Expediting the Use of Clean-Diesel Engines with Retrofit Emission Control Technologies Air Quality Conference for Local Elected Officials May 10-11, 2001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Diesel Engine Technology 2007 and Beyond Diesel Engine Technology 2007 and Beyond Vice President, Chief Technical Officer International Truck and Engine.
Advertisements

Joe Kubsh, MECA Marty Lassen, Johnson Matthey November 17, 2008 National Caucus of Environmental Legislators Diesel Forum Washington, DC Manufacturers.
SCR & 2010 Emissions.
John Campbell Director On-Highway Engine Products March 16, 2004 American Trucking Association Technology & Maintenance Council.
Emission control technology for marine applications.
Mobile Sources. Mobile sources Gasoline car: 4-strokes Diesel car Automobile : 4-strokes, 2-strokes.
Robert Tekniepe Clark County Department of Air Quality and Environmental Management Air Quality Forum November 14, 2006 Clean Diesel Strategies.
Diesel emission reduction Student: Group: E Scientific adviser: Language adviser:
0 BNSF Railway Alternative Fuels for Locomotives Discussion Points June 8 th, 2011.
Retrofit Emission Control Technologies for On-Road, Off-Road, and Stationary Diesel Engines Manufacturers of Emission Controls Association May 2000.
Reducing harmful emissions while protecting Fleet Investment.
Retrofit Emission Controls for On-Road Diesel Engines OCA Air Quality Summit Fresno, CA October 27, 2005 Manufacturers of Emission Controls Association.
Retrofit Emission Control Technologies for On- and Off-Road Diesel Engines Manufacturers of Emission Controls Association May 2002.
Diesel Exhaust Emissions PM and NOx After treatment.
DIESEL RETROFITS FOR HEAVY-DUTY VEHICLES ROUNDTABLE ON CLEAN FUELS AND VEHICLES in TURKEY May 4, 2006 Katherine Buckley, US EPA.
THE ROLE OF RETROFIT TECHNOLOGY IN REDUCING VEHICLE EMISSIONS MAY 2014 Dr RICHARD O’SULLIVAN COMMERCIAL DIRECTOR.
“Ceryx means Clean Air” The QuadCAT Four-Way Catalytic Converter An Integrated Emission Control System for Diesel Engines presented to the: February 3,
2010 Diesel Emission Reduction Consortium Experimental Studies of Exhaust Chemistry and Aftertreatment Professor Thatcher Root Department of Chemical and.
,. CLEAN DIESEL DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM Diesel Emission Control Retrofit Users Conference Pasadena, CA February 6 -7, 2001.
The Path To Cleaner Buses & Trucks Cleaner Fuels Tighter New Vehicle Standards Inspection and Maintenance Other –Scrappage –Retrofit –Alternative Fuels.
GREENING NORTH AMERICA’S TRADE CORRIDORS “HOW TO GREEN NAFTA TRUCKS” April 22, 2008 Improving Profits + Reducing Environmental Impact.
Comparison of Clean Diesel and Natural Gas HD Vehicles
Introduction and Overview Sub Workshop 4 Mobile Sources Better Air Quality 2002 Hong Kong December 16-18, 2002.
Impact of Fuel Sulfur on Vehicle Emissions Nazeer Bhore Fuels Development and Policy Planning ExxonMobil Refining and Supply Co. Fairfax, VA Latin.
2007 Program Update for ATA/TMC John Campbell 10 June 2003.
GCAA Tier 4 Specifications BP Lubricants USA Inc Geno Capitoni National Accounts Manger.
The International Experience Europe Developing Road maps for Conventional Fuels in Asia Axel Friedrich Umweltbundesamt (UBA) Germany.
Diesel Particulate Matter Emission Reduction Methods.
Reducing Emissions from Existing Trucks and Buses
TADGER Turbulating Atomizer Diesel Gas Emission Reducer
Briefing on Recent Emission Control Developments May, 2000 Manufacturers of Emission Controls Association.
Sohail Ghanchi Energy Technology and Policy The University of Texas at Austin.
