Doc.: IEEE 802.15-13-0660-00-0sru Submission Nov 2013 Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric IndustriesSlide 1 Simulation Methodology for SRU Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneemail.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE sru Submission Sep 2013 Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric IndustriesSlide 1 Evaluation methodology and simulation scenarios.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE s Submission January 2015 Mineo Takai, Space-Time EngineeringSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE wng0 Submission January, 2015 Shoichi Kitazawa, ATRSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE s Submission March 2015 Mitsuru Iwaoka, Yokogawa Electric Co.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE s Submission January 2015 Mitsuru Iwaoka, Yokogawa Electric Co.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE /037r0 Submission January 2003 Ed Callaway, Motorola Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Mar 2008 doc:IEEE e Slide 1 Submission Paul Dixon, Pei Liu, Hisilicon Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE sru Submission 17 Sept 2013 M Ariyoshi, S Kitazawa (ATR)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: e Submission Liang Li, J Shen,Betty ZhouSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 SubmissionMukul Goyal, U Wisconsin MilwaukeeSlide 1 Impact of IEEE n Operation On IEEE Performance Notice: This.
July 2004 Jay Bain, Fearn Consulting doc.: IEEE /0379r0 Submission Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE s Submission September 2015 Hidetoshi Yokota and Ruben Salazar, Landis&GyrSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for.
Mar 2008 doc:IEEE e Slide 1 Submission Paul Dixon, Pei Liu, Hisilicon. Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Feb doc:IEEE c Slide 1 Submission Pei Liu, Hisilicon. Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE Submission doc. : IEEE March 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
, Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Impact of Frame Length on Latency and Throughput]
Doc.: IEEE g TG4g - SUN September 2009 Phil Beecher, Beecher Communications Consultants Ltd Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group.
Doc.: IEEE sru Submission March 2011 Shoichi Kitazawa, ATRSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /30r2 SubmissionMukul Goyal, U Wisconsin MilwaukeeSlide 1 Impact of IEEE n Operation On IEEE Performance Notice: This.
Doc.: IEEE Submission Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed.
Doc.: IEEE Submission September 2014 N. Sato and K. Fukui (OKI)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
1 May 2009 Doc: IEEE g Submission Scott Weikel, Elster Electricty Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE sru Submission Jan 2014 Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric IndustriesSlide 1 Consideration on standardization process Authors:
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANS) Submission Title: [UWB System Design for Low Power, Precision Location.
Doc.: IEEE g TG4g Presentation Sept 2010 C.S. SumSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)‏
Doc.: IEEE s Submission May 2015 Hidetoshi Yokora, Landis&GyrSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE Submission September 2013 Li, Hernandez, Dotlic, Miura, NICT Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE j Submission May 2011 Kiran Bynam, Samsung Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE sru Submission 11 November 2013 M Ariyoshi, S Kitazawa (ATR)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE sru Submission May 2013 Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric IndustriesSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE g Submission July 2010 Roberto Aiello, John BuffingtonSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Submission November 2015 Slide 1Li Qiang, Huawei Technologies Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.
Doc.: IEEE COEX-02/004r0 Submission 23 January, 2001 James P. K. Gilb, Appairent Technologies Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE sru Submission 9 May 2014 M Ariyoshi (ATR)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE b Submission July 2004 Liang Li, WXZJ Inc Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE r0 Submission September 2004 Michael Mc Laughlin, decaWaveSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE /449r0 Submission November 2001 Ed Callaway, Motorola Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE e Submission July 2009 Andy Summers, Skip Ashton, EmberSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
p Submission June 2012 Yale Lee, Lilee Systems Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.
Submission Title: [Add name of submission]
November 2014 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [SRM related functions in ]
June 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed Scenarios for Usage Model Document.
Submission Title: [Comment resolution for i-31]
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2011
May 2013 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposal of radio resource management architecture]
Submission Title: [The Distributed Contention Access Scheme]
Submission Title: [Non-persistent CSMA Mechanism]
Submission Title: [802.11n Liaison Report May 2009]
March 2015 doc.: IEEE s March 2015 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title:
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
< November, 2011 > Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [More Low Energy Mechanism Details]
Submission Title: [Non-Persistent CSMA Mechanism]
平成31年1月 doc.: IEEE /424r1 July 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Japanese.
Submission Title: [Non-persistent CSMA Mechanism]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 January 2018
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Distributed Contention Access Scheme]
doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 Sep 19, 2007 June 2009
Submission Title: [Distributed Contention Access Scheme]
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> January 2013
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> January 2013
Submission Title: [Non-persistent CSMA Mechanism]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Date Submitted: [29 August 2016]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 Sep 19, 2007 Sept 2010
<author>, <company>
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE sru Submission Nov 2013 Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric IndustriesSlide 1 Simulation Methodology for SRU Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Takashi YamamotoSumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd , Shimaya, Konohana-ku, Osaka, Japan Yoshizo Kenichi Hirotsugu Yoji

