Module 6.1 Contaminant Monitoring Part 1 – Promoting food safety along the food chain.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Significance of ISO to the Food Industry
Advertisements

Geneva, Switzerland, June 2000
Workshop on Good Agricultural Practices, Rome October 2004 Good Agricultural Practices in Codex Jeronimas Maskeliunas MD, PhD Food Standards Officer.
CODE OF PRACTICE AND COMMODITIES STANDARDS, PRESENTED AT NIGERIA AFLATOXIN WORKSHOP BY STANDARDS ORGANISATION OF NIGERIA.
CODEX REGULATIONS NIGERIA AFLATOXIN WORKSHOP ABUJA NOVEMBER 5 TH 2012.
EUREPGAP The European Principles of Food Safety. Increasing awareness of food safety in consumers greater variety of foods available for the consumer.
Food Safety Legislation. Introduction Victorian England ( ) The history of much modern food safety legislation can be traced back to Victorian.
Establish Verification Procedures (Task 11 / Principle 6)
1 MANUFACTURING AND PRODUCTION OF BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS (ERT 455) HAZARD ANALYSIS AND CRITICAL CONTROL POINT (HACCP) SYSTEM Munira Mohamed Nazari School.
BRC Storage & Distribution Safety and Quality Management System Training Guide
ISO General Awareness Training
Good hygienic practices
Good Hygiene Practices along the coffee chain The Codex General Principles of Food Hygiene Module 2.3.
Introduction to Food Safety Management and GMP
Presentation 4.2 CODEX STANDARDS ON SAFETY Section IV Food Quality and Standards Service (ESNS) Food and Nutrition Division. FAO.
Objectives Objectives: Food safety management systems
FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE
FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE
Protection Against Occupational Exposure
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP)
Food Safety Management Systems
Good Hygiene Practices along the coffee chain The Codex General Principles of Food Hygiene – Primary Production Module 3.1.
Codex Guidelines for the Application of HACCP
NextEnd. ISO 22000:2005 Introduction Food has always been a topic of interest to the human being and public at large. Every single person requires food.
BRC Food Safety Quality Management System Training Guide
Ashland Specialty Ingredients IFAC’s cGMP Audit Guide How the Food Ingredient Industry has Responded to FSMA and Food Safety Audits Priscilla Zawislak.
8-2 Food Safety Management Systems Food safety management system: Group of practices and procedures intended to prevent foodborne illness Actively controls.
Prepared by: Taruna Navraksha Irfaan Shashi Food Quality & Certification.
Mike Murray Chair of EFPIA EH&S AHG MPA Conference Uppsala
Good Hygiene Practices along the coffee chain The World Trade Organization Module 2.2.
Understanding ISO 22000:2005 TCISys.com.
Food quality means general features and criteria by means of which food is characterized considering its nutritional value, organoleptic quality and safety.
Improving the Safety of Food International aspects
Science - the basis of CODEX work. The Role of Science in Codex Decision-Making Key principles Risk analysis guide Codex stds from development to implementation.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Reviewing Management System and the Interface with Nuclear Security (IRRS Modules 4 and 12) BASIC IRRS TRAINING.
WHO European Centre for Environment and Health, Rome Based on the “WHO Global Food Safety Strategy” Surveillance of foodborne diseases and monitoring.
SMMSS - Support to Modernisation of Mongolia Standardisation System Food Chain Risk Assessment and Management - Seminar on Food Safety Ulaanbaatar / Mongolia.
Food Safety Assurance August Scope of food quality & food safety The term “food” covers any unprocessed, semi- processed, or processed item that.
FAO/WHO Codex Training Package Module 2.8 FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE SECTION TWO – UNDERSTANDING THE ORGANIZATION OF CODEX 2.8 Is there a format for.
Important informations
FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Statistics Related to Food Safety and Quality Food and Nutrition Division. FAO.
The Codex Alimentarius Commission
OVERVIEW OF THE ROLES OF VARIOUS INSTITUTIONS AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR AFLATOXIN CONTROL IN TANZANIA RAYMOND N. WIGENGE DIRECTOR OF FOOD SAFETY TFDA.
Module 3 Risk Analysis and its Components. Risk Analysis ● WTO SPS agreement puts emphasis on sound science ● Risk analysis = integrated mechanism to.
FAO/WHO Codex Training Package Module 4.2 JOINT FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE MODULE FOUR – SCIENTIFIC BASIS FOR CODEX WORK 4.2 Requesting, accessing.
FAO/WHO Codex Training Package Module 4.3 FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE SECTION FOUR – SCIENTIFIC BASIS FOR CODEX WORK 4.3 What is JECFA?
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
8-2 Service Objectives: Food safety management systems Active managerial control Hazard Analysis Critical Control point (HACCP)
International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.
Lecture held on the Food Safety Conference March 2004 Dublin 1 Control Methods and Organisation of Official Controls in Hungary Dr. Peter A. BIACS,
JOINT FAO/IAEA PROGRAMME of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture 1 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS) Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) &
1 OIE standards: Ante- and post-mortem meat inspection Stuart A. Slorach Chair, Animal Production Food Safety Working Group Regional Seminar for OIE National.
Awareness Training: ‘HARPC’ for Food Safety Complimentary Presentation by Quality Systems Enhancement 1790 Wood Stock Road Roswell GA E. mail:
ISO 9001:2015 Subject: Quality Management System Clause 8 - Operation
Tracy McCracken SPS Technical Advisor East Africa Region United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Kenya and East Aferica/Office of Regional.
BRC Packaging ISSUE 5 Global Standard for Packaging and Packaging Materials.
Organizations of all types and sizes face a range of risks that can affect the achievement of their objectives. Organization's activities Strategic initiatives.
© Food – a fact of life 2009 Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) HACCP is a system which looks for and prevents potential problems before they.
National Food Control Systems
The Codex Alimentarius Commission
Significance of ISO to the Food Industry
Overview of the WTO SPS Agreement and the role of
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP)
Food Production Systems
HACCP Essential Tool for Food Safety
Instructor Notes There is no DVD associated with this topic.
Regional Seminar for OIE National Focal Points on Animal Production Food Safety Importance of collaboration between the Veterinary Services and industry.
H A C C P HAZARD ANALYSIS CRITICAL CONTROL POINTS 1 December 2018
EU Food Safety Requirements: - Hygiene of Foodstuffs -
Presentation transcript:

Module 6.1 Contaminant Monitoring Part 1 – Promoting food safety along the food chain

Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring Objectives To make stakeholders aware of the importance of the role of monitoring programmes in assuring food safety To make stakeholders aware of main considerations in planning monitoring programmes Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Outline of presentation What is contaminant monitoring and how does it contribute to food safety Factors to consider in the design and operation of monitoring programmes International guidelines on food contaminants and use of food contaminant monitoring data internationally Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring What are contaminants? Contaminants Any substance not intentionally added to food, which is present in such food as a result of the production, manufacture, processing, treatment, packing, packaging, transport or holding of such food or as a result of environmental contamination Codex definition Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring What is monitoring? Possible working definition The act of carrying out planned observations, measurements, etc in order to collect, review and use information for a stated goal (to assess a particular situation) Food contaminant monitoring The act of carrying out planned observations or measurements related to the occurrence of food contaminants in order to collect and analyse information needed to achieve stated food safety goals Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Why contaminant monitoring? To protect public health From chemical and microbiological hazards Through proactive, preventative programmes based on scientific evidence By enabling better prioritisation of food control resources By regular evaluation of efficacy of existing food safety measures Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Why contaminant monitoring? To facilitate food trade By providing a scientific base to support food safety decisions By developing consumer or importer trust through demonstrated commitment to food safety Through improved transparency by making contaminant data widely available Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring Food-borne hazards Monitoring programmes provide information on occurrence of hazards A hazard is: A biological, chemical or physical agent in, or condition of, food with the potential to cause an adverse health effect Hazards can include Micro-organisms Heavy metals and environmental contaminants Residues of pesticides and other agricultural chemicals Naturally-occurring toxins Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Mycotoxins – an important food safety hazard Mycotoxins are secondary metabolites produced by a number of moulds while growing on a range of foods The elimination of this naturally occurring toxin from the food supply is not possible – good food safety management allows the reduction of these hazards to tolerable levels Public health risks are associated with acute and chronic exposure to mycotoxins Mycotoxin monitoring programmes exist in many countries Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Responsibilities for food safety Food industry Is responsible for ensuring that food produced is safe and meets all requirements established by government Government Is responsible for establishing food safety requirements for industry to meet Should ensure compliance with food safety requirements Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Economic operators in the food chain Why are they responsible for food safety? They are in the best position to prevent or minimise the occurrence of hazards by implementing adequate food safety management programmes throughout the food chain Adequate food safety management is part of the ‘cost’ of doing business – they should bear this cost They can benefit through increased consumer confidence (and reduced loses) Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Government’s interest in food safety Government has a responsibility to defend public interests – such as public health Government must safeguard the country’s economic interest by assuring importing countries that their food safety requirements are met Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring

How does industry meet its food safety responsibilities? Maintaining adequate quality assurance programmes GHP in primary production Raw material control systems Cleaning, sanitation and pest control Process controls Proper storage and transportation Document control systems Carrying out periodic monitoring to verify that standard operating procedures and quality/safety assurance programmes are functioning well Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring

How does government meet its food safety responsibilities? Communication with economic operators at all stages of the food chain and consumers on food safety issues Establishment of appropriate legislation and regulations Economic operators should be consulted during the process of elaborating legislation and regulations Legislation and regulations should be consistent with international guidelines and regulations Training and other technical support to industry Government has an important role to play in assisting economic operators to understand and meet their food safety obligations Technical support to economic operators must be tailored to their needs – this is particularly important for small enterprises Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring

How does government meet its food safety responsibilities? Implementation of controls to ensure compliance Adequate resources are necessary to run compliance programmes Monitoring programmes allow verification that food safety measures are effective Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Contaminant Monitoring Part 2 – Design and operation of programmes Module 6.1 Contaminant Monitoring Part 2 – Design and operation of programmes