RETROFIT EMISSION CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES FOR HEAVY DUTY DIESEL ENGINES - THE STATE OF THE ART Sougato Chatterjee Johnson Matthey Catalysts BAQ 2004.
Cleaning Up Diesel in the Bay Area What Are the Sources? What are the Clean-Up Opportunities? Patricia Monahan Senior Analyst, Clean Vehicles Program.
Jeremy Harris Simultaneous Reduction of PM, NOx, HC & CO From Large Stationary Diesel Engines March 21, 2006.
Clean Cities Webcast Cummins Westport Gordon Exel.
Summer Meeting – 2012 Diesel Emissions (Tier 4) Scott Weyant Chris Knipfer John Hale Chris Vernon.
CARB Off-Road Mobile Source Technology Workshop February 2-3, 2000 El Monte, California Emissions Technologies for Off-Highway Compression Ignition Engines.
OTC Mobile Source Committee OTC Committee Meeting September 2009 Buffalo, New York 1.
Diesel Particulate Filters. Overview The case for air quality management Explanation of diesel filtration technology Benefits of diesel particulate filters.
1 EPA’s Proposal for Nonroad Diesel Engines & Fuel May 2003 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Transportation and Air Quality Informal document.
Copies of Presentations Contact Info for Questions Workshop Q&A Document Later this Year.
Technology For 2007 And Beyond Dr. Steve Charlton Executive Director – Advanced Engineering Cummins Inc.
Diesel Risk Reduction Plan California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board.
Diesel Fuel Quality and Sulfur Effects on Catalyst-Based Exhaust Emission Controls: Manufacturers of Emission Controls Association May 2000.
WRAP Offroad Mobile Source Retrofit Program Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City November 10, 2004.
Diesel Emissions Regulation and Control Impact of ARB Regulation.
INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES LECTURER PROF.Dr. DEMIR BAYKA.
Shaping the Future Exhaust After Treatment Systems.
Atlas Copco Compressors LLC
© 2005 Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management (NESCAUM) Advanced Mobile Source Training Course MS Diesel Session I. Motor Vehicle Diesel.
Retrofitting Transit Buses to Reduce Air Emissions Kim Perrotta, Air Quality Coordinator, Ontario Public Health Association CUTA Conference 2003.
© 2005 Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management (NESCAUM) Advanced Mobile Source Training Course MS Diesel Section V Planning for the.
1Korea University of Technology and Education 2 Generation Common Rail VGT Variable Swirl 32Bit Computer Elec. Controlled EGR Flap C P F Electronically.
Presentation to CPT Engineering Committee - March 10th, 2015 GreenUrban’s retrofit SCRT Systems for compliance with London’s proposed Ultra Low Emission.
Diesel Exhaust Aftertreatment Systems for Gasoline Engine Instructors Curt Ward.
ASE-IEA PRESENTATION JULY 24, 2017 Concord, NC
and Emissions Reduction
Diesel Exhaust Emissions
Nonroad Diesel Engine and Fuel Standards
Emission Control Technology Implementation Feasibility
Emission Control Systems
Diesel Engine Catalyst Deactivation/Ageing
ASE Education Foundation July 25th, 2018 Dallas, TX
OHIO TECHNICAL COLLEGE June 27th, 2018 Cleveland, OH
GreenPower™ Technology Schematic :
Affect of Biodiesel Blends on DPF and SCR Systems
June 28, 2018 Sacramento, California
Presentation transcript:

Expediting the Use of Clean-Diesel Engines with Retrofit Emission Control Technologies Air Quality Conference for Local Elected Officials May 10-11, 2001 Sacramento, CA

Presentation Outline Introduction Background Retrofit Control Technologies Elements of a Retrofit Program Cost Estimates Conclusion

