Centre for Actuarial Research The Costing of the Chronic Disease List January 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Policy options to address access to chronic disease medicines Dr. Richard Laing Ms. Alexandra Cameron Department of Essential Medicines and Pharmaceutical.
Advertisements

Who are we? We are a registered medical scheme – serving our members since We are a non-profit organisation with our members as our primary stateholders.
What Is Long Term Care?. u Long Term Care is an ever changing array of services aimed at helping people with chronic conditions cope with limitations.
CHANGES TO THE POST-RETIREMENT SUBSIDY FOR SATS PENSIONERS March
MEDICARE: PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Department of Sociology & Anthropology.
MEDICARE: PAST, PRESENT AND F UTURE James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Department of Sociology & Anthropology.
Part I: Basic Economics Tools
Healthcare Cover with Lifestage Modelling The Impact of Best Advice on the Medical Schemes Industry Anthea Towert Technical and Actuarial Consulting Solutions.
3rd Baltic Conference on Medicines Economic Evaluation, Reimbursement and Rational Use of Pharmaceuticals Pricing and Reimbursement of Pharmaceuticals.
Centre for Actuarial Research HIV/AIDS Benefits in Medical Schemes in 2002.
HEALTHCARE FINANCING REFORM IN AUSTRALIA International Hospital Federation Congress 2001 Pre Congress Health Summit, Hong Kong 14 May 2001 Presented by.
Briefing to the Health Portfolio Committee: Operational Activities and Budgets KP Matshidze Acting CEO and Registrar Council for Medical Schemes XX August.
Centre for Actuarial Research The Costing of Prescribed Minimum Benefits January 2003.
Health Care 101 Understanding the Basics
Private Medical Insurance UK vs Republic of Ireland
Centre for Actuarial Research The Impact of PMBs on Affordability January 2003.
Presentation to Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Health OHSC Tuesday, 13 March 2012 Tjaart Erasmus.
Developing Quality Indicators & Dashboards for Dementia Adam Cook South East Coast Quality Observatory.
Council for Medical Schemes Annual Report Presentation KP Matshidze Acting CEO and Registrar Council for Medical Schemes 18 November 2009.
© Nuffield Trust 24 October 2015 NHS payment reform: evolving policy and emerging evidence Chief Economist: Anita Charlesworth.
Annual Report of the Council for Medical Schemes Dr Monwabisi Gantsho Chief Executive & Registrar Presentation to the Health Portfolio Committee.
Social Health Insurance Policy Development. Presentation Policy process to date Constitutional mandate Policy context WHO Ranking Key objectives Future.
2010 Benefit Presentation. Risk Benefits Major Medical Benefit Chronic Benefit Preventative Care Benefit Emergency Benefit Crime Trauma Benefit Day-to-day.
Review of the Medical Schemes Environment and the Private Health Industry: Alex van den Heever Advisor Council for Medical Schemes.
PRESENTATION TO HPC 12 OCTOBER 2012 CAPE TOWN. Outline of presentation 1.Legislated mandate of the Council for Medical Schemes (CMS) 2.Highlights for.
REF Contribution Table 2006 Implicit Price January 2006 Risk Equalisation Fund.
1 Practical Challenges on the Medicine pricing Regulations Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Health By the National Department of Health 16 November.
PRESENTATION TO PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON HEALTH PRICING REGULATIONS Presented by: Amos Masango, Acting Registrar South African Pharmacy Council 16 November.
NHI in Turks and Caicos Islands—Performance Assessment and Lessons for the Future Presented by Zaneta Burton (contributions by Mr. Hernado Montas( Actuary))
SOCIAL HEALTH INSURANCE POLICY Presentation to Health Portfolio Committee 7 June 2005.
Presentation on Bonitas Medical Fund to The Health Portfolio Committee June 2010 Prepared by: Gerhard van Emmenis: Acting Principal Officer.
1 PRESENTATION BY THE NATIONAL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (DOH) TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON DEFENCE AND MILITARY VETERANS: MILITARY VETERANS BILL [B1-2011]
THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Essential Health Benefits Under the Affordable Care Act: HHS Guidance and Key Implementation Issues Sara R. Collins, Ph.D. Vice President,
Road Accident Fund Amendment Bill, 2004 Comments by the South African Medical Association (SAMA) Presented by: Dr J. Van Zyl.
Health Market Inquiry presented by Charlene Sunkel.
Centre for Actuarial Research Prescribed Minimum Benefits Package.
The community pharmacy environment HMI Public Hearing Set 1 Hearing 2
HEALTH BENEFITS 101 Lucia Mar Unified School District Presented by Michelle Rogers Human Resources Technician May 11th, 2016.
INSURANCE LAWS AMENDMENT BILL Finance Portfolio Committee Parliament 30 May 2008 Council for Medical Schemes Alex van den Heever (Technical Advisor to.
CDL Disease Prevalence: Diagnosis and Treated 8 June 2009 Additional material supplied with IMSA NHI Policy Brief 3 National Health Insurance Policy Brief.
ICORD 2006 Kerstin Westermark Md, PhD, Assoc. prof. COMP Chairperson.
LIMS Reforms and Equitable Subsidies 20 January 2010 National Health Insurance Policy Brief 17.
Costing and Long-term Modelling of NHI September 2009 National Health Insurance Policy Brief 6.
The Impact of Chronic Disease on a Future NHI
Affordability of Health Insurance
The Costing of the Chronic Disease List
CHANGES TO THE POST-RETIREMENT SUBSIDY FOR SATS PENSIONERS March
CHANGES TO THE POST-RETIREMENT SUBSIDY FOR SATS PENSIONERS March
The Costing of Prescribed Minimum Benefits
The Costing of Prescribed Minimum Benefits
The Impact of PMBs on Affordability
CHANGES TO THE POST-RETIREMENT SUBSIDY FOR SATS PENSIONERS March
The Impact of Chronic Disease on a Future NHI
Redefining Competition
Consolidation of Medical Schemes Christoff Raath 22 August 2017
Costing and Long-term Modelling of NHI
Frequently asked questions
Health Technology Assessment
Revision of the Benefit Framework for Medical Schemes
Essential to the Future of South African Healthcare
Affordability of Health Insurance
Applications of quality assurance to administration and managed care
Guideline Tariffs for Medical practitioners and dentists
Pharmacy practice and the healthcare system Ola Ali Nassr
Towards cost-effective delivery Within an insurance system
CIRCULAR 8 OF 2006 WILLEM CLAASEN 9 MARCH 2006.
Prescribed Minimum Benefits Package
Private sector operates in a constraining legislative framework
Reducing Fragmented Risk Pools
PMB Review Update PO’s Forum
Presentation transcript:

