CNI Task Force Meeting December 6, 2004 Western Waters Digital Library Building a Multi-State Aggregated Collection Using CONTENTdm®

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Possibility in Digital Collection Management Introduction to CONTENTdm TM Hitoshi Kamada University of Arizona Presentation for OCLC-CJK Users Group Annual.
Advertisements

Alabama Mosaic continues an IMLS funded project, ( ) called the Cornerstone Project, which established the infrastructure.
Linking Repositories Scoping Study Key Perspectives Ltd University of Hull SHERPA University of Southampton.
Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries
Sandra McIntyre Program Director. OVERVIEW Analysis.
Global Resources Forum October 21, 2010 The Western Waters Digital Library: Building a Resource Through Multi- State Collaboration and Technology
OCLC Online Computer Library Center Sustainability: Partnership models Geri Bunker Ingram CONTENTdm Customer Service Specialist DiMeMa, Inc. January 20,
Oregon Spatial Data Library Partnership Metadata Training OU Knight Library Eugene, Oregon December 3, 2009 Kuuipo Walsh Institute for Natural Resources.
Maliaca Oxnam, University of Arizona Marie Waltz, Center for Research Libraries Joni Blake, Greater Western Library Alliance Living the Future 7 May 2,
River Campus Libraries (c) 2004 University of Rochester Libraries 1 CNI Task Force, Fall 2004 Nancy Foster, Lead Anthropologist University of Rochester.
Formation of ETD‘s and releated issues 6th ETD Conference May 20 – , Berlin Dr. Nikola Korb, Co-ordination Agency DissOnline Deutsche Bibliothek.
What is metadata and why is it important? Norm Friesen, CanCore Initiative
Using Metadata in CONTENTdm Diana Brooking and Allen Maberry Metadata Implementation Group, Univ. of Washington Crossing Organizational Boundaries Oct.
Expanding the Focus of the IR: Scholars’ Bank at the University of Oregon Elizabeth Breakstone, Reference Librarian Heather Briston, University Archivist.
Metadata Guidelines for the Mountain West Digital Library: Who, What, Where, When, Why? CONTENTdm Users Group Meeting July 23, 2007 Portland, Oregon Vicki.
By Carrie Moran. To examine the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) metadata scheme to determine its utility based on structure, interoperability.
1 Open Library Environment Designing technology for the way libraries really work December 8, 2008 ~ CNI, Washington DC Lynne O’Brien Director, Academic.
DAMS: An Overview July 13, 2011 Karen Estlund Head, Digital Library Services.
The Mountain West Digital Library A multi-site, statewide resource by the Utah Academic Library Consortium
J. WILLARD MARRIOTT LIBRARY January 23, 2008Kenning Arlitsch Starting and Sustaining Digitization Projects: The Utah Experience
The Natural Resources Digital Library Needs, Partners, and Challenges Bonnie Avery, Janine Salwasser, & Janet Webster Oregon State University.
IMLS NLG Collection Registry & Item-Level Metadata Repository at the University of Illinois Timothy W. Cole Mathematics Librarian &
A Glimpse Into the Past and a Roadmap for the Future: University of Oregon Digital Collections Presented by Carol Hixson Head, Metadata and Digital Library.
Digitization Panel August 12, 2010 Christopher C. Brown, coordinator Mike Culbertson, Colorado State U. James Mauldin, GPO.
The Western Waters Digital Library: Building a Resource Through Multi- State Collaboration and Technology Dawn Paschal Assistant Dean, Digital Library.
Getting Started with CONTENTdm Corey Harper, University of Oregon Terry Reese, Oregon State University OLA - April 8, 2005.
Building Sustainable Digital Collections: Challenges & Opportunities A Presentation for the Digital Collection Coordinator position at the University of.
ALCME: OAI at OCLC Jeffrey A. Young OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc.
I Never Met a Data I Didn’t Like Metadata Issues in Local and Shared Digital Collections Presentation to ALCTS Electronic Resources Interest Group January.
Transforming Catalogers (and Others) into Digital Library Specialists The Evolution of the University of Oregon’s Metadata and Digital Library Services.
Creating and Operating a Digital Library for Information and Learning– the GROW Project Muniram Budhu Department of Civil Engineering & Engineering Mechanics.
U T A H A C A D E M I C L I B R A R Y C O N S O R T I U M.
The Global Video Grid: DigitalWell Update & Plan For SRB Integration Myke Smith, Manager Streaming Media Technologies University of Washington / ResearchChannel.
The Portal to Texas History: Harnessing Technology to Enable Collaboration with Small Museums and Libraries CNI, December 6, 2005 Cathy Nelson Hartman.
Is Dublin Core Dying? Kayla Willey – Brigham Young University Cheryl Walters – Utah State University Utah Library Association Annual Conference St. George,
November 10, 2005DLF OAI Training Interoperability, OAI, and Shareable Metadata Sarah Shreeves University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign OAI Best Practices.
I Never Met a Data I Didn’t Like Metadata Issues in Local and Shared Digital Collections Presentation to ALCTS Electronic Resources Interest Group January.
Imaging Pittsburgh: Creating a Shared Gateway to Digital Image Collections of the Pittsburgh Region IMLS 2002 National Leadership Grant Library & Museum.
By Addison, Jessica, and Lauren. Management The Mountain West Digital Library is a program of the Utah Academic Library Consortium (UALC) Three Governing.
This presentation describes the development and implementation of WSU Research Exchange, a permanent digital repository system that is being, adding WSU.
Colorado Virtual Library & Open SiteSearch Brenda Bailey-Hainer Director, Networking and Resource Sharing Colorado State Library January 2002.
Integrating Access to Digital Content Sarah Shreeves University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Visual Resources Association 23 rd Annual Conference Miami.
Search Interoperability, OAI, and Metadata Sarah Shreeves University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Basics and Beyond Grainger Engineering Library April.
Scholarly Communication and Institutional Repositories Scholars’ Bank at the University of Oregon A Presentation to the ACRL Oregon & Washington Joint.
Digital Collections at the University of Oregon Presented by Carol Hixson Head, Metadata and Digital Library Services University of Oregon Libraries
Existing knowledge Grey literature and other documents, images, videos, and more represent the mission and work of an agency, but preserving and creating.
Metadata and OAI DLESE OAI Workshop April 29-30, 2002 Katy Ginger Presentation available at:
Metadata and OAI DLESE OAI Workshop June 29 to July 2, 2002 Katy Ginger Presentation available at:
IMLS DCC Project Briefing ( ) Jenny Benevento ( ) Timothy W. Cole.
A Resource Discovery Service for the Library of Texas Requirements, Architecture, and Interoperability Testing William E. Moen, Ph.D. Principal Investigator.
New Collaborations in a Brave New World: Building an Agile Consortium for the 21st Century Adrian W. Alexander Executive Director Greater Western Library.
Open Archive Forum Rachel Heery UKOLN, University of Bath UKOLN is funded by Resource: The Council for Museums, Archives.
Montana Memory Project beta Montana Memory Project beta Jason Clark, Montana State University Steve McCann, University of Montana
The Promise of Institutional Repositories : Scholars’ Bank at the University of Oregon Carol Hixson Head, Metadata and Digital Library Services University.
A Project of the University Libraries Ball State University Libraries A destination for research, learning, and friends.
Metadata-based Discovery: Experience in Crystallography UKOLN is supported by: Monica Duke UKOLN, University of Bath, UK A centre of.
Santi Thompson - Metadata Coordinator Annie Wu - Head, Metadata and Bibliographic Services 2013 TCDL Conference Austin, TX.
Transforming Catalogers (and Others) into Digital Library Specialists : The Evolution of the University of Oregon’s Metadata and Digital Library Services.
Sharing Your Finding Aids in CONTENTdm Encoded Archival Description (EAD) Files in Mountain West Digital Library June 3, 2009 Sandra McIntyre, Mountain.
Online Information and Education Conference 2004, Bangkok Dr. Britta Woldering, German National Library Metadata development in The European Library.
If We Build It, Will They Come (Eventually)? : Scholarly Communication and Institutional Repositories A Presentation to the NASIG 2005 Conference May 20.
Kathy Weimer Coordinator of Map and GIS Services and Collections
Utility of an OAI Service Provider Search Portal
WHAT DOES THE FUTURE HOLD? Ann Ellis Dec. 18, 2000
Metadata in the Marriott Library
Jodi Allison-Bunnell, Alliance
Western Waters Digital Library
Transforming Catalogers (and Others) into Digital Library Specialists : The Evolution of the University of Oregon’s Metadata and Digital Library Services.
Western Waters Digital Library
Transforming Catalogers (and Others) into Digital Library Specialists
Presentation transcript:

CNI Task Force Meeting December 6, 2004 Western Waters Digital Library Building a Multi-State Aggregated Collection Using CONTENTdm® Carol Hixson Head of Metadata and Digital Library Services Knight Library, University of Oregon Kenning Arlitsch Head of Information Technology Marriott Library, University of Utah

CNI Task Force Meeting December 6, 2004 Overview Led by Greater Western Library Alliance (GWLA) Led by Greater Western Library Alliance (GWLA) Funded by IMLS Funded by IMLS Objectives: Objectives: –Begin developing comprehensive information resource –Establish a viable technical infrastructure –Serve as a collaborative model Initial river basins focus: Initial river basins focus: –Platte, Colorado, Rio Grande, and Columbia

CNI Task Force Meeting December 6, 2004 Overview (cont’d) Geographically distributed collections Geographically distributed collections –12 of 30 GWLA institutions currently participate –Each site runs CONTENTdm server CONTENTdm Multi-Site Server at Univ. of Utah CONTENTdm Multi-Site Server at Univ. of Utah –harvests only metadata –creates aggregated index for single site search –results link out to remote sites Balancing local control vs. central usability Balancing local control vs. central usability

CNI Task Force Meeting December 6, 2004 Current Participants Arizona State U. Arizona State U. Brigham Young U. Brigham Young U. Colorado State U. Colorado State U. Oregon State U. Oregon State U. University of Arizona University of Arizona University of New Mexico University of New Mexico University of Oregon University of Oregon University of Nebraska University of Nebraska University of Nevada-L.V. University of Nevada-L.V. University of Utah University of Utah University of Washington University of Washington Washington State U. Washington State U.