Introduction Diesel Engines Are a Major Source of NOx, PM, and Toxic Emissions Even with the Prospect of Tighter Emission Standards in the Future, Existing, High-Emitting Diesel Engines Will Be in Use for the Next 10 to 20 Years Retrofitting Existing Diesel Engines with Exhaust Control Technologies or Converting Diesel Engines to Natural Gas Are Available Strategies to Reduce Emissions and Expedite Clean-Vehicle Deployment A Successful Retrofit Program Must Be Properly Designed and Implemented

Available Retrofit Technologies PM, CO, HC and Toxics –Diesel Oxidation Catalysts (DOC) –Diesel Particulate Filters (DPF) –Enhanced Combustion Modifications (e.g., cams, coatings, superchargers) –Crankcase Emission Controls

Available Retrofit Technologies (cont.) NOx –Selective Catalytic Reduction –Lean NOx Catalyst Technology –Systems Strategies (e.g., engine modifications to reduce NOx plus PM exhaust controls) –EGR

Retrofit Experience Mining Materials Handling Truck and Bus Marine Vessels and Locomotives Stationary Diesel Engines

Overview of Retrofit Programs The Number and Scope of Retrofit Programs Is Rapidly Growing –North America (California, New York, New England, Mexico, and elsewhere) –Europe (Austria, Finland, France, Germany, Sweden, Switzerland, and United Kingdom) –Asia (Hong Kong, Korea, Japan, and Taiwan) –Latin America (El Salvador and Nicaragua)

Diesel Oxidation Catalysts Carbon SOF NOx CO HC Carbon NOx Water Oxidation Catalysts Oxidize CO, HC, and SOF to Reduce PM, CO, HC, and Toxic Emissions.

Diesel Oxidation Catalysts Are Efficient and Proven Oxidation Catalyst Control Capabilities –PM % Reduction –CO and HC -- >90% –Toxic HCs -- >70%

DOCs Destroy Large Fractions of Toxic Emissions Toxic Hydrocarbon Compounds Reduced by 68% PAH Emissions Reduced by 56% Greater Reductions Possible with Low Sulfur Fuel mg/bhp-hr Source: MECA 1999

Diesel Particulate Filters Trapped PM Cell Plugs Exhaust (PM, CO, HC) Enter Ceramic Honeycomb Wall Exhaust (CO 2, H 2 O) Out

Diesel Particulate Filters Are Efficient and Are Developing an Impressive Track Record Filter Control Capabilities –PM -- 80%->90% Reduction –CO and HC -- >90% –Toxic HCs -- >90% Reduction

ARB/ARCO/CEC Retrofit Demonstration Program Source: SAE undetectable

Filters Destroy Large Fractions of Toxic Emissions PAH Emissions Reduced by 89% PAH, mg/bhp-hr Source: MECA

Recent Data Reports nitro-PAH Are Decreased with Filters Octel, SAE TopTec 9/00

Filters Are Very Effective in Reducing Ultra-Fine Particles Post filtered gas has the same particulate concentrations as the dilution air Carbon-Based Ultra-Fine Particles Reduced by in Excess of % Peugeot SAE

Diesel Particulate Filter Retrofit Durability Vehicle Application Engine Displacement (l) and Power (hp) Accumulated Distance (mi) PM Reduction Efficiency (%) Euro ESC 1 US FTP 2 Intercity Train , Airport Bus ,53180n.a. Express Bus ,59894 Mail truck , City Bus , Refuse Truck ,34293n.a. Refuse Truck723565,74392n.a. Averages:194,

SCR SCR Applications

SCR Has Been Used Successfully on Stationary Sources and Is Now Used for Mobile Sources SCR Control Capabilities –PM – 30-50% Reduction –CO and HC -- >80% –Toxic HCs – >80% –NOx – 60 - >80%