Centre for Actuarial Research The Costing of the Chronic Disease List January 2003

Centre for Actuarial Research CDL Study Data  Data from Medscheme Data Warehouse  Data covers 2001 calendar year, extracted in August 2002  Data fully run-off, no adjustment for IBNR  46 options  27 schemes  million beneficiary months of data  Average exposure of 1,341,892 beneficiaries

Centre for Actuarial Research Cluster Analysis and Applicability

Centre for Actuarial Research Cluster Analysis  Distinct clusters:  High contains options with older, 'whiter' members with high utilisation;  Medium-older contains options with medium utilisation and older members;  Medium-younger contains options with medium utilisation and younger members; and  Low contains options with younger, 'blacker' members with low utilisation.  Additional not present in PMB study. Single large scheme where the ethnicity is predominantly so-called “Coloured”

Centre for Actuarial Research Cluster Analysis  Different clusters experience different benefit utilisation, costs and disease profiles. Provider behaviour differs by cluster, even within the same hospital facility.  Study contains more Low cluster beneficiaries than the industry.  For industry comparisons, use Weighted industry price.  This uses 50% of the costs of the Low cluster and 100% of the other clusters.  Low cluster is more relevant to the emerging low-cost option environment.

Centre for Actuarial Research Beneficiaries by Cluster Centre for Actuarial Research

Centre for Actuarial Research Age Profile by Cluster Centre for Actuarial Research

Centre for Actuarial Research Proportion of Options Covering the CDL

Centre for Actuarial Research Industry Benefit Study 2001 Source : CARE Monograph

Centre for Actuarial Research Proportion of Beneficiaries Covered for CDL

Centre for Actuarial Research Chronic Registrations by Cluster Q data

Centre for Actuarial Research Chronic Registrations High Cluster Cluster Average 29.7% Q data

Centre for Actuarial Research Chronic Registrations Medium-older Cluster Cluster Average 16.9% Centre for Actuarial Research Q data

