Implementing an Effective Congestion Management Process Development Framework Frankfort, KY August 21, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Interim Guidance on the Application of Travel and Land Use Forecasting in NEPA Statewide Travel Demand Modeling Committee October 14, 2010.
Advertisements

Statewide Mobility Performance Measures Team Meeting Webinar June 17, 2013.
Wade E. Kline, AICP Community Development Planner.
I-80 Corridor System Management Plan Alameda County Transportation Commission ACTAC Meeting September 7, 2010.
Congestion Management System The Mobility Management Process.
Management and Operations In MPO Planning Christopher O’Neill.
Nathan Masek, AICP 18 th ITS World Congress, October
Transportation Data Palooza Washington, DC May 9, 2013 Steve Mortensen Federal Transit Administration Data for Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Analysis,
Transportation Planning Section, Transportation Development Division Oregon Transportation Plan 2005 Modeling Alternative Policy Choices Becky Knudson,
Operations Planning Organizing for Travel Time Reliability Ohio Planning Conference July 15, 2014.
May 28, Vision Statement and Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures for the 2040 LRTP Status of these items: Draft Approved by LRTP Subcommittee.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Planning Process & Alternatives Analysis Unit 7: Forecasting and Encouraging Ridership.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
Navigating SB 375: CEQA Streamlining and SB 743 Transportation Analysis 2014 San Joaquin Valley Fall Policy Conference.
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Act of 2011 Potential Freight Implications FHWA Talking Freight December 2011 Tony Furst, Director FHWA.
Transportation Planning Board: Background, Constrained Long- Range Plan, and Ongoing Work Presentation to the Board of Directors Metropolitan Washington.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Integrated Corridor Analysis Tool (ICAT) William W. Stoeckert I-95 Corridor Coalition.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Incorporating Management and Operations and the Congestion Management Process into Metropolitan Transportation Planning FHWA/FTA Webinar June 24, 2008.
A Case Study of Promoting Metropolitan Freight Collaboration: The Twin Cities Experience Performance Management Framework Minnesota Department of Transportation.
TSM&O FLORIDA’S STATEWIDE IMPLEMENTATION Elizabeth Birriel, PEElizabeth Birriel, PE Florida Department of TransportationFlorida Department of TransportationTranspo2012.
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
Multimodal Corridor System Management – Incorporating Analysis of Transit, Demand Management Programs and Operational Strategies Presented by Bill Loudon,
Connectivity & Mobility
Jennifer Murray Traffic Forecasting Section Chief, WisDOT Metropolitan Planning Organization Quarterly Meeting July 28 th, 2015.
North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department Summary Presentation January 2004 MOBILITY 2025: THE METROPOLITAN.
May 14, Our transportation system will provide a safe and accessible range of options that enhances existing urban areas communities while providing.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Lance Neumann Cambridge Systematics, Inc. August.
California Department of Transportation Transportation Management Systems (TMS) and their role in addressing congestion Discussion Materials Lake Arrowhead.
RPS Modeling Results Presentation to RPS Policy Committee Brian Gregor Transportation Planning Analysis Unit June 6,
November 30, 2012 Beverly Davis, AICP Ron Ratliff, AICP.
Managed Lanes CE 550: Advanced Highway Design Damion Pregitzer.
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Major Transportation Corridor Studies Using an EMME/2 Travel Demand Forecasting Model: The Trans-Lake Washington Study Carlos Espindola, Youssef Dehghani.
Transportation Planning Process Freight Transportation Planning Workshop July 11, 2001.
FDOT Transit Office Modeling Initiatives The Transit Office has undertaken a number of initiatives in collaboration with the Systems Planning Office and.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop presented by Krista Jeannotte Cambridge Systematics, Inc. March.