SCR Test Results in European & US Steady State Test Cycle

Integrated System Using a DOC, DPF, and SCR Engine Catalyst/Filter SCROxidation Cat Removal of HC, CO, PM Removal of NOx Removal of NH 3 slip if required 4-way conversion Urea

Integrated System – Lean NOx Catalysis + Filter Integrate heat transfer and chemistry for simultaneous reduction of NOx, CO, HC, & PM LNC (NOx reduction) DPF (CO, HC, and PM oxidation) Dirty Exhaust In Clean Air Out Gain Heat Lose Heat Recuperator Supplementa ry HC Injection

Elements of a Proper Retrofit Control Program The Condition of the Engine Is an Important Factor in Making a Decision Whether to Retrofit Control Technology For Filter Retrofit, Vehicle Application, Exhaust Temperature (Duty Cycle), and Fuel Sulfur Level Must Be Properly Matched

Elements of a Proper Retrofit Control Program (cont.) Retrofit Technology Check List –Size Properly Sized Control Technologies Ensure Low Back Pressure and Maximum Performance –Vehicle Integration An Important Aspect of Control Technology Retrofit, but Has Been Successfully Accomplished on Both On- and Off-Road Vehicles (muffler replacement or in-line installation)

Elements of a Proper Retrofit Control Program (cont.) Retrofit Technology Check List (cont.) –Fuel Quality For PM Control, <15 ppm Allows for Maximum Emission Control Performance and Best Filter Regeneration Characteristics Oxidation Catalysts Can Be Formulated to Minimize Sulfation, but at the Expense of Some Reduced Emission Control Performance Some Technologies Can Be Applied to Certain Applications Using Fuels with Higher Sulfur Levels –Maintenance Vehicles to Be Retrofitted Should Be Properly and Regularly Maintained Retrofit Technology Should Be Maintained per Manufacturer’s Recommended Procedures

Filter System Retrofitted to a Bus

Filter System

Filter System Retrofitted to a Refuse Truck Filter System

Direct Fit In-line Converter Catalyst

Integrated Converter Muffler Muffler Replacement

Central Artery/Tunnel Project (Big Dig) Filter System

Current Cost Filter Technology –Depends on Engine Size – Approximately $ $5500 per Vehicle Depending on Type of Vehicle Integration –2-4 Hours for Installation –Ash Removal at ~60,000 Miles Oxidation Catalyst Technology –Approximately $500 - $1800 per Vehicle Depending on Type of Vehicle Integration –2 Hours for Installation –Maintenance – Periodic Inspection and Cleaning if Necessary

Current Cost (cont.) SCR –Approximately $15,000 - $50,000 per Vehicle Depending on Type of Vehicle –2 Days for Installation –Reagent Consumed at 6% of Fuel Consumption (depending on conversion efficiency, engine type, etc.) Lean-NOx/Filter Technology –$5,000 - $10,000 per Vehicle Depending on Type of Vehicle Costs for Retrofit Control Technologies Will Decrease as Sales Volumes Increase and Systems Are Fully Optimized

Stationary Engine Urea SCR Cost Effectiveness (2000 hp Diesel Engine) 400 hrs/yr 8000 hrs/yr NOx removed 11.3 TPY 225 TPY Reagent usage 22.6 TPY 450 TPY Capital recovery factor Reagent, $/ton $ 400 $ 200 Annual cost:Capital 17,800 24,960 Reagent 9,040 90,000 Total $26,840 $115,160 Cost/ton NOx removed $ 2,375 $ 512

Conclusions A Variety of Demonstrated Retrofit Technologies Are Available to Significantly Reduce PM, NOx, HC, CO, Toxic, Smoke, and Odor Emissions from Existing HDDEs A Growing Number of Retrofit Programs Are Being Successfully Implemented A Properly Designed and Implemented Program Can Achieve Important Diesel Exhaust Emission Reductions and Expedite the Use Of Clean-Diesel Engines Active Participation by All Interested Parties Will Be A Key Element in a Successful Program