybrid Launch Vehicle Phase I: Concept Development & Demonstration Planning Mr. Bob Hickman Aerospace Corporation Space and Missile Systems.
Design Goals Saturn V Ariane 4 Pegasus Vanguard Bellerophon ? ? ?
Principles of Propulsion and its Application in Space Launchers Prof. Dr.-Ing. Uwe Apel Hochschule Bremen REVA Seminar1.
Delta Clipper To Boldly Go…. A presentation by: Jason Moore & Ashraf Shaikh.
Minimalist Human Mars Mission Surface infrastructure discussion July 26 th, 2008.
Introduction to Hypersonic Propulsion Systems
Request for Proposal: Joint Strike Fighter for Australian Air Force JLFANG Black Knight 170 Aerospace Engineering Design I University of California, San.
Earth-Moon Transport Doroteo Garcia Kazuya Suzuki Patrick Zeitouni.
Propulsion Engineering Research Center NASA Technology Roadmap: Launch Propulsion Systems Robert J. Santoro The Propulsion Engineering Research Center.
Reducing the cost of sustained operations through technology infusion April 2004 Darin Skelly NASA Kennedy Space Center Transformational Spaceport & Range.
Launch System Launch Vehicle Launch Complex Orbit Insertion Orbit Maneuvers.
Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology National Aeronautics and Space Administration National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
“Fly me to the Moon”. Few can argue there is a more exciting vehicle than the Saturn V One of the most successful craft ever built by NASA, no payload.
Comprehend why the shuttle was developed Comprehend the space shuttle’s main features Comprehend the shuttle’s legacy The Space Shuttle Program.
EXTROVERTSpace Propulsion 02 1 Thrust, Rocket Equation, Specific Impulse, Mass Ratio.
Ryan Mayes Duarte Ho Jason Laing Bryan Giglio. Requirements  Overall: Launch 10,000 mt of cargo (including crew vehicle) per year Work with a $5M fixed.
DARPA ARES Program Ken Dorsett 25October 2014.
Strike Warfare MIDN 3/C Draper and MIDN 4/C Hollis.
Space-Based Force Application: A Technical View Dr. Laura Grego Union of Concerned Scientists Outer Space & International Security: Options for the Future.
Requirements and Operations Team Industry Day Briefing 17 January, 2002.
United States Air Force: Air Doctrine – Provide Global Capability Objective: Know how the United States Air Force is structured in terms of missions and.
What does it take to LAND on Mars? Whitney Eggers Emmett, Idaho Aaron McKinnon, Boise, Idaho Mentors: Behzad Raiszadeh, Eric Queen Whitney Eggers Emmett,
Current Need Aging space shuttle fleet’s retirement is imminent If the ISS is going to continue operation there needs to be a replacement to get humans.
Team PM8 Eventus Slide 1. Commercial spaceflight has seen increased activity as more privately owned companies invest in the venture. To avoid a catastrophic.
Aeronautics Technology Where NASA is going….. Aeronautics Technology Environmentally Friendly Aircraft Smog-free No impact on global climate Noise within.
Distribution A: Cleared for Public Release, SAF/PA
Infrastructure for Reusable Vehicles The next generation of Space Travel Eric Jensen ASTE 527 Infrastructure for Reusable Vehicles The next generation.
STRATEGIES FOR MARS NETWORK MISSIONS VIA AN ALTERNATIVE ENTRY, DESCENT, AND LANDING ARCHITECTURE 10 TH INTERNATIONAL PLANETARY PROBE WORKSHOP June,
Projectile Kinetic Energy Reduction System (PKERS)
Mars Today 1 An immediate and inexpensive program for manned Mars visitation.
HIAD Mission Infusion: Technology Development & Potential Utilization
1. Mission Statement Design Requirements Aircraft Concept Selection Advanced Technologies / Concepts Engine / Propulsion Modeling Constraint Analysis.
MIDN 4/C Coleman and MIDN 4/C Thompson-James
Unit 6 Lesson 1 Explanation. In 2004, President Bush set the following goal for the NASA constellation program, “this vision… is a sustainable and affordable.
Human Exploration of Mars Design Reference Architecture 5
1 Stan Graves Vice President, Science & Engineering ATK Propulsion Systems March 23 – 24, 2011 NASA Technology Roadmaps.
Powered Re-entry Vehicle David Lammers ASTE 527 Concept 13 December 2011.
LEO Propellant Depot: A Commercial Opportunity? LEAG Private Sector Involvement October 1 - 5, 2007 Houston, Texas LEAG Private Sector Involvement October.
AIAA Responsive Space April 22, 2004 Highly Operable Propulsion System Approaches and Propulsion Technologies for Operationally Responsive Space.
AAE Team 1 - 2/20/07 System Requirements Review 2/20/07 Team 1 John Horst John Horst Jared Odle Jared Odle Keith Fay Keith Fay Boyce Dauby Boyce.
Hello! I am Ahamath Jalaludeen I am here because I love to give presentations. You can find me at
October, 2005 NASA’s Exploration Architecture. 2 A Bold Vision for Space Exploration  Complete the International Space Station  Safely fly the Space.
Launch Structure Challenge - Background Humans landed on the moon in 1969 – Apollo 11 space flight. In 2003, NASA started a new program (Ares) to send.
Utilizing your notes and past knowledge answer the following questions: 1) The intensity or strength of the vortices is directly proportional to the ________.
An Earth – Moon Transportation System Patrick Zeitouni Space Technology.
Propulsion Economic Considerations for Next Generation Space Launch by Chris Y. Taylor 40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit.
Hybrid Electric Vehicles
Future In-Space Operations (FISO) Telecon Colloquium
NASA Hypersonic Research
Development and Principles of Rocketry
Matching of Propulsion Systems for an Aircraft
Space Travel Present & Future
Analysis of Rocket Propulsion
Vice President, Business Development
Team A Propulsion 1/16/01.
Presentation transcript:

