June 21, 2011 CCSSO-NCSA Stretching NAEP – But in Which Directions? 6/21/11CCSSO-NCSA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Analyzing Student Work
Assessment Adapted from text Effective Teaching Methods Research-Based Practices by Gary D. Borich and How to Differentiate Instruction in Mixed Ability.
PORTFOLIO.
The Need To Improve STEM Learning Successful K-12 STEM is essential for scientific discovery, economic growth and functioning democracy Too.
Dennis M. Williams, Jr., Principal Dr. Susan Bitner, Assistant Principal Ralph Rapino, Assistant Principal William Miles, Assistant Principal Louis James,
Iowa Assessment Update School Administrators of Iowa November 2013 Catherine Welch Iowa Testing Programs.
The Common Core State Standards. What is the Common Core (CCSS)? A state-led effort to develop a common set of standards in English language arts (ELA)
Making preparations in Ohio: Common Core and Ohio’s Revised Academic Content Standards New System of Assessments.
Kansas Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: March 10, 2011 Updates.
Large Scale Assessment Conference June 22, 2004 Sue Rigney U.S. Department of Education Assessments Shall Provide for… Participation of all students Reasonable.
Summer Leadership Institute
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Common Core State Standards & Assessment Update The Next Step in Preparing Michigan’s Students for Career and College MERA Spring Conference May 17, 2011.
OCTOBER ED DIRECTOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 10/1/14 POWERFUL & PURPOSEFUL FEEDBACK.
Tools for Instruction and Assessment for the Maryland College- and Career-Ready Standards Time to Revisit Tools that will Inform Instruction.
1 North Dakota Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Grades K-12 Adopted June 2011 Effective July 1, 2013 “After July 1, 2013, all public school districts.
Consortia of States Assessment Systems Instructional Leaders Roundtable November 18, 2010.
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
KEYS to School Improvement Missouri National Education Association Teaching and Learning Director.
NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,
The Common Core: Moving Ohio Forward Stan W. Heffner Superintendent of Public Instruction February 15, 2012.
Ohio’s Assessment Future The Common Core & Its Impact on Student Assessment Evidence by Jim Lloyd Source doc: The Common Core and the Future of Student.
November 7,  Provisos are in annual Appropriations Bills  Proviso 1A.60 included in bill  Very prescriptive.
TODAY Observations Hypotheses Connection to Student Performance CSIP ASPIRING Goal(s) Objectives & Actions.
Common Core State Standards Background and ELA Overview Created By: Penny Plavala, Literacy Specialist.
Curriculum and Learning Omaha Public Schools
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
Copyright ©2006. Battelle for Kids. Understanding & Using Value-Added Analysis.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
OASD Annual Report October 14, 2013 Maximizing Opportunities For Success.
The Instructional Decision-Making Process 1 hour presentation.
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
Polk County Public Schools through Strategic Plan.
{ Principal Leadership Evaluation. The VAL-ED Vision… The construction of valid, reliable, unbiased, accurate, and useful reporting of results Summative.
A significant and historic opportunity for states to collectively develop and adopt a core set of academic standards in Mathematics and English/Language.
The College Board Standards for College Success CCSSO – SEC State Collaborative Alignment Study CCSSO-SEC Meeting and Content Analysis Workshop San Diego,
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
June 22, 2011 CCSSO-NCSA Innovative Approaches to Statewide Writing Assessments 6/22/11CCSSO-NCSA.
Dr. Nancy S. Grasmick July 26,2012.  Maryland is proud to be the top-ranked state in U.S. growth as reported in this study, and judged by Education Week.
Georgia’s Changing Assessment Landscape Melissa Fincher, Ph.D. Associate Superintendent for Assessment and Accountability Georgia Department for Education.
Developing NAEP Frameworks: A Look Inside the Process Mary Crovo Deputy Executive Director National Assessment Governing Board November 17, 2007.
1. 2 Agenda  What is ReadiStep™?  The College Readiness Pathway  Basics  Coordinating the ReadiStep Program –Before the Test –On Test Day –After the.
Race to the Top General Assessment Session Atlanta, Georgia November 17, 2009 Louis M. (Lou) Fabrizio, Ph.D. Director of Accountability Policy & Communications.
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
Smarter Balanced Field Test March 3, 2014 Sequim School District.
North Carolina Read to Achieve. The Goal “The goal of the State is to ensure that every student read at or above grade level by the end of third grade.
 What is it?  What is tested?  Who, When and Where?  Why take it?  How to get ready?  Scores? 1.
Standards Instruction Assessment Feedback. Session Outcomes Participants will:  Develop an understanding of the Test and Quizzes application in BCPS.
Aiken County Public Schools’ Middle School STEM Initiative April 15, 2014.
Understanding AzMERIT Results and Score Reporting An Overview.
21 st Century Learning and Instruction Session 2: Balanced Assessment.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Teachers of Teachers of Mathematics (TOTOM) Bend, OR September 6, 2013 Mark Freed, ODE Mathematics Education Specialist ODE Update.
U SING D ATA TO ASSESS AND INFORM SCHOOL CHANGE Data for change Presenter: Judith Marty Principal Mater Academy Charter Middle High.
STRUCTURE STANDING COMMITTEES - CURRENT, COMPREHENSIVE CURRICULUM AVAILABLE TO ALL INSTRUCTIONAL STAFF IN A USER-FRIENDLY, ONLINE FORMAT EXTERNAL ALIGNMENT.
Summer Institutes 2013 Changing Teacher Practice Changing Student Outcomes.
Common Core Study Session LVUSD. Agenda LVUSD transition to Common Core Strategic Plan goals for 13/14 Demonstration of NGA & Common Core Instructional.
Required Skills for Assessment Balance and Quality: 10 Competencies for Educational Leaders Assessment for Learning: An Action Guide for School Leaders.
Rising Sun School District Summative Stocktake. 2 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute Our district’s primary goal consists of four strategies StrategyOwner.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
CaMSP Science Assessment Webinar Public Works, Inc. Sharing Lessons Learned in the Development and Use of Science Assessments for CaMSP Teachers and Students.
TAP Math: Teachers and Administrators Partnering for Mathematics Learning Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Department of Education funded through.
California Assessment of STUDENT PERFORMANCE and PROGRESS
NWEA Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)
Louisiana’s Comprehensive Assessment System
To Improve Instruction
State Assessment Update
Presentation transcript:

June 21, 2011 CCSSO-NCSA Stretching NAEP – But in Which Directions? 6/21/11CCSSO-NCSA

Stretching NAEP … Moderator David Driscoll, Chair, National Assessment Governing Board Panelists Lou Fabrizio, Director of Accountability Policy & Communications NC Dept. of Public Instruction Steven Paine, VP Strategic Planning and Business Development, CTB/McGraw Hill W. James Popham, Professor Emeritus, UCLA Cornelia Orr, Executive Director, NAGB CCSSO-NCSA 2 6/21/11

Discussing Ideas for Stretching NAEP Session Format Presentation of Ideas (20 min.) Small Group Discussions (30 min.) 1.Discussion suggestions presented 2.Identify other “stretch” possibilities Large Group Discussion (30 min.) CCSSO-NCSA 3 6/21/11

Making a Difference NAEP as part of the National Effort to:  Improve Student Achievement  Close Achievement Gaps Using NAEP tools and audiences examples  12 th Graders Taking NAEP Test Seriously  Parents Understanding Proficiency CCSSO-NCSA 4 6/21/11

Ex. Ideas for Stretching NAEP Find appropriate ways to inform parents about NAEP and the urgency of addressing the achievement gap Make NAEP results and NAEP resources—such as test items, data, and frameworks—accessible and useful to teachers Provide feedback to students who participate in NAEP about how they perform Provide NAEP items for diagnostic assessments Make information on NAEP more accessible by widespread audiences CCSSO-NCSA 5 6/21/11

Your Ideas Motivation of students – giving feedback Let districts who want to be involved participate Motivate locals by sharing information with them Document relationship with Common Motivation partnership with parents and PTOs (NAEP Parent Institute-certification or promoters of NAEP) Use/promote use of NAEP tools, Real Estate ? Use results at the school level CCSSO-NCSA 6 6/21/11

Your Ideas School-level reporting What is happening in the field Linking to CC Assessments Use of Computer adaptive testing (better estimates) Opportunity to partner with parents (better communication and information) Why 12 th grade, why not 10 th grade to make the use of the data more useable locally CCSSO-NCSA 7 6/21/11

Your Ideas Giving better results at the school level Give other things to schools, not just results (ex. Prof. development) Making reports easier for parents to understand Common Core – why do we need NAEP? Give oversampled student results Making NAEP more relevant today – connections to the Common Core CCSSO-NCSA 8 6/21/11

Your Ideas Sprinkle NAEP items in State Assessment 11 th grade Other grade – end of 9 or 10 Below state NAEP expanded opportunities Work with consortia to adopt scale for achievement PSA RE: importance of NAEP NAEP Tool more accessible for schools Reporters – something down and dirty “how to use NAEP data” CCSSO-NCSA 9 6/21/11

Your Ideas Inclusion policy – move toward more consistency Provide models for state assessments about how innovations can move forward More embedded in Common Core Motivation in 12 th grade – schools don’t have an accurate idea about NAEP Communicate with parents and the public about what NAEP is, ex., podcasts CCSSO-NCSA 10 6/21/11

Your Ideas Value of NAEP data to the field staff (don’t know how data can be used and can’t sell it) and schools Feedback to schools – would be useful and national in schools Continue to help states strengthen tests and curriculum NAEP continues to be relevant even in the Common Core era CCSSO-NCSA 11 6/21/11

Your Ideas NAEP continue to point out variable rigor on proficient Open new frontiers in assessment, ex. Online assessment R&D, pioneer, make mistakes, Advantages of NAEP sampling, techniques, assessing SWD Emphasize descriptive information (not accountability) Keep agenda of other content areas CCSSO-NCSA 12 6/21/11

Your Ideas Difference of preparedness vs. readiness think about careers Getting back to basics – leadership in psychometrics Linking – increasing links to other assessment (SAT, etc.), increasing opportunities for student linking 4 th to 8 th, mini diagnostic tool using released items Feedback to students teachers and schools CCSSO-NCSA 13 6/21/11

Your Ideas NAEP linking classroom instructional practice in the classroom to scores Public document – lessons learned and common misconceptions Common Core Repository info for/from the Consortia and alignment Connecting state level data to NAEP data Connect Question tool to Consortia Definition of Preparedness CCSSO-NCSA 14 6/21/11

Your Ideas Don’t do any of the ideas. Use the bully pulpit of NAEP to argue for best psychometric practices to reduce sampling error (pilot testing practices) and maintain high reliability on produced test. Continue to focus on what NAEP does well. Study bumps in the scores to determine contributing factors. CCSSO-NCSA 15 6/21/11

Contact Information Cornelia Orr, Executive Director National Assessment Governing Board CCSSO-NCSA 16 6/21/11