Monitoring data – basis for decision-making Deciding what contaminants might be of public health concern Providing data for risk assessment of contaminants thought to present a substantial public health risk Allowing assessment of risk management options for handling specific problem Allows continual evaluation of adequacy of existing food safety measures / suitability of food handling practices Can facilitate pro-active food safety programming Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Monitoring data – building stakeholder confidence Demonstrates commitment to food safety Making data available to stakeholders can build trust Trust can lead to improved cooperation – nationally and internationally Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Contaminant monitoring – initial planning First step should be a clear statement of programme objectives May serve to give a general picture of exposure to contaminants and toxins Can be used to investigate some specific problem May allow evaluation of effectiveness of a particular food safety measure Can allow assessment of impact of new industry practices Etc... Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Contaminant monitoring – joint planning? The better the background information, the better the planning of a monitoring programme Scope for collaboration with industry and trade bodies, other government or research institutions? Other agencies/groups might be interested in collaborating in monitoring programme Staff and financial resources to support monitoring programmes are important considerations Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Contaminant monitoring – programme design Must be well matched with stated objectives Should take into consideration compounds that are likely to be of public health significance Should take into consideration factors known to affect level of contaminant (climatic conditions, geology, processing/ handling methods) Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Contaminant monitoring – programme design Should select appropriate matrices (target tissues) for sampling and testing Should include the statistical basis for the sampling plan and analysis of results Should take into consideration available resources (technical and financial) to support the programme Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Contaminant monitoring – programme operation Describe sampling procedures including sample selection, collection, identification and security Describe analytical methods, document that they are validated and consistent with stated objectives of monitoring programme Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Contaminant Monitoring Part 3 – The international context Module 6.1 Contaminant Monitoring Part 3 – The international context

Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring Codex and food safety Codex standards and guidelines are recognised by the WTO as the benchmark for safety of food in international trade Codex Alimentarius Commission has adopted many standards, guidelines and maximum levels relevant to monitoring programmes for food contaminants and other hazards Codex food safety standards are based on risk analysis Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Codex General Standard on Contaminants and Toxins in Foods Takes a ‘horizontal’ approach to dealing with contaminants and toxins in food and feed (does not cover residues of vet. drugs or pesticides) Outlines general principles on contaminants in foods Emphasis on prevention measures Risk assessment is necessary when contaminated foods pose a health hazard Risk management policy must be applied to deal with substantiated public health concerns National measures should not be unnecessarily trade restrictive Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Codex General Standard on Contaminants and Toxins in Foods States principles for establishing maximum levels Max. level of a contaminant in a food should only be set when the food contributes significantly to total exposure All technological possibilities to comply with max. levels should be taken into account Outlines criteria to be considered when making recommendations on contaminants in Codex, covering Toxicological information Analytical data Intake data Fair trade considerations Technological considerations Risk assessment and risk management considerations Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Codex maximum and guideline levels for contaminants Methyl mercury in some fish Vinyl Chloride and Acrylonitrile in food and packaging material Maximum level and sampling plan for aflatoxin in peanuts (for further processing) Radionuclides in foods Aflatoxin M1 in milk Patulin in apple juice Arsenic, Cadmium and Lead in various product groups Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Codex maximum levels for chemical residues Database of Codex maximum levels are available from the Codex website Codex MRLs for pesticides - 2466 Codex EMRLs* - 50 Codex MRLs for vet. drugs - 289 * Extraneous maximum residue limit for contaminants arising from environmental sources, including former agricultural use Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring GEMS/Food The Global Environmental Monitoring System/Food contamination and assessment programme was established in 1976 GEMS/Food is implemented by WHO in cooperation with a network of collaborating institutions in over 70 countries GEMS/Food contaminant databases are available at the WHO web site GEMS/Food periodically prepares assessment documents to provide a global overview of problems of chemicals in food Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Use of GEMS/Food monitoring data GEMS/Food informs governments, Codex Alimentarius Commission and other relevant institutions as well as general public On levels and trends of contaminants in foods Contribution of contaminants in foods to total human exposure Monitoring data is used in carrying out international risk assessments Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Use of monitoring data in food safety decision-making Contaminant monitoring programmes Codex Scientific Advisory bodies - JECFA, JMPR, JEMRA Patterns of contamination, Exposure data Maximum levels Guidelines and Codes of practice Results of risk assessment Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Recent JECFA risk assessments of mycotoxins Aflatoxin in peanuts - comparison of public health significance of maximum levels of 10 and 15g/kg Aflatoxin M1 in milk - public health significance of maximum levels of 0.05 vs. 0.5g/kg Ochratoxin A in cereal products - public health significance of maximum levels of 5 vs. 20g/kg Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring

Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring Conclusions Contaminant monitoring is an important component of food control programmes Data from monitoring programmes strengthen risk assessment and risk management decisions at international and national levels Monitoring programmes must be carefully designed and implemented according to stated objectives Collaboration among stakeholder groups should lead to better planning of monitoring programmes and optimal use of available resources in their implementation Adequate food analysis capability and capacity is essential to support contaminant monitoring programmes Module 6.1 – Contaminant Monitoring