Marine Operations Using Space Transportation Terry Phillips Schafer Corp 13 July 05

p 2 ICD for Small Unit Space Transport and Insertion (Sustain) Defines Capacity for JFC to Rapidly Transport Strategic Capabilities to Any Point on Globe Addresses Rapid Employment of Tailored Expeditionary Forces from CONUS Including Use of National Security Space (NSS) Material Approaches 1)Increased Forward Presence 2)Evolutionary Improvements to Conventional Assault Support 3)Revolutionary Improvements to Terrestrial Aviation Capabilities 4)Space Insertion-Terrestrial Extraction 5)Space Insertion and Extraction with Refueling 6)Space Insertion and Extraction without Refueling Marine BGen Richard C Zilmer, Commander 29 Palms Training Command: “We briefed the Pentagon, Congress, USSOCOM, and the NSC and were never thrown out years from now the idea is to move a squad-sized unit of Marines to any place on Earth in less than two hours.”

p 3 HOT EAGLE Incrementally Addresses Multiple Capabilities Affordable, Reliable Spacelift Global or Theater ISR Space to Space ISR Space Interdiction and Control Force Application to Space Force Application to Globe Space Insertion of Personnel Global Insertion of Personnel

p 4 Multiple Options Evaluated Space Insertion – Terrestrial Extraction Forward Deployment Space Insertion and Extraction Limited Range Space Insertion and Extraction Without Refueling Near Space Revolutionary Improvements to Terrestrial Aviation Capabilities Revolutionary Improvements to Terrestrial Aviation Capabilities Limited Range and Space Insertion and Extraction Space Insertion and Extraction With Refueling Space Insertion and Extraction Without Refueling

p 5 CAV-Based Marine Space Transportation Options Space Insertion – Terrestrial Extraction Light Weight Structure Evolution Common Aero Vehicle (CAV) Resupply – Maneuvering reentry vehicle – GPS guided parafoil final descent – CONUS launch – 1000 lb payload currently CAV-Based RV Team Insertion – 20 Klb class CAV-like vehicle – Capacity: Marine squad plus equipment – Trajectory optimized for low “g” with resulting light weight structure – Integral life support – 2 hours maximum from launch to insertion – Stealthy insertion Multiple Team Extraction Concepts

p 6 Team Extraction Approaches Self Extraction – Hike Out – Leave crew capsule behind Aircraft/Helicopter/Ship – Osprey / C-17 / C-130 – Leave crew capsule behind Crew Capsule Pick Up Via Aircraft/Helicopter – CAV crew capsule separates from aeroshell and life support – Crew compartment pick-up via balloon cable and C-17 – Pick up crew capsule via C-17