Strategic Highway Research Program 2 Project L07 Identification and Evaluation of the Cost- Effectiveness of Highway Design Features to Reduce Nonrecurrent.
1 Using Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Technologies and Strategies to Better Manage Congestion Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator of.
Linking Planning and Operations in Las Vegas Talking Operations Seminar March 23, 2005.
Draft 2008 Congestion Management Process (CMP) Technical Report Andrew J. Meese COG/TPB Staff TPB Technical Committee June 6, 2008 Item # 8.
Review of the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) 2007 Urban Mobility Report By Ronald F. Kirby Daivamani Sivasailam TPB Technical Committee October 5,
The Fargo/Moorhead Area Interstate Operations Study Opportunities and Planned Activities Presentation for the Mn/DOT Travel Demand Modeling Coordinating.
Analyzing the Mobility Impacts of TOD Level of Service in Transit Oriented Districts Service for Who?
TPB CLRP Aspirations Scenario 2012 CLRP and Version 2.3 Travel Forecasting Model Update Initial Results Ron Kirby Department of Transportation Planning.
1 Update on the Congestion Management Process (CMP) and Related Data Activities Wenjing Pu COG/TPB Staff Travel Management Subcommittee Meeting May 26,
Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015 Freight Master Plan.
Integrated Corridor Management Initiative ITS JPO Lead: Mike Freitas Technical Lead: John Harding, Office of Transportation Management.
1 Briefing on the Congestion Management Process (CMP) Andrew J. Meese, AICP Melanie Wellman COG/TPB Staff Travel Management Subcommittee November 27, 2007.
Review of the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) 2007 Urban Mobility Report By Ronald F. Kirby Presentation to Transportation Planning Board October.
Transportation System Management & Intelligent Transportation Systems May 5, 2009 Steve Heminger Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
TRAVEL TIME ANALYSIS Use of Data IN-KY-OH Traffic Incident Management Conference October 9, 2015 Dayton, OH.
The Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study Initial Results of CLRP/CLRP+ Analysis with Round 6.4 Growth Forecasts and Five Alternative Land Use Scenarios.
December 17, 2010 Developing Transit Performance Measures for Integrated Multi-Modal Corridor Management.
Company LOGO Georgia Truck Lane Needs Identification Study Talking Freight Seminar March 19, 2008 Matthew Fowler, P.T.P Assistant State Planning Administrator.
Summary of the WILMAPCO Congestion Management Process Prepared for T3 Webinar September 18, 2007.
1 National Governors Association Roundtable Presentation April 2, 2001 Dr. Christine Johnson Director, ITS Joint Program Office Program Manager, FHWA Operations.
Intelligent and Non-Intelligent Transportation Systems 32 Foundations of Technology Standard 18 Students will develop an understanding of and be able to.
Unit 2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (LRTP) LCTCC Educational Program.
SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE MEASURES, RANKING AND PRIORITIZATION CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PLANS INCORPORATION INTO STIP & TIP STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION MONITOR.
Virginia House Bill 2 – Funding the Right Projects Intelligent Transportation System Activities May 19, 2016.
Office of Freight Management and Operations 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington, D.C FHWA Freight Intermodal.
0 Freight Activities: Year in Review Dec. 12 th 2015.
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE Congestion Management Process Plan (CMPP) Major Update February 24, 2016.
Unit 1 THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS AND THE ROLE OF THE MPO LCTCC Educational Program.
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
Performance Measure Exploration Preparing for the 2018 RTP
San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan update
Category 2 Parameters Transportation Management Areas (TMA) – 200,000+ pop. 8 TMAs in Texas Austin Corpus Christi Dallas-Fort Worth El Paso Hidalgo County.
Presentation transcript:

Implementing an Effective Congestion Management Process Development Framework Frankfort, KY August 21, 2008

Learning Objectives Highlight integration of planning process and management and operations objectives Discuss the CMP eight step process Highlight good practice for each step Focus on performance measures, strategies and evaluation techniques

CMS to CMP in 8 Steps or Less 2. Area of Application 3. System Definition (modes & network) 4.Performance Measures 5. Performance Monitoring Plan 6. Identification/ Evaluation of Strategies 7. Implementation & Management 8. Monitor Strategy Effectiveness 1. Develop Regional Operations Objectives

CMP in TMA’s shall provide for effective management and operations to address congestion management. CMP should be part of developing the Plan and TIP

Steps in Development of Regional Operations Objectives Consider 8 Planning Factors in creating regional goals Develop objectives relating to goal achievement Ensure measurability and outcomes Foster coordination with stakeholders

The 8 Steps of the CMP Framework Define Congestion for your area

Definitions Goals: Generalized statements which broadly relate the physical environment to values Objectives: Specific, measurable statements related to the attainment of goals Goal C Objective C-1Objective C-3Objective C-2 Start with Goals and Objectives

Be SMART about Objectives Specific Measurable Agreed Realistic Time-bound

Objectives-Driven Planning Objectives = specific, measurable statements, based on goals, relating to the attainment of system performance Examples (all relating to a goal of congestion reduction): Over the next 3-5 years, reduce the clearance time of traffic incidents on freeways and major arteries in the region from a current average of X minutes to an average of Y minutes. Over the next 3-5 years, reduce the variability in travel time on freeways and major arteries in the region such that 95% of trips (19 out of 20) have travel times no more than 1.5 times the average travel time for a specific time of day. By 2012, enhance connectivity among transit services so that transfers between transit modes (rail, bus) and operators are seamless and can occur with one “smart card”

North Jersey MPO Example CMP Performance Goals Strategy Analysis – Examination of CMP-related projects – Prioritization of new strategies and projects for the Regional Transportation Plan – Identification of new strategies and projects for implementation by appropriate agencies

Eight Goal Categories (district based) Accessibility Reliability Sustainability Intermodality Highway Mobility Transit Mobility Walk/Bike Mobility Freight Mobility

CMP Integration w/Plan & TIP Common set of performance measures with Plan and TIP and regional operations and management strategies Common set of goals and objectives with Plan and TIP and regional operations and management strategies

CMP/Planning Process Relationships Regional ITS Architecture TIP project selection criteria NEPA documentation

2. Define Area of Application What geographic area? – Entire TMA boundary – Planning boundary (model network) What level of network facilities? – Highway Facilities (Interstate, Arterials, Collectors, etc.) – Transit Routes – Freight Corridors, Intermodal Connectors

CMP Process – Step 1 Defining the System Define the Transportation Modes Congestion Identification will be limited to roadway congestion for this report. Congestion Solutions, however, will include all modes Source: Wilmapco

3. Define System Characteristics Multimodal in Nature Corridors, Activity Centers, Hot Spots What level of network facilities? – Highway Facilities (Interstate, Arterials, Collectors, etc.) – Transit Routes

CMP Defining the System Define the Transportation Network CMP Network consists of all roads in the region with functional classification of Minor Arterial and higher (plus some additional roads suggested by the CMP Subcommittee). Source: Wilmapco

CMP Network – Hampton Roads, VA MPO CMP network includes all minor arterials and above, as well as selected collectors Over 1,500 roadway segments (1,300 centerline miles) CMP network = Long range planning network CMP database includes various traffic characteristics for each roadway segment

CMP Network – Greenville, SC MPO

 Objectives need performance measures  They reveal the extent to which alternative actions or plans will lead to the attainment of an objective Goal C Objective C-1 PM C1a PM C1b PM C1c 4. Develop the Performance Measures Build a Hierarchy

CMP & Performance Measures Measure the Extent of Congestion Evaluate Strategy Effectiveness Establish in a Cooperative Fashion Federal Requirements

Selecting Measures Be Measurable Have a clear and intuitive meaning Be comparable across time and geographical areas (facilities,corridors, subareas) Have a relationship to actual system operations Provide for cost-effective data collection

Application of Measures Facility Corridor Subarea Forecastable

Performance Measures Travel Time – Average Travel Time (LOS, contours, etc.) – Average Peak Period Travel Time by Functional Class – Origin/Destination Travel Time – Percent of Time Average Speed Below – Average Travel Speed

