Knowledge management, quality management and the challenges of digital workflow: A strategic perspective Richard Vines Quality / Knowledge Manager, Children’s.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Good governance for water, sanitation and hygiene services
Advertisements

Action Learning Set: Support for Middle Leadership in Multi- agency settings Summary of progress: January 20th Output from questionnaires: -What.
Every Child Matters: Change for Children Building a world-class workforce for children and young people David N Jones Children’s Services Improvement.
Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.
Assessing student learning from Public Engagement David Owen National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement Funded by the UK Funding Councils, Research.
Common Assessment Framework for Adults Demonstrator Site Programme Event to Support Expressions of Interest.
Head of Learning: Job description
INDIGENOUS COMMUNITY GOVERNANCE PROJECT RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP.
HR Manager – HR Business Partners Role Description
Introduction to the Victorian state disability plan 2013–2016.
The Rubric Partnership The Collaboration Rubric An action research approach to partnership building across community-based child and family networks ACWA.
Elizabeth Deane WIL symposium July One definition: The broad skills that a University expects that graduates will have acquired and be able to demonstrate.
Welcome The challenges of integrating service user and carer experiences into the Health and Social Care curriculum Reflections on an Open University.
Connecting government services to improve community outcomes Establishing Victorian state-wide area based governance architecture Presentation to the VCOSS.
The Continuous Quality Improvement Process Empowering staff to develop local level solutions.
Building Supportive Infrastructure to Support Families of Young Children A Community-Based Approach Helen Francis Frank Tesoriero Association of Children’s.
Big Sell 3 rd October 2012 CONSORTIA AND COLLABORATION Maggie Jones Children England.
Reflective Practice Leadership Development Tool. Context recognised that a key differentiator between places where people wanted to work and places where.
Lecture 13 Revision IMS Systems Analysis and Design.
More than Knowing At Mercy College Karin Gilbert & Michelle Cotter.
Domain Modelling the upper levels of the eframework Yvonne Howard Hilary Dexter David Millard Learning Societies LabDistributed Learning, University of.
Graduate Attributes Jackie Campbell, Laura Dean, Mark de Groot, David Killick, Jill Taylor.
Network of School Planners in Ireland Mark Fennell 28 th April 2012 Implementing effective changes to improve student learning:
GSIM Stakeholder Interview Feedback HLG-BAS Secretariat January 2012.
Building Inclusive Knowledge Societies Session organized by the UNCT in India and other UN entities.
Riga – Latvia, 4 & 5 December 2006
BSBIMN501A QUEENSLAND INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS ACADEMY.
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland Experience and new arrangements Ministry of Infrastructure and Development, Poland Athens,
The Development of the ACT Health ‘Walk-in Centre’ Susan Hayward Project Manager.
VCOSS Forum: Homelessness and human rights in Victoria HRBA: Achieving organisational change Tuesday 16 th November 2010.
Module CC3002 Post Implementation Issues Lecture for Week 1 AY 2013 Spring.
The Coalition for Action on ICT enabled change in Europe.
EDRMS underpinning the move toward better Knowledge Management
=_A-ZVCjfWf8 Nets for students 2007.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
NIPEC Organisational Guide to Practice & Quality Improvement Tanya McCance, Director of Nursing Research & Practice Development (UCHT) & Reader (UU) Brendan.
Schema Interoperability Liam Magee Global Cities Institute RMIT University Melbourne, Australia.
Illustrations and Answers for TDT4252 exam, June
Towards a futures strategy for the Victorian Community Services Sector A Knowledge Perspective Richard Vines Centre for Excellence in Child and Family.
BCO Impact Assessment Component 3 Scoping Study David Souter.
FLAGSHIP STRATEGY 1 STUDENT LEARNING. Student Learning: A New Approach Victorian Essential Learning Standards Curriculum Planning Guidelines Principles.
SmartNets Results Overview SmartNets SmartNets Methods.
EU Projects – FP7 Workshop 6: EU Funding –What’s Next? Carolina Fernandes Innovation & Funding Manager GLE Group.
Christine Yang March 17, As a teacher it is critical for me to demonstrate mastery of technology teacher standards. ISTE-NETS Teacher Standards.
Promoting excellence in social security Building on sector wide commonalities to enhance the benefits of Information.
Larry Stillman, Monash University Richard Vines, Childrens’ Protection Society Dean Lombard, VCOSS IT Sustainability for the community sector Progress.
Developing a Framework In Support of a Community of Practice in ABI Jason Newberry, Research Director Tanya Darisi, Senior Researcher
New approaches to Information Management systems Can a distributed approach to IM be made to work? Interoperability Working Group Richard Vines Children’s.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Processes and Practices Supporting the implementation of the Occupational Therapy and Personal Care Growth Funding Julie Cairns Project Officer for the.
ITU Strategic Planning ICE Proposal January, 2014.
Global Partnership for Enhanced Social Accountability (GPESA) December 19, 2011 World Bank.
Mapping the interoperability landscape Interoperability Working Group.
Technology-enhanced Learning: EU research and its role in current and future ICT based learning environments Pat Manson Head of Unit Technology Enhanced.
UTA/ARRI. Enterprise Engineering for The Agile Enterprise Don Liles The University of Texas at Arlington.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Education and Culture Life Long Learning: Education and Training policies School Education and Higher education.
Creating an evaluation framework to optimise practice returns: Process & progress within a large community sector organisation Australasian Evaluation.
Building and protecting futures Creating a multi-disciplinary approach across an organisation using change management, leadership and quality models that.
Building Systems for Today’s Dynamic Networked Environments A Methodology for Building Sustainable Enterprises in Dynamic Environments through knowledge.
MY TIME, OUR PLACE Framework for School Age Care In Australia Prepared by: Children’s Services Central April 2012 Team Meeting Package.
Copyright © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 44 Health Promotion Theories S. Maggie Reitz.
Leveraging Monitoring and Evaluation System for Good Governance - Indian Experience Rashmi Agrawal
A look into current and future trends in national policies for eHealth and Innovation in the WHO European Region Clayton Hamilton, eHealth and Innovation.
Spotlight on ‘standards’: 2004 update Sue Halbwirth University of Technology Sydney 5 th Annual Conference ACTKM Forum 14 October 2004 Standards Australia.
© Copyright Richard Dealtry th & 10 th February 2012 Revolutionary Corporate University Forum Web:
FILM AND PUBLICATIONS BOARD
Introduction to the Victorian state disability plan 2013–2016
12th Biennial National Conference Choices that matter: ECI in a new era … A collaborative project to support early childhood educators to support inclusion.
Claire NAUWELAERS, independent policy expert
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland
Presentation transcript:

Knowledge management, quality management and the challenges of digital workflow: A strategic perspective Richard Vines Quality / Knowledge Manager, Children’s Protection Society VCOSS Interoperability Working Group Establishing an information management system integrated with a digital workflow so as to best manage client and organisational information

Aim is to emphasise that: Service delivery is human centric (personal / tacit knowledge) Technology is transforming the sensemaking process of service delivery (with the focus on evidence-informed decision making and explicit knowledge) We are in the midst of a huge transformation, where practitioners and technologists will need to come together more effectively (mixing and matching personal / tacit / explicit knowledge) We are grappling with the challenge of “outcomes and social impact” Establishing an information management system integrated with a digital workflow so as to best manage client and organisational information Objective is to highlight that: To build a digital workflow culture within the community sector there is a need for new expressions of governance and partnership

Is there a workflow problem? Three background articles to give extra context. VCOSS Congress paper 2007: Part 1: Introduction to the Interoperability Working GroupIntroduction to the Interoperability Working Group Part 2 Cooperative Federalism, Social Inclusion and InteroperabilityCooperative Federalism, Social Inclusion and Interoperability These papers reflect the knowledge of sector practitioners and the sorts of thinking that have gone into scoping the nature of the problems in relation in ICT infrastructure The VCOSS Interoperability Working Group discussion paper downloadable herehere Back to basics

Some background resources about the nature of print – electronic convergence Vines, R. 2006a. In-house printing to Document Workflow. A guide for the better serving of readers, users and knowledge workers in an era of communications and digital media convergence. White Paper, Network of In-house Print Professionals, Australasia, Canon Australia. - Vines, R., Hall, W.P “Riding the waves of technological convergence in the media publishing industries”, Printers Post - Vines, R An analysis of the effectiveness and value of having a centralised print / copy facility within an organisation. Canon Australia. White Paper prepared for the Network of In-house Print Professionals - Australasia - Print and electronic convergence in large complex enterprises (and sectors) The challenges of multiple quality standards and Interoperability Vines, R. McCarthy, G., Jones, M. August Decreasing the Burden - Increasing the Impact. Enabling the growth of quality-knowledge within the Victorian Community Sector. Report prepared for the Office for the Community Sector. DPCD Melbourne. Back to basics

Productivity Commission report The tranformational stretch? The focus on IM and knowledge systems Back to basics

Quality management forms a part of an overall approach to strengthening knowledge capacity Knowledge capacity is best understood as the means by which the quality of decision making and innovation is continuously enhanced. [The focus is on distributed decision making capacity (not centralised procedural type decision making]. The objective is to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of generating solutions to problems and to support the adaptive capacity to implement, monitor and improve the effectiveness of solutions Exploring the relationship between quality management and knowledge management Domain inter-relationship

Plan (Sensemaking / decision options / program logics) Monitor (Data and information agenda) Evaluate (Single and double loop analysis) Decision support system Client outcomes and social impact Taking actions with the end in mind Adaptive capacity Decision to act Building Knowledge Capacity at the Community Services Organisation (CSO) level Domain inter-relationship