p 7 Bimese RLV Marine Space Transportation Options Forward Deployment Space Insertion & Extraction Use Bimese VTVL RLV – Bimese both stages same size – Upper stage has 24,000 fps ΔV ideal Forward Deploy Upper Stage Only – Bimese can launch from CONUS, recover upper stage globally Refuel and Launch Upper Stage – Upper stage inserts team – Arrival not stealthy Recover Upper Stage – Team performs mission, moves to pick-up location Upper Stage Picks Up Team Out of Box Team Extraction Idea – Upper stage rejoins with C-17 which tows stage home – Stage is released for independent landing Single Bimese Stage Range

p 8 Bimese RLV Marine Space Transportation Options Forward Deployment Space Insertion & Extraction (cont) Both Bimese Stages Could Forward Deploy – With identical stages, 2 CONUS launches forward deploy – Alternatively ship or aircraft could transport one stage Stages Mated and Fueled at Forward Location – Upper stage inserts team – Recovers in theater – Portable LOX generation, JP-8 fuel, portable mating gear, bare pad launch possible with VTVL stages Range Increases % Using Two Stages Bimese RLV Range Bimese Technology Implications High Mass Fraction Stages Required High AoA Reentries Useful for Stealthy Ingress Operability Technologies for Forward deployment

p 9 Heavy Lift RLV Marine Space Transportation Option Global Insertion & Limited Range Extraction without Refueling Heavy-Lift Vehicle – Many Options – Launches Full-Propellant RLV Upper Stage – CONUS to Global Locations – Traditional modular approaches – Or Revolutionary technologies (DE, CCE, etc.) RLV Uses Only Landing Propellant during Insertion – Landing propellant only 10-12% of propellant load – Limited Stealth Insertion sonic boom can be minimized via high alpha reentry Rocket engine ignition 2-3 min prior to landing not stealthy (but throttle is low) – Most propellant reserved for extraction – Integral DE fire support possible RLV extracts team – Recovers in-theater – nm range Close to Desired Marine Capability No CONUS Direct Return Possible Initially Mass Fraction Improvements could Enable Longer Range Returns Technology Implications Very High Mass Fraction Upper Stage Needed

p 10 Supports SOCOM Space Enabling Concept Requirement, 18 Mar 04 UNS Marine Requirement, 13 Jul 02 Stealthy, Survivable Transport of 13 Troops & Equipment Launch on Demand Unrefueled transport No overflight restrictions VTVL Multiple Boost Options High AOA High Altitude Reentry over Target Minimizes Overflight & Noise First Order Assessment Insertion Very Viable – Egress Requires Very High Mass Fraction VTVL Egress Option Suborbital Hop Booster RTLS HTV-3 Technology Multiple Stage Options One CONOPS Heavy Lift RLV Marine Space Transportation Option Global Insertion & Limited Range Extraction without Refueling

p 11 High Mass Fraction Lander Notional Design Concept & Weights Composite JP-8 Tank Payload Bay (9’ x 14’) Composite LOX Tank Avionics Rack/Low Cost GN&C Control surfaces for high AOA flight Modified Production RD-0124 Engine Strap On Drop Tanks Augment performance if Required

p 12 Team Extraction Approaches Powered Options Self Extraction – Powered – Limited Range of nm Initially Insertion Vehicle Pick Up Via Aircraft – Boost to aircraft rendezvous – snag and tow – Boost to parasail glide – snag and tow – Deploy balloon from ground – snag and tow

p 13 Upper Stage Landing Vehicle Release Marine Space Transportation Option Limited Range Space Insertion & Extraction RLV Upper Stage Releases Aerodynamic Descent, Parafoil Final Descent, Landing Vehicle Upper Stage Recovers to Forward Location for Refueling Parafoil Makes Final Descent and Landing – Stealthy insertion – Expendable landing vehicle Upper Stage Extracts Team – Recovers in-theater – High L/D upper stage for extra range – ~1000 nm radius Landing Vehicle Gives Flexibility Aerodynamic Cross-Range Useful Stealthy Arrival Good Radius of Action Do Not Have to Defend Landing Vehicle Technology Implications Very High Mass Fraction Upper Stage Needed High L/D Upper Stage Needed Very Lightweight Landing Vehicle Needed