doc.: IEEE sru Submission Nov 2013 Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric IndustriesSlide 2 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [SRU Simulation Methodology] Date Submitted: [16, Sep 2013] Source: [Takashi Yamamoto] Company [Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd] Address [1-1-3, Shimaya, Konohana-ku, Osaka, Japan] Voice:[ ], FAX: [ ], Re: [In response to call for proposals for SRU Study Group] Abstract:[A simulation methodology for SRU is proposed.] Purpose:[For the SG and future work] Notice:This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release:The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P

doc.: IEEE sru Submission Abstraction Nov 2013 Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric IndustriesSlide 3 In this report, we propose simulation methodology to identify and evaluate gains of new RRMM strategies. Unique requirements for focused M2M use cases shall be looked into, and so traffic model, power consumption model, evaluation metrics and measurement modeling are particularly discussed.

doc.: IEEE sru Submission Traffic Model Nov 2013 Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric IndustriesSlide 4 Periodic transmission of short packet should be evaluated. The simulation parameters are below. –Payload Size:5bytes, Interval:1s-10s Additional random backoff in application can be applied to avoid constant packet loss caused by interference. –The efficiency of CSMA/CA is unclear with many devices. –Clock accuracy of oscillation may affect this issue. Device A (without random backoff) Device B (without random backoff) Device C (with random backoff) Time packet

doc.: IEEE sru Submission Power Consumption Model Nov 2013 Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric IndustriesSlide 5 Gateway Device Application Data ACK Time Sleep Time (X[mW]) Microcomputer onWireless module on Microcomputer and wireless module off Run Application (Y[mW]) Transmission and Reception (Z[mW]) Battery life extension by reducing wake-up time can be one of the requirements of the RRMM mechanism. An example of power consumption model is shown below, but more precise models and parameters should be investigated.

doc.: IEEE sru Submission Evaluation Metrics Nov 2013 Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric IndustriesSlide 6 Currently SRU has focus on the following use cases: –hospital, industrial automation and infrastructure monitoring. In the use cases, each device conveys important information for each application. Therefore, we propose that 1% throughput from CDF should be evaluated. CDF over multiple random trials throughput 100% 1% Evaluate whether this value is acceptable or not.

doc.: IEEE sru Submission Measurement Function Modeling Nov 2013 Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric IndustriesSlide 7 Measurement functions are not clarified in IEEE , but they have impact on the performance of RRMM. The following simulation models are applied as baseline. ED (Energy Detection) LQI (Link Quality Indicator) X: ED value X e : RSSI [dBm] of the channel at any measurement time (128us) Z: error (90% bound for +/-6dB) X: LQI value X l : RSSI [dBm] of a received packet Z: error

doc.: IEEE sru Submission Other Simulation Parameters Nov 2013 Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric IndustriesSlide 8

doc.: IEEE sru Submission Outdoor Industrial Automation Scenario Nov 2013 Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric IndustriesSlide 9 Area size: 2km x 2km Channel model: –Free space (no fading) Gateway locations: –Number: 25 –Placed at intervals of 400m –5 channels at 2450MHz Device locations: –Number: from 500 to 6000 –Placed randomly –Mobility: Stationary Gateway The colors of gateways show their channels. [m]

doc.: IEEE sru Submission MAC/PHY Parameters Nov 2013 Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric IndustriesSlide 10 PHYFrequency2450MHz Bandwidth2MHz Tx power10dBm ModulationIEEE O-QPSK 250kbps Bit error rateIEEE E Radio noise figure25dB PHY header size6bytes Clock errorideal MACAccess protocolIEEE unslotted CSMA-CA with default parameters CCA Mode1: Energy above threshold ( -75dBm) Max # of retries3 Max backoff window size255 MAC header size11bytes Association (baseline)Devices are associated with the highest LQI gateways.

doc.: IEEE sru Submission An Example of Simulation Result Nov 2013 Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric IndustriesSlide 11 [m] Number of Devices:500, Transmission Interval:1s (40bps) CDF of per-device throughput [bps] [%] Deployment map The colors of devices show their channels. Some devices are associated with the distant gateways because of the measurement errors, though their QoS performances seem good enough. Average throughput:: bps 1% throughput: bps

doc.: IEEE sru Submission Summary Nov 2013 Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric IndustriesSlide 12 Simulation methodology for SRU was proposed. –Traffic model: periodic transmission of short packet –Power consumption model: should be investigated further –Evaluation metric: 1% throughput from cdf –Measurement function modeling Future work –Advance the simulation activity and clarify the requirements of SRU through RRMM mechanism. –Can we use this methodology to assess enhancements? If you encounter any problems to do the simulation, please contact me.