Building Knowledge Capacity at the CSO level Organisational mindfulness Human Centric ICT solutions The socio-technical organisation Domain inter-relationship This cycle occurs at multiple levels of context

Building Knowledge Capacity at the CSO level Shine a spotlight on areas of emergence How mindful are we in our organisational work? Domain inter-relationship Human Centric ICT solutions

Building Knowledge Capacity at the CSO level Shine a spotlight on areas of emergence How well are we fairing in this matter on knowing what might be the social impact of our programs? How mindful are we in our organisational work? Domain inter-relationship

Building Knowledge Capacity at the CSO level – discussion 1—2—3—4—5—6—7 How would you describe your ICT solutions that contribute to providing data and Information about client outcomes and social impact? Record one word that comes to mind Very poorExcellent Domain inter-relationship

Building Knowledge Capacity at the CSO level – discussion 1—2—3—4—5—6—7 How would you describe your organisation’s planning capacity in relation to reporting on client outcomes and social impact Record one word that comes to mind Very poorExcellent Domain inter-relationship

Building Knowledge Capacity at the CSO level – discussion How would you describe your organisation’s systematic use of data and information to support the continuous improvement of your organisation’s activities? Record one word that comes to mind 1—2—3—4—5—6—7 Very poorExcellent Domain inter-relationship

Building Knowledge Capacity at the CSO level How many years would you estimate it will take for your organisation to be able to claim it is systematically contributing to knowledge capacity? Cannot say 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years over 5 years Record one word that comes to mind Domain inter-relationship

1—2—3—4—5—6—7 How would you describe your ICT solutions that contribute to providing data and Information about client outcomes and social impact? Very poorExcellent How would you describe your organisation’s planning capacity in relation to reporting on client outcomes and social impact How would you describe your organisation’s systematic use of data and information to support the continuous improvement of your organisation’s activities? How many years would you estimate it will take for your organisation to be able to claim it is systematically contributing to knowledge capacity? Cannot say 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years over 5 years Summary of questions for breakout discussions Knowledge capacity is best understood as the means by which the quality of decision making and innovation is continuously enhanced. [The focus is on distributed decision making capacity - not centralised procedural type decision making]. The objective is to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of generating solutions to problems and to support the adaptive capacity to implement, monitor and improve the effectiveness of solutions

Do our current quality systems contribute to knowledge capacity?

Visualisation of the different standards Disability HASS FRSP Family services HACC Source: BISQAS project

Cross linking of the “see also” relationships This represents only about 40% of the complexity Source: BISQAS project

Cross mapping of possibilities to re-use evidence Acknowledge the efforts of other members of the BISQAS project team: Gavan McCarthy Michael Jones Mark Graham Joanne Evans Ailie Smith Helen Morgan Simon Porter From the University of Melbourne eScholarship Research Centre Also thank you to Chris Kirk (Exact Data) for his intellectual contribution to this thinking Source: BISQAS project

Building Knowledge Capacity at the SECTOR level National impactStatewide impact Regional impact Catchment impact

The world of digital media convergence and the Community sector Why is this issue important? For example What stake will the community sector have in the national broad band infrastructure? Will the sector have a place at the governance level? Can the knowledge capacity of the sector be strengthened?

E-text convergence and the notion of markup

MEMO TO: David FROM: Robert SUBJECT:Meeting tomorrow DATE:October 29, 2009 Can we meet to discuss the next stage of the project Example: visual manifestation What would you do if you wanted to send this memo (authored in MS word) to a PDA somewhere in the world? The notion of markup

[FIXED FORMAT] MEMO TO: =First name FROM: = Last name SUBJECT:= Subject DATE:=Meeting date [Fixed format] Can we meet to discuss the next stage of the project Example: Data base approach The notion of markup

David Robert Meeting tomorrow Can we meet to discuss the next stage of the project ? start tag end tag Markup approach Well formed XML – involves both syntax and semantics The rules about the definitions of tags is what XML schemas do. Negotiated agreements about schemas can be published as standards The notion of markup Memo schema consists of: To, From, Subject, Date, Para Front, Body

Reminder of objective To build a digital workflow culture within the sector there is a need for new expressions of governance and partnership

Sector based knowledge management CSO based schemas – data dictionaries Feedback loops Sector based standards – data dictionaries Feedback loops These are theories that provide data as a decision support system The KM principle: theories are fallible and need to continuously reviewed based on the evidence of what works in the world

Growth in knowledge through time Passage of time Building knowledge capacity (increasing the impact) Upgrading to new standards through time Systematic collation of current and evolving evidence Linking to a research agenda and testing the evidence base Authoritative location of standards and regulations Defined publishing schemas as standards Feedback loop Feedback loop Feedback loop Feedback loop Feedback loop The idea of constructing quality- knowledge (Through time) Source: BISQAS project Passage of time

Governance and partnership

Thank you Richard Vines