Congestion Measure Thresholds % of Time at Free Flow Speed – Serious < 40% – Congested > 40% and < 50% – Marginal> 50% and < 65% – OK> 65% and < 80% – Good>80% Source: Greenville, SC MPO

Congestion Analysis – Hampton Roads Morning and afternoon peak hour LOS determined for CMS network – Three time periods analyzed Existing TIP programmed projects (6 year horizon) Long range (20+ year horizon) Map Existing PM Peak Hour Congestion Level Peninsula South Joins Map 9 – Peninsula North Joins Map 13 – Southside WestJoins Map 15 – Southside East

Performance Measures (2) Delay – Number of Delays per Trip – Percent Incident Delays per VMT – Annual Vehicle Delay Due to Recurring Congestion – Annual Vehicle Delay Due to Incidents

Detailed Analytical Tools Localized Delay – Hidalgo, TX MPO

Performance Measures (3) Capacity – Volume of Traffic vs. Capacity by Functional Classification – Congestion Index – VMT/Lane Mile

V/C Ratios – good for small TMAs Wilmapco, DE Syracuse, NY Providence, RI

Potential Truck-Related Measures Percent Truck VMT by Congestion Level Spot Delay Measures (e.g.,weigh stations) Average Truck Trip Time and Distance

Freight-related Good Practice Puget Sound Regional Council (Seattle) - CMP addresses incident management response on prioritized truck routes Metroplan Orlando – designates truck routes and tracks congestion separately

Potential Transit Operational Measures Passengers/revenue vehicle mile Passenger/revenue vehicle hour Peak Passengers/seat Average vehicle speed/travel time per mile Percentage of on-time arrivals

Transit-related Good Practice Wilmapco (Wilmington, DE) – adding performance measure “transit load factor”

Model-related Measures Number & Percentage Miles Congested Number & Percentage Lane-Miles Congested Number & Percentage of VMT Congested Average Vehicle Speed (VMT/VHT) Number & Percentage PMT Congested Average Person Speed (PMT/PHT)

Performance Measures Linkage Performance Measures Crashes per VMT Crashes per capita Hours of delay Congestion index Objective Reduce rate of motor vehicle crashes Decrease travel times for commuting SafetyMobility Goal Ensure high standards of safety in the system Provide access to jobs, housing, and economic activities

CMP Congestion Definition & Identification Developing Performance Measures 1. Roadway Volume/Capacity Ratio 2. Intersection Level of Service 3. Percent Under Posted Speed Source: Wilmapco

5. Develop Performance Monitoring Plan What data is/will be available? – Travel surveys – Traffic counts – HPMS – ITS detection – Aerial surveys – Speed data collection

CMP Data – Hampton Roads MPO CMP database includes various traffic characteristics for each roadway segment – Daily volumes – Roadway characteristics – Peak hour data – Truck data – Travel time data – GIS data

GPS receiver: data collection Easy to use Small & simple to use (1 button) Place on dashboard, No antenna required PDA not needed for simple runs Good accuracy ( good matches to GIS data) Inexpensive: $180 including PDA software Purchased 6 units for CRCOG Up to 6 different staff members Ample capacity Stores 50,000 data points (>24 hrs) Battery: 8 hours before recharging Other equipment tested: More features Too expensive ($1500) Too bulky Too hard to use Operator error Not ‘hands free’

Stopped at back of queue Stopped in queue Traffic signal Taking a closer look at plotted data

6. Identify and Evaluate Strategies Establish “toolbox” of available strategies Inventory available analytical tools Evaluate strategies for feasibility at congested locations Develop short-list for implementation or further study

Consider Strategy Impacts Implementation Difficulty Social Impacts Air Quality Impacts Environmental Impacts Safety Impacts

CMP Toolbox of Strategies Demand management measures Operational improvements Capacity Expansion

Toolbox of Mitigation Strategies

Demand Management Strategies Transit/Ridesharing Improvements Non-motorized travel options Alternative work hours Travel behavior modification Pricing Land use management

Operational Improvements Traffic Engineering Improvements Incident Management Transit Service Improvements Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) technologies High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes

Land Use Management Smart Growth Strategies – Mixed Use Development – In-fill Development – Nontraditional Modes – Access Management

Supply Management Traffic Engineering Improvements Incident Management Transit Service Improvements Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) technologies High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes

Travel Behavior Modification Employer Support Programs Alternative Work Schedules Teleworking Financial Incentives Congestion Pricing

New Capacity In TMAs designated as non-attainment for ozone or carbon monoxide, significant additional capacity for SOVs requires additional analysis demonstrating the extra capacity is warranted!

