The Structure and Role of QA Bodies at the University and faculty/department levels UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE Serbia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COMMISSION FOR ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
Advertisements

Setting internal Quality Assurance systems
1-st stage DoQuP Report on countries. State standards in the area of assurance of education quality are developed with the aim of:  meeting permanent.
Activity of Croatian Rector’s Conference Aleksa Bjeliš University of Zagreb 14 January 2005.
The role of national standards for quality assurance of training programs in higher educational institutions of the Republic of Tajikistan Samadov Safarboy,
“Articulating the work on NQF, QA and recognition ” JULY 2008, Cetinje.
NQF SERBIA 2009 NQF SERBIA 2009 current state and SWOT analyses Ljubljana, June 2009.
Irish Universities Quality Board Internal Quality Assurance at Universities: The Irish perspective Dr Padraig Walsh Chief Executive Irish Universities.
European University Association By Nureddin Kırkavak & Mohammad Mesgarpour Department of Industrial Engineering.
Prof. dr. Bozin Donevski University “St. Kliment Ohridski” 7000 Bitola, Macedonia EVALUATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS IN THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA.
UNIVERSITY STRATEGY FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF BP IN SERBIA Grant Applicant Institution: Universite Paris 12 Val de Marne, Prof Patricia Pol, Vice President.
1 Education in Europe: Quality Enhancement and Setting Standards Dr Marie Donaghy Head of School of Health Sciences.
Developing a National Qualifications Framework: the Georgian experience General Overview Nodar Surguladze Deputy Minister Ministry of Education and Science.
RUSSIAN EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM
Europeanization v. academic freedom in higher education in Poland
Progress on higher education reforms and the implementation of the Bologna process Ministry of Education, Republic of Moldova.
Quality Assurance in the Bologna Process Fiona Crozier QAA
UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID CENTRO DE AMPLIACIÓN DE ESTUDIOS CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES FOR THE ACCREDITATION OF MASTER’S DEGREES IN SPAIN 1.
CHANGES IN THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS OF THE SS. CYRIL AND METHODIUS UNIVERSITY IN SKOPJE Prof. Dr. Velimir Stojkovski Rector Ss. Cyril and Methodius University.
Career Center as a Bridge between University and Labor Market Neda Bokan University of Belgrade Studentski trg Belgrade, Serbia Decowe Conference.
Quality assurance in IVET in Romania Lucian Voinea Mihai Iacob Otilia Apostu 4 th Project Meeting Prague, 21 st -22 nd October 2010.
Implementation of Bologna Declaration MAGNA CHARTA UNIVERSITATUM 18 September 1988 UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE Serbia.
BOLOGNA PROCESSES On June 19, 1999, 29 European Ministers of Education signed a declaration in the oldest town of Bologna. By signing the document the.
Ministry of Education and Youth Republic of Moldova 1 Implementing the Bologna Process in the Republic of Moldova: Achievements and Problems Viorelia Moldovan-Batrinac,
Institutional Evaluation of medical faculties Prof. A. Сheminat Arkhangelsk 2012.
Quality Assurance Systems in Higher Education in Uzbekistan TerSU / TSAU Z.Djumaev, S.Islomov S.Adilov.
Supporting Activities for ECTS Implementation by Ministry of Education and Sports Mirko Ožegović, Serbian Ministry of Education and Sports.
Quality Assurance at the University of Chile Universidad de Chile.
QUALITY MANAGEMENT AS A TOOL FOR QUALITY CULTURE EMBEDMENT: VILNIUS UNIVERSITY APPROACH Inga Milisiunaite, Roma Adomaitiene, Juozas Galginatis Vilnius.
Akkreditierungsrat The German System of Accreditation Franz Börsch Accreditation Council Office SYSTEM OBJECTIVES STANDARDS PROCEDURE.
Swiss Quality Assurance & Accreditation System in Higher Education: Perspectives for Southeast Asia By Dr. Alexandre Dormeier Freire, Graduate Institute.
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND STRUCTURAL ORGANIZATION FOR THE QUALITY ASSURANCE OF SPs ■ Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava ■ Faculty of Civil Engineering.
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN ESTONIA: EVALUATION OF ACADEMIC PROGRAMMES Workshop: Boosting quality: International Credential Evaluation and Higher Education Quality.