Centre for Actuarial Research Chronic Registrations Medium-Younger Cluster Cluster Average 9.3% Q data

Centre for Actuarial Research Chronic Registrations Low Cluster Cluster Average 11.4% Centre for Actuarial Research Q data

Centre for Actuarial Research Chronic Registrations Scheme H Q data

Centre for Actuarial Research Prevalence of CDL Conditions from Registrations

Centre for Actuarial Research Registration of Beneficiaries for Chronic Medicine Other Chronic Conditions 22.9% CDL Conditions 77.1%

Centre for Actuarial Research Prevalence of CDL Registrations Centre for Actuarial Research

Centre for Actuarial Research Co-morbidity in Registrations As Co-morbidity 59.4% Single Disease 40.6% Centre for Actuarial Research

Centre for Actuarial Research Co-morbidity in Registrations Centre for Actuarial Research

Centre for Actuarial Research Co-morbidity in Registrations Centre for Actuarial Research

Centre for Actuarial Research Beneficiaries Registered for CDL Conditions

Centre for Actuarial Research Single Disease Analysis

Centre for Actuarial Research Registered Beneficiaries Claiming Centre for Actuarial Research Single diseases only

Centre for Actuarial Research Proportion of Total Drug Claims Centre for Actuarial Research Single diseases only

Centre for Actuarial Research Proportion of Total Drug Cost Centre for Actuarial Research Single diseases only

Centre for Actuarial Research Average Cost per Case Centre for Actuarial Research Single diseases only Centre for Actuarial Research

Centre for Actuarial Research Average Cost per Case Centre for Actuarial Research Single diseases only Centre for Actuarial Research

Centre for Actuarial Research Multiple Disease Analysis

Centre for Actuarial Research Registered Beneficiaries

Centre for Actuarial Research Multiple diseases Registered Beneficiaries Claiming Centre for Actuarial Research

Centre for Actuarial Research Proportion of Total Drug Claims Centre for Actuarial Research Multiple diseases

Centre for Actuarial Research Proportion of Total Drug Cost Multiple diseases Centre for Actuarial Research

Centre for Actuarial Research Average Cost per Case Centre for Actuarial Research Multiple diseases

Centre for Actuarial Research Average Cost per Case vs. Sum of Single Diseases Centre for Actuarial Research Multiple diseases

Centre for Actuarial Research Prevalence All Diseases

Centre for Actuarial Research CDL Package by Age

Centre for Actuarial Research Age of Exposed Beneficiaries 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% Proportion of beneficiaries Centre for Actuarial Research

Centre for Actuarial Research Age of Claiming Beneficiaries

Centre for Actuarial Research Age of Claiming Beneficiaries 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% Proportion of Claiming Beneficiaries

Centre for Actuarial Research Age of Claiming Beneficiaries for Selected Diseases Centre for Actuarial Research

Centre for Actuarial Research Age of Claiming Beneficiaries for Selected Diseases Centre for Actuarial Research

Centre for Actuarial Research CDL Prevalence by Age

Centre for Actuarial Research CDL Prevalence by Age

Centre for Actuarial Research CDL Prevalence by Age All ages Prevalence per 1000 beneficiaries

Centre for Actuarial Research Average Cost by Age

Centre for Actuarial Research Average Cost of CDL by Age

Centre for Actuarial Research Raw Price of CDL by Age Centre for Actuarial Research

Centre for Actuarial Research Raw Price of CDL by Age ,000 1,250 1,500 1,750 2,000 2,250 2, All Ages Price per beneficiary pa

Centre for Actuarial Research Proportion of Price by Age Centre for Actuarial Research

Centre for Actuarial Research Raw Price of CDL by Wider Age Bands Centre for Actuarial Research

Centre for Actuarial Research CDL Package by Cluster

Centre for Actuarial Research Age of Exposed Beneficiaries Centre for Actuarial Research

Centre for Actuarial Research Age of Exposed Beneficiaries Centre for Actuarial Research

Centre for Actuarial Research Prevalence All CDL Diseases

Centre for Actuarial Research Prevalence by Cluster

Centre for Actuarial Research Prevalence by Cluster Centre for Actuarial Research

Centre for Actuarial Research Average Cost by Cluster Centre for Actuarial Research

Centre for Actuarial Research Raw Price by Cluster

Centre for Actuarial Research Raw Price by Age and Cluster

Centre for Actuarial Research Raw Price High vs. Low Cluster Centre for Actuarial Research

Centre for Actuarial Research High Price Relative to Low Price by Age Centre for Actuarial Research

Centre for Actuarial Research Average Cost of Hypertension High vs. Low Cluster

Centre for Actuarial Research Differences Between Clusters  Age profile differences explain roughly two-thirds of difference in raw cluster prices.  Other differences are probably due to a combination of “the four P’s”:  variation in Prevalence rates of important conditions;  Presentation or manifestation of conditions;  Provider choice (GP vs. specialist and the management or prescribing habits of each); and  benefits available within the health care Plan.

Centre for Actuarial Research Adjustments to the Raw Price of the CDL Package

Centre for Actuarial Research Adjustments to Raw Price  Haemophilia  Removal of three diseases from final Regulations  Cost of diagnosis and medical management  Adjustment for compliance  Adjustment for limits  Adjustment for co-payments  Costs of chronic medicine management programme  Costs of administration  Reduction for cost of delivery in the public sector

Centre for Actuarial Research Haemophilia  Patients do not register for chronic medicine. Covered by ‘Blood and related products’ benefit, not Medicines.  Haemophilia Society estimates 2000 patients in SA, which suggests prevalence of 1/  220 people claiming ‘Blood and related products’ benefit; estimate 67 are haemophiliacs.  Average case cost of R2 500 per month (R p.a.) for ‘Blood and related products’ benefit.  But majority are renal failure patients, erythropoietin for treatment of chronic anaemia.  Recommendation: use estimate of R0.50 pbpa

Centre for Actuarial Research Removal of Diseases from Final Regulations  Anti-coagulating Therapy: 0.7% of total cost  Cushing’s Disease: 0.0% of total cost  Osteoarthritis: 3.1% of total cost  In total, 1.8% of people excluded from any CDL benefit  12.7% now excluded from partial CDL benefits  Recommendation: reduce raw CDL price by 3.7%.

Centre for Actuarial Research Cost of Diagnosis and Medical Management  Prescribed Minimum Benefit:  “diagnosis, medical management and medication, to the extent that this is provided for by way of a therapeutic algorithm for the specified condition, published by the Minister by notice in the Gazette”.  Need to determine and finalise therapeutic algorithms.  Process requires full study of cost implications.  Recommendation: use initial rough estimate of R per beneficiary per annum.

Centre for Actuarial Research Cost of Diagnosis and Medical Management

Centre for Actuarial Research Adjustment for Compliance  Longitudinal study of new applications with follow-up for one year. 27% of beneficiaries classified as non-compliant used only 28% of the value of the medicines authorised.  Scheme only experienced 71% of the potential cost of the medicines authorised.  Recommend stress-testing price through adjusting margin for compliance.  Recommendation: add margin of 20% of raw price of CDL package for possible increase in compliance in a mandatory environment.

Centre for Actuarial Research Adjustments for Limits  Design of project to attempt to obtain full cost of the CDL conditions without constraints:  Relatively generous chronic medicine limits in schemes.  All members can select option with chronic medicine.  Extracted both chronic and acute usage.  Full tariff amount of item prescribed, not amount paid.  But need small margin where beneficiaries stop claiming during the year because limits have been reached.  Recommendation: add margin of 5% to raw price of CDL package for effect of removing all limits in a mandatory environment.

Centre for Actuarial Research Adjustments for Co-payments  Design of project:  Full tariff amount of item prescribed, not amount paid.  Could be small increase in usage of Primary CDL-NAPPIs relative to Secondary CDL-NAPPIs in mandatory environment, with member co-paying difference in price.  Potentially an increase in usage because full benefit will be paid without constraints from pooled benefits.  Recommendation: add margin of 5% to raw price of CDL package for effect of removing co-payments in a mandatory environment.

Centre for Actuarial Research Medicine Management Costs

Centre for Actuarial Research CDL Administration Costs

Centre for Actuarial Research EDL State Tender Price Compared to Private Sector Price Source: Rothberg and Walters (SAMJ 1996)

Centre for Actuarial Research Savings for Switch to EDL Medicines at State Tender Prices Source: Rothberg and Walters (SAMJ 1996)

Centre for Actuarial Research CDL Cost in the Public Sector  1995 Committee of Inquiry’s estimate of a 50% reduction in private sector costs is achievable for primary health care medicines.  Access to Essential Drugs List medicine at State tender prices is a potential policy option.  Recommendation: use estimate of 50% saving in cost of CDL package when delivered in public sector. As policy unfolds, so this estimate can be further refined.

Centre for Actuarial Research Full Price of the CDL Package

Centre for Actuarial Research Full Price of CDL Package  Four components:  Medicine component, based on full data in study (high degree of certainty)  Portion of price for which uncertainty exists until package is fully defined and allowance for impact of package being mandatory  Amount added for medical management costs  Non-healthcare costs.  Note: Prices should not be used blindly in pricing work. Contact a professional for assistance.

Centre for Actuarial Research Full Price CDL Package

Centre for Actuarial Research Full Price PMB Package

Centre for Actuarial Research Non-Healthcare Expenditure Well below Registrar’s benchmark of 10% of total expenditure

Centre for Actuarial Research CDL Package Relative to Medicine Expenditure Centre for Actuarial Research

Centre for Actuarial Research PMB Package Relative to Benefits and Contributions

Centre for Actuarial Research Conclusions

Centre for Actuarial Research Preliminary Conclusions on Affordability  CDL package, both in basic form and with added margins for change in claiming behaviour when mandatory, appears to be affordable compared to medicine benefits.  PMB package (including CDL) appears to be well covered when compared to total benefits and contributions in the industry.

Centre for Actuarial Research Price in Mandatory Environment  Expect change in member and provider behaviour from existing environment.  Uncertainty exists in price until package is fully defined.  Have included an effective 30% margin on medicine component of CDL package.  Consortium opinion that collective margin of 30% on medicine component is sufficiently conservative to cover this uncertainty in the pricing.

Centre for Actuarial Research Need for Mandatory Package Community rated price

Centre for Actuarial Research Need for Mandatory Package  Real danger that open schemes will pursue more aggressive self-seeking behaviour and limit chronic medicine benefits to discourage older members and improve their community rate relative to their competitors.  Substantial broker activity and churning of members worsens this incentive.  A mandatory minimum package of chronic medicine and management benefits is essential for reducing opportunistic behaviour by some schemes.

Centre for Actuarial Research Further Policy Issues  Membership of medical schemes needs to be compulsory, rather than voluntary, for medium to higher income groups to stabilise the system.  A risk equalisation system between medical schemes, based on the Prescribed Minimum Benefit package will reduce the opportunistic profiting from risk selection still further.

Centre for Actuarial Research Composition of the CDL List  Brief did not extend to consider diseases outside of the draft list and whether any should have been included.  Need for a process of chronic disease prioritisation in medical schemes in order to inform the rationing process in future.

Centre for Actuarial Research Definition of CDL Package  Draft of Treatment Guidelines for Chronic Disease List Conditions  Based on Standard Treatment Guidelines and Essential Drugs List published by DoH in  Appoint task team for documenting and maintaining treatment algorithms for CDL conditions.  Actuarial and pricing expertise to estimate the price of the algorithms. Iterative process of refining algorithms.  Project manager to ensure process completed in time for pricing in August 2003 if implementation is 1 January 2004.

Centre for Actuarial Research Complementary and Traditional Medicine  Serious concerns about the implications of legislating the algorithms for CDL conditions.  Only one approach to treatment will receive funding from medical schemes: entrenchment of an allopathic approach to treatment, largely based on drug interventions.  Hard won legal freedoms to operate must not be negated by preventing funding of complementary medicine and African traditional medicine for CDL conditions.  Allied Health Professions Council with 11 modalities.  Consumers will increasingly question health plans.  Inclusion unlikely to be simple and debate will be vigorous.

Centre for Actuarial Research Chronic Medicine Management Programmes  Medicines management is essentially divided into rules- based formulary management and clinically-based member management.  Experience with a large membership base shows that there is no question that a combination of the two yields the best results.

Centre for Actuarial Research Further Research  Combine with PMB study to obtain total expenditure on CDL conditions. Aid in setting industry priorities.  Range of costs for each condition, rather than average costs.  Understand price difference between High and Low clusters.  Current prices of EDL medicines at State tender prices compared to medicines used by beneficiaries in this study.  Costs of treating CDL conditions in the public sector.

Centre for Actuarial Research A Research Unit of the University of Cape Town (CARE) Centre for Actuarial Research A Research Report Prepared Under Contract for the Council for Medical Schemes