APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
T H A N K Y O U !. Charlie Robinson Charlie
Advertisements

RIDE – Office of Special Populations
APS Teacher Evaluation
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Implementation of the PA Core Standards. Effective Communication Guiding Principle 1 Design and establish systems of effective communication among stakeholders.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
PORTFOLIO.
Comparison of School and KSU Assessment of Teachers
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System 0 August 2012.
Preparing for Learning Objectives Review the TAPS component of the Cobb Keys for Teacher Effectiveness Explore the Teacher Performance Standards.
California Standards for the Teaching Profession
0 Documenting Teacher Performance: Using Multiple Data Sources for Authentic Performance Portraits This sample lesson and accompanying documentation are.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 7: Preparing for My Mid-Year Conversation.
Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
February 9, 2012 Session 1: Observing Lessons NYSED Principal Evaluation Training Program.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
Observation Process and Teacher Feedback
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System
What should be the basis of
1 SESSION 1 using The New Performance Standards and New VDOE Requirements
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Kyrene Professional Growth Plan
In order to succeed, your desire for success should be greater than your fear of failure. McPherson
NAPS Educator Evaluation Spring 2014 Update. Agenda Evaluation Cycle Review Goal Expectations and Rubric Review SUMMATIVE Evaluation Requirements FORMATIVE.
Document Review STANDARDEVIDENCE Standard 1 - Professional KnowledgeDocumentation and Observation Standard 2 - Instructional PlanningDocumentation and.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 1: Content and Structure Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Requirements are now 20 hours per year. July 1 – June 30 1.School calendar changes 2.Out of district opportunities 3.Online opportunities - Safe Schools.
Stronge and Associates Educational Consulting, LLC Documenting Teacher Performance: Using Multiple Data Sources for Authentic Performance Portraits Simulation.
APS Teacher Evaluation
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Ms. Caley Hughes’s Candidate Teaching Presentation Anonymous: Anything your mind can believe, you can achieve. Believe and achieve. Website.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 7: Formal Observation Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Supporting and Coaching Classroom Facilitators Oudete Taylor August 13, 2015.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 10: Interim and Summative Evaluations.
Teacher Performance Evaluation System Data Sources.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 8: Standard 2- Instructional Planning Please sit in groups with teachers NOT from your school.
Primary Purposes of the Evaluation System
Laura Blake Candidate Teaching Summit Presentation “The shell must break before the bird can fly” ~ Alfred Lord Tennyson Website .
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part A: Observation Data for the Summative Rating.
Teacher Performance Evaluation System (TPES) AASSA Association of American Schools in South America.
What Are the Characteristics of an Effective Portfolio? By Jay Barrett.
MWSD. Differentiated Supervision Mode (DSM)  Reference Pages in Plan Book 8-16 Description of Differentiated Mode Relevant Appendices 34 Teacher.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT A process – not an event. Summative assessment “Information is used by the teacher to summarize learning at a given point in time.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
APS Teacher Evaluation A Process for Student and Teacher Growth Sign in and create your name tent. Welcome!
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
Wilkinsburg School District Literacy Development Framework May 2011.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Simulation 1 – Elementary School Documenting Teacher Performance: Using Multiple Data Sources for Authentic Performance Portraits.
Summative Evaluation Shasta Davis. Dimension: Preparation (Score- 4) Plans for instructional strategies that encourage the development of critical thinking,
Open Math Module 3 Module 3: Approaches to Integrating OER into Math Instruction Planning Instruction with OER 1.0 Introduction.
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Georgia Department of Education
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
Presentation transcript:

APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings

APS Teacher Evaluation Process Overview Lesson Plans Writes SMART Goal Document Log ObservationsMid-YearEvaluation Monitors Lesson Plans WritesCompilesParticipates ApprovesReviewsConductsFacilitates Annual Cycle

Multiple Data Sources Summative ratings are based on multiple data sources. Observation Announced unannounced Documentation Required Artifacts Teacher-Selected Artifacts Other Sources

In the last module we collected evidence on Teacher A through classroom observation. Today we will add to that through evidence – submitted in the document log – collected by the evaluator Observation Data

The document log is an additional source of evidence. Review the documentation log. Note evidence to include for each standard. – Tool: Summary of Evidence Document Log

Evaluators may have data from additional sources (i.e. communications with the teacher, parents, and other interactions with the teacher) This data can also be considered when making summative ratings. Additional Data Sources

What evidence did you collect from the document log? Each group will share out on one standard. Reviewing the Data

8 1. Professional Knowledge – Specific Evidence Document Log Evidence Lesson Plan Demonstrates: Content Knowledge is appropriate for the lesson Links content to other subject areas and to the students real world experiences through the use of the The Queen’s Dilemma and student experiences of where they have seen arrays in everyday life. Connected to prior lesson: Array Hunt Lesson objectives aligned to third grade mathematics standards Integrates questions that facilitate higher order thinking skills.

9 2. Instructional Planning – Specific Evidence Document Log Evidence: Lesson Plan Demonstrates: Arrays lesson is aligned to lesson objectives and curriculum A variety of resources are used for the mathematics lesson to include a storybook, SMART Board, various manipulatives Important components of lesson built in - direct instruction, modeling, student practice, student sharing, metacognition Integrates literacy into math instruction through use of storybook Planned for some general differentiation through the use of teacher scaffolding, a remediation handout, and more challenging problems for those who master arrays.

10 3. Instructional Delivery – Specific Evidence Document Log Evidence Array Remediation Activity Demonstrates: Teacher provides opportunities for differentiation Lesson Plan Demonstrates: Uses a variety of instructional strategies to promote learning - manipulatives, direct instruction, guided practice, discussion, student pairs. Builds upon previous lesson –Array Hunt Utilizes SMART Board for student learning

11 4. Assessment of and for Student Learning Document Log Evidence Sample Student Reflection Demonstrates: Periodically has students complete student reflections for teacher’s knowledge and students’ knowledge uses student feedback to involve students in monitoring their own learning, as formative assessment, and to document learning. Lesson Plan Demonstrates: Uses Math Arrays Quick Check to assess student learning

12 5. Learning Environment – Specific Evidence Document Log Evidence Classroom Management Plan Demonstrates: Teacher has established clear expectations for behavior

13 6. Professionalism – Specific Evidence Document Log Evidence Professional Activities Summary Demonstrates Hosted student intern Participates in professional development “Inquiry-Based Learning” PD SMART Board Training Takes a leadership role in activities outside of the classroom that benefit student learning Book Club Math Buddies Other Data Sources Communicates with parents on a regular basis

7. Student Academic Progress – Specific Evidence Document Log Evidence SMART Goal demonstrates – 80% of students met the SMART Goal and increased their performance 40% or more

Using the data that you collected today, rate Teacher A for each performance standard and overall. Draw an X on the chart paper around the room to represent that rating that your gave for each performance standard and as an overall rating Making a Summative Rating

Debrief on the Summative Ratings

“Arlington Public Schools will provide every student with highly effective educators that have the necessary tools to positively impact student learning and growth.” APS Teacher Evaluation Vision Since 1999

APS Teacher Evaluation A Process for Student and Teacher Growth