p 14 Hypersonic Airbreathing Marine Space Transportation Options Near Space Revolutionary Improvements to Terrestrial Aviation Capabilities Hypersonic Cruise Vehicle (HCV) – Mach HTVL airbreather Launch from CONUS or Forward Deployment Base – Diego Garcia, Guam possibilities ~ 9000 nm Round Trip – ~ 1 hr flight time including acceleration, deceleration – Segments can be optimized for scenario, ROE Insert Team – Approach not stealthy Remain with Team or Depart to Safe Area – Potential integral DE fire support Extract Team – Limit on extraction range likely T/W for vertical landing and T/O Technology Implications High Mass Fraction Needed High L/D Needed Advanced TPS Needed Efficient Propulsion Needed HCV is Really Fast Aircraft

p 15 Hybrid Airbreathing-Rocket Marine Space Transportation Options HCV with RLV Upper Stage – RLV VTVL HCV Flies by or Over Target Area – Strategy determined by politics and threat RLV Stage Separates and Lands – Short range flight preserves RLV propellants RLV Remains or Departs to Safe Location – Integral DE fire support possible RLV Extracts Team In-Theater – Extraction range 1000 nm+ Out of Box Extraction Idea – RLV rejoins with another HCV for extraction Hybrid Airbreathing and Rocket Stages Revolutionary Improvements to Terrestrial Aviation Capabilities Limited Range Space Insertion and Extraction Technology Implications High Mass Fraction Needed High L/D Needed Advanced TPS Needed Efficient Propulsion Needed

p 16 On-Orbit Refueling Marine Space Transportation Option Space Insertion & Extraction With Refueling TSTO Orbit-Capable RLV with VTVL Upper Stage Upper Stage Refueled On-Orbit – Could also add external/conformal propellant tanks on-orbit Short On-Orbit Loiter of hrs Possible Upper Stage Deorbits and Inserts Team – Only landing propellant used during insertion Integral DE Fire Support Possible Upper Stage remains and Extracts Team – Only landing propellant used during insertion External/Conformal Tanks Burned First and Jettisonned Range nm, Possibly Intercontinental with Evolved High Mass Fraction Upper Stage Space Basing a Possibility – Physiological effects on Marines need studying On-Orbit Refueling Offers Several Advantages Technology Implications High Mass Fraction stages Needed High L/D Upper Stages Needed

p 17 SSTO CONUS-CONUS Marine Space Transportation Option Space Insertion & Extraction Without Refueling VTVL SSTO RLV – Rocket Powered or Combined Cycle Airbreathing CONUS Insertion, CONUS Extraction – Round trip 1-4 hours flight time Noise and Other Signature Reductions – Stealthy ingress and egress Integral DE Fire Support – Lasers, EM weapons – Stun technologies – Other non-lethal techniques – Non-lethal picket fence protection Requires Much Better Propulsion and/or Structures than exist today Limited duration space basing is possible Evolutionary Changes Lead to Development of Revolutionary Technologies Technology Implications Revolutionary Propulsion or Ultra-Lightweight Structures Needed

p 18 Stepping Stones to Marine Capability CAV Being Developed by DARPA Falcon Program and AFSPC HCV Being Developed by DARPA Falcon Program, AFRL, and NASA (X-43, etc.) RLV First Stage Being Developed by AFSPC/SMC/AFRL Advanced Reusable Spacelift (ARES) Program RLV Upper Stage Program Could be DARPA/AFRL Hot Eagle Program Recommendation Corps Support for Falcon, ARES, and Hot Eagle as Initial Stepping Stones to Capability to Place a Marine Squad Anywhere on the Globe in Two Hours Stepping Stone Programs All Funded Except Hot Eagle Reusable Upper Stage Program

p 19 Hot Eagle Recommendation Biggest Common Technology Need for Upper Stages is High Mass Fraction Airframe / Structure High Mass Fraction Stages Enable Bimese, Heavy-Lift, Hybrid Airbreathing and Eventually SSTO Concepts DARPA/AFRL Hot Eagle RLV Upper Stage Program Should Emphasize High Mass Fraction High Mass Fraction Gives Higher Performance, Larger Payload, Longer Extraction Range for Marine Applications High Mass Fraction Allows Smaller and Less Expensive Upper Stages to Provide Same Capabilities as Larger, More Expensive Lower Mass Fraction Stages High Mass Fraction Benefits All Space Concepts