CNI Task Force Meeting December 6, 2004

CNI Task Force Meeting December 6, 2004

CNI Task Force Meeting December 6, 2004

CNI Task Force Meeting December 6, 2004

CNI Task Force Meeting December 6, 2004

CNI Task Force Meeting December 6, 2004

CNI Task Force Meeting December 6, 2004

CNI Task Force Meeting December 6, 2004

CNI Task Force Meeting December 6, 2004

CNI Task Force Meeting December 6, 2004

CNI Task Force Meeting December 6, 2004

CNI Task Force Meeting December 6, 2004 Challenges Metadata* Metadata* Searching aggregated metadata* Searching aggregated metadata* Selection of content Selection of content Communication* Communication* Technology Technology Consortia funding models Consortia funding models

CNI Task Force Meeting December 6, 2004 Metadata Challenges Project participants have agreed to follow the Western States Dublin Core Metadata Best Practices, version 2.0 Project participants have agreed to follow the Western States Dublin Core Metadata Best Practices, version 2.0 –The standards provide considerable latitude for some elements Some participants are harvesting from legacy collections that were created without reference to these standards Some participants are harvesting from legacy collections that were created without reference to these standards

CNI Task Force Meeting December 6, 2004 Different Application of Metadata Standards Digitization Specifications Digitization Specifications –Mandatory and repeatable –Not mapped to a Dublin Core element –Refers to a variety of standards –Lot of local latitude in: labeling field labeling field input standards input standards

CNI Task Force Meeting December 6, 2004 Application of Metadata Standards (Cont’d) Date.Original and Date.Digital Date.Original and Date.Digital –Both fields are mandatory (when applicable) –Western States Best Practices document gives clear guidance Both map to Dublin Core Date Both map to Dublin Core Date Both say to follow W3C – Date Time Format Both say to follow W3C – Date Time Format –yyyy-mm-dd ( for July 16, 1897)

CNI Task Force Meeting December 6, 2004 DC Mapping and Aggregated Searching

CNI Task Force Meeting December 6, 2004 UO’s Local Site

CNI Task Force Meeting December 6, 2004 Local Customized Search Interfaces

CNI Task Force Meeting December 6, 2004 Local Customized Search Interfaces

CNI Task Force Meeting December 6, 2004 No Mapping to Encoding Schema

CNI Task Force Meeting December 6, 2004 Inconsistent Search Results

CNI Task Force Meeting December 6, 2004 Inconsistent Search Results (cont.)

CNI Task Force Meeting December 6, 2004 Selection of Content Selection of content is major challenge for any digital collection Selection of content is major challenge for any digital collection –Aggravated in a consortial environment Local sites focus on different aspects of the target audience Local sites focus on different aspects of the target audience Local sites involve different groups within the institution Local sites involve different groups within the institution Local sites have access to radically different source materials Local sites have access to radically different source materials Issue of legacy collections Issue of legacy collections

CNI Task Force Meeting December 6, 2004 Communication GWLA direction and oversight GWLA direction and oversight –Executive Board/Library directors (30) –Digital Projects Task Force WWDL communication forums WWDL communication forums –Electronic discussion list –Monthly reports and conference calls with project coordinators –Semi-annual meetings at ALA –Online repository for reports, standards, minutes, etc. Consortia are fragile Consortia are fragile –Misunderstandings arise as result of misinformation –Are problems result of software, our metadata, our interfaces? –Issues/concerns/opinions must be voiced openly

CNI Task Force Meeting December 6, 2004 Opportunities Widening use of metadata standards Widening use of metadata standards Collectively digitize more types of material Collectively digitize more types of material Develop consensus on methods for presenting different types of material Develop consensus on methods for presenting different types of material Improve CONTENTdm software by providing consortia feedback to DiMeMa Inc. Improve CONTENTdm software by providing consortia feedback to DiMeMa Inc.

CNI Task Force Meeting December 6, 2004 Website – Presentation - Carol Hixson, Head of Metadata and Digital Library Services Knight Library, University of Oregon (541) Kenning Arlitsch, Head of Information Technology Marriott Library, University of Utah (801) Adrian Alexander, Executive Director Greater Western Library Alliance (816) Contact Information