Traffic Signal System Improvement Program Area faced poorly timed & coordinated systems across jurisdiction lines, MPO with local cities’ traffic engineers creates 6 year work program, updated every 4 years, Funded by CMAQ, MPO Program staffed by 3 Engineers & 3 Technicians.

ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES

Sample Analytical Activities Identify Existing and Future Congestion Identify congestion problems and causes Evaluate demand management strategies Evaluate operational management strategies Predict system performance Evaluate SOV capacity expansion Evaluate strategy effectiveness

Congestion Analysis – Hampton Roads MPO Identified congested locations Created a congestion mitigation “toolbox” Recommended congestion management strategies for those locations without funded improvements Results incorporated into long range planning process Results also used in CMAQ and RSTP project selection

CMP Evaluation Tools Empirical Data Travel Demand Model Arterial/Intersection Simulation TDM Model Land Use Model Highway Capacity Manual

7. Implementation and Management MPO coordinates with project sponsors to select appropriate implementation strategies Categorize selected strategies as short-term or long-term in scope of completion CMP outcomes reflected in LRP updates and TIP project selection

Priorities in Plan & TIP

8. Monitor Strategy Effectiveness Evaluate effectiveness of implemented strategies in context of performance measures Document successes/failures Feedback to beginning steps of CMP for future iterations

Data Collection Needs Traffic Counts Screenline Counts Toll Counts Transit Boarding Counts Travel Times Vehicle Occupancy Crash Locations

Traffic Data Total Volume Bus Volume Truck Volume Auto Occupancy Bus Load Factor Average Link Speed

Example Benefits of Operations and Management Example Strategy Freeway Management Arterial Operations Benefits Ramp metering in Minneapolis: 22% decrease in mainline travel times Adaptive signal controls/Canadian cities: delay decreases from 15-40% Incident management such as Seattle, DC, San Antonio: reduced clearance times of 20-50%; reduced secondary accidents by 30% Big I project/Albuquerque: reduced average clearance times by 44% Incident Management Construction Work Zone Traffic Management Traveler Information RWIS Simulations show reductions in travel time of 1-3 percent An anti-icing program Idaho reduced accident frequencies by 83%

Big Picture Thoughts

Outline Tasks in UPWP Develop integration with planning process Continue to monitor the CMP network Review performance measures for CMP network Select high priority corridor(s), isolated intersections, etc. for further review Perform additional data collection for priority review locations

Guidance for Staff CMP Efforts MPO policy board committee MPO technical committee MPO technical sub-committee Special Task Force Citizen’s Advisory Group

Implementation Issues Time and Fiscal Constraints Operations Objectives Multimodal Approach Project Prioritization Linkage to NEPA Process Documentation of SOV Analysis

Summary – CMP Framework 1. Regional Operations Objectives 2. Area of Application 3. Networks 4. Performance Measures 5.Monitor/Analyze Performance 6.Identify/Assess Strategies 7.Implement and Management 8.Monitor Effectiveness

Resources “Congestion Management Process (CMP) Innovations: A Menu of Options” Prepared for NY State Association of MPO’s Prepared by ICF Consulting – February 24,

Resources FHWA CMP and M&O Guidebooks Office of Planning, Environment and Realty – Planning for Operations –

CMP Case Studies WILMPACO Hampton Roads Planning District Commission North Jersey MPO

For further information contact: Brian Betlyon Metropolitan Planning Specialist FHWA Resource Center Phone (410)

CMP Perfection???