Caged Crassostrea ariakensis Deployment in Chesapeake Bay: Growth, Disease and Mortality Kennedy T. Paynter, Jacob Goodwin, Marcy Chen University of Maryland,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DermoWatch : Gulf-Wide Coverage for Dermo Disease in Oysters Sammy M. Ray Texas A&M University at Galveston Thomas M. Soniat Nicholls State University.
Advertisements

DermoWatch : Gulf-Wide Coverage for Dermo Disease in Oysters Sammy M. Ray Texas A&M University at Galveston Thomas M. Soniat Nicholls State University.
DermoWatch : Monitoring the Health of Galveston Bay with Oysters Sammy M. Ray Texas A&M University at Galveston Thomas M. Soniat Nicholls State University.
An ontogenic comparison of relative fecundity and egg quality of female Crassostrea virginica from northern Chesapeake Bay Hillary Lane 1 Vince Politano.
Biomarkers of Oxygen and Temperature Stress in Oysters Kelsie Kronmiller 1, Heather Patterson 2, and Anne Boettcher 1 1 Department of Biology, University.
Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife.
Inter-site and inter-specific differences in rates of survival and growth of C. ariakensis and C. virginica: A collaborative on-bottom study in Virginia.
Eastern oyster settlement and early survival on alternative reef substrates adjacent to intertidal marsh, rip rap, and manmade oyster reef habitats in.
The Effect of Cow Nose Ray Predation on Oyster Restoration and the Use of Spat on Shell for Brood Stock Enhancement of Sanctuary Reefs A. T. Leggett, Jr.,
Increasing Tolerance for Perkinsus marinus Among Natural Crassostrea virginica Populations from Virginia Waters Ryan B. Carnegie and Eugene M. Burreson.
Ryan B. Carnegie and Eugene M. Burreson Department of Environmental and Aquatic Animal Health Virginia Institute of Marine Science Gametogenesis and Spawning.
Role of oyster age vs. oyster size in determining sex ratios on restored oyster reefs in Chesapeake Bay M. Lisa Kellogg, Marcy E. Chen, Victor S. Kennedy,
Public/Private Oyster Restoration in Virginia Virginia Institute of Marine Science/ Virginia Marine Resource Commission Michael S. Congrove, Standish K.
Passive acoustics as a monitoring tool for evaluating oyster reef restoration Introduction Approximately 21 acres of oyster reef have been created in the.
Abstract Organismal lipid content has been used as an indicator of habitat quality and has potential for use in the development of oyster reef restoration.
Karen Kesler, Vincent Politano, Kennedy Paynter Differentiating the impact of the physical and biotic components of the eastern oyster, Crassostea virginica,
THE BIOECONOMIC FEASIBILITY OF CULTURING TRIPLOID CRASSOSTREA ARIAKENSIS IN NORTH CAROLINA Jonathan H. Grabowski Gulf of Maine Research Institute, Portland,
Ben Schulman Windsor Knolls Middle School (FCPS) ESEP Teacher Research Fellowship Principle Investigators:Researchers: Dr. Roger NewellChristie.
Foodweb support for the threatened Delta smelt: Microzooplankton dynamics in the low salinity zone of San Francisco Bay J.K. York 1, B. Costas 1, G. McManus.
COASTAL ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT IN WELLFLEET HARBOR, MA: ADDRESSING SUSTAINABLE SHELLFISHING AND AQUACULTURE AnneMarie Cataldo, Earth, Environmental and Ocean.
Break-out Session Questions relating to Genetics What are the best uses for disease resistant strains (DRS) of oysters? –originally intended for aquaculture.
The Role of Estuarine Science in Informing the Location and Dynamics of Growing Areas Damian C. Brady, Ph.D. Maine Sea Grant Ira C. Darling Marine Center.
Reef-associated fauna in Chesapeake Bay: Does oyster species affect habitat function? H. Harwell* 1, P. Kingsley-Smith 2, M. Kellogg 3, K. Paynter, Jr.
Matthew P. Hare and Colin Rose Department of Biology University of Maryland THE BENEFITS AND CONSEQUENCES OF RESTORATION USING SELECTIVELY-BRED, DISEASE-TOLERANT.
Effects of recent seagrass species change on habitat structure and function: Preliminary research proposal Emily French Summer 2013.
SMOCS SOUTHERN MARYLAND OYSTER CULTIVATION SOCIETY Design by Kent Forest Virginia Institute of Marine Science.
It’s Not Easy Being Green Jill Buerck, Southeast Missouri State University Gretchen A. Koch, Goucher College Sarah Schubert, Southeast Missouri State University.
Peyton Robertson, NOAA February Goal: Restore oyster populations in 20 tributaries by 2025 Tributary Selection: MD & VA Oyster Restoration Interagency.
Impacts of upstream drought on downstream oysters in Apalachicola Bay Laura E. Petes NOAA Climate Program Office.
Oyster Reefs as a Restoration Tool: Do Reef Structure, Physicochemical Conditions, and Wave Energy Environment Affect Reef Sustainability? Sandra M. Casas.
North Cape Scallop Restoration Project Lessons learned from the restoration efforts in Rhode Island’s south county salt ponds Boze Hancock 1, James Turek.
Southeast Watershed Alliance Symposium Portsmouth, New Hampshire, 11 May 2011 Oyster Restoration, Aquaculture, and Bioextraction in New Hampshire Ray Grizzle.
Toward the Sustainability of Oyster Aquaculture in Kinmen Island, Taiwan 黃守忠、謝蕙蓮、陳章波 Shou-Chung Huang a, Hwey-Lian Hsieh a, Chang-Po Chen a,b a Research.
Secondary Production of Infaunal Benthic Communities in Chesapeake Bay in Comparison to Restored Oyster Reefs Amanda Lawless and Dr. Rochelle Seitz Virginia.
NOAA’s Non-native Oyster Research Program in Support of an EIS Jamie L. King, Ph.D. NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office November 16, 2006 NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office.
Oyster Reef Restoration in the Chesapeake Bay Kelly Galyean Department of Biological Sciences, York College of Pennsylvania Introduction Oyster reefs in.
Hypoxia Management tools: indicators & models Bob Wood John Jacobs Heath Kelsey Xinsheng Zhang Cooperative Oxford Lab
The Chesapeake Bay Oyster Also known as the Eastern Oyster or Crassostrea virginica
 OVERFISHING OYSTERS IN THE CHESPEAKE BAY Aaron Natoli Carleton 4/20/14.
Recruitment of oysters in Mobile Bay Sean Powers, Kyeong Park, C-K Kim, Jason Herrmann, and Ben LaCour UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA DAUPHIN ISLAND SEA LAB.
GENTAMICIN AS A BIOCIDAL AGENT IN CONTROLLING ACANTHAMOEBA A POTENTIAL BIOLOGICAL WEAPON Katherine J. Barter, B.S., MT., Center for Molecular Medicine.
Genetic Considerations in Broodstock Selection for Oyster Restoration, Aquaculture Development, and Non-native Species Introductions Kimberly S. Reece.
Ecological considerations for oyster restoration: interactions between oyster larvae and reef-associated fauna Brian B. Barnes*, Mark W. Luckenbach, Peter.
MULTI-INFECTION PATTERN IN THE EXPLOITED MANILA CLAM (Ruditapes philippinarum) OF ARCACHON BAY (France) Dang C. 1, Saez S. 1, de Montaudouin X. 1, Caill-Milly.
Bay Guidance Programs. The Bay Program partnership includes: 19 federal agencies Nearly 40 state agencies and programs in DE, MD, NY, PA, VA,
Triploids presented higher survival rates than diploids Increased growth rate and survival in the triploids is its effect on final yield of oyster “meat”.
Can Extensive and Intensive Oyster Farming Keep the Industry Alive in Virginia, USA? T. Leggett. (1), B. Goldsborough (2), J. Harmon (1) Chesapeake Bay.
1 A brief introduction to UMCES Chesapeake Bay Model Yun Li and Ming Li University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science VIMS, SURA Meeting Oct
Introduction Aureococcus anophagefferens, which was first observed blooming in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island in 1985, is a toxic phytoplankton. For the.
The Eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica, populations along the east coast have been decimated by the combined impacts of disease, excessive siltation.
A COMMUNITY-BASED OYSTER RESTORATION STRATEGY FOR DELAWARE'S COASTAL (INLAND) BAYS John W. Ewart 1, E. J. Chalabala 2, Frank Marenghi 3 and Aaron Gibson.
Smithsonian Environmental Research Center. Temporal Changes in SAV Coverage Total # of Species Total No. of All Species Eurasian Watermilfoil Dominant.
Limiting Factors in the Success of Habitat Restoration Sites for O. Conchaphila in San Francisco Bay For the: 9 th International Conference on Shellfish.
Samuel T. Dunn 1, 2, Andrew G. Bunn 3, John D. Schade 1
Chesapeake Bay Oyster Metrics Workgroup Report Summary
The Chesapeake Bay Oyster
Hypoxia Forecasts as a Tool for Chesapeake Bay Fisheries
North Cape Scallop Restoration Project
By Peter Sharpe and Andrew H. Baldwin The University of Maryland
Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold
NOAA’s Non-native Oyster Research Program in Support of an EIS
Mark W. Luckenbach1, Elizabeth North2, M
Predation as a mechanism of invasion resistance
Michael, B. D. , Trice, T. M. , Heyer, C. J. , Stankelis, R. M
Assessing oyster reef habitat value through naked goby
Recruitment of oysters in Mobile Bay
Secondary Production of Infaunal Benthic Communities in Chesapeake Bay in Comparison to Restored Oyster Reefs Amanda Lawless and Dr. Rochelle Seitz Virginia.
PLANS II Plankton and Nutrient Studies for the Chesapeake Bay
By Peter Sharpe and Andrew H. Baldwin The University of Maryland
Presentation transcript:

Caged Crassostrea ariakensis Deployment in Chesapeake Bay: Growth, Disease and Mortality Kennedy T. Paynter, Jacob Goodwin, Marcy Chen University of Maryland, College Park Donald Meritt University of Maryland Center of Environmental Science Stan Allen Virginia Institute of Marine Science

Previous Observations Calvo et al., –C. ariakensis grew much faster than C. virginica –C.a. experienced much lower mortality due to disease Grabowski et al., –C.a. grew faster than C.v. in intermediate to high salinities but did not grow well in low salinities. However both studies, Compared diploid C.v. to triploid C.a. Did not compare specific parasite free (SPF) C.a. to SPF C.v.

Experimental Design Md sites - Severn, Patuxent, Choptank Rivers Va site - York River Deployed April individuals of each species - –Both triploid –400 in each of two ADPI bags - sample –250 in each of ADPI “reef” trays - left alone Monitored monthly since deployment Size, mortality, P. marinus prevalence

Site Locations Severn River Patuxent River Choptank River York River

6 psu

9 psu

11 psu

17 psu

C. ariakensis C. virginica Approximately 200 of each species

Perkinsus marinus In addition to growth, the difference in disease susceptibility between native and non-native oysters is important in considering an introduction

Mortality since deployment LOCATIONC. ariakensisC. virginica Severn Choptank Patuxent 24 6 York Mean 24 23

Summary C. ariakensis grew much faster in higher salinities but only slightly faster in lower salinity waters in Maryland. C. ariakensis acquired lower dermo prevalence. Mortality in both species was low and similar, however, dermo infections remained light during this portion of the study and heavy disease-related mortalities appear likely in C.v. in the near future.

York River Spat Settlement in spat/oyster 2.3 spat/oyster C. virginica C. ariakensis Spat settlement on C. virginica (A) and C. ariakensis (B). Spat were found in significantly higher numbers in C. ariakensis (ANOVA; P<0.02). A. B.

Additional Observations There were differences in Polydora sp. infestations (See poster A6. Ward) Hypoxia tolerance varied between C. ariakensis and C. virginica (See poster A4. Harlan)

Acknowledgements Funding from Maryland Sea Grant, NOAA, and Maryland Department of Natural Resources. Technical assistance from, Mark Sherman Steve Allen,, Tim Koles, Nancy Ward, Terra Lederhouse, Nicole Harlan, Paul Miller, Kennedy and Rick Paynter.

Spat Settlement York River was the only site with spatfall in 2004 Spat were found in significantly higher numbers in C. ariakensis (ANOVA: P<0.02)

Mortality Table Comparisons Location C. Ariakensis C. virginica Severn Choptank Patuxent York Avg