A Case Study of Promoting Metropolitan Freight Collaboration: The Twin Cities Experience Performance Management Framework Minnesota Department of Transportation.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

General Update March Background As the region grows, increased travel demand on our aging Metro Highway System will continue to create additional.

Advertisements

Performance Measures CTP 2040 Policy Advisory Committee August 19, 2014.

Idaho/Canada Border Issues Transportation Border Working Group Meeting Coeur d’Alene, ID April 22-23, 2008.

Freight Advanced Traveler Information Systems and Cross Town Improvement Project Randy Butler January 18, 2012 Freight Dynamic Mobility Applications.

Department of Industrial Engineering1 Economic Evaluation of the Impact of Waterways on the Port of Cincinnati-Tristate Heather Nachtmann, Ph.D. River.

Freight in the Southeast Conference Bob Romig State Transportation Development Administrator Florida Department of Transportation February 9, 2011 Florida’s.

Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to SEMCOG Southeast Michigan Council of Governments Detroit presented by Lance R. Grenzeback and Marwan.

Proposition 1B and the Strategic Growth Plan Randell Iwasaki California Department of Transportation.

Freight Transportation Planning and Modeling CE 451/551.

Regional and Short Line Railroads

System Management and Operations System Development and Design Growth and Development Plan Components E AST -W EST G ATEWAY.

Transportation System Issues and Challenges

Framework for Model Development General Model Design Highway Network/Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) Development of Synthetic Trip Tables Development of.

Barbara Ivanov Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Freight Systems Division Director Washington State Freight Mobility Plan Truck Freight.

Planning for One Transportation System – Marine Highways Kevin Schoeben Deputy Director Office of Planning and Programming Illinois Department of Transportation.

Bruce Warner, Director Oregon Department of Transportation A Bi-State Project: Lessons Learned.

2016 Cape Cod Regional Transportation Plan Development 16 MARCH 2015 CAPE COD METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION.

Traffic Incident Management – a Strategic Focus Inspector Peter Baird National Adviser: Policy and Legislation: Road Policing.

Jeffrey F. Paniati Executive Director Federal Highway Administration US Department of Transportation Washington, DC Reducing Congestion Tools of.

Talking Freight April 15, General Themes Seen in Reauthorization Proposals/Positions Defining a federal role in freight and goods movement given.

Workshop on Infrastructures Sustainable Infrastructure for Efficient Mobility: the Key Challenges Luc Bourdeau ECTP Secretary General Industrial Technologies.

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Planning Process & Alternatives Analysis Unit 7: Forecasting and Encouraging Ridership.

Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.

Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Talking Freight Seminar presented by Richard Margiotta Cambridge Systematics, Inc. September 21,

Ohio Transportation Planning Conference July 16, 2014.

Mid Wales LTP Stakeholder Workshop 3 rd October Presentation by Ann Elias and Janice Hughes.

MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.

BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.

Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.

Innovative ITS services thanks to Future Internet technologies ITS World Congress Orlando, SS42, 18 October 2011.

California’s Strategic Growth Plan Ken De Crescenzo Federal Liaison California Department of Transportation.

North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department Summary Presentation January 2004 MOBILITY 2025: THE METROPOLITAN.

Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Lance Neumann Cambridge Systematics, Inc. August.

MARYLAND FREIGHT SUMMIT Freight in the Mid-Atlantic Region Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration September.

California Department of Transportation Transportation Management Systems (TMS) and their role in addressing congestion Discussion Materials Lake Arrowhead.

Regional Goods Movement Study for the San Francisco Bay Area presented by Michael J. Fischer Cambridge Systematics, Inc. November 12, 2004 Agenda Item.

Engaging State DOT’s Engaging State DOT’s 2008 ITS America State Chapters Council Annual Meeting and State Chapters Strengthening Workshop Bernie Arseneau,

3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC

Presentation for Talking Freight, November 16, 2011 Debbie Bowden Freight and Economic Policy Analyst, Office of Freight and Multimodalism Maryland Department.

SAFETEA-LU Operations, ITS, and Freight Provisions Jeffrey F. Paniati Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.

1 Using Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Technologies and Strategies to Better Manage Congestion Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator of.

SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Key Provisions Jeff Lindley Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.

Regional Transportation Issues Infrastructure Maintenance New Facilities Air Quality Pollution Congestion Freeway System Surface Streets Income.

Context and Priorities April 9,  Why FHWA Focuses on Improving Operations  FHWA Operations Program Areas  Key Current Program Priorities.

Competitive and Efficient Freight Transportation

System Management and Operations System Development and Design Growth and Development Plan Components E AST -W EST G ATEWAY.

Nate Asplund Director – Public Private Partnerships September 20, 2009 SCORT 2009 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII.

Transportation Finance Advisory Committee May 18, 2012.

Regional Concept for Transportation Operations: An action plan to address transportation operations in Southeast Michigan Talking Technology & Transportation.

Submission Document went to cabinet … Planning for the Future Core Strategy and Urban Core Plan (the Plan) is a key planning document and sets out the.

A Case Study of Promoting Metropolitan Freight Collaboration: The Twin Cities Experience Story of Freight Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan.

A Case Study of Promoting Metropolitan Freight Collaboration: The Twin Cities Experience Overview Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan Council.

December 17, 2010 Developing Transit Performance Measures for Integrated Multi-Modal Corridor Management.

SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Provisions Jeff Lindley Director of the Office of Transportation Management Office of Operations Federal Highway.

Company LOGO Georgia Truck Lane Needs Identification Study Talking Freight Seminar March 19, 2008 Matthew Fowler, P.T.P Assistant State Planning Administrator.

1 USDOT Congestion Initiative Baltimore – Washington Regional Traffic Signal Forum Maritime Institute Linthicum, MD March 14, 2007 Regina McElroy Director,

Freight Transportation Plan Savannah, GA AMPO Conference - October 23, 2014.

U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Mary Peters Administrator Federal Highway Administration National Stone, Sand and Gravel.

The Transportation Logistics Company Indiana Logistics Summit Infrastructure Needs and Opportunities September 26, 2007.

AASHTO – SCOPM Palm Desert, California October 23, 2009 Mn/DOT Performance Management - Setting our Direction.

Our nation’s freight transportation system is a vast, complex network of almost seven million miles of highways and local roads, railways, navigable waterways,

Presented to Indiana Logistics Summit Indianapolis, Indiana presented by Keith Bucklew Director - Freight Mobility Indiana Department of Transportation.

The Freight Transportation System Background on domestic highway, rail, and waterborne freight modes.

Minnesota’s Freight Performance Measures Cecil Selness, Director Office of Freight and Commercial Vehicle Operations Minnesota Department of Transportation.

Statewide Transportation Planning Oklahoma DOT Planning Process Statewide Long Range Transportation Plan Statewide Freight Transportation Plan Arkansas.

Freight Transportation Plan Savannah, GA

Connecting Freight and Land Use Planning Through a Regional Freight Priority Network Christine Sherman, RSG Wednesday, May 17, 2017.

ITTS FEAT Tool Methodology Review ITTS Member States Paula Dowell, PhD

Mobility Goal--Continually improve the public’s access to activities, goods, and services through preservation, improvement, and expansion of the highway.

Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha

Presentation transcript:

A Case Study of Promoting Metropolitan Freight Collaboration: The Twin Cities Experience Performance Management Framework Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan Council U.S. Department of Transportation - Volpe Center Federal Highway Administration Office of Freight Management and Operations Talking Freight Seminar Series March 20, 2013

Performance Management: Why? Demand > Supply Measures & indicators point to Framework helps Place & extent of problems Solutions grounded in root causes Balance competing goals Set priorities Lower quality

Performance Management: How? Framework for Twin Cities Freight Used existing state & MPO policy documents Referenced NCFRP #10NCFRP #10 Researched 5 goals: Safety/security Infrastructure preservation Mobility Accessibility to key centers Community & environmental sustainability

Framework Summary of Metro Freight System Performance by Mode Strategic Goals All ModesHighwayRailAirWater See Table 2 See Table 3See Table 4See Table 5See Table 6 Safety/Security Infrastructure preservation Mobility (LOS, congestion, travel time reliability) Accessibility to key centers (economic development) Community and Environmental sustainability

Performance Management: What? Relevant to policy objectives Data exist to support and can be collected Level of detail matches action considered Successful= Indicators: trends affecting mode’s performance in terms of a goal + providing early warning signals Measures: mode’s performance regarding a goal Definitions

Performance Management Info Metro Twin Cities Framework for Freight Safety/Security All Modes  Indicators: o Trends in insurance costs o Facilities with security vulnerabilities o System resilience: availability of alternate routes  Measures: o Fatalities o Serious injuries

Performance Management Info Metro Twin Cities Framework for Freight Infrastructure Preservation Highway Indicators: o # bridges and roads with weight restrictions o # RR grade crossings on major truck routes Measures: o Bridge condition on principal arterials (% poor) o Pavement ride quality (% poor) by functional class (principal arterial, other arterial)

Performance Management Info Metro Twin Cities Framework for Freight Mobility Highway Indicators: o Truck vehicle miles traveled o Ton-miles and dollar value carried Measures: o Duration and extent of congestion on freeways (peak hour spreads) o Metro area delay estimates for freight o Clearance time for metro-urban freeway incidents

Performance Management Info Metro Twin Cities Framework for Freight Accessibility to Key Economic Centers Rail  Indicators: o Rail abandonments o Adequacy of intermodal connector routes  Measures: o # key centers with adequate rail access o Cost of goods movement and travel time on key rail corridors (e.g., container rail between Twin Cities and Los Angeles, Seattle and Chicago)

Performance Management Info Metro Twin Cities Framework for Freight Mobility Water  Indicators: o Tonnage and value of freight carried by barge to/from Twin Cities river ports  Measures: o Physical lock and river capacity (maximum number of barges in one tow) o Availability of container handling or bulk transfer capability

Performance Management Info Metro Twin Cities Framework for Freight Community/Environmental Air Indicators: o # noise complaints/month Measures: o Percent of publicly funded Minnesota airports that have Airport Safety Zoning o Freight related fuel consumption o Freight-related emissions

Performance Management Framework: So What? Value to Twin Cities Region A starting place for the Metro conversation Opportunities that build off existing agreements Point out where new data essential to effective use

Performance Management Framework: Observations Use what you have to the fullest Anchor in strategic goals for the region Start where need greatest Bring measures down to action level Predict impact of actions wherever possible Bake into long- range planning & priority setting

Twin Cities Metro Regional Freight Study: Points of Common Interest How and when used? Pros and cons of approach? Who’s also developed a freight framework? Overlapping goals? Best ways to collaborate? Lessons learned in DOT/MPO collaboration?