Recognition: the national centre and the ENIC Network Seminar on the recognition of qualifications Baku, 22 April 2005 Gunnar Vaht Head of the Estonian.
Maiki Udam Tallinn University of Technology Estonia.
Meeting of the TEMPUS DoQuP Project –Workshop on “Documentation for Quality Assurance of Study Programs" 1-6 May 2012, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan Accreditation.
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN ESTONIA ACCREDITATION OF ACADEMIC PROGRAMMES AND INSTITUTIONS TIIT LAASBERG.
Quality Assurance at the University of Arts in Belgrade Novi Pazar, 14 th February 2011 Olga Stanković General Secretary.
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN BULGARIAN HIGHER EDUCATION Prof. Anastas Gerdjikov Sofia University March 30, 2012.
King Saud University, College of Science Workshop: Programme accreditation and quality assurance Riyadh, June 15-16, 2009 I.2 Relevant Documents
Role of CAQA in the course of further development of higher education systems International Conference on Higher Education Reform: Towards Joint Regional.
Legal framework for student participatiing in decison making process in Serbia V. Dondur University of Belgrade-Faculty of physical chemistry CAQA, HERE.
King Saud University, College of Science Workshop: Programme accreditation and quality assurance Riyadh, June 15-16, 2009 II.3 Self-Evaluation and Appendices.
Quality Assurance Agency in the Republic of Moldova PhD Nadejda Velico, Head for higher education department, Ministry of Education Ministry of Education,
1 Joint EAIE/NAFSA Symposium Amsterdam, March 2007 John E Reilly, Director UK Socrates-Erasmus Council.
1 FIRST STAGE OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION REFORM IN CROATIA – TASKS OF AUTHORISED BODIES.
Assessing student participation in governance and management in HE institutions towards improved QA Nenad Jovanovic, University of Nis.
Prof. Dr. Mehmet Durman /27 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS ON QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION IN TURKEY.
ENCHASE “ENHANCING ALBANIAN SYSTEM OF QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION: APPLICATION OF THE PROCESS AND OUTCOME BASED METHODOLOGY ”
Ministry of Education and Science Republic of Armenia Levon Mkrtchyan Minister of Education and Science of Armenia IMPLEMENTATION OF PRINCIPLES OF BOLOGNA.
Bologna Process in Croatia Melita Kovačević University of Zagreb Consortia Meeting of the Tempus Project UM-JEP Moving Ahead with the Bologna Process.
The Bologna Process at the University of Helsinki University of Helsinki
Double degrees and joint degrees: international inter-university cooperation Lewis Purser, Director Academic Affairs.
Student Conference of Serbian Universities - SCSU 30 th January 2014., Niš, Serbia Fostering University Support Services and Procedures for Full Participation.
Klaipeda, LITHUANIA, International Meeting Joint Study Programme in International Business Management WSINF – WYŻSZA SZKOŁA INFORMATYKI (THE.
Nacionalna agencija Republike Slovenije za kakovost v viskoem šolstvu - NAKVIS Slovenian Quality Assurance Agency of Higher Education - SQAA presented.
Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education Qualification Recognition Policy Merima Baraković University of Tuzla Banja Luka/March, 8th.
1 UNIVERSITY OF EAST SARAJEVO Stevan Trbojevic Dejan Bokonjic Srdjan Masic 1 st Consortium meeting of CCNURCA project
Kick-off meeting of the ENQA/UNESCO-GIQAC Project-Workshop on “Implementing the ESG in the Balkan Region” Accreditation and External Evaluation of HE Institutions.
TOWARDS AN ACCREDITED BLENDED MASTER IN EUROPEAN SOCIAL SECURITY: FEASIBILITY STUDY MAPPING THE SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES Draft findings gathered via.
Quality Assurance in Egypt and the European Standards and Guidelines
DEVELOPMENT OF STUDY PROGRAMS IN UNIVERSITY OF PRISHTINA/KOSOVO
The Role of Students in Program and Course Evaluation
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
HIGHER EDUCATION IN MONTENEGRO
Bulgaria Higher Education System
Assessing student participation in governance
Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education
Key Results of the Twinning Project AZ-ad-EHEA Baku 29 August 2017 Helka Kekäläinen, PhD Heli Mattisen, PhD Project Leaders.
Josip Juraj Strossmayer University in Osijek
Presentation transcript:

The Structure and Role of QA Bodies at the University and faculty/department levels UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE Serbia

31 Faculties 10 Research Institutes Scheme of the Organisation RECTORATE 1 Faculties of Social and Humanistic Sciences 2 Faculties of Medical Sciences 3 Faculties of Sciences & Mathematics 4 Faculties of Engineering and Technology Groups: University Library Computer center UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE Serbia PR service Career center Centre for strategic management of higher education Sport center Information center

Staff: 1 Full Professors = Associate professors = Assistant professors = Assistants = = Administration = UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE Serbia 1 Undergraduate = Graduate = Students: Academic year 2007/2008

Present state: Higher Education system at the University of Belgrade is essentially based on two main cycles: The second cycle leads to the MASTER and/or DOCTORATE degree Access to the second cycle requires successful completion of undergraduate studies II GRADUATE and I UNDERGRADUATE 123 UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE Serbia

UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE Serbia 1 Diploma Supplement Establishment of a system of credits (ECTS) Updating and restructuring of specific subject’s curricula Considerable involvement of the University of Belgrade in the preparation of the Law on Higher Education Development of the informative system for student schooling and services Self-evaluation of faculties in respect to the Bologna Declaration requirements Implementation of Bologna Declaration

Organisation of University Organisation of QA Bodies SCHEME OF THE ORGANISATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF QUALITY ASSUARANCE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE Faculties groups Faculties University of Belgrade University committee for QA University working group for QA Faculties’ working groups for QA Faculty working group for QA Responsibilities and reports Communication Establishment of the working groups

UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE Serbia External evaluation May 2002*

Significance of Accreditation in Europe The Berlin Declaration ( 2003) reads as follows: “The quality of higher education has proven to be at the heart of the setting up of a European Higher Education Area.” National quality assurance systems should include the following: Evaluation of programmes or institutions, including internal assessment, external review, participation of students and the publication of results Evaluation of programmes or institutions, including internal assessment, external review, participation of students and the publication of results, A system of accreditation, certification or comparable procedures.

all countries in Europe have established national quality assurance systems in the domain of higher educationaccreditation procedures These political concepts have been largely implemented to date: practically all countries in Europe have established national quality assurance systems in the domain of higher education, and accreditation procedures have become an important method for external quality assurance. Definition and Purpose of Accreditation The European Consortium for Accreditation (ECA) defines accreditation as a formal and independent decision, indicating that an institution of higher education and/or programmes offered meet certain standards “a formal and independent decision, indicating that an institution of higher education and/or programmes offered meet certain standards.” This definition also covers some quality assessments that are described as “accreditation like procedures”.

multi-step process  Accreditation is achieved through a multi-step process selfevaluation/ documentation submitted by the unit undergoing accreditation;  external assessment by independent experts  external assessment by independent experts; the accreditation decision.  The accreditation decision depends upon a quality assessment based on internationally accepted quality standards.  The final decision of the accreditation “yes” or “no” judgment  The final decision of the accreditation procedure itself is authoritative in nature, has been determined by an external process, and results in a “yes” or “no” judgment with a limited validity.

The Law on Higher Education (2005) “Službeni glasnik 76/2005” NATIONAL ASSEMBLY ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE COMMISSION (CAQA) MINISTRY OF EDUCATION NATIONAL COUNCIL OF HIGHER EDUCATION Institutions of higher education Conference of Serbian Universities Conference of high school principals Republic of Serbia

RULES AND REGULATIONS SELF- ASSESSMENT AND QUALITY CONTROL ON STANDARDS OF SELF- ASSESSMENT AND QUALITY CONTROL OF HEIs RULES AND REGULATIONS OF EXTERNAL QUALITY CONTROL ON STANDARD PROCEDURES OF EXTERNAL QUALITY CONTROL RULES AND REGULATIONS ACCREDITATION STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES INSTITUTIONS STUDY PROGRAMS OF ACCREDITATION STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES FOR HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THEIR STUDY PROGRAMS Accreditation and Quality Assurance Commission proposed to the National Council the rules,regulations procedures and standards for  s s s self-assessment and quality control,  e e e external quality control and  a a a accreditation of the high education institutions and study programmes. The National Council of higher education (2006) The National Council of higher education (2006) approved the following:

THE FIRST AND SECOND LEVEL OF HIGHER EDUCATION ACCREDITATION STANDARDS FOR THE FIRST AND SECOND LEVEL OF HIGHER EDUCATION Standard 1. Study program structure Standard 2. Study program purpose Standard 3. Objectives of the study program Standard 4. Competences of the graduated students Standard 5. Curriculum Standard 6. Quality, modernity and international compliance Standard 7. Admission of students Standard 8. Grading and advancement of students Standard 9. Teaching staff Standard 10. Organization and material resources Standard 11. Quality control Standard 12. Distance learning courses HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS ACCREDITATION STANDARDS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS Standard 1. Basic goals and objectives of higher education institution Standard 2. Planning and control Standard 3. Organization and administration Standard 4. Studies Standard 5. Science research and artistic work Standard 6. Teaching staff Standard 7. Non-teaching staff Standard 8. Students Standard 9. Premises and equipment Standard 10. Library, textbooks and IT support Standard 11. Sources of funds Standard 12. Internal mechanisms for quality assurance Standard 13. Transparency DOCTORAL STUDIES ACCREDITATION STANDARDS FORSTUDY PROGRAM OF DOCTORAL STUDIES Special standard - Competence of the higher education institution to carry out the doctoral studies Standard 1. Study program structure Standard 2. Study program goals Standard 3. Study program objectives Standard 4. Competence of graduated students Standard 5. Curriculum Standard 6. Quality, modernity and international compliance of study program Standard 7. Admission of students Standard 8. Grading and advancement of students Standard 9. Teaching staff Standard 10. Organizational and material resources Standard 11. Quality control

The accreditation request supported by the data and documents ОДЛУКА О АКРЕДИТАЦИЈИ The accreditation procedure The Commission form sub-commission The Commission, at the proposal by sub- commission, designate two reviewers The reviewer report to the sub-commission The sub-commission finalize the draft report for accreditation The sub-commission Visit institution- report The Commission The accreditation decision accept the accreditation request and grant the Accreditation Certificate reject the accreditation postpone decision on accreditation complain to the National Council of Higher Education 1 2

Institutions of higher education in Serbia achieve accreditation from Commision for Accreditation and Quallity Assurance CAQA The Law on Higher Education “Službeni glasnik 76/2005” the accreditaton of all Institutions of higher education in Serbia should be finished to the june By virtue of Article 116., item 1. of the Law on Higher Education, the accreditaton of all Institutions of higher education in Serbia should be finished to the june Institutions of higher education 250 Institutions of higher education >1500 study programs All higher education institutions in the Republic of Serbia and their respective study programs shall be subject to the procedure for accreditation.

It leads to formal external recognition of quality, which is important not only with regard to recognition of credits and degrees and with regard to funding, but also in acquiring legitimacy in the higher education system, towards other institutions, towards employers and other stake-holders, and towards students and the general public. As institutions increasingly gain autonomy, external accreditation is seen as an affirmation of the self-regulating capacity of institutions. Of course, accreditation also has important benefits for institutions